No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

GitHub vs OfficeSuite comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

GitHub
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.5
Number of Reviews
102
Ranking in other categories
Application Security Tools (4th), Version Control (2nd), Agile and DevOps Services (2nd)
OfficeSuite
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
Fax over IP (FoIP) (10th)
 

Mindshare comparison

GitHub and OfficeSuite aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. GitHub is designed for Agile and DevOps Services and holds a mindshare of 3.2%.
OfficeSuite, on the other hand, focuses on Fax over IP (FoIP), holds 3.4% mindshare, up 0.8% since last year.
Agile and DevOps Services Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
GitHub3.2%
Red Hat OpenShift6.6%
VMware Tanzu Platform5.5%
Other84.7%
Agile and DevOps Services
Fax over IP (FoIP) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
OfficeSuite3.4%
OpenText Fax17.8%
OpenText Core Fax11.7%
Other67.1%
Fax over IP (FoIP)
 

Featured Reviews

Abdulmunafz Mct - PeerSpot reviewer
Full Stack Developer at Sri Krishna Arts and Science
Daily workflows have become streamlined as I manage projects, learn from clones, and host sites
The thing that has frustrated me is sometimes when I push using a Git command, I need to force the push, which is the main thing. The setup is frustrating because GitHub could add a repository with pre-installed packages or something since I need to install packages in VS Code before pushing and maintain it in the codebase. Git packages need to be installed manually, and if that was already in a GitHub repository, that would be much better. GitHub packages can be installed previously for the project upon the project requirement, and that is the thing I wanted to add here. That would be good. According to governance and security, I recently heard about some security issues in GitHub. I think that could be centralized and should consider those security issues and clear them. The AI capabilities there include Copilot or something else. I recently heard about security issues, but I do not know about it clearly. However, if security has been more tightened, it will be better.
TT
Consultant at NFC/IT
Good call routing capability, but the interface is non-intuitive, the integration is bad, and the mobile app needs improvement
Their pricing and "automatic contracts" are abhorrent. We left Broadview for Intermedia because, at the end of the day, we are in the business of being a complete IT solution, which we can't do without offering a phone system. We are firm believers in practicing what you preach (or dogfooding if you prefer). As I stated previously, they dropped us as vendors because we couldn't sell many systems. The auto-attendant setup was horrid. It was extremely dated and doesn't have any modern features that you would expect for the price point. The mobile app, desktop app, and hardware was outdated and clumsily integrated. One reason we couldn't sell the product is that they nickel and dime you to death. For example, a line is one price. If you want a soft phone, that's extra. Mobile app? Extra. Auto-attendant? Yup... extra. We went with Intermedia because they have a far more modern system with seamless integration and simpler pricing. It is one price per user that includes everything Broadview charges extra for. Finally, after we switched, Broadview is trying to extort us for a year's fees stating we didn't terminate the contract in time. Importantly, we did, but it was "auto-renewed." Basically, if you want phone technology from the '90s and the practices to go along with it, Broadview is your ticket.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"You can write the code with AI. But when it comes to implementation, you must upgrade the bits of code that will support this and generate solutions based on that architecture. Then, you need comparable code bits. Therefore, AI can propose how much a specific function can be better optimized. So, AI can help stakeholders reach tasks quicker."
"The tool also helps organize collaboration by allowing users to share a repository with other developers."
"GitHub is the perfect tool for use at present and is extremely necessary."
"During our use of GitHub, we have not encountered any problems and GitHub adds new features frequently."
"We liked it because it was solving all of our queries, and whatever our needs were, we were able to accomplish them with GitHub."
"We have been quite satisfied with its capabilities."
"The most valuable feature of GitHub is version control and continuous integration."
"GitHub actually is a pretty easy tool; it is not very difficult to understand, and everyone can set up branches there or work on it."
"We never had any reliability issues."
"We were able to route calls to mobile devices as well as hard phones."
 

Cons

"There is a bit of a learning curve."
"The thing that has frustrated me is sometimes when I push using a Git command, I need to force the push, which is the main thing."
"If something has to be moved into approvals, and if they don't approve it in a few hours, then they should move the approval request to some other user, or they should have a way to escalate it."
"GitHub's issue management could be improved a little from an organization standpoint."
"The solution should have less integration with the AI part, but it needs to add features with other automation tools so that it can be easily integrated."
"They're improving the work items to track the progress of the team, but in my experience, Azure DevOps is better in this functionality. GitHub needs to improve the form to track the progress of the work done by a team."
"GitHub needs to improve its UI."
"It is very tricky to work with GitHub. For example, it is difficult to merge a code or restore it to an older version."
"The mobile app, desktop app, and hardware was outdated and clumsily integrated."
"Their pricing and "automatic contracts" are abhorrent."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I use the free version of the tool."
"The tool offers a free program. As you go, you can upgrade from the community version to the professional one. I believe it costs about ten dollars per person, per month."
"We pay a subscription-based yearly licensing fee for the solution."
"The product is reasonably priced."
"The basic licensing model is free, and if you need to have technical support and such things, then it does cost something. You only need to pay extra if you need technical support."
"I am using the free version of the solution. However, there are some costs my organization pays."
"It’s an open-source solution."
"It is open-source. There is no license for GitHub."
"Their pricing and "automatic contracts" are abhorrent."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Agile and DevOps Services solutions are best for your needs.
911,493 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
14%
Outsourcing Company
10%
Marketing Services Firm
8%
Manufacturing Company
7%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business43
Midsize Enterprise14
Large Enterprise55
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub?
I have been using GitHub for free, and recently I got a free education offer, such as educational resources. I believe it is GitHub Pro or something similar. I have been using the educational offer...
What needs improvement with GitHub?
When we were using GitHub, sometimes within a month or two, GitHub is down for some time. Also, it is using SAML authentication, so when we restart our system, if there is an update on our laptop t...
What is your primary use case for GitHub?
My main use case for GitHub is as a source repository where I'm pushing our code there. Whatever the microservices or the services code we have, we are pushing there. We are running our build and s...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Dominion Enterprises, NASA, Braintree, SAP, CyberAgent
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Red Hat, GitHub, LocalStack and others in Agile and DevOps Services. Updated: August 2026.
911,493 professionals have used our research since 2012.