FlutterFlow vs Jitterbit Vinyl comparison

FlutterFlow and Jitterbit are both solutions in the Low-Code Development Platforms category. FlutterFlow is ranked #17 with an average rating of 8.3, while Jitterbit is ranked #25. FlutterFlow holds a 2.1% mindshare in LCDP, compared to Jitterbit’s 0.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of FlutterFlow users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Jitterbit users who would recommend it.

FlutterFlow

Read 3 FlutterFlow reviews

886 Views
620 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Jitterbit Vinyl

Read 31 Jitterbit Vinyl reviews

1,087 Views
880 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

FlutterFlow

Jitterbit Vinyl

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 18, 2024

Jitterbit Vinyl and FlutterFlow are competitors in the software development and integration category. FlutterFlow is perceived to have the upper hand due to its superior features, making it worth the price despite Jitterbit Vinyl's advantages in pricing and support.

Features: Jitterbit Vinyl offers user-friendly data integration, robust API management, and seamless enterprise connectivity. FlutterFlow provides advanced app-building capabilities, a rich component library, and intuitive drag-and-drop functionality.

Room for Improvement: Jitterbit Vinyl needs better documentation, more customization options, and improved user interface aesthetics. FlutterFlow requires performance optimization, more template variety, and enhanced back-end integration capabilities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Jitterbit Vinyl is praised for easy deployment and responsive customer support. FlutterFlow offers a smooth deployment experience but experiences occasional delays in customer service response.

Pricing and ROI: Jitterbit Vinyl is appreciated for competitive pricing and good ROI. FlutterFlow offers reasonable pricing and satisfactory ROI considering its advanced features.

To learn more, read our detailed FlutterFlow vs. Jitterbit Vinyl Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

FlutterFlow vs. Jitterbit Vinyl

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

FlutterFlow

Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms

17th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Jitterbit Vinyl

Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms

25th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Rapid Application Development Software (28th), No-Code Development Platforms (16th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Low-Code Development Platforms category, the mindshare of FlutterFlow is 2.1%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Jitterbit Vinyl is 0.7%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Low-Code Development Platforms

Featured Reviews

Luis Gerardo Meneses Hernandez

Software developer at Apps2Go TECH

Creates versatile applications seamlessly across platforms

I like the simplicity of making panels with Flutter. It is easy to use when you understand the code, know how to use Docs, and understand the components of Flutter. It allows you to create fragments that look good and work on both mobile and web environments. Additionally, it works for both PC and iOS devices.

Read full review

Larry Egan

VP Strategic Technologies at Alnylam Pharmaceuticals Inc

Can connect to any data source so we don't need to replicate data into a data warehouse to do reporting analytics

Having been a customer of theirs for a long time, I think the UI needed improvements early on. But, they have done a remarkable job catching up in that regard. They have always been great at connecting to a variety of data sources. They are a leader in that space. They do a great job, from a business analyst perspective, helping you shape what the ultimate system is going to look like. There really aren't a lot of areas that need improvement. The areas that they have, they are keenly aware of and have made great strides in recent releases.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable features of FlutterFlow are the integrations and workflows."

"It allows you to create fragments that look good and work on both mobile and web environments."

"FlutterFlow offers a lot, but one feature that really helps me is the debugging features that allow me to test everything on the spot. This is really helpful."

"I like the simplicity of making panels with Flutter."

"When it comes to the speed of development of the applications with Zudy VINYL it has been the fastest and most powerful that I've been able to do. We've tried building things from scratch. It takes an enormous amount of time. We've cut that time by probably a fifth, with more power. I've been very happy with the speed of doing things in Zudy VINYL."

"The way that they've done some of the reports, they've created really great data dumps. If I want to see a snapshot of something in time, for a given timeframe, I can download it. From that download, I can create further analysis or do my own thing with it, which is really helpful. I'm even able to go back several years and get data."

"The Lite Integration is really the key thing. You're able to attach the Vinyl software to a variety of different systems very easily and pull data together in a way that is really difficult to do using traditional technology... Also, the fact that it's a no-code platform also makes it easier for people to understand and deal with internally, to continue to build applications and modify existing applications."

"It's made things seamless and it's more efficient, and there's an audit trail where it wasn't there before."

"Their integrations are terrific. We've had zero issues, a 100 percent success rate with integrations. In terms of Zudy's data source connectors and API integrations, we've been really pleased. We use some software that is very common in the media business, and then we also have some custom things that we built for a variety of different use cases within our company, and we've had zero integration issues, in terms of getting data into Zudy and getting data out of it. It's been great."

"The ZPM system enables us to organize projects and monitor their progress. The ease of logging into the VINYL app to test new features makes testing smoother, and we feel more involved in the creation of the app and its functions at every step of the way."

"The integration is a huge accelerator into enabling new business processes. As a small company, we have a few different systems that otherwise couldn't talk to each other. We recognize, from an IT perspective, the value that data and change in status of certain data in one area could influence the ability to take action in another. With these integration points, we are able to essentially create that communication from one system to another, letting system B know that something has been completed or is ready in system A. That allows our users to know that they are ready to complete a task. Without that, we would be relying on a lot of manual communication. We would be relying on individuals sending emails, saying, "Hey, by the way, this is ready in system A." Now, we have the system recognizing it and shooting that email off automatically, with all the instructions necessary."

"The fact that it's no-code is one of the most important features because it allows us to deliver very quickly. We can get the value to the business delivered much more quickly than with other solutions."

More Jitterbit Vinyl pros

Cons

"I am trying to see how it can be integrated with the backend. That said, I haven't gotten there yet."

"The UI components could be more standardized. Sometimes, for certain properties, I have to search more than I do with other platforms. With other platforms, once you know one, you know all. But with FlutterFlow, sometimes you have to look around for what you need."

"Scaling depends on project requirements."

"There is room for improvement in advanced functionality so it could cater to more complex app development needs."

"One of the troubles we have sometimes is the amount of data we're processing within the applications. That can really add a lot of "laggy-ness." That's an ongoing struggle we're going to have while we use it. It doesn't happen for all our applications, only some of them that are heavy on the reporting."

"If it could be prettier, it might be a bit more attractive on the business side. The most meaningful improvement might be done in some of the aesthetics of the reporting and dashboarding."

"Having been a customer of theirs for a long time, I think the UI needed improvements early on. But, they have done a remarkable job catching up in that regard."

"Version 2.3 has a good UI but we want a more customizable UI."

"It might help if they put out different types that would provide different ways to view the data. I'd like to see more on that."

"When designing the user interface, there are many built-in features; however, Vinyl could use some more extensive design elements that are used in marketing, such as Canva or Web design tools. These would allow for more extensive design elements to be added more easily."

"The ease of use for individuals to self-serve could be improved. The solution is no-code, but there is still a decent learning curve associated with the product and some app design principles necessary before people can self-serve."

"Right now it's very dependent on having an imagination to understand."

More Jitterbit Vinyl cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I would rate the licensing costs a three out of ten, with ten being expensive and one being cheap. Currently, I use the free version."

"The licensing costs we pay are, I believe about 5,000 a month. That's every quarter. We've been doing it for about a year now, and the prices have remained steady. We feel it's a reasonable cost for what we're getting because it's unlimited users. So as big as you want to make it, you're not constrained by a per-user licensing cost or any of those other restrictions, so that's going to stifle your development."

"Pricing is less than the cost of a consultant and the value you receive is much greater."

"We haven't really had any issues with pricing. Like with any good partnership, you're paying a fair and good price for a good product. That's where great partnerships are developed, when one side doesn't feel like they won in a deal; when both sides feel like they won. That's where we are with Zudy VINYL."

"Pricing was actually one of the things that drew us to the product initially... the way it was licensed at the time, I got a flat monthly fee from Zudy for the Vinyl product, which allowed me to basically have unlimited use of it... We have an annual license, we pay monthly. It's very competitive and very worthwhile given the return we get out of it."

"Pricing and licensing are expensive."

"Pricing and licensing are on par with or better than what we were looking at and what we had. That was also one of the key factors for making the decision. We cut our costs in half by going over to the Zudy platform."

"The key thing here is that the pricing is just one price. We can do as much or as little with the product as we want to which is very attractive. I don't have to worry about if I build a new app, I have to pay more. Or, if I put 20 more people logging into the app, I don't have to pay any extra for that either."

"We also pay for the managed services help that we get from them. But, to me, it is a very effective cost model. Licenses are relatively inexpensive, then you pay by the drink in terms of the managed services that you are going to need, which has been great. We figure out where we want to apply those services and try to be pretty diligent about managing the costs there."

More Jitterbit Vinyl pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Low-Code Development Platforms solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Media Company

13%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

15%

Consumer Goods Company

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about FlutterFlow?

FlutterFlow offers a lot, but one feature that really helps me is the debugging features that allow me to test everything on the spot. This is really helpful.

See all answers

What needs improvement with FlutterFlow?

Right now, I think it's a good tool. It's easy to understand when you know Dart. It helps create applications, and I am trying to see how it can be integrated with the backend. That said, I haven't...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for FlutterFlow?

Currently, I am using Flutter to make a dashboard.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Lovable vs FlutterFlow

Compared 53% of the time

Microsoft Power Apps vs FlutterFlow

Compared 25% of the time

Mendix vs FlutterFlow

Compared 8% of the time

Oracle Application Express (APEX) vs FlutterFlow

Compared 6% of the time

OutSystems vs FlutterFlow

Compared 5% of the time

More FlutterFlow Competitors

Microsoft Power Apps vs Jitterbit Vinyl

Compared 100% of the time

More Jitterbit Vinyl Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Low-Code Development Platforms

August 2025

Download FlutterFlow product report

Buyer's Guide

Jitterbit Vinyl

August 2025

Download Jitterbit Vinyl product report

Overview

FlutterFlow is used for developing mobile applications quickly and efficiently, ideal for building prototypes, MVPs, and full-fledged applications without extensive coding experience. It supports cross-platform development, enabling simultaneous deployment on Android and iOS.

FlutterFlow's visual development tools and integrations streamline the app creation process, making it perfect for startups and developers looking to launch their apps faster. Its comprehensive drag-and-drop interface, pre-built components, and templates facilitate rapid app development. Integration with Firebase simplifies backend connections, and the robust documentation and tutorials support quick learning. Real-time collaboration features improve teamwork, enhancing the development experience.

What are the most important features of FlutterFlow?

Comprehensive drag-and-drop interface accelerates app development.
Pre-built components and templates streamline design processes.
Integration with Firebase simplifies backend connections.
Robust documentation and tutorials support rapid learning.
Real-time collaboration enhances teamwork.

What benefits or ROI should be looked for when evaluating FlutterFlow?

Quick app development with a visual interface.
Reduction in development costs and timelines.
Ease of integrating backend services.
Enhanced team collaboration during development.

FlutterFlow can be particularly useful in industries that require fast app iterations, such as startups and tech companies. Its support for cross-platform development is beneficial for companies targeting both Android and iOS markets. The ease of use and comprehensive support make it an appealing choice for businesses looking to launch functional apps quickly, without extensive coding knowledge. Though improvements in stability, performance, customization, debugging, and customer support are needed, FlutterFlow's overall features present a strong front for efficient app development.

FlutterFlow

Jitterbit's Vinyl (previously Zudy) is an enterprise low-code application platform that makes it easy to build scalable, end-to-end apps that are easily integrated with new and existing systems. Designed for large enterprises to solve complex business problems at scale, Vinyl empowers anyone to create fully integrated, bi-directional applications in weeks. Powerful enough for Full Stack Developers, intuitive enough for Citizen Developers/Business Technologists, Vinyl empowers you to create secure apps that run on any device, automate any business process, and integrate any data source without coding.

Create fully integrated, bi-directional applications
Utilize guided development and visual rule builders
Predictable pricing with no per-user fees
Integrate the entire ecosystem without impacting source data
Protect apps with enterprise-grade security
Integrate real-time data
Deploy apps via enterprise cloud, on-premise or hosted
Improve customer digital experience

For more information: www.jitterbit.com/product/viny

Jitterbit

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Aetna, Alnylam Pharmaceuticals Inc., Alvarez and Marsal, Audacy, Barstool Sports, Brooks Brothers, Cal-Maine Foods Inc., CNH Financial, Collette Travel, Darn Tough Vermont, DXL, Fresh Direct, iHeartMedia, Intra-Cellular Therapies, JBS Foods, J.Crew, Kraft Sports Group, MEMIC, New England Patriots, PGT Trucking Inc., United Healthcare, Worley

Buyer's Guide

FlutterFlow vs. Jitterbit Vinyl

July 2025

Free Report: FlutterFlow vs. Jitterbit Vinyl

Find out what your peers are saying about FlutterFlow vs. Jitterbit Vinyl and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our FlutterFlow vs. Jitterbit Vinyl report.

See our list of best Low-Code Development Platforms vendors.

We monitor all Low-Code Development Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.