Google Workspace vs Microsoft Office SharePoint Server comparison

Google and Microsoft are both solutions in the Content Collaboration Platforms category. Google is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.3, while Microsoft is ranked #7. Google holds a 7.9% mindshare in CCP, compared to Microsoft’s 6.3% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Google users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 76% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

Google Workspace

Read 102 Google Workspace reviews

1,017 Views
485 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Microsoft Office SharePoint...

Read 23 Microsoft Office SharePoint Server reviews

1,240 Views
1,063 Comparison Views

76% willing to recommend

Google Workspace

Microsoft Office SharePoint...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 6, 2025

Google Workspace and Microsoft Office SharePoint Server compete in the productivity and collaboration software category. Google Workspace appears to have the upper hand due to its ease of use and scalability, while Microsoft SharePoint Server excels in document management and customization.

Features: Google Workspace includes tools like Gmail, Drive, and Meet, facilitating seamless real-time collaboration. Microsoft SharePoint Server offers robust document management, version control, and customization options, including templates for generating sites and workflows.

Room for Improvement: Google Workspace could enhance email integration with Outlook and improve its chat and video functionalities to rival competitors like Zoom. Microsoft SharePoint Server needs improvement in user interface and workflow processing, and additional CRM-like functions would be beneficial.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Google Workspace offers an easy cloud-based deployment and is noted for reliability, though direct support is limited. Microsoft SharePoint Server’s deployment, especially on-premises, is complex but accompanied by extensive documentation beneficial for enterprises needing custom solutions.

Pricing and ROI: Google Workspace is cost-effective, with different pricing tiers and low hardware costs, providing a good ROI by enhancing productivity. Microsoft SharePoint Server potentially incurs higher costs due to additional licensing but justifies these with deep Microsoft product integration and enterprise-level customizations.

To learn more, read our detailed Google Workspace vs. Microsoft Office SharePoint Server Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Google Workspace vs. Microsoft Office SharePoint Server

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 860,168 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Google Workspace

Ranking in Content Collaboration Platforms

4th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

102

Ranking in other categories

Email Applications (1st), Wireless Email (2nd), Cloud Storage (5th)

Microsoft Office SharePoint...

Ranking in Content Collaboration Platforms

7th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Content Collaboration Platforms category, the mindshare of Google Workspace is 7.9%, up from 6.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Office SharePoint Server is 6.3%, down from 10.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Content Collaboration Platforms

Featured Reviews

Sunil-Nair

IT Manager at Universal Carpets & Rugs

Email collaboration and accessibility have improved team productivity

The valuable features include the email service, email updates, and Google Drive. People are given email access to Google Drive. The team can share manual files and work accordingly. They can access different teams from anywhere, collectively putting files, sharing them, and managing them. Additionally, the manufacturing product does not require any downgrades. It works fine and continuously for the last three or four years. Users can access their emails from anywhere in their browser without a laptop or can directly access from Gmail. This is helpful for salespeople.

Read full review

Mehdi Hasankhan

Head of Development and Implementation at Arak Petrochemical Company

Easy to use but offers poor integrations with Oracle and has inflexible security configuration

I can't configure the current security I want. There are a lot of bots in it. Sharepoint doesn't integrate well with Oracle, and we use a lot of Oracle products at our company. Therefore, it makes more sense for us to go to Oracle instead of continuing to use Sharepoint.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The general ease of use is the solution's most valuable aspect. It's extremely simple to use. You don't even have to look up videos in order to figure things out. It's all very intuitive."

"Overall, I rate Google Workspace a ten out of ten."

"The features of Google Workspace that significantly improve our work include real-time collaboration on documents, dynamic email for easy suggestions and approvals, integration with BigQuery for data analysis, seamless document sharing and storage in Google Drive, and advanced calendaring capabilities."

"It's a secure solution that enables you to choose those you wish to share with."

"G Suite and all of Google were the first to have a built-in multifactor authentication without needing to purchase another product."

"Google Meet is the most valuable function for me. It has enhanced collaboration in our team."

"The corporate email feature on Google's Gmail is fantastic."

"The solution is easy to use, and you don't need a lot of knowledge for it."

More Google Workspace pros

"The forms aspect of the solution, for example, the creation of surveys, is its most valuable aspect."

"The support from Microsoft is very quick and they are very proactive."

"The collaboration, the ability for multiple users to work on a single document."

"This solution has provided us with a collaborative workspace to allow everyone to work together and be on the same page."

"The level of stability is good."

"The most valuable feature is the "Alert Me", which provides the ability to set an alert when content is either added or changed and that the alerts can be either real-time or aggregated for the day or the week."

"Document management and records management features are the most valuable."

"The solution's most valuable features is its document management. It allows sharing with external users and integrates well with Office apps and Microsoft Flow."

More Microsoft Office SharePoint Server pros

Cons

"Our users have faced an issue with increasing their email quotas over the last three months."

"When I compare with Office 365, G Suite has fewer features."

"The user interface, especially on Google Drive, could be better."

"I am not a big fan of how Gmail organizes the mail. I find it complicated to see which mail from which users send at which date. Especially if there is a lot."

"I believe Google Drive has potential for improvement. Enhancements could be made in terms of synchronization and the functionality of the Google Sheets app, particularly in areas like formulas and pivot tables, to make it more comparable to Microsoft Excel. Google Chat needs to make improvements so that we can send Excel and PDFs from the mobile app itself. I would like to see Google Bard integrated with the product."

"For Google Docs, if you upload a Word document up to Google Docs, it could mess up your formatting quite a bit."

"Integrating Copilot with Google Workspace is slightly difficult."

"In some cases, we are using the Google Meet functions but only when we have external clients. Internally, we are using Slack. Google Meet virtual meeting function is not as advanced as the one in Slack and should improve."

More Google Workspace cons

"This solution is not very stable. It is useful to arrange data but it's not the best for big data. Sometimes we have issues with our reports as a result."

"The solution needs to enable better sharing capabilities between users and external users. Several users also have problems with linking their emails to their Microsoft account."

"Technical support could be improved. They are not fast enough, especially when we'll go deeper in the product itself. More complex issues make it very tough to find someone that can help you."

"The solution is like a CRM, so the initial setup is complex. It takes a few days to deploy the solution and the length of time depends on how large the company's topology is and what the client's demands are."

"The product is behind in development and lacks some features."

"The GUI is outdated."

"Workflows could be simplified."

"The search feature needs improvement. I can never find the information I need when I use it."

More Microsoft Office SharePoint Server cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Pricing is something concerning. We find the solution very expensive."

"There are benefits that can provide a competitive advantage, e.g., improved productivity (with appropriate training), increased collaboration (with correct use of tools), flexible working - work from home or remote locations, easy to scale - fast onboarding of new employees, and ability to add and remove licenses, as required."

"There are different versions of the solution available, such as premium."

"2,500 Rupees per month per user."

"The price of the solution can vary."

"G Suite and Microsoft Office 365 offer products with similar functionality at several different price points. Zoho offer a more extensive range of products and attempts to provide all the applications required to run most small and medium-sized businesses."

"It's cheaper to run a couple of users in a Google platform than what it would be with Microsoft Exchange."

"Traffic management tools may be required for larger setups and should be included in any pricing calculations."

More Google Workspace pricing and cost advice

"It can be expensive for on-premises deployments, especially when you have to support SQL Server as your backend database. That's where the cost comes into play. SQL Server has its own licensing, which Microsoft keeps on changing. Therefore, it can become costly. In the earlier versions of SharePoint, version 2007 or 2010, they had an express version where the SQL Server licensing was free. It wasn't like a full-blown SharePoint. It was only a slimmed-down version. It used to be whatever your hardware costs. You would install the free software and work with it, but you were very limited in what you could do in SharePoint. If you wanted the SharePoint Enterprise Server with all the bells and whistles, then you had to pay more to get the SQL Server license based on the number of users or servers. The subscription model is different for cloud deployments. Licensing is per user and per month. The cost also depends on the storage required. If you have a lot of sites or documents, then you need to expand it based on your needs."

"Pricing plans may be flexible depending on volume usage and your corporate relationship with Microsoft."

"One of the reasons why we don't recommend the cloud version of SharePoint is the cost. With the on premise version, you pay for the license once. For the cloud version, there is a recurring fee. It is very expensive. They expect everyone to pay $20 or $30 per user per month."

"There are some aggressive discounts offered by Microsoft for organizations that are not for profit, which we are, and it makes it quite attractive to consider."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Content Collaboration Platforms solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

860,168 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

14%

Educational Organization

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Google Workspace?

Easy-to-build forms are allowing me to get feedback and information from my internal teams as well as from the customers very efficiently with the result data in structured manner.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Google Workspace?

The pricing for Google Workspace is moderate. I would rate it a five out of ten, indicating it is neither cheap nor expensive. The current cost is approximately seven to ten euros per user per mont...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Google Workspace?

I do not have any major suggestions for improvement. However, while the security functionalities are similar to those in competitors like Active Directory, they could be optimized for stronger secu...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Amazon WorkMail vs Google Workspace

Compared 28% of the time

Microsoft Exchange Online vs Google Workspace

Compared 24% of the time

ProtonMail vs Google Workspace

Compared 10% of the time

Office 365 vs Google Workspace

Compared 6% of the time

Amazon WorkDocs vs Google Workspace

Compared 3% of the time

More Google Workspace Competitors

Amazon WorkDocs vs Microsoft Office SharePoint Server

Compared 73% of the time

Datto Workplace vs Microsoft Office SharePoint Server

Compared 17% of the time

Flock vs Microsoft Office SharePoint Server

Compared 5% of the time

Kiteworks vs Microsoft Office SharePoint Server

Compared 5% of the time

More Microsoft Office SharePoint Server Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Google Workspace

June 2025

Download Google Workspace product report

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Office SharePoint Server

June 2025

Microsoft Office SharePoint Server report

Download Microsoft Office SharePoint Server product report

Also Known As

G-Suite Enterprise, G-Suite, Google Apps for Business, G Suite Basic, G Suite Business, G-Suite Basic, G-Suite Business, Google Vault

Office SharePoint Server, MS Office SharePoint Server

Overview

Similar to G Suite, all Google Workspace plans provide a custom email for your business and include collaboration tools like Gmail, Calendar, Meet, Chat, Drive, Docs, Sheets, Slides, Forms, Sites, and more.

As we’ve evolved G Suite into a more integrated experience across our communication and collaboration tools, we’ve rebranded to Google Workspace to more accurately represent the product vision.

Google

Microsoft Office SharePoint Server (MOSS) is a Microsoft software portal based on the ASP.NET framework. MOSS facilitates file sharing and collaboration, social networking, Web databases and Web publishing. It is hosted by Microsoft Windows Server and is accessible through Microsoft Office or the Web.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

There are over five million businesses that use Google Apps for Business worldwide. Some key customers include The Roche Group, National Geographic, American Red Cross, City of Los Angeles, Flight Centre, and Konica Minolta.

Del Monte Foods, Unicredit Leasing, Dudley Metropolitan Borough Council, Nokia Czech Republic, Perkins Eastman, JLL, ICA, óxito Software, Dorset Software, PKP Cargo, Arcapita Bank B.S.C., AVE CZ, Chesapeake Energy

Buyer's Guide

Google Workspace vs. Microsoft Office SharePoint Server

June 2025

Free Report: Google Workspace vs. Microsoft Office SharePoint Server

Find out what your peers are saying about Google Workspace vs. Microsoft Office SharePoint Server and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

860,168 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Google Workspace vs. Microsoft Office SharePoint Server report.

See our list of best Content Collaboration Platforms vendors.

We monitor all Content Collaboration Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.