Recorded Future and GitGuardian compete in the cybersecurity sector. Recorded Future appears to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive threat intelligence platform, covering various online sources.
Features: Recorded Future offers integration with security solutions, anonymous internet searches, and customizable dashboards. GitGuardian focuses on detecting secret leaks quickly, features "Dev in the loop," and provides reliable secret detection with minimal false positives. GitGuardian's strengths are geared towards code security, while Recorded Future offers a broader intelligence range.
Room for Improvement: Recorded Future could enhance data automation, reduce false positives, and lower pricing for better affordability. GitGuardian needs user interface enhancements, better integration with popular platforms for developers, and extended customization for security needs.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Recorded Future primarily supports public cloud deployment, with complexities that challenge some users. GitGuardian provides more deployment flexibility with public and private cloud options and on-premises solutions. Both platforms generally receive positive technical support feedback, with GitGuardian's customer service noted as more consistent by some users.
Pricing and ROI: Recorded Future is known for being expensive, especially impacting small and midsize businesses. Significant investments are needed to achieve its value. GitGuardian, though not inexpensive, is perceived as reasonably priced with options for small teams and competitive pricing. The ROI from GitGuardian is seen as more immediate, while Recorded Future's ROI highly depends on user engagement with its features.
I can certainly say that we have saved significant time and resources in terms of people and automation.
The majority of our incidents for critical detectors and important secret types are remediated automatically or proactively by developers through GitGuardian's notification system, without security team involvement.
It effectively helps us with credentials security and has been performing satisfactorily.
I would rate their technical support a nine out of ten.
I would rate the technical support as excellent.
The customer support is frustrating and not efficient.
In terms of scalability, I would rate it around a ten out of ten, as it handles all the repositories and commit activity we have.
I would rate it a ten out of ten for scalability.
Currently, what GitGuardian Platform is doing works effectively.
Being a SaaS, Recorded Future generally does a good job in terms of scalability.
We set up a lot of the repository, so GitGuardian is a required check.
The SaaS platform has experienced two significant moments of downtime or instability in the last six months, requiring notices and retrospectives.
I would rate the stability of the GitGuardian Platform as excellent with no downtimes.
Recorded Future is very stable, with a rating of nine.
Another thing that would be good to see is some more metrics on the usage of the GitGuardian pre-push hooks.
The self-healing activity by developers isn't reflected in the analytics, requiring us to collect this data ourselves.
We are looking for better metrics and audit data, wanting more features such as knowing which users are creating the most secrets or committing the most secrets, what repository, what directory, and who is not checking in secrets.
The Insikt Group covers a narrow range of areas, which doesn't reflect my needs.
Overall, the secret detection sector is expensive, but we are happy with the value we get.
It's fairly priced, as it performs a lot of analysis and is a valuable tool.
Recorded Future is expensive, with a personal rating of eight for cost.
One of the best features of the solution is the ability to use pre-push hooks.
A high number of our exposures are remediated by developers before security needs to step in, as the self-healing playbook process engages them automatically.
GitGuardian Platform performs the capability to detect secrets in real time exceptionally, as it activates from the commit and can detect it immediately.
Having a layer of intelligence within my SIEM that reflects in Recorded Future, and being able to enrich the data at my SIEM, offers various angles that I wouldn't be able to see without it.
GitGuardian is an advanced secrets security platform that strengthens Non-Human Identity security and ensures compliance with industry standards by detecting and managing secrets in development environments.
GitGuardian integrates Secrets Security and Secrets Observability, facilitating the detection of compromised secrets and managing legitimate secrets' lifecycle. Supporting over 450 types of secrets, the platform offers public monitoring for leaked data and employs honeytokens as an added defense. Trusted by over 600,000 developers, organizations such as Snowflake and ING rely on GitGuardian for robust secrets protection.
What features define GitGuardian?In sectors like healthcare and telecommunications, GitGuardian is implemented for detecting and managing the exposure of sensitive information in code repositories. Teams benefit from its ability to integrate with platforms such as GitHub, allowing for immediate alerts and efficient remediation of security risks, enhancing application security by safeguarding operational environments.
Recorded Future is a powerful and effective cyber threat intelligence (CTI) platform that aims to empower administrators to protect their organizations from threats, both known and unknown. The machine learning engine that Recorded Future utilizes can process the same amount of data that 9,000 analysts working five days a week, eight hours a day for an entire year can process. It simplifies threat detection and remediation so that organizations can focus on other tasks.
Recorded Future Benefits
Some of the ways that organizations can benefit by choosing to deploy Recorded Future include:
Recorded Future Features
Some of the many features Recorded Future offers include:
Reviews from Real Users
Recorded future is a solution that stands out when compared to its top competitors. Two major advantages it offers are the threat research tools that it provides and the threat monitoring capabilities that it enables users to leverage.
A security operations lead at a comms service provider writes, “Recorded Future covers a lot of different use cases. For example, we are using it for threat intelligence research. We do use the tool to make active research on what is found around the threat. We look at patterns, for example, and see what can be elaborated on from that.”
They also write, “We can also use it for active monitoring in the customer interface. We can monitor the business side of a campaign. We can monitor for specific threats or market activity on the dashboard. We can develop queries to run in a continuous mode in order to get the best reviews.”
We monitor all Threat Intelligence Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.