"One of the most valuable features is being able to see file movement, where files are going. Every week we review the files. It can identify software codes, so we code files and we know where they're going and who's doing what. It gives us visibility."
"With OCR and Risk Analysis, we are able to determine if anything sensitive is been shared. OCR helps us to safeguard those things and with risk ranking, we can determine which user is trying to violate policies multiple times even though they have been blocked to him or her."
"Forcepoint has been the leader in the space for many years and they, are very well established, and mature."
"The product is good and reliable. The vendor company is continually improving it and they seem to stay one step ahead."
"The most valuable feature is the endpoint DLP. It's specific to copying to the USB or copying to the internal storage in our office."
"The scalability is fantastic. One of the things that I like about Forcepoint is that I can customize the solution to suit my objectives."
"Regardless of the size of your company, this solution can be scaled accurately."
"The GUI is very intuitive. That is the way I would explain its ease of use. It is straightforward."
"It's one of the easier products on the market as far as set-ups and deployments. Even across their whole product suite, they've made it pretty simple."
"You can close your data protection gaps with Zscaler. You can quickly find all the classified, sensitive data across the cloud."
"As a cloud-based service, it is very easily implemented."
"Everything can be improved and maybe there is a way to improve the user experience through the interface."
"Their discovery or the way they discover the data at risk can also be improved. There are many database servers that are not supported by Forcepoint."
"The user-friendliness of the interface in formulating DLP policies could be improved. An example would be managing policies. It's a little daunting at first, and can be confusing, at times, when it comes to how to set things up and how to add policies. They could improve on that."
"The price could be reduced to be more cost, effective."
"In terms of display, the support and the Mac platform requires a lot of improvement."
"You have to monitor the solution all the time."
"This solution has a tendency to provide false-positive results."
"I would like to see improvement in the reporting. We can only get one week's worth of data; we can't get more than that. Also, the reporting console is very slow, making it very frustrating to use."
"Price-wise, it is a costly product and it should be reduced."
"There aren't really any missing features that I have witnessed."
"In the next release, I would like to see RE2 Regex supported."
More Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention Pricing and Cost Advice →
Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention is ranked 3rd in Data Loss Prevention (DLP) with 13 reviews while Zscaler Cloud DLP is ranked 9th in Data Loss Prevention (DLP) with 3 reviews. Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention is rated 8.2, while Zscaler Cloud DLP is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention writes "Good interface, powerful OCR and data discovery capabilities, customizable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Zscaler Cloud DLP writes "Stable with good pricing and very good for monitoring sensitive data". Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention is most compared with Symantec Data Loss Prevention, Microsoft Data Loss Prevention, Digital Guardian, McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator and McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention, whereas Zscaler Cloud DLP is most compared with Symantec Data Loss Prevention, Endpoint Protector, McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator, Microsoft Data Loss Prevention and Digital Guardian. See our Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs. Zscaler Cloud DLP report.
See our list of best Data Loss Prevention (DLP) vendors.
We monitor all Data Loss Prevention (DLP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
