The primary area for improvement I see is in artifact management, especially for saving screenshots or videos from failed tests or data-driven actions. Currently, the configuration for saving these artifacts is complex. Simplifying this process would make GitHub Actions even more user-friendly and efficient. Other than this aspect, GitHub Actions stands out as an excellent tool for automating and managing workflows. For additional functionalities, one aspect I'd like to see improved is the integration of performance testing and API automation projects directly within GitHub Actions, without the need for third-party tools. This direct integration would streamline the process significantly.
Business Mobility Development (AVP-BMD) at SC Asset
Real User
Top 5
2023-11-21T12:45:28Z
Nov 21, 2023
I feel that the product is okay for me. Sometimes, it takes a while to deploy the product. Some of the functions of the product are hard to understand owing to its scripts or UI. The solution's integration capabilities and UI are areas of concern where improvement is required to make the product more user-friendly.
While our current pipeline handles most of the deployment, we believe there's room for improvement, especially when it comes to generating comprehensive reports and metrics. The reporting capabilities are somewhat limited.
It specialist at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Top 10
2023-08-31T09:09:00Z
Aug 31, 2023
We can leverage this database tool to manage everything within our environment and data burners, allowing for customization and execution. An additional advantage is the capability to modify aspects like file size, making processes more efficient and faster across the pipelines. Regarding improvements or implementations, I believe there should be enhancements made to the deployment tool. It should be integrated as part of the solution. Infrastructure-wise, we already have tools like GitHub and RobSpot, and data enables us to automate various processes, which is quite beneficial. As for further enhancements, I'm uncertain. I've shared everything I know. However, if there's something specific you'd like to see in future releases, a feature that may not exist yet but would be desirable, I can't provide any input on that matter.
Build automation tools automate the time-consuming tasks inherent in creating a “build,” or usable version of an application. They automate and orchestrate the sometimes complex processes of compiling computer source code into binary code and packaging that binary code as well as running automated tests
Some PeerSpot members use build automation solutions. In reviews, they offer opinions on the most significant selection factors to consider when looking at this type of software. One theme...
The primary area for improvement I see is in artifact management, especially for saving screenshots or videos from failed tests or data-driven actions. Currently, the configuration for saving these artifacts is complex. Simplifying this process would make GitHub Actions even more user-friendly and efficient. Other than this aspect, GitHub Actions stands out as an excellent tool for automating and managing workflows. For additional functionalities, one aspect I'd like to see improved is the integration of performance testing and API automation projects directly within GitHub Actions, without the need for third-party tools. This direct integration would streamline the process significantly.
There is a part that detects outdated libraries. If that feature could be more intuitive and informative, that would be nice.
I feel that the product is okay for me. Sometimes, it takes a while to deploy the product. Some of the functions of the product are hard to understand owing to its scripts or UI. The solution's integration capabilities and UI are areas of concern where improvement is required to make the product more user-friendly.
While our current pipeline handles most of the deployment, we believe there's room for improvement, especially when it comes to generating comprehensive reports and metrics. The reporting capabilities are somewhat limited.
We can leverage this database tool to manage everything within our environment and data burners, allowing for customization and execution. An additional advantage is the capability to modify aspects like file size, making processes more efficient and faster across the pipelines. Regarding improvements or implementations, I believe there should be enhancements made to the deployment tool. It should be integrated as part of the solution. Infrastructure-wise, we already have tools like GitHub and RobSpot, and data enables us to automate various processes, which is quite beneficial. As for further enhancements, I'm uncertain. I've shared everything I know. However, if there's something specific you'd like to see in future releases, a feature that may not exist yet but would be desirable, I can't provide any input on that matter.