No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Google Firebase vs Virtuozzo Application Platform comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Google Firebase
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
49
Ranking in other categories
Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) (6th), Mobile Development Platforms (10th)
Virtuozzo Application Platform
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.6
Number of Reviews
7
Ranking in other categories
PaaS Clouds (21st)
 

Mindshare comparison

While both are Cloud Services solutions, they serve different purposes. Google Firebase is designed for Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) and holds a mindshare of 3.8%, up 3.4% compared to last year.
Virtuozzo Application Platform, on the other hand, focuses on PaaS Clouds, holds 1.7% mindshare, up 1.0% since last year.
Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Google Firebase3.8%
Amazon AWS12.8%
Microsoft Azure8.6%
Other74.8%
Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS)
PaaS Clouds Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Virtuozzo Application Platform1.7%
Amazon AWS13.3%
Microsoft Azure11.3%
Other73.7%
PaaS Clouds
 

Featured Reviews

Himash Careem - PeerSpot reviewer
Intermediate Software Engineer at Xelleron Pty
Analytics integration has improved how I manage user identity and understand customer behavior
I face difficulties with the authentication parts in Google Firebase when it goes with iOS applications. With Android applications, that is easier because Google owns it. When it goes to iOS applications, there should be a much more straightforward, smoother way. I mostly faced that with Flutter because with Flutter, there are two sides with Android and iOS. The Android part was pretty much easier for me, but when it goes to the iOS part, there was more work on that.
Miguel Maloney Thompson - PeerSpot reviewer
IC Director at a printing company with 11-50 employees
A scalable and stable solution that has good scalability and is easy to setup
It is a scalable solution. I have yet to have a scenario regarding automatic scale and if there's an increase in resource requirement or need. We have yet to have that scenario. We have yet to test that. The scalability was more than manually adjusting and increasing whatever I had to do. I rate it eight out of ten.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The Firebase hosting and the automated authentication service, as well as the cloud functionality, are the solution's most valuable features."
"The solution is useful for managing users and user authentication."
"We already use this technology in our company to build our Android and iOS mobile applications and to communicate with our back-end infrastructure."
"It is a very stable solution."
"The scalability is good."
"Google Firebase has a lot of services like storage, Firestore, and push notifications."
"We use the platform to deploy our software projects."
"Google Firebase is one I like a lot because it gives us a little bit more power and accessibility when it comes to publishing apps a lot quicker and for the needs that we have."
"If you are looking for a great PaaS product, don't hesitate to check Jelastic!"
"The control is valuable. It's really easy to use and you have good control of your solutions."
"We almost don't have to maintain our servers."
"As a strategic solution, it's really good because it will avoid a lot of cost if you are building your data center, for example, or from scratch."
"Jelastic is exactly what we expect from a PaaS vendor: easy-to-start, easy-to-manage, container based technology, support for vertical and horizontal auto-scaling, and all this without vendor lock-in."
"The solution is scalable, and that is what we are looking at. There is no learning curve as we have not done much research."
"Technical support from Jelastic is very good."
"The technical support is extremely helpful, and they have a very good support team."
 

Cons

"I rate the support from Google Firebase a four out of five."
"It is not easy to calculate the cost per copy, use or if the load rose dramatically we did not know how that would impact the final price."
"If I were to review the service, it would be about paid functionalities, like implementing notifications, is easy, but debugging is not."
"The solution's pricing could be better."
"You need to have some experience with deployment."
"In Google Firebase, reporting is an area with shortcomings where improvements are required to be made in the future."
"Scheduling the import was very difficult with Firestore; we had to use a couple of other tools to create schedulers to import, but the import on the Google BigQuery and the Firestore component was still a manual process, which was a bit annoying."
"We use Firebase for media processing and we are growing more. As we grow, the pricing goes high and it's high compared to competitors. The solution is expensive."
"The backup features need improvement, or rather it should be added, as I could not find it."
"The security layers also need to be improved because there is no clear layer or tier of security in the solution."
"An S3 like storage system, if they have a s3 API compatible system I can move my files from AWS."
"I would like to see better integration into enterprise storage products."
"The backup functionality needs to be improved."
"For now, some customers are requesting support of Docker containers for Windows."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The monthly cost is based on writing data and queries to the database."
"I rate the price of Google Firebase a four out of five."
"Google Firebase is an expensive solution."
"Google Firebase’s pricing needs improvement."
"It is an expensive tool."
"The price is perfect and very clearly defined. The price during the trial setup is free and then you move to a paid service."
"The pricing plans indicate it can get very expensive."
"The price of Google Firebase is very good."
"Pricing for providers is revenue-shared based. Providers should invest in hardware to set up the Jelastic cluster."
"I would rate the cost 3 out of 5. There are additional costs other than licensing fees."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) solutions are best for your needs.
920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Outsourcing Company
12%
Comms Service Provider
10%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Marketing Services Firm
8%
Outsourcing Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Construction Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business31
Midsize Enterprise9
Large Enterprise9
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business7
 

Questions from the Community

How does Microsoft Azure compare to Google Firebase?
I would recommend Google Firebase instead of Microsoft Azure, simply for the array of features that it has to offer. In particular, the Firebase library grants you access to a shared data structure...
Looking to compare Google Firebase, Amazon AWS, and Microsoft Azure
We like Google Firebase hosting and authentication and also the excellent cloud functionality. Our team found the flexibility of handling and dealing with the database through EDL to be very useful...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Google Firebase?
The pricing structure needs improvement since it uses cloud billing. We do not know how the pricing is calculated as it is all on the cloud. They could have implemented credits based on usage so th...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

No data available
Jelastic
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Fabulous, Pic Collage, Shazam, SkyScanner
Hosting Providers: Hidora, Elastx, eApps, SaveInCloud, Infomaniak, Layershift, Valtti, Dogado, Locaweb, Planeetta, dogado, ServInt, Hostnet, Info.nl, Innofield, Lunacloud, Reg.ru, Websolute Private Cloud and Integrators: Joe's Datacenter, Croc, Ciklum, Vergence, Centerprise, GMV Soluciones
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Amazon Web Services (AWS), Akamai and others in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS). Updated: October 2026.
920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.