Frontegg vs Microsoft Entra Verified ID comparison

Frontegg and Microsoft are both solutions in the Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) category. Frontegg is ranked #14, while Microsoft is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.3. Frontegg holds a 2.9% mindshare in CIaA, compared to Microsoft’s 4.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Frontegg users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

Frontegg

Read 6 Frontegg reviews

2,010 Views
824 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Microsoft Entra Verified ID

Read 8 Microsoft Entra Verified ID reviews

2,137 Views
1,261 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Frontegg

Microsoft Entra Verified ID

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 27, 2025

Frontegg and Microsoft Entra Verified ID compete in user identity management, each with distinct strengths. Frontegg stands out for its cost-effectiveness with competitive pricing, whereas Microsoft Entra Verified ID shines with its advanced feature set that appeals to security-conscious users.

Features: Frontegg provides versatile authentication capabilities, including multi-factor authentication, single sign-on, and reCaptcha integration. It supports granular roles and permissions and seamlessly integrates with third-party applications. Microsoft Entra Verified ID, in contrast, provides strong verification processes with two-factor authentication through its authenticator app, fraud detection capabilities, and seamless integration with on-premises Active Directory features.

Room for Improvement: Frontegg could enhance its feature offerings by incorporating more advanced security measures, broader compliance standards, and expanding its auditing capabilities. Meanwhile, Microsoft Entra Verified ID could improve by simplifying its user interface, enhancing its deployment model to be less complex, and offering more flexible pricing options to appeal to a wider audience.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Frontegg is noted for its smooth onboarding and integration, thanks to extensive documentation and responsive support. It offers easy user management through its admin console. Microsoft Entra Verified ID focuses on strong customer service, guiding users through its complex deployment process with effective support and ensuring user satisfaction through proactive service strategies.

Pricing and ROI: Frontegg's pricing model is transparent and competitive, often resulting in a high ROI due to its lower setup costs. It attracts budget-conscious clients. Microsoft Entra Verified ID, while requiring higher initial investments, justifies the cost with its comprehensive feature array desirable for clients valuing long-term security and identity verification benefits.

To learn more, read our detailed Frontegg vs. Microsoft Entra Verified ID Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Frontegg vs. Microsoft Entra Verified ID

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 909,725 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Frontegg

Ranking in Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM)

14th

Average Rating

9.6

Reviews Sentiment

8.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Single Sign-On (SSO) (20th), Authentication Systems (34th)

Microsoft Entra Verified ID

Ranking in Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM)

8th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Microsoft Security Suite (21st)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) category, the mindshare of Frontegg is 2.9%, down from 4.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Entra Verified ID is 4.1%, up from 3.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Microsoft Entra Verified ID	4.1%
Frontegg	2.9%
Other	93.0%

Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM)

Featured Reviews

it_user1658712

Co-Founder & CTO at a computer software company with 11-50 employees

Great granularity for roles and permissions and is multi-tenant by design

Today the features we’re using the most include the registration page, user and tenants management (including storing custom data on the tenant level to use as “feature flags”), and the admin portal. I like the admin portal since it allows us a full-stack solution for user management. The frontend side is a major benefit that I am happy I can give my customers from day one, without compromising. It helps us grow fast and focus our dev team on the core product while providing important user infrastructure to our customers. Another important benefit we discovered is the ease of integration. The integration with Frontegg is almost immediate, and the support is great. If you’re thinking of developing it on your own, don’t.

Read full review

MuhammadWaqar

IT Director at Interwood Mobel Pvt Ltd

Supports user management and authentication but needs simpler hybrid integration for broader adoption

I believe there should be an easy provision for the on-premises and for the hybrid environment in Microsoft Entra Verified ID, as there seems to be some difficulty with hybrid implementations, especially in a country like Pakistan where most are transitioning to cloud but not fully migrating, instead opting for hybrid solutions. An ease for hybrid integration would greatly help the technical teams. I believe the policy implementation is a little bit complex on the Microsoft side; there should be a simpler way to implement policies, utilizing standardized templates for compliance, such as industry-specific templates for the service industry, which would be helpful for HIPAA and other compliances.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The frontend side is a major benefit that I am happy I can give my customers from day one, without compromising."

"Frontegg's solution fits us very well, as it removes the extra work of developing, maintaining, storing, and securing all of the user-management platforms."

"Frontegg enabled us to worry less about parts of the system that are not unique to our product, and instead spend more time developing out key value propositions."

"The admin portal layer is super useful and saves valuable front-end development time."

"SaaS companies like ours can just focus on what matters and not spend time on building SaaS essentials such as audit logs, SSO etc."

"We like the SSO, permissions and roles, multiple workspaces, and react login components."

"Every feature is multi-tenant by design, making different customer requests effortless to provide."

"In addition, I was most impressed with Frontegg's quick turnaround to fix bugs and implement feature improvements."

More Frontegg pros

"The MFA number matching feature effectively prevents unauthorized access by phishing bad actors who might obtain email credentials. This feature requires users to verify a number on their screen, ensuring they only approve genuine requests."

"Entra allows us and our customers to access workloads on Azure and Office 365 securely, and we've integrated it with other applications to provide a single pane of glass for user identification, eliminating the need for multiple IDs."

"Microsoft Entra Verified ID has smoothed out our identity verification process and made it easier for us to authenticate users, making us more confident about our users being who they say they are so we can trust that we have secure logins for all our users."

"The authentication features of Microsoft Entra Verified ID are valuable. As an infrastructure professional, I appreciate the exceptional integration between on-premises Active Directory features and Entra ID."

"I like the Microsoft Authenticator app since it comes with two-factor authentication."

"I find Microsoft Dynamics 365 very easy and useful because most of the users on our end are using Microsoft, thus they are very familiar with the Microsoft Office stack, and some of SharePoint and Teams."

"Microsoft Entra Verified ID has helped reduce fraud or impersonation attacks because if you are using a government-sanctioned ID, what is more secure than that?"

"The most valuable features of the solution are mainly in the areas of security and auditing."

More Microsoft Entra Verified ID pros

Cons

"Frontegg is fairly stable, however, we are looking forward to some promised capabilities, such as more tightly integrated Feature Flag support."

"The PHP SDK is limited."

"It would be nice to have a export button to file with all tenants/users so that in case of a disaster we will have the option to restore the users from file."

"We really like the ability to add the same user across tenants. From a UX perspective, the flow can be betterized."

"The PHP SDK is limited. It's not a huge deal as we can just use their web API directly, but it is something to note if you're using PHP.‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‏‏‎ ‎‏‏‎ ‎‏‏‎ ‎‏‏‎ ‎‏‏‎"

"We're hoping to see more user management-related features, according to Frontegg's roadmap."

"The web interface is missing a way to delete a workspace. I have accidentally created a workspace and was not able to delete it. It's a minor thing that should be supported."

"I must do two-factor authentication when I sign in from a different location. It creates friction. It's not personalized for the end user. I would like to see specific insights."

"I still feel the pricing is on the higher side for larger customers."

"There are issues with the integration of Microsoft Entra Verified ID and MFA. Sometimes, the MFA process doesn't succeed, requiring users to sign out and log back in."

"The tool's expensive nature is an area of concern where improvements are required."

"There is room for improvement in Microsoft Entra Verified ID, particularly in the integration with other platforms, as they could do better with the API, for example."

"While Microsoft continues to improve the solution, integrating the ID with biometric features could be enhanced, especially in terms of standard B2C flows for multi-factor authentication. Improvements in remembering devices and the timing of MFA triggers could also be beneficial."

"I believe there should be an easy provision for the on-premises and for the hybrid environment in Microsoft Entra Verified ID, as there seems to be some difficulty with hybrid implementations, especially in a country like Pakistan where most are transitioning to cloud but not fully migrating, instead opting for hybrid solutions."

"Standard support could be improved, as it's often not as responsive."

More Microsoft Entra Verified ID cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The pricing and setup are standard. With Entra, you choose between P1 and P2 licenses. We recommend having at least one P2 license in a company for better alert management, even though P2 is more expensive."

"I still feel the pricing is on the higher side for larger customers. They don't pay anything for on-prem Active Directory. Although we receive additional features with Microsoft’s SSO, pricing is an area Microsoft can work on."

"If one is cheap and ten is very expensive, I rate the product price as seven."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Government

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Construction Company

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	4

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What needs improvement with Microsoft Entra Verified ID?

It is hard for me to say how Microsoft Entra Verified ID can be improved. I really do not know the extent of how that can benefit everything. I am trying to learn that here at the Ignite conference.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Microsoft Entra Verified ID?

My main use cases for Microsoft Entra Verified ID are verifying the end user saying who they are and being able to back that up with government-issued proof.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Microsoft Entra Verified ID?

My organization has not implemented the Face Check feature yet; we are using YubiKeys. My organization's trust in digital interactions really has not changed since implementing Microsoft Entra Veri...

See all answers

Comparisons

Auth0 Platform vs Frontegg

Compared 17% of the time

WorkOS vs Frontegg

Compared 15% of the time

Microsoft Entra ID vs Frontegg

Compared 14% of the time

Okta Platform vs Frontegg

Compared 11% of the time

Fortinet FortiAuthenticator vs Frontegg

Compared 6% of the time

More Frontegg Competitors

SSOJet vs Microsoft Entra Verified ID

Compared 20% of the time

Okta Platform vs Microsoft Entra Verified ID

Compared 11% of the time

Microsoft Entra ID vs Microsoft Entra Verified ID

Compared 9% of the time

Ping Identity Platform vs Microsoft Entra Verified ID

Compared 7% of the time

Omada Identity vs Microsoft Entra Verified ID

Compared 6% of the time

More Microsoft Entra Verified ID Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Single Sign-On (SSO)

July 2026

Download Frontegg product report

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Entra Verified ID

August 2026

Download Microsoft Entra Verified ID product report

Overview

Frontegg offers seamless SSO onboarding, granular role management, and robust RBAC/ABAC. It enhances security with webhooks and audit logs, supports Python and Flask, and delivers modern security with reCaptcha and MFA, all via an efficient admin console with React components.

Frontegg provides a comprehensive authentication and user management platform, facilitating quick implementation for SaaS companies with multi-tenancy needs. Its integration capabilities with Gmail and LinkedIn, coupled with granular permissions and React components, streamline frontend management. Despite minor limitations in the PHP SDK and requests for enhancements in user management and documentation, Frontegg's speed of bug fixes and transparent roadmap support development efforts, allowing organizations to focus on their core applications.

What are Frontegg's key features?

SSO: Facilitates seamless user onboarding.
Granular Roles and Permissions: Offers fine-tuned access control.
RBAC and ABAC Models: Enhances security policies.
Webhooks and Audit Logs: Improve organizational security.
Multi-tenant Design: Simplifies customer management.
Integration with Python and Flask: Eases development processes.
reCaptcha and MFA Policies: Delivers modern security standards.
React Login Components: Supports efficient user interface management.

Why should users evaluate Frontegg?

Quick Implementation: Saves time in deploying key features.
Transparent Roadmap: Aligns with development efforts.
Multi-tenancy Support: Addresses complex application needs.
Integration Capabilities: Enhances existing workflows and systems.

Many SaaS companies leverage Frontegg to incorporate user management, webhooks, and SSO efficiently. Its granular permissions and multi-tenancy support align well in industries requiring complex structures. Frontegg's integration options and agile features enable organizations to focus on their principal applications while relying on Frontegg for flexible authentication and management needs.

Frontegg

Microsoft Entra Verified ID offers robust identity verification with enhanced MFA features, integrating seamlessly with Active Directory while reducing server maintenance and enhancing security.

Entra Verified ID is a cloud-based identity solution providing robust security and auditing. It enhances user authentication and fraud protection with features like Face Check and number matching for MFA, seamlessly integrating with Active Directory. Users experience improved anti-phishing measures and operational efficiencies without needing extensive personnel. Integrating easily into existing systems like Azure AD and Office 365, it suits organizations looking to streamline identity verification processes.

What are the key features of Microsoft Entra Verified ID?

Robust Security and Auditing: Offers comprehensive monitoring for enhanced protection.
Cloud-Based System: Reduces server maintenance costs and complexity.
Enhanced Identity Verification: Features like Face Check and number matching for MFA.
Active Directory Integration: Seamlessly integrates to streamline workflows.
User Self-Service: Simplifies identity management for users.
Anti-Phishing Improvements: Protects against fraud and impersonation.

What benefits and ROI should users expect from Microsoft Entra Verified ID?

Operational Efficiency: Streamlines authentication with reduced personnel needs.
Fraud Protection: Enhances security against phishing and impersonation.
Cost Reduction: Lowers server maintenance costs through cloud solutions.
Simplified Identity Management: Eases integration with existing systems like Azure AD.
Improved User Experience: Facilitates user self-service and seamless authentication.

Microsoft Entra Verified ID is implemented across industries for user authentication and single sign-on in business applications. Organizations, including MSPs, utilize it for authentication in Office 365 and Azure, manage internal and guest accounts in the non-profit sector, and authenticate users with government-issued proof. It's also instrumental during client onboarding to Azure Cloud, ensuring secure and efficient identity verification.

Microsoft

Buyer's Guide

Frontegg vs. Microsoft Entra Verified ID

August 2026

Free Report: Frontegg vs. Microsoft Entra Verified ID

Find out what your peers are saying about Frontegg vs. Microsoft Entra Verified ID and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Frontegg vs. Microsoft Entra Verified ID report.

See our list of best Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) vendors.

We monitor all Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.