FlutterFlow vs Jitterbit Vinyl comparison

FlutterFlow and Jitterbit are both solutions in the Low-Code Development Platforms category. FlutterFlow is ranked #15 with an average rating of 8.3, while Jitterbit is ranked #24. FlutterFlow holds a 1.5% mindshare in LCDP, compared to Jitterbit’s 1.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of FlutterFlow users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Jitterbit users who would recommend it.

FlutterFlow

Read 3 FlutterFlow reviews

1,154 Views
785 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Jitterbit Vinyl

Read 31 Jitterbit Vinyl reviews

1,360 Views
925 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

FlutterFlow

Jitterbit Vinyl

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 18, 2024

Jitterbit Vinyl and FlutterFlow are competitors in the software development and integration category. FlutterFlow is perceived to have the upper hand due to its superior features, making it worth the price despite Jitterbit Vinyl's advantages in pricing and support.

Features: Jitterbit Vinyl offers user-friendly data integration, robust API management, and seamless enterprise connectivity. FlutterFlow provides advanced app-building capabilities, a rich component library, and intuitive drag-and-drop functionality.

Room for Improvement: Jitterbit Vinyl needs better documentation, more customization options, and improved user interface aesthetics. FlutterFlow requires performance optimization, more template variety, and enhanced back-end integration capabilities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Jitterbit Vinyl is praised for easy deployment and responsive customer support. FlutterFlow offers a smooth deployment experience but experiences occasional delays in customer service response.

Pricing and ROI: Jitterbit Vinyl is appreciated for competitive pricing and good ROI. FlutterFlow offers reasonable pricing and satisfactory ROI considering its advanced features.

To learn more, read our detailed FlutterFlow vs. Jitterbit Vinyl Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

FlutterFlow vs. Jitterbit Vinyl

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 879,422 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

FlutterFlow

Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms

15th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Jitterbit Vinyl

Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms

24th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Rapid Application Development Software (27th), No-Code Development Platforms (14th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Low-Code Development Platforms category, the mindshare of FlutterFlow is 1.5%, down from 1.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Jitterbit Vinyl is 1.3%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Low-Code Development Platforms Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
FlutterFlow	1.5%
Jitterbit Vinyl	1.3%
Other	97.2%

Low-Code Development Platforms

Featured Reviews

Bibhu Sahu

Senior VP Technology at HDFC Bank

Simplifies integrations, accelerates development timelines, and offers a good MVP

We integrate FlutterFlow into our app development process by first developing the code using the enterprise ID. Once the code is ready, we preview it and then download it. We have built a CI process where the code, once pushed to the gate, is processed by CI actions to generate the appropriate output, whether it is an IPA or APK file. While FlutterFlow currently focuses on website development, we write the code in a way that allows us to adapt it for mobile apps as well. We maintain a unified codebase for all three platforms, ensuring consistency and efficiency in our development workflow. FlutterFlow accelerated my development timeline on a project where I needed a simple website with basic navigation and form submissions. While it lacks advanced design pattern options and some features are still maturing, it simplifies integration and speeds up development. FlutterFlow's UI design capabilities have significantly impacted my app development by allowing me to communicate marketing concepts more effectively through visual flow. Every feature in FlutterFlow, from screen design to integrations, has been valuable for my development efforts. However, having better support for multiple design patterns and ensuring compatibility with custom changes would greatly improve the development experience. Overall, I would rate FlutterFlow as an eight out of ten.

Read full review

reviewer2208660

Mobile Dog Product Manager at BioPet Laboratories

It has sped up the app development process, enabling us to release a public version of the app much quicker

Some aspects of VINYL are limiting from a B2C standpoint. For example, it would be nice to have more flexibility with what the VINYL parameters allow us to develop within the app. It is difficult to think of an example off the top of my head, but there have been times when we couldn't develop something a particular way because VINYL didn't support it. However, the team Zudy assigned to us has been great about adjusting and finding ways around these hurdles.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I like the simplicity of making panels with Flutter."

"It allows you to create fragments that look good and work on both mobile and web environments."

"FlutterFlow offers a lot, but one feature that really helps me is the debugging features that allow me to test everything on the spot. This is really helpful."

"The most valuable features of FlutterFlow are the integrations and workflows."

"Zudy has increased development speed. What would take us months to be able to complete, we're getting done in a matter of weeks. I have a number of projects that we were working on that I thought that we'd [only] be able to get completed by next year. We've already completed them and we're still in the year 2020."

"This is an extremely scalable solution because it enables us to interface with all types of disparate information."

"The integration is a huge accelerator into enabling new business processes. As a small company, we have a few different systems that otherwise couldn't talk to each other. We recognize, from an IT perspective, the value that data and change in status of certain data in one area could influence the ability to take action in another. With these integration points, we are able to essentially create that communication from one system to another, letting system B know that something has been completed or is ready in system A. That allows our users to know that they are ready to complete a task. Without that, we would be relying on a lot of manual communication. We would be relying on individuals sending emails, saying, "Hey, by the way, this is ready in system A." Now, we have the system recognizing it and shooting that email off automatically, with all the instructions necessary."

"It's extremely easy to use in getting into the IDE and then back down to your applications, and getting from your applications to your pages, and navigating through all your tables. That's very simple and pretty intuitive."

"It is very scalable from its licensing to design. We have not had any performance issues when scaling."

"We have been able to leverage the platform to rapidly build custom solutions, and tailor-make them to our needs."

"We find it is easy to learn and use, and the user interface is easy to pick up. We have trained some of our own people to be able to do apps with VINYL. Therefore, we can turn things around quickly."

"The feature that I find most valuable with Zudy VINYL is how flexible it is. There are so many ways that you can connect data to it and there are so many features that are out-of-the-box that make the product very flexible and easy and easy to work with. It's got a great user interface which makes it a nice looking product that our employees are able to engage with quickly."

More Jitterbit Vinyl pros

Cons

"I am trying to see how it can be integrated with the backend. That said, I haven't gotten there yet."

"There is room for improvement in advanced functionality so it could cater to more complex app development needs."

"Scaling depends on project requirements."

"The UI components could be more standardized. Sometimes, for certain properties, I have to search more than I do with other platforms. With other platforms, once you know one, you know all. But with FlutterFlow, sometimes you have to look around for what you need."

"Some new features I think I'd like to see is visibility into running jobs so that we can see what the status is, or it's not stuck in its process and doing its thing, or how much longer it's going to take. I'd also like to see a native calendaring function so we can put calendars into our apps with maybe even recurring tasks or appointments and that sort of thing. We'd also like to see multi-select lists. The users being able to pick multiple things to filter on and get a list and be able to export that list."

"The ease of use for individuals to self-serve could be improved. The solution is no-code, but there is still a decent learning curve associated with the product and some app design principles necessary before people can self-serve."

"I would like them to build out more tools for communication, particularly the ability to do a multinode panel via email."

"The interface has had a lot of changes to it. It is better than it was before. However, with the subqueries in particular, this has been the most difficult part of the interface."

"The features that I'd like to see in VINYL next would be the ability to have more control over, or have a rule-based control over column headings and column labels."

"I sometimes find formatting tricky to get the front end of an app the way I want it."

"When you are trying to delete certain columns or delete or drop tables, it will throw an error and it will force you to hunt down every location where those things are being referenced. You have to delete them from the very end and work your way backward... It would be easier, when you're deleting that table, if it would concatenate all the way down."

"The calendar has room for improvement, but that's what they're going to be working on next, to make a Gantt chart."

More Jitterbit Vinyl cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I would rate the licensing costs a three out of ten, with ten being expensive and one being cheap. Currently, I use the free version."

"The value for us for VINYL is that we've got one fee that we're paying per year and we can deploy and build as many apps and bring in as many users as we need."

"The pricing and the licensing of Zudy are reasonable. Pricing is always a tricky thing. It could be a little simpler, but they're doing well. I'm happy with it."

"It is affordable."

"Our licensing costs are approximately 100K annually, and from my perspective, that really is quite the value with the flexibility and what we're getting from the product."

"The key thing here is that the pricing is just one price. We can do as much or as little with the product as we want to which is very attractive. I don't have to worry about if I build a new app, I have to pay more. Or, if I put 20 more people logging into the app, I don't have to pay any extra for that either."

"We also pay for the managed services help that we get from them. But, to me, it is a very effective cost model. Licenses are relatively inexpensive, then you pay by the drink in terms of the managed services that you are going to need, which has been great. We figure out where we want to apply those services and try to be pretty diligent about managing the costs there."

"You always look for the underlying cost, there's always underlying costs but the value is fine. I don't think it should cost any more. You pay for the software but you're also paying for their employees, when they work onsite for you."

"Pricing and licensing are expensive."

More Jitterbit Vinyl pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Low-Code Development Platforms solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,422 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Media Company

12%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Performing Arts

Consumer Goods Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	14

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about FlutterFlow?

FlutterFlow offers a lot, but one feature that really helps me is the debugging features that allow me to test everything on the spot. This is really helpful.

See all answers

What needs improvement with FlutterFlow?

Right now, I think it's a good tool. It's easy to understand when you know Dart. It helps create applications, and I am trying to see how it can be integrated with the backend. That said, I haven't...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for FlutterFlow?

Currently, I am using Flutter to make a dashboard.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Lovable vs FlutterFlow

Compared 69% of the time

Microsoft Power Apps vs FlutterFlow

Compared 14% of the time

Mendix vs FlutterFlow

Compared 7% of the time

OutSystems vs FlutterFlow

Compared 4% of the time

Oracle Application Express (APEX) vs FlutterFlow

Compared 3% of the time

More FlutterFlow Competitors

Microsoft Power Apps vs Jitterbit Vinyl

Compared 34% of the time

QuickBase vs Jitterbit Vinyl

Compared 30% of the time

Temenos Quantum vs Jitterbit Vinyl

Compared 18% of the time

Studio Creatio vs Jitterbit Vinyl

Compared 18% of the time

More Jitterbit Vinyl Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Low-Code Development Platforms

November 2025

Download FlutterFlow product report

Buyer's Guide

Jitterbit Vinyl

December 2025

Download Jitterbit Vinyl product report

Overview

FlutterFlow is used for developing mobile applications quickly and efficiently, ideal for building prototypes, MVPs, and full-fledged applications without extensive coding experience. It supports cross-platform development, enabling simultaneous deployment on Android and iOS.

FlutterFlow's visual development tools and integrations streamline the app creation process, making it perfect for startups and developers looking to launch their apps faster. Its comprehensive drag-and-drop interface, pre-built components, and templates facilitate rapid app development. Integration with Firebase simplifies backend connections, and the robust documentation and tutorials support quick learning. Real-time collaboration features improve teamwork, enhancing the development experience.

What are the most important features of FlutterFlow?

Comprehensive drag-and-drop interface accelerates app development.
Pre-built components and templates streamline design processes.
Integration with Firebase simplifies backend connections.
Robust documentation and tutorials support rapid learning.
Real-time collaboration enhances teamwork.

What benefits or ROI should be looked for when evaluating FlutterFlow?

Quick app development with a visual interface.
Reduction in development costs and timelines.
Ease of integrating backend services.
Enhanced team collaboration during development.

FlutterFlow can be particularly useful in industries that require fast app iterations, such as startups and tech companies. Its support for cross-platform development is beneficial for companies targeting both Android and iOS markets. The ease of use and comprehensive support make it an appealing choice for businesses looking to launch functional apps quickly, without extensive coding knowledge. Though improvements in stability, performance, customization, debugging, and customer support are needed, FlutterFlow's overall features present a strong front for efficient app development.

FlutterFlow

Jitterbit's Vinyl (previously Zudy) is an enterprise low-code application platform that makes it easy to build scalable, end-to-end apps that are easily integrated with new and existing systems. Designed for large enterprises to solve complex business problems at scale, Vinyl empowers anyone to create fully integrated, bi-directional applications in weeks. Powerful enough for Full Stack Developers, intuitive enough for Citizen Developers/Business Technologists, Vinyl empowers you to create secure apps that run on any device, automate any business process, and integrate any data source without coding.

Create fully integrated, bi-directional applications
Utilize guided development and visual rule builders
Predictable pricing with no per-user fees
Integrate the entire ecosystem without impacting source data
Protect apps with enterprise-grade security
Integrate real-time data
Deploy apps via enterprise cloud, on-premise or hosted
Improve customer digital experience

For more information: www.jitterbit.com/product/viny

Jitterbit

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Aetna, Alnylam Pharmaceuticals Inc., Alvarez and Marsal, Audacy, Barstool Sports, Brooks Brothers, Cal-Maine Foods Inc., CNH Financial, Collette Travel, Darn Tough Vermont, DXL, Fresh Direct, iHeartMedia, Intra-Cellular Therapies, JBS Foods, J.Crew, Kraft Sports Group, MEMIC, New England Patriots, PGT Trucking Inc., United Healthcare, Worley

Buyer's Guide

FlutterFlow vs. Jitterbit Vinyl

December 2025

Free Report: FlutterFlow vs. Jitterbit Vinyl

Find out what your peers are saying about FlutterFlow vs. Jitterbit Vinyl and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

879,422 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our FlutterFlow vs. Jitterbit Vinyl report.

See our list of best Low-Code Development Platforms vendors.

We monitor all Low-Code Development Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.