GeneXus vs SS&C Blue Prism comparison

GeneXus and SS&C Technologies are both solutions in the Low-Code Development Platforms category. GeneXus is ranked #19 with an average rating of 9.0, while SS&C Technologies is ranked #14 with an average rating of 7.8. GeneXus holds a 0.8% mindshare in LCDP, compared to SS&C Technologies’s 1.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of GeneXus users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of SS&C Technologies users who would recommend it.

GeneXus

Read 14 GeneXus reviews

909 Views
627 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

SS&C Blue Prism

Read 5 SS&C Blue Prism reviews

1,928 Views
463 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

GeneXus

SS&C Blue Prism

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 2, 2025

GeneXus and SS&C Blue Prism compete in the automation domain. GeneXus has the upper hand in rapid application development while SS&C Blue Prism leads in robust automation features.

Features: GeneXus offers rapid application development and flexibility with strong integration capabilities, supporting multiple platforms efficiently. It provides automatic code generation and compatibility with third-party tools. SS&C Blue Prism stands out with sophisticated automation features, process delivery, and robust robotic process automation, enabling seamless task automation. It offers excellent workflow visibility and a straightforward design studio for building and monitoring automation.

Room for Improvement: GeneXus could enhance its front-end capabilities and streamline integration with more languages. Simplification of complex feature configurations could improve its usability. The solution could also benefit from better documentation for beginners. SS&C Blue Prism can work on reducing its complexity for easier deployment and offer more flexible pricing models. Enhancements in user interface intuitiveness and faster updates could also be beneficial.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: GeneXus excels with a straightforward deployment process praised for its ease of installation and configuration. It provides comprehensive support services. SS&C Blue Prism, while offering reliable deployment solutions, is more complex, requiring advanced technical expertise. However, it is commended for an effective customer support system that aids in navigating complex deployment challenges.

Pricing and ROI: GeneXus is noted for a competitive pricing structure that facilitates quick ROI due to lower initial costs and flexible licensing options, ideal for smaller enterprises. SS&C Blue Prism, despite higher upfront costs, justifies the expense with its extensive feature set offering long-term ROI. It is a suitable option for enterprises willing to invest in comprehensive automation suites.

To learn more, read our detailed GeneXus vs. SS&C Blue Prism Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

GeneXus vs. SS&C Blue Prism

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 879,422 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

GeneXus

Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms

19th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Mobile Development Platforms (10th)

SS&C Blue Prism

Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms

14th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

5.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Design (15th), Business Process Management (BPM) (16th), Process Automation (13th), Medical Insurance Claims Software (2nd), Insurance Claims Processing (3rd), Document Management Software (8th), Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) (11th), Loan Management Software (3rd), Document Automation Software (3rd), Business Orchestration and Automation Technologies (19th), AI Customer Experience Personalization (11th), AI Finance & Accounting (5th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Low-Code Development Platforms category, the mindshare of GeneXus is 0.8%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SS&C Blue Prism is 1.2%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Low-Code Development Platforms Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
SS&C Blue Prism	1.2%
GeneXus	0.8%
Other	98.0%

Low-Code Development Platforms

Featured Reviews

XavierEspinoza

Internal System Coordinator at Red CEDIA

Offers a simplified architecture with outstanding integration capabilities

The integration capabilities of GeneXus are highly valuable for our organization. The metadata obtained within the logic of different systems is also vital. Due to the solution, our company team doesn't have to work with multiple languages and integrations can be made with C Sharp. JavaScript can also be used with GeneXus, the tool takes charge of all the rest and has a simple architecture. The solution can be used out of the box without facing any issues and nothing much needs to be done with frameworks. In our case we need to use Python with GeneXus, we use Ironpython to embed python code in C# .

Read full review

VikasKumar16

Technical Auditor at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Has defined complex workflows and handled detailed automation scenarios efficiently

It requires extensive knowledge if somebody wants to work on SS&C Blue Prism, compared to other tools. The downside is you need to be very aware of the tool. You need to know how to write the workflow and have a detailed understanding of SS&C Blue Prism. It takes more time to learn compared to other tools in the market which are more user-friendly.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"In Knowledge Base, being able to model the workflow before developing the screens is great. We first work with the tables or the transactions using GeneXus and then we work on the screens."

"The solution provides ease of programming and the speed of delivery of demands."

"I find the implementation process of GeneXus to be easy."

"It is fast in creating systems and connects to the database quickly."

"The integration capabilities of GeneXus are highly valuable for our organization"

"With GeneXus, we can create logical representations of transactions in the form of objects."

"The integration module is the most valuable feature of this solution for our business, as it allows our clients to create new systems based on their outdated databases, across all API's."

"The most valuable feature is that GeneXus works with several languages. It's possible to develop chatbots and other functionalities."

More GeneXus pros

"Some important features include the language capabilities, which are crucial since RPA has to read the documents provided by the customer."

"We have a lot of customer requests on a daily basis for different use cases, and we have different processes for that."

"I find the design studio, where I can build the automation, and the control room feature, which allows me to run and monitor the automation, to be the most useful."

"The key feature of SS&C that I find valuable is the general workflow visibility."

Cons

"We would like to see more extensions and more user controls added to the front-end of this solution, in order to help developers manage the website."

"Code generation is highly time-consuming for GeneXus"

"It would be helpful to have additional assisted processing with training."

"It's expensive for a company."

"The tool needs to be tuned before being used. You need some experience to get the best out of the tool."

"I told them to add something about Angular. They're already working on adding it."

"There are issues in integrating it with other solutions."

"It would be better if GeneXus had a wiki. The developer needs some experience to work with the tools. It would be better if they could improve the community. If we have some problem, I open a ticket that takes us to a board, and I have to describe my issue in detail. If the tools have a general community for us to explore with some videos or some articles, I think that that may help the developer."

More GeneXus cons

"Blue Prism is more costly than UiPath in terms of robotic licenses and orchestrators."

"There is a need for improved integration with external systems in SS&C."

"I noticed that it lacks the ability to automatically record the process steps like some of its competitors."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I give the cost of the solution a four out of ten."

"I know that its licenses are generally per year, and in the past, the license for GeneXus was around $5,000, but I don't know what's the current price of the GeneXus license."

"The cost of a GeneXus license is extremely high. At the same time, one person using the solution can do the work of three Java or data developers. I think that's why they charge so much. It's too expensive, which is one reason it isn't widely used."

"The tool's price is good."

"I don't know about the price because I am an employee, but I hear it's cheaper than other tools."

"People tend to work with GeneXus if it's cheap, but GeneXus does have licensing policies...Moreover, the cost of resourcing work in GeneXus may make it more expensive than other programming languages."

"This solution offers multi-plan licenses, depending on the size of the company and the features required, as opposed to being priced per user/device."

"I would rate the pricing a seven out of ten"

More GeneXus pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Low-Code Development Platforms solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,422 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Energy/Utilities Company

Outsourcing Company

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Retailer

18%

Financial Services Firm

18%

Computer Software Company

10%

Government

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	12
Large Enterprise	2

No data available

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with GeneXus?

GeneXus needs to be more consistent in functionality without any errors. Code generation is highly time-consuming for GeneXus, but in some cases, it saves time as well. Some errors will take too lo...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for GeneXus?

Our company uses the latest version of GeneXus. The solution is used in our company to develop various enterprise systems, and GeneXus is used as an integrator, which further facilitates low-cost d...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering GeneXus?

The tool's use case depends upon the requirements. The solution is ideal for integrations to modernize systems. GeneXus is also used in a site to develop systems with functional programming for big...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SS&C Blue Prism?

The pricing was not particularly competitive. It wasn't flexible for different geographies. For instance, in Africa, they didn't have a different pricing model to account for affordability. The pri...

See all answers

What needs improvement with SS&C Blue Prism?

It requires extensive knowledge if somebody wants to work on SS&C Blue Prism, compared to other tools. The downside is you need to be very aware of the tool. You need to know how to write the w...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for SS&C Blue Prism?

My main use case for SS&C Blue Prism is automating business processes in different areas of the company, for legacy application automations, for SAP, different web services, and we provide that...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Azure App Service vs GeneXus

Compared 26% of the time

Magic xpa Application Platform vs GeneXus

Compared 22% of the time

Oracle Application Express (APEX) vs GeneXus

Compared 19% of the time

Mendix vs GeneXus

Compared 17% of the time

OutSystems vs GeneXus

Compared 17% of the time

More GeneXus Competitors

Alfresco vs SS&C Blue Prism

Compared 30% of the time

Camunda vs SS&C Blue Prism

Compared 13% of the time

FIS Commercial Lending Suite vs SS&C Blue Prism

Compared 11% of the time

IBM BPM vs SS&C Blue Prism

Compared 9% of the time

ServiceNow Now Platform vs SS&C Blue Prism

Compared 8% of the time

More SS&C Blue Prism Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

GeneXus

December 2025

Download GeneXus product report

Buyer's Guide

Business Process Design

December 2025

Download SS&C Blue Prism product report

Also Known As

No data available

SS&C AWD

Overview

What is GeneXus? GeneXus™ is the best Low-Code Platform that you don't know yet.

It's a Software Development Platform that simplifies and automates the tasks of creating and evolving enterprise applications and multi-channel user-experiences. Great Advantages:

- Higher productivity, with automatic maintenance & evolution
- Multi-Experience, we continuously create new code generators
- Agile, incremental approach, with fully functional prototypes
- Easier to learn, one single language to cover all technologies
- Future-proof, we've been around for 30 years, evolving for you

Key Differentiators against the competition:

- No runtime fees, we charge by developer
- Best theoretical framework, which allows us to evolve
- Best coverage in the market: Most technologies, most languages, most markets and industries
- We run on-premise or on the cloud
- Multiple starting points depending on the type of company you work in, with products for Students, Startups, ISVs, Corporate Development, and SAP technologies

GeneXus uses Artificial Intelligence techniques to create software, enabling truly incremental development of apps, providing a low-code, future-proof development platform for the leading execution platforms and languages, and the most popular DBMS.

GeneXus

SS&C Blue Prism, renowned for its language capabilities and workflow design, supports detailed automation building, enhancing productivity. Despite some challenges like cost and limited integration, it offers substantial potential in automating diverse processes.

SS&C Blue Prism offers strong capabilities in document reading and a straightforward workflow design, making it accessible with basic BPM knowledge. Detailed automation design in the studio and effective monitoring in the control room are notable features. While facing higher costs and a steeper learning curve, it supports process mining and generative AI initiatives, crucial for industries aiming at transformation and activation services. Limited external system integration and lack of agile delivery encourage a strategic approach in its deployment.

What are the key features?

Strong Language Capabilities: Essential for document reading and interpretation.
Straightforward Workflow Design: Provides ease of use for individuals with basic BPM knowledge.
Detailed Automation Building: Design studio allows comprehensive workflow definitions and scenario planning.
Effective Monitoring: Control room supports detailed automation oversight.

What ROI should users expect?

Efficiency in Task Automation: Automates repetitive tasks in back-office services.
Enhanced Process Integration: Facilitates automation by integrating data inputs in insurance sectors.
Support for Process Mining: Aids in generative AI initiatives and process transformation.
Complex Project Management: Useful in managing large-scale migration projects.

SS&C Blue Prism finds its application across industries. In service industries, it automates repetitive tasks while supporting migration projects. Within the insurance sector, it helps automate claims handling and pricing by integrating data efficiently. Companies use it when transitioning processes, such as upgrading systems from older versions to new applications.

SS&C Technologies

Sample Customers

Canal de Panamá, Gerdau, Coca-Cola, Mercado Libre, DHL, Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, TECNISA, Mexican Polak Group, Ferrovalle, Canon, Azteca, KPMG, TURBUS, Santander, BBVA

AWS, EY, Deloitte, ABBYY, Microsoft, GLYNT.AI, Pfizer, Invesco, Western Union

Buyer's Guide

GeneXus vs. SS&C Blue Prism

December 2025

Free Report: GeneXus vs. SS&C Blue Prism

Find out what your peers are saying about GeneXus vs. SS&C Blue Prism and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

879,422 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our GeneXus vs. SS&C Blue Prism report.

See our list of best Low-Code Development Platforms vendors.

We monitor all Low-Code Development Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.