Exabeam vs NetWitness NDR comparison

Exabeam and NetWitness are both solutions in the Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP) category. Exabeam is ranked #12 with an average rating of 7.4, while NetWitness is ranked #40. Additionally, 73% of Exabeam users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 87% of NetWitness users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 5, 2024

Exabeam and NetWitness NDR are leading competitors in the security analytics market. Exabeam seems to hold an edge with its advanced integration and threat detection capabilities.

Features: Exabeam is notable for advanced analytics, behavior analytics, and automation capabilities. It provides robust integration abilities and an intuitive search function. NetWitness NDR offers detailed market visibility and operates with various OS, providing a unified dashboard for component management.

Room for Improvement: Exabeam needs enhancement in integration, reporting, and documentation, particularly in data lake features and API interaction. NetWitness NDR could improve threat intelligence, reporting, and scalability, with improvements needed for its modular structure, automation, and detection features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Exabeam supports both on-premises and public cloud deployments, with satisfactory technical support albeit some delayed response times. NetWitness NDR is primarily on-premises, users have positive technical support experiences but report issues with regional support availability and complicated configurations.

Pricing and ROI: Exabeam is cost-effective, consolidates monitoring tools, reducing operational expenses, with flexible and lower pricing than competitors. NetWitness NDR is expensive due to its licensing model and support costs, with noted budget constraints in large-scale environments suggesting a need for improved pricing competitiveness.

To learn more, read our detailed Exabeam vs. NetWitness NDR Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Exabeam vs. NetWitness NDR

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 879,927 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Torq

Featured Reviews

reviewer2767650

Senior Consultant at a university with 10,001+ employees

Have found automation to save analyst time but miss more accurate data classification

From our research and testing with the tool, we determined there need to be modifications and changes to train the LLM on the back end. It was able to capture data but was unable to differentiate between the agent hostname we are using and the hostname that resides on the back end of the Internet. It was unable to do that sort of classification. We concluded this tool would be more suitable for initial ticket management rather than security automation. Regarding data handling, I would give preference to Torq. For case management, Cortex and its dashboards prove more useful. Cortex and Palo's solutions do not have as much capability as Torq provides with the same tools. However, Torq's dashboards could be improved, especially on the case management side.

Read full review

reviewer2650449

Analyst at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees

Machine learning features improve security insight but on-prem limitations prompt consideration of migration

We only use Exabeam for Advanced Analytics. We don't do all those other aspects like ticketing plugins. We just use it for the integration purposes, which are kind of basic. We send alerts via the dashboard for our SOC to identify risky users Exabeam includes machine learning features and…

Read full review

reviewer1799727

Manager, IT Security Operations at a non-profit with 11-50 employees

Reliable and good support but can be expensive

I have no real complaints about the solution. Threat detection could be better. They need to enhance their threat intelligence feeds. We would like to have more IOCs or more trade intelligence to not only rely on the intelligence of the engineer in charge but to have some threat intelligence and some seeds of IOCs and to have the host have some artificial intelligence to reduce the number of false positives. I don't see this solution being very scalable. The solution is pricey.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"As an analyst, it has demonstrated potential to reduce workforce requirements and time needed for related activities."

"It's a very user-friendly product and it's a very comprehensive technology."

"Exabeam includes machine learning features and out-of-the-box rules that we rely on."

"The solution's automation capabilities are great."

"Exabeam has improved our organization by speeding up the investigation process."

"The advanced analytics has a really great overview of user behavior."

"Exabeam is very easy to use, with a straightforward platform and workflow, unlike other tools that require more expertise."

"The most valuable feature of Exabeam Fusion SIEM is the easy-to-use user interface."

"The Exabeam SIEM has a user friendly UI interface."

More Exabeam pros

"The interface of this solution is very flexible and easy to use."

"It helps our security team respond more accurately when there are threats, then we get less false positives or negatives."

"It's a scalable solution. We have around five to eight customers using RSA NetWitness Endpoint, and we hope to increase the number of users."

"We've contacted technical support several times. They've been very good. They have been able to help us resolve our issues."

"They have recently updated the features and the most valuable ones are the instant threat response, ease of use, web interface, integration, and easy access. RSA NetWitness Endpoint is very compatible with other solutions and technologies. However, they do not rely on third-party solutions and have most features built-in."

"Technical support is knowledgeable."

"The log correlation is good."

"Ability to isolate the machine when there are malicious files."

More NetWitness NDR pros

Cons

"It was able to capture data but was unable to differentiate between the agent hostname we are using and the hostname that resides on the back end of the Internet."

"Exabeam's reporting dashboard could have included a filtering option to filter by the most recent detection."

"The initial setup of Exabeam Fusion SIEM is complex because it needs to integrate with the SIEM solution, but after this is complete it is straightforward."

"Updating the new release of Exabeam Fusion SIEM takes time and slows our performance."

"We use the on-prem Exabeam product and face limitations using the web UI and administration of custom models and rules."

"I believe if it were more flexible it would be a better product."

"Exabeam needs to improve its adaptive nature towards rules and its capability to understand the entire client environment faster."

"Exabeam should be a bit faster, especially in loading and vulnerability scanning."

"Exabeam lacks customizable dashboards, which might be a limitation if visualization is a key requirement."

More Exabeam cons

"The solution is modular, for example you can buy the RSA ePack, which you buy as a module is not part of the conduit solution. They could include it and have it as an all-in-one solution."

"The solution lacks a reporting engine."

"The deployment process is complex. I don't know why, but this solution will suddenly stop working. Logs stop coming. Often, one thing or another stops working. Most of the time, one of my team members is working with troubleshooting and working with technical support. Log passing is also one of the biggest challenge."

"Threat detection could be better."

"The initial setup requires a high level of skill."

"The threat intelligence could improve in RSA NetWitness Endpoint."

"I would like to see Security Orchestration and Response Automation (SOAR) integration."

"The integration of the solution needs to be improved. The dashboard needs lots of updates as well. In the next release, we would like to see advanced fraud detection features."

More NetWitness NDR cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"Exabeam Fusion SIEM's pricing is reasonable."

"They have a great model for pricing that can be based either on user count or gigabits per day."

"Exabeam is not a cheap solution."

"The platform is not extremely expensive compared to its direct competitors; I would rate its pricing around six out of ten."

"The solution is expensive."

"There is an annual license required to use Exabeam Fusion SIEM. The price of the solution should be reduced."

"It is an expensive product."

"It is highly scalable. It can be bought based on your requirements."

"The price of the solution depends on the environment. If the environment is large then it will cost more. However, the larger the environment with more endpoints, you will receive an increased discount. If the environment is very small, then you might think it is expensive. It is always better to buy in bulk to receive a discount. The minimum number of assets is usually 500, with discounts on 1000 and 2000."

"The cost depends on the number of endpoints that you want to monitor, but it is not expensive."

"NetWitness Endpoint is less costly than its competitors, but it offers fewer features."

"With RSA, there is flexibility in choosing the service, products, and the range that meets your requirement, as well as they are flexible in terms of pricing."

"I do not have any opinion on the pricing or licensing of the product."

"We are on a three-year contract to use RSA NetWitness Network."

More NetWitness NDR pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,927 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Financial Services Firm

10%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Performing Arts

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	12
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	7

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	5

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Torq?

From our research and testing with the tool, we determined there need to be modifications and changes to train the LL...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Torq?

I used Torq for conducting one of the proof of evaluations for a vendor we are connected with. I am currently working...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Torq?

One of our members uses AWS, and we receive their feed. This involves triaging AWS-related logs. While I do not have ...

See all answers

What are the biggest differences between Securonix UEBA, Exabeam, and IBM QRadar?

It mostly depends on your use-cases and environment. Exabeam and Securonix have a stronger UEBA feature set, friendli...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Exabeam Fusion SIEM?

I do not have much information about the pricing. However, I am aware that Exabeam is cheaper than Palo Alto based on...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Exabeam Fusion SIEM?

We use the on-prem Exabeam product and face limitations using the web UI and administration of custom models and rule...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Tines vs Torq

Compared 49% of the time

Splunk SOAR vs Torq

Compared 14% of the time

Blink Ops vs Torq

Compared 12% of the time

Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR vs Torq

Compared 10% of the time

Swimlane vs Torq

Compared 7% of the time

More Torq Competitors

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Exabeam

Compared 9% of the time

IBM Security QRadar vs Exabeam

Compared 5% of the time

Splunk User Behavior Analytics vs Exabeam

Compared 5% of the time

Microsoft Sentinel vs Exabeam

Compared 4% of the time

Securonix Next-Gen SIEM vs Exabeam

Compared 4% of the time

More Exabeam Competitors

Darktrace vs NetWitness NDR

Compared 9% of the time

ExtraHop Reveal(x) vs NetWitness NDR

Compared 5% of the time

Wazuh vs NetWitness NDR

Compared 5% of the time

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform vs NetWitness NDR

Compared 5% of the time

Corelight vs NetWitness NDR

Compared 5% of the time

More NetWitness NDR Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR)

December 2025

Download Torq product report

Buyer's Guide

Exabeam

January 2026

Download Exabeam product report

Buyer's Guide

NetWitness NDR

December 2025

Download NetWitness NDR product report

Also Known As

No data available

RSA ECAT, NetWitness Network

Overview

Torq provides advanced automation capabilities, enabling organizations to streamline operations and enhance efficiency. It's designed to address complex workflows, reducing manual efforts and improving productivity.

Leveraging automation, Torq assists companies in managing intricate processes with agility and precision, making it indispensable for those seeking to optimize their workflows. Its robust platform integrates smoothly into current infrastructures, minimizing disruptions while enhancing operational capacities.

What are Torq's standout features?

Automation Workflows: Streamlines repetitive tasks to enhance efficiency.
Seamless Integration: Connects with existing systems effortlessly.
Scalability: Adapts to growing business demands efficiently.

What benefits should you look for in reviews?

Productivity Gains: Significant improvement in task completion rates.
Cost Reduction: Decreases manual labor costs through automation.
Enhanced Collaboration: Facilitates better communication among teams.

Torq's capabilities are especially beneficial in industries like finance and healthcare where intricate workflows and compliance requirements are common. Automation in these sectors supports better data management and regulatory adherence, providing a decisive edge in operational efficiency.

Torq

Exabeam Fusion is a cloud-delivered solution that that enables you to:

-Leverage turnkey threat detection, investigation, and response
-Collect, search and enhance data from anywhere
-Detect threats missed by other tools, using market-leading behavior analytics
-Achieve successful SecOps outcomes with prescriptive, threat-centric use case packages
-Enhance productivity and reduce response times with automation
-Meet regulatory compliance and audit requirements with ease

Exabeam

Using a centralized combination of network and endpoint analysis, behavioral analysis, data science techniques and threat intelligence, NetWitness NDR helps analysts detect and resolve known and unknown attacks while automating and orchestrating the incident response lifecycle. With these capabilities on one platform, security teams can collapse disparate tools and data into a powerful, blazingly fast user interface.

NetWitness

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Hulu, ADP, Safeway, BBCN Bank

ADP, Ameritas, Partners Healthcare

Buyer's Guide

Exabeam vs. NetWitness NDR

December 2025

Free Report: Exabeam vs. NetWitness NDR

Find out what your peers are saying about Exabeam vs. NetWitness NDR and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

879,927 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Exabeam vs. NetWitness NDR report.

See our list of best Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP) vendors and best Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) vendors.

We monitor all Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.