FlutterFlow vs Jitterbit Vinyl comparison

FlutterFlow and Jitterbit are both solutions in the Low-Code Development Platforms category. FlutterFlow is ranked #17 with an average rating of 8.3, while Jitterbit is ranked #23 with an average rating of 8.0. FlutterFlow holds a 2.3% mindshare in LCDP, compared to Jitterbit’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of FlutterFlow users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Jitterbit users who would recommend it.

FlutterFlow

Read 3 FlutterFlow reviews

575 Views
86 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Jitterbit Vinyl

Read 31 Jitterbit Vinyl reviews

941 Views
23 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

FlutterFlow

Jitterbit Vinyl

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 18, 2024

Jitterbit Vinyl and FlutterFlow are competitors in the software development and integration category. FlutterFlow is perceived to have the upper hand due to its superior features, making it worth the price despite Jitterbit Vinyl's advantages in pricing and support.

Features: Jitterbit Vinyl offers user-friendly data integration, robust API management, and seamless enterprise connectivity. FlutterFlow provides advanced app-building capabilities, a rich component library, and intuitive drag-and-drop functionality.

Room for Improvement: Jitterbit Vinyl needs better documentation, more customization options, and improved user interface aesthetics. FlutterFlow requires performance optimization, more template variety, and enhanced back-end integration capabilities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Jitterbit Vinyl is praised for easy deployment and responsive customer support. FlutterFlow offers a smooth deployment experience but experiences occasional delays in customer service response.

Pricing and ROI: Jitterbit Vinyl is appreciated for competitive pricing and good ROI. FlutterFlow offers reasonable pricing and satisfactory ROI considering its advanced features.

To learn more, read our detailed FlutterFlow vs. Jitterbit Vinyl Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

FlutterFlow vs. Jitterbit Vinyl

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 857,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

FlutterFlow

Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms

17th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Jitterbit Vinyl

Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms

23rd

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Rapid Application Development Software (24th), No-Code Development Platforms (6th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Low-Code Development Platforms category, the mindshare of FlutterFlow is 2.3%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Jitterbit Vinyl is 0.6%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Low-Code Development Platforms

Featured Reviews

Luis Gerardo Meneses Hernandez

Software developer at Apps2Go TECH

Creates versatile applications seamlessly across platforms

I like the simplicity of making panels with Flutter. It is easy to use when you understand the code, know how to use Docs, and understand the components of Flutter. It allows you to create fragments that look good and work on both mobile and web environments. Additionally, it works for both PC and iOS devices.

Read full review

reviewer2208660

Mobile Dog Product Manager at BioPet Laboratories

It has sped up the app development process, enabling us to release a public version of the app much quicker

Some aspects of VINYL are limiting from a B2C standpoint. For example, it would be nice to have more flexibility with what the VINYL parameters allow us to develop within the app. It is difficult to think of an example off the top of my head, but there have been times when we couldn't develop something a particular way because VINYL didn't support it. However, the team Zudy assigned to us has been great about adjusting and finding ways around these hurdles.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It allows you to create fragments that look good and work on both mobile and web environments."

"I like the simplicity of making panels with Flutter."

"FlutterFlow offers a lot, but one feature that really helps me is the debugging features that allow me to test everything on the spot. This is really helpful."

"The most valuable features of FlutterFlow are the integrations and workflows."

"It gives us an accurate idea of where we stand as a business, on many different levels. It also gives our sales department more of an idea of how they are doing for the month, every month. And it gives us more capabilities within our systems, to pull information out."

"The Lite Integration is really the key thing. You're able to attach the Vinyl software to a variety of different systems very easily and pull data together in a way that is really difficult to do using traditional technology... Also, the fact that it's a no-code platform also makes it easier for people to understand and deal with internally, to continue to build applications and modify existing applications."

"Zudy has increased development speed. What would take us months to be able to complete, we're getting done in a matter of weeks. I have a number of projects that we were working on that I thought that we'd [only] be able to get completed by next year. We've already completed them and we're still in the year 2020."

"The ease of moving around the platform cannot be understated."

"VINYL works across different data sources. It is very useful to be able to map the data across different data sources and different environments. It is also very easy to develop small applications within a short span of time."

"It's customizable to whatever you see might use it for... It's very user-friendly, and the front-end is exactly what we need to see, very simple. It can get more complicated too, if those are the needs."

"Maintenance is very minimal. With our live production applications, they just don't break, which is great. We love that. There's zero-to-little maintenance required."

"VINYL has given us the ability to really improve the speed with which we deploy releases and respond to the good ideas that our people have."

More Jitterbit Vinyl pros

Cons

"Scaling depends on project requirements."

"The UI components could be more standardized. Sometimes, for certain properties, I have to search more than I do with other platforms. With other platforms, once you know one, you know all. But with FlutterFlow, sometimes you have to look around for what you need."

"I am trying to see how it can be integrated with the backend. That said, I haven't gotten there yet."

"There is room for improvement in advanced functionality so it could cater to more complex app development needs."

"There are a lot of almost "hidden" features captured in these Edge Case settings... If you want a scroll bar at the bottom, instead of having it select rows to show, you have to select Disable Panel Location Service, which doesn't sound at all like what it's supposed to do. Naming conventions could be changed a little bit."

"It might help if they put out different types that would provide different ways to view the data. I'd like to see more on that."

"Perhaps the UI could be improved."

"When you are trying to delete certain columns or delete or drop tables, it will throw an error and it will force you to hunt down every location where those things are being referenced. You have to delete them from the very end and work your way backward... It would be easier, when you're deleting that table, if it would concatenate all the way down."

"I sometimes find formatting tricky to get the front end of an app the way I want it."

"During the initial rollout, the text editor wasn't 100% what we were looking for, but we were able to get the job done. After some discussions and finding ways to use different plugins during the short term, Zudy actually came back a few months later and said that they have integrated a standard product into their text editing that checked all the boxes for us."

"The ease of use for individuals to self-serve could be improved. The solution is no-code, but there is still a decent learning curve associated with the product and some app design principles necessary before people can self-serve."

"I don't have a lot of negative things to say about the platform. One of the things we joke about, because it is very minor in detail, is that as with any platform, when you're hosting a live webinar on a GoToMeeting or a Zoom, everything slows down a little bit. So when you're doing a live demo internally with folks, the platform can go a step slower. That's not necessarily just a Zudy thing."

More Jitterbit Vinyl cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I would rate the licensing costs a three out of ten, with ten being expensive and one being cheap. Currently, I use the free version."

"We also pay for the managed services help that we get from them. But, to me, it is a very effective cost model. Licenses are relatively inexpensive, then you pay by the drink in terms of the managed services that you are going to need, which has been great. We figure out where we want to apply those services and try to be pretty diligent about managing the costs there."

"The licensing costs we pay are, I believe about 5,000 a month. That's every quarter. We've been doing it for about a year now, and the prices have remained steady. We feel it's a reasonable cost for what we're getting because it's unlimited users. So as big as you want to make it, you're not constrained by a per-user licensing cost or any of those other restrictions, so that's going to stifle your development."

"Pricing and licensing are on par with or better than what we were looking at and what we had. That was also one of the key factors for making the decision. We cut our costs in half by going over to the Zudy platform."

"The pricing and licensing of Zudy are fair."

"Our licensing costs are approximately 100K annually, and from my perspective, that really is quite the value with the flexibility and what we're getting from the product."

"We have seen a 30 percent decrease in time for some of our workflows."

"It is affordable."

"Pricing was actually one of the things that drew us to the product initially... the way it was licensed at the time, I got a flat monthly fee from Zudy for the Vinyl product, which allowed me to basically have unlimited use of it... We have an annual license, we pay monthly. It's very competitive and very worthwhile given the return we get out of it."

More Jitterbit Vinyl pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Low-Code Development Platforms solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

857,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

11%

Media Company

11%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Computer Software Company

10%

Computer Software Company

17%

Consumer Goods Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about FlutterFlow?

FlutterFlow offers a lot, but one feature that really helps me is the debugging features that allow me to test everything on the spot. This is really helpful.

See all answers

What needs improvement with FlutterFlow?

Right now, I think it's a good tool. It's easy to understand when you know Dart. It helps create applications, and I am trying to see how it can be integrated with the backend. That said, I haven't...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for FlutterFlow?

Currently, I am using Flutter to make a dashboard.

See all answers

What do you like most about Zudy VINYL?

The ZPM system enables us to organize projects and monitor their progress. The ease of logging into the VINYL app to test new features makes testing smoother, and we feel more involved in the crea...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Zudy VINYL?

Payment processing has changed since Jitterbit acquired Zudy. We previously cut checks, but we are no longer allowed. This has made paying for the service more complicated, but the issue is being r...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Zudy VINYL?

See all answers

Comparisons

Lovable vs FlutterFlow

Compared 35% of the time

Microsoft Power Apps vs FlutterFlow

Compared 34% of the time

Mendix vs FlutterFlow

Compared 10% of the time

Oracle Application Express (APEX) vs FlutterFlow

Compared 9% of the time

OutSystems vs FlutterFlow

Compared 7% of the time

More FlutterFlow Competitors

Microsoft Power Apps vs Jitterbit Vinyl

Compared 65% of the time

Mendix vs Jitterbit Vinyl

Compared 35% of the time

More Jitterbit Vinyl Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Low-Code Development Platforms

June 2025

Download FlutterFlow product report

Buyer's Guide

Jitterbit Vinyl

June 2025

Download Jitterbit Vinyl product report

Overview

FlutterFlow is used for developing mobile applications quickly and efficiently, ideal for building prototypes, MVPs, and full-fledged applications without extensive coding experience. It supports cross-platform development, enabling simultaneous deployment on Android and iOS.

FlutterFlow's visual development tools and integrations streamline the app creation process, making it perfect for startups and developers looking to launch their apps faster. Its comprehensive drag-and-drop interface, pre-built components, and templates facilitate rapid app development. Integration with Firebase simplifies backend connections, and the robust documentation and tutorials support quick learning. Real-time collaboration features improve teamwork, enhancing the development experience.

What are the most important features of FlutterFlow?

Comprehensive drag-and-drop interface accelerates app development.
Pre-built components and templates streamline design processes.
Integration with Firebase simplifies backend connections.
Robust documentation and tutorials support rapid learning.
Real-time collaboration enhances teamwork.

What benefits or ROI should be looked for when evaluating FlutterFlow?

Quick app development with a visual interface.
Reduction in development costs and timelines.
Ease of integrating backend services.
Enhanced team collaboration during development.

FlutterFlow can be particularly useful in industries that require fast app iterations, such as startups and tech companies. Its support for cross-platform development is beneficial for companies targeting both Android and iOS markets. The ease of use and comprehensive support make it an appealing choice for businesses looking to launch functional apps quickly, without extensive coding knowledge. Though improvements in stability, performance, customization, debugging, and customer support are needed, FlutterFlow's overall features present a strong front for efficient app development.

FlutterFlow

Jitterbit's Vinyl (previously Zudy) is an enterprise low-code application platform that makes it easy to build scalable, end-to-end apps that are easily integrated with new and existing systems. Designed for large enterprises to solve complex business problems at scale, Vinyl empowers anyone to create fully integrated, bi-directional applications in weeks. Powerful enough for Full Stack Developers, intuitive enough for Citizen Developers/Business Technologists, Vinyl empowers you to create secure apps that run on any device, automate any business process, and integrate any data source without coding.

Create fully integrated, bi-directional applications
Utilize guided development and visual rule builders
Predictable pricing with no per-user fees
Integrate the entire ecosystem without impacting source data
Protect apps with enterprise-grade security
Integrate real-time data
Deploy apps via enterprise cloud, on-premise or hosted
Improve customer digital experience

For more information: www.jitterbit.com/product/viny

Jitterbit

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Aetna, Alnylam Pharmaceuticals Inc., Alvarez and Marsal, Audacy, Barstool Sports, Brooks Brothers, Cal-Maine Foods Inc., CNH Financial, Collette Travel, Darn Tough Vermont, DXL, Fresh Direct, iHeartMedia, Intra-Cellular Therapies, JBS Foods, J.Crew, Kraft Sports Group, MEMIC, New England Patriots, PGT Trucking Inc., United Healthcare, Worley

Buyer's Guide

FlutterFlow vs. Jitterbit Vinyl

June 2025

Free Report: FlutterFlow vs. Jitterbit Vinyl

Find out what your peers are saying about FlutterFlow vs. Jitterbit Vinyl and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

857,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our FlutterFlow vs. Jitterbit Vinyl report.

See our list of best Low-Code Development Platforms vendors.

We monitor all Low-Code Development Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.