GitHub CoPilot vs KiSSFLOW comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
GitHub Logo
991 views|906 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
KiSSFLOW Logo
1,169 views|644 comparisons
92% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between GitHub CoPilot and KiSSFLOW based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Rapid Application Development Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed GitHub CoPilot vs. KiSSFLOW Report (Updated: March 2024).
771,157 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The most valuable aspects in terms of features, revolve around its code generation capabilities.""GitHub CoPilot has good stability and performance.""The product's initial setup is straightforward because it's pushed through the updates.""The document generation features are valuable.""The initial setup of the product is easy.""GitHub CoPilot accelerates productivity. It is an easy-to-use solution that is also helpful in saving the team's time.""The product is easy to integrate.""When I write code, I feel like I have someone sitting with me to help me. Wherever I'm stuck, I just ask a question, and it provides guidance that I can use."

More GitHub CoPilot Pros →

"I work in HR and am fond of automation. I like the tool's email automation and integration with Outlook.""The flexibility and speed in modifying and creating processes are great features. If we have a process in mind, we can usually create it within ten minutes.""The most valuable feature is APIs. Its integrations are very flexible, allowing developers to connect multiple applications like DocuSign, Salesforce, OpenText, and SEB.""Kissflow is intuitive and easy to use, and I haven't faced any errors using the solution so far.""The support team responds fast.""The best thing about KiSSFLOW is that we can do virtual approvals.""The user interface is very, very good.""The best thing about Kissflow is its user-friendliness."

More KiSSFLOW Pros →

Cons
"The solution is expensive. It should also support other programming languages.""GitHub CoPilot's alerting features need improvement.""In a few cases, the results aren't correct, so that needs improvement. Also, it would be great if the results could be presented in different formats, not just text. As engineers, it takes time to read through text-based results.""There's room for improvement to ensure that suggestions align more precisely with the context of what I'm seeking, minimizing instances of unrelated or inaccurate code suggestions.""In certain instances, OpenAI didn't respond in the expected way. The responses were more general and didn't address the specific point.""The suggestions provided by the product must be improved.""The product's price is an area of concern where improvements are required.""Some of the suggestions provided by GitHub CoPilot are not accurate, making it an area of concern where improvements are required."

More GitHub CoPilot Cons →

"When there are multiple steps or if there's a disconnect when creating the ticket, it could be a problem for the user.""The integration between forms should be made easier.""One area where I believe Kissflow can be improved is customization.""Sometimes some notifications don't appear on the mobile app.""They should increase their marketplace with existing tools so that connections are directly through connectors instead of API integrations.""There is room for improvement in terms of stability.""If Kissflow can help users to be able to organize the company manuals and information, the blogs, and everything into one resource, that would be awesome.""Some of the tool's fields only accept certain types of text. The input fields are inflexible."

More KiSSFLOW Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The product offers a free version and a paid version. Whether to choose the product's free version or paid version depends on the size of the company where it will be used."
  • "GitHub CoPilot's pricing is reasonable. Our licensing costs were initially monthly, but then we switched to yearly payments. I rate the tool's pricing an eight out of ten."
  • "GitHub CoPilot comes readily available for enterprise customers, so it's a free add-on if you already have GitHub's enterprise license."
  • "A personal license is priced at ten dollars per month, while a professional or enterprise license costs nineteen dollars per user, and these rates are consistent for all users."
  • "It's affordable."
  • "There is a need to pay around 10 USD to be able to use the solution."
  • More GitHub CoPilot Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "This is an affordable product and everything is included in the subscription."
  • "Kissflow's licensing cost is lower than other products. However, the contract has changed with the second version they have given us, which is the low-code one."
  • "The product costs $15 per user per month."
  • "Your company must subscribe to the solution if you create a business account."
  • "The license is very expensive."
  • More KiSSFLOW Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Rapid Application Development Software solutions are best for your needs.
    771,157 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:There is a need to pay around 10 USD to be able to use the solution.
    Top Answer:I have not used the product much to be able to comment on what needs improvement in it. With the passage of time, I believe that there will be improvements in its prompt response, like ChatGPT… more »
    Top Answer:The best thing about Kissflow is its user-friendliness.
    Top Answer:The license is very expensive. However, there are no additional costs to the standard license.
    Top Answer:One area where Kissflow can be improved is customization, specifically, the ability to modify the input fields, UI, and design elements. Currently, it's not possible to alter the colors or make the UI… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    991
    Comparisons
    906
    Reviews
    10
    Average Words per Review
    451
    Rating
    8.4
    Views
    1,169
    Comparisons
    644
    Reviews
    11
    Average Words per Review
    781
    Rating
    8.5
    Comparisons
    Camunda logo
    Compared 18% of the time.
    Microsoft Power Apps logo
    Compared 17% of the time.
    ServiceNow logo
    Compared 16% of the time.
    Nintex Process Platform logo
    Compared 12% of the time.
    Appian logo
    Compared 11% of the time.
    Learn More
    Overview

    Trained on billions of lines of code, GitHub Copilot turns natural language prompts into coding suggestions across dozens of languages.

    KiSSFLOW understands that you know how to solve your office chaos problems better than anyone else. That’s why they created a cloud-based platform to help business leaders create, modify, and use automated business applications. You can make each application with beautiful, easy-to-use, and modern technology. You get the functionality of high-end BPM software with no coding or complicated mapping required, so you don’t have be a programmer to create amazing applications.
    Sample Customers
    Information Not Available
    KiSSFLOW has 1.3 million users and 10,000+ customers across 121 countries. The people who get the most out of KiSSFLOW are business leaders like department heads, senior managers, and process owners who want to automate repetitive processes. These people can set up and modify the application on their own. The interface is simple so that all the users in the organization can utilize it through the web application, mobile apps (iOS and Android), smart actions on Gmail, and email notifications. Notable companies are Royal Caribbean, Dominos, Motorola, Danone, The Telegraph, Michelin, and PepsiCo.
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company25%
    Recruiting/Hr Firm13%
    Financial Services Firm13%
    Non Profit13%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm17%
    Healthcare Company11%
    Computer Software Company9%
    Insurance Company8%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm29%
    Mining And Metals Company14%
    Recruiting/Hr Firm14%
    Construction Company14%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company14%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    Educational Organization8%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business55%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise36%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business13%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise77%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business31%
    Midsize Enterprise31%
    Large Enterprise38%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business26%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise57%
    Buyer's Guide
    GitHub CoPilot vs. KiSSFLOW
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about GitHub CoPilot vs. KiSSFLOW and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    771,157 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    GitHub CoPilot is ranked 15th in Rapid Application Development Software with 10 reviews while KiSSFLOW is ranked 14th in Rapid Application Development Software with 12 reviews. GitHub CoPilot is rated 8.4, while KiSSFLOW is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of GitHub CoPilot writes "Though it offers good integration features, the price needs to be lowered". On the other hand, the top reviewer of KiSSFLOW writes "The tool is intuitive to use and, through automation, has been a real time-saver". GitHub CoPilot is most compared with GitLab, Oracle Application Express (APEX), Pega BPM, ServiceNow and Mendix, whereas KiSSFLOW is most compared with Camunda, Microsoft Power Apps, ServiceNow, Nintex Process Platform and Appian. See our GitHub CoPilot vs. KiSSFLOW report.

    See our list of best Rapid Application Development Software vendors.

    We monitor all Rapid Application Development Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.