Fortify Software Security Center and GitLab compete in the software security arena. GitLab is generally preferred due to its feature richness despite Fortify's positive feedback on pricing and support.
Features: Fortify is recognized for robust security analysis, competitive setup costs, and effective deployment processes. GitLab is notable for its CI/CD capabilities, seamless integration, and comprehensive feature set supporting varied workflows.
Room for Improvement: Fortify could expand its integration scope and more frequently update its analysis tools. It could also improve customer service proactivity. GitLab needs to enhance customer support response times, navigation intuitiveness, and address high setup costs concerns.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Fortify deploys effectively with straightforward processes but could benefit from more proactive customer service. GitLab offers flexible deployment with efficient processes, though customer service responsiveness needs improvement.
Pricing and ROI: Fortify has competitive setup costs, but its ROI receives mixed feedback. GitLab, despite higher setup costs, is perceived to offer value proportional to its pricing, with users noting a higher ROI aligned with its extensive feature set.
GitLab is a complete DevOps platform that enables teams to collaborate and deliver software faster.
It provides a single application for the entire DevOps lifecycle, from planning and development to testing, deployment, and monitoring.
With GitLab, teams can streamline their workflows, automate processes, and improve productivity.
We monitor all Static Application Security Testing (SAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
