No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Google Firebase vs Virtuozzo Application Platform comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Google Firebase
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
49
Ranking in other categories
Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) (6th), Mobile Development Platforms (7th)
Virtuozzo Application Platform
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.6
Number of Reviews
7
Ranking in other categories
PaaS Clouds (21st)
 

Mindshare comparison

While both are Cloud Services solutions, they serve different purposes. Google Firebase is designed for Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) and holds a mindshare of 3.5%, down 3.9% compared to last year.
Virtuozzo Application Platform, on the other hand, focuses on PaaS Clouds, holds 1.7% mindshare, up 0.8% since last year.
Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Google Firebase3.5%
Amazon AWS13.3%
Microsoft Azure8.4%
Other74.8%
Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS)
PaaS Clouds Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Virtuozzo Application Platform1.7%
Amazon AWS13.7%
Microsoft Azure12.0%
Other72.6%
PaaS Clouds
 

Featured Reviews

Himash Careem - PeerSpot reviewer
Intermediate Software Engineer at Xelleron Pty
Analytics integration has improved how I manage user identity and understand customer behavior
I face difficulties with the authentication parts in Google Firebase when it goes with iOS applications. With Android applications, that is easier because Google owns it. When it goes to iOS applications, there should be a much more straightforward, smoother way. I mostly faced that with Flutter because with Flutter, there are two sides with Android and iOS. The Android part was pretty much easier for me, but when it goes to the iOS part, there was more work on that.
Miguel Maloney Thompson - PeerSpot reviewer
IC Director at a printing company with 11-50 employees
A scalable and stable solution that has good scalability and is easy to setup
It is a scalable solution. I have yet to have a scenario regarding automatic scale and if there's an increase in resource requirement or need. We have yet to have that scenario. We have yet to test that. The scalability was more than manually adjusting and increasing whatever I had to do. I rate it eight out of ten.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The price of Google Firebase is very good."
"We already use this technology in our company to build our Android and iOS mobile applications and to communicate with our back-end infrastructure."
"The product’s most valuable features are integration and hosting."
"The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that its storage can be easily used in our mobile applications."
"Its initial setup process is easy."
"The solution is stable."
"Firebase has been helpful in providing analytics and crash insights."
"The most valuable feature I like is about the realtime. Updates are also very fast."
"The solution is scalable, and that is what we are looking at. There is no learning curve as we have not done much research."
"As a strategic solution, it's really good because it will avoid a lot of cost if you are building your data center, for example, or from scratch."
"The advanced level of production-ready Docker hosting, one-click application deployment, and the truly flexible pricing."
"The technical support is extremely helpful, and they have a very good support team."
"Technical support from Jelastic is very good."
"If you are looking for a great PaaS product, don't hesitate to check Jelastic!"
"The dynamic vertical scaling is a unique feature."
"Jelastic is exactly what we expect from a PaaS vendor: easy-to-start, easy-to-manage, container based technology, support for vertical and horizontal auto-scaling, and all this without vendor lock-in."
 

Cons

"The exploration of the functions within Firebase could be improved."
"The solution's pricing could be better."
"The solution could improve by providing an improved SDK tool and automatic indexing for databases."
"We have numerous projects for mobile application development, and we have shifted from Google Firebase to Supabase because there is a fixed price for Supabase."
"I would prefer Google Firebase to focus more on its integration capabilities since it is an area in the solution with certain shortcomings."
"We had some compatibility issues with Elixir."
"It is not easy to calculate the cost per copy, use or if the load rose dramatically we did not know how that would impact the final price."
"The only thing that I won't do on Firebase is the hosting side of things for a progressive web app because it feels like you actually still need to download the app first before you can actually get into the functionality of the app."
"I would like to see better integration into enterprise storage products."
"The backup functionality needs to be improved."
"The backup features need improvement, or rather it should be added, as I could not find it."
"The security layers also need to be improved because there is no clear layer or tier of security in the solution."
"An S3 like storage system, if they have a s3 API compatible system I can move my files from AWS."
"For now, some customers are requesting support of Docker containers for Windows."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Google Firebase is an expensive solution."
"I rate Google Firebase a seven or eight out of ten for pricing."
"Pricing for Google Firebase is not so expensive, and if you're a start-up with a small amount of data, it will be quite cheap, and there's even a free tier that you can use. If you're doing a pilot with a reasonable amount of data, for example, just a few gigabytes, it's still on the free tier. If you increase the amount of data, Google Firebase pricing is still reasonable."
"My company makes very minimal payments toward the licensing costs of the solution."
"The monthly cost is based on writing data and queries to the database."
"The more the number of reads and writes, the more one gets charged."
"The solution's price is based on the number of consumers."
"The pricing component is a bit confusing when it comes to what exactly you'll pay for, but I wouldn't say it's expensive."
"I would rate the cost 3 out of 5. There are additional costs other than licensing fees."
"Pricing for providers is revenue-shared based. Providers should invest in hardware to set up the Jelastic cluster."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) solutions are best for your needs.
913,683 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Outsourcing Company
12%
Comms Service Provider
9%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Marketing Services Firm
8%
Outsourcing Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Construction Company
6%
Energy/Utilities Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business31
Midsize Enterprise9
Large Enterprise9
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business7
 

Questions from the Community

How does Microsoft Azure compare to Google Firebase?
I would recommend Google Firebase instead of Microsoft Azure, simply for the array of features that it has to offer. In particular, the Firebase library grants you access to a shared data structure...
Looking to compare Google Firebase, Amazon AWS, and Microsoft Azure
We like Google Firebase hosting and authentication and also the excellent cloud functionality. Our team found the flexibility of handling and dealing with the database through EDL to be very useful...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Google Firebase?
The pricing structure needs improvement since it uses cloud billing. We do not know how the pricing is calculated as it is all on the cloud. They could have implemented credits based on usage so th...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

No data available
Jelastic
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Fabulous, Pic Collage, Shazam, SkyScanner
Hosting Providers: Hidora, Elastx, eApps, SaveInCloud, Infomaniak, Layershift, Valtti, Dogado, Locaweb, Planeetta, dogado, ServInt, Hostnet, Info.nl, Innofield, Lunacloud, Reg.ru, Websolute Private Cloud and Integrators: Joe's Datacenter, Croc, Ciklum, Vergence, Centerprise, GMV Soluciones
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Amazon Web Services (AWS), Google and others in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS). Updated: September 2026.
913,683 professionals have used our research since 2012.