Fujitsu vs IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe comparison

Fujitsu and IBM are both solutions in the NVMe All-Flash Storage Arrays category. Fujitsu is ranked #17 with an average rating of 7.0, while IBM is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.6. Fujitsu holds a 0.8% mindshare in N, compared to IBM’s 1.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Fujitsu users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of IBM users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 5, 2024

IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe and Fujitsu compete in storage solutions, each offering strengths that cater to different needs. IBM stands out for its pricing and support, while Fujitsu impresses with advanced features.

Features: IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe provides a high-speed NVMe interface and robust scalability, efficiently supporting substantial data workloads. Fujitsu's versatile features include seamless integration and enhanced data protection, making it a strong choice for businesses focused on adaptability and security.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM's deployment is appreciated for streamlined processes and effective technical support, ensuring a smooth setup. Fujitsu's personalized deployment comes with detailed guidance, and although it may seem less straightforward initially, its strong focus on customer service provides consistent support.

Pricing and ROI: IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe offers a cost-effective setup with rapid ROI, appealing to budget-conscious buyers and providing significant value. Fujitsu, despite its higher setup costs, promises ROI through long-term efficiencies and a feature-rich infrastructure suitable for businesses that invest for lasting solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed Fujitsu vs. IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Fujitsu vs. IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Pure FlashArray X NVMe

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the NVMe All-Flash Storage Arrays category, the mindshare of Pure FlashArray X NVMe is 2.9%, up from 2.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Fujitsu is 0.8%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe is 1.5%, down from 2.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

NVMe All-Flash Storage Arrays

Featured Reviews

Jaehoon Oh

Chief Technology Officer at Lambda256

Supports efficient storage management through volume snapshots and offers reliable non-disruptive upgrades

I have no specific improvements to suggest for Pure FlashArray X NVMe at this time. The performance statistics could be enhanced. I can see the performance statistics in the Pure Storage console, but it does not show the performance by 4K byte unit. It displays IOPS and bandwidth, but IOPS is about real use, and I want to know how many IOPS are currently running in 4K byte units. I cannot see that IOPS because most storage systems report their performance by 4K byte unit. I want to see Pure Storage performance by 4K byte unit to compare with other storage or other internal NVMe SSD.

Read full review

Branko Cirovic

Storage Engineer at Comtrade Group

Reliable storage solutions that offer an attractive balance of affordability and performance

The graphical interface is somewhat lacking, and it doesn't cover all the necessary tasks, often requiring users to resort to the command line for completion. They did not invest significantly in updating the design and functionality of their graphical interface, giving it a somewhat outdated appearance and functionality, resembling technology from two decades ago.

Read full review

MohammedIsmail

Datacenter Manager at Tracker Connect

Enhanced storage performance and an easy setup with compression challenges

We use IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe as a storage device in the IT industry The features I find most valuable include its use for storage and performance. The solution's compression needs to be improved, as it's not the best. Furthermore, support from the partner could also be improved as it's been…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature of this solution is its ease of use."

"The initial setup was extremely simple and straightforward."

"Everything, especially the VMs inside, is pretty fast."

"Pure FlashArray X NVMe will quickly overcome all the hurdles you face, including network and latency issues."

"The high availability of the product is the most valuable feature."

"Overall stability is very good. It is a very stable solution."

"It offers competitive performance, and the Evergreen storage model of Pure fits well with my organization."

"The most valuable features of Pure FlashArray X NVMe are its superior performance compared to other flash tiers, as well as its ease of use, with an intuitive user interface that is simple to deploy and use."

More Pure FlashArray X NVMe pros

"The solution's most valuable features stem from the DX series and the all-flash storage system."

"It stands out for its affordability and the ability to provide unified storage."

"IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe is easy to use and comes with good performance."

"The high performance and high availability improved our overall processes."

"IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe is one of the leading storage systems in the world...I rate the solution's stability a ten out of ten."

"It is a very stable product. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten because we did not face any issues in the last three years."

"IBM FlashSystem provides the same software on each box, including virtualized solutions."

"Its ease of use, performance, and hardware compression is very useful feature."

"Good performance with a user-friendly UI."

"The most valuable feature is the speed."

More IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe pros

Cons

"The tool's portfolio is minimal. It is expensive."

"You cannot tag a LUN with a description, and that should be improved. What I like on the Unity side is that when I expand LUNs or do things, there is an information field on the LUN. This is the Information field that you can tag on your LUNs to let yourself know, "Hey, I've added this much space on this date". Pure lacks that ability. So, you don't have a mechanism that's friendly for tracking your data expansions on the LUN and for adding any additional information. That's a downside for me."

"In the future, I would like to see integration with enterprise backup systems."

"We would like to see VNC integration or be able to use Pure Storage with VNC."

"Our use cases require more multi-tenant capabilities and additional VLAN interfaces for separating different customers. We currently use it to provide storage, sometimes shared storage, to different customers, but it is less flexible in comparison to a dedicated solution."

"The software layer has to improve."

"We have run into a couple of instances recently where we are running out of space. So we have had to buy some more packs for it and they have deployed fine and it has increased smoothly."

"One point I'd like to improve is that the tool should start selling small boxes again. It discontinued some products and is focusing on bigger, more capable boxes, neglecting the SMB market. Even though it's not a big market, it shouldn't have removed them."

More Pure FlashArray X NVMe cons

"The graphical interface is somewhat lacking, and it doesn't cover all the necessary tasks, often requiring users to resort to the command line for completion."

"The product's prices are an area of concern where improvements are required."

"The pricing should be more competitive."

"In the FlashSystem 5200, there were only four ports of 32 fiber channels for the architecture. This has been resolved in the new generation."

"The solution's compression needs to be improved, as it's not the best."

"The storage system itself should have built-in capabilities for different ransomware attacks."

"I would like to see IBM products become more affordable because they can be quite expensive, which limits their accessibility to a broader customer base."

"Other vendors have included a block and file system. IBM doesn't include a file system. And yet, it's very necessary for all organizations' networks to have file systems. We have other systems for the file system, however, ideally, we would like to have one system with these features."

"IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe is an expensive solution, and its pricing could be improved."

"The ZIO interface could be improved."

More IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Pure FlashArray X NVMe’s pricing is cheaper than other products."

"With VMware, we pay $300,000 annually."

"The tool is an investment that we've budgeted for. While the prices may be higher than those of other vendors, we see it as a market leader with benefits. We don't regret purchasing it."

"The licensing is on a yearly basis."

"The support cost per array is about $20,000 a year for 24/7 support."

"They can tout the functionality and cutting edge technology that they have, but that's where the price tag comes in. The cost is high, but I think as they grow their business and get more customers that it will probably go down a little bit."

"The product is expensive."

"Our licensing fees are $500,000+ USD."

More Pure FlashArray X NVMe pricing and cost advice

"The entry-level midrange model from Fujitsu is cost-effective for our target market"

"There is a need to make yearly payments towards the licensing charges associated with the product."

"Compared to other solutions, the cost of IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe is reasonable, with a one-time payment of around $70,000. However, additional support is available for $25,000 for three years. The overall maintenance cost is steep."

"The price of the FlashSystem 9100 NVMe is reasonable."

"It's a lot less costly than cloud storage. People get surprised by the cost of cloud storage, which is extremely expensive and four or five times the cost of storage on-premises. People don't realize what they're spending on storage until they start getting bills from Amazon, Microsoft, and others. This is a good way to reduce your cloud storage expenses."

"There are pricing options from the mid-rand to the high-range, of which the suitability depends upon the requirements."

"The price of IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMele can be considered affordable when taking into account the operating system that is required for it to function properly. This operating system, which is licensed by IBM, may carry a higher cost, but it is worth the investment for larger corporate entities, such as insurance companies, Fortune Five companies, and banks, who make up a significant portion of their target market. The FlashSystems are designed for larger corporations and multinational enterprises, and may not be the most cost-effective solution for smaller businesses."

"The price of IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe is less than Dell. For upgrades, the Dell solutions are more expensive."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is a low price and ten is a high price, I rate the pricing an eight."

"Compared to its competitors, IBM's offering is the most cost-effective."

More IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which NVMe All-Flash Storage Arrays solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Government

No data available

Computer Software Company

11%

Government

10%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Pure FlashArray X NVMe?

Pure FlashArray X NVMe helps to improve our processing speed. It is user-friendly and easy to use.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Pure FlashArray X NVMe?

The price of Pure FlashArray X NVMe is very expensive, though I do not know the actual price because I am using the E...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Pure FlashArray X NVMe?

I have no specific improvements to suggest for Pure FlashArray X NVMe at this time. The performance statistics could ...

See all answers

What do you like most about Fujitsu?

It stands out for its affordability and the ability to provide unified storage.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Fujitsu?

There is a need to make yearly payments towards the licensing charges associated with the product.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Fujitsu?

In terms of Fujitsu, the classical storage systems are going to be obsolete in my point of view. With SaaS storage to...

See all answers

What do you like most about IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe?

The storage serves the virtual environment. Most of our applications run in the virtual environment, and it serves ne...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe?

The tool is expensive, though I do not know the specific licensing costs.

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe?

The solution's compression needs to be improved, as it's not the best. Furthermore, support from the partner could al...

See all answers

Comparisons

Dell PowerStore vs Pure FlashArray X NVMe

Compared 25% of the time

TrueNAS R-Series vs Pure FlashArray X NVMe

Compared 17% of the time

Pure Storage FlashBlade vs Pure FlashArray X NVMe

Compared 13% of the time

Dell PowerMax vs Pure FlashArray X NVMe

Compared 13% of the time

HPE Alletra Storage vs Pure FlashArray X NVMe

Compared 10% of the time

More Pure FlashArray X NVMe Competitors

Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform vs Fujitsu

Compared 100% of the time

More Fujitsu Competitors

Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform vs IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe

Compared 26% of the time

Dell PowerStore vs IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe

Compared 26% of the time

Dell PowerMax vs IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe

Compared 23% of the time

HPE Alletra Storage vs IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe

Compared 13% of the time

Hitachi VSP E Series vs IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe

Compared 12% of the time

More IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Pure FlashArray X NVMe

August 2025

Download Pure FlashArray X NVMe product report

Buyer's Guide

NVMe All-Flash Storage Arrays

July 2025

Download Fujitsu product report

Buyer's Guide

IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe

August 2025

Download IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe product report

Also Known As

Pure FlashArray//X NVMe, Pure FlashArray//X, FlashArray//X

No data available

IBM FlashSystem 9100, FlashSystem 9100

Overview

Pure Storage FlashArray//X is the world’s first enterprise-class, all-NVMe flash storage array. It represents a new class of storage – shared accelerated storage, which is a term coined by Gartner – that delivers major breakthroughs in performance, simplicity, and consolidation.

Pure Storage

Fujitsu offers advanced technological solutions tailored to industry-specific demands. Recognized for robust performance and reliability, it facilitates a wide range of applications, providing users with flexibility and enhanced productivity across different sectors.

Fujitsu stands out as a leader in technology, integrating cutting-edge innovations that drive efficiency and elevate performance. Its offerings cover diverse areas, ensuring adaptability and seamless integration. Users benefit from its comprehensive approach, which combines state-of-the-art features with user-focused enhancements, addressing needs such as scalability and security.

What are the most important features of Fujitsu?

Scalability: Fujitsu allows for flexible scaling to address varying demands.
Security: Incorporates strong security protocols to protect data and systems.
Reliability: Known for dependable performance in demanding environments.
Flexibility: Supports diverse applications and integrates smoothly with existing setups.

What benefits or ROI can Fujitsu provide?

Increased Efficiency: Streamlines processes to save time and resources.
Cost Reduction: Lowers operational costs through optimized resource use.
Enhanced Productivity: Facilitates uninterrupted workflows, boosting output.
Data Protection: Offers robust measures for safeguarding sensitive information.

Fujitsu finds applications in industries such as healthcare, finance, and manufacturing, where its adaptability and security features are critical. In healthcare, its technology supports patient data management and operational efficiency. In finance, it ensures secure transactions, while in manufacturing, it enhances workflow processes and data analysis capabilities.

Fujitsu

IBM FlashSystem 9100 combines the performance of flash and Non-Volatile Memory Express (NVMe) end-to-end with the reliability and innovation of IBM FlashCore technology and the rich features of IBM Spectrum Virtualize - all in a powerful 2U enterprise-class storage system. Providing intensive data driven multicloud storage capacity, FlashSystem 9100 is deeply integrated with the software defined capabilities of IBM Spectrum Storage allowing you to easily add in the multicloud solutions that best support your business.

IBM

Sample Customers

Fremont Bank, Judson ISD, The Nielsen Company

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Fujitsu vs. IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe

July 2025

Free Report: Fujitsu vs. IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe

Find out what your peers are saying about Fujitsu vs. IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Fujitsu vs. IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe report.

See our list of best NVMe All-Flash Storage Arrays vendors.

We monitor all NVMe All-Flash Storage Arrays reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.