Exabeam and GitGuardian compete in the cybersecurity category, focusing on advanced threat detection and management. GitGuardian holds an advantage in detection speed and developer interaction, offering features like immediate notification and "Dev in the loop" for feedback, which enhances response efficiency.
Features: Exabeam offers advanced analytics, a simple timeline for user behavior tracking, and effective AWS integration. Automation features reduce workload and prioritize vulnerabilities. In contrast, GitGuardian excels in rapid secrets detection, excellent integrations, and proactive remediation features such as immediate developer notifications and extensive detection capabilities.
Room for Improvement: Exabeam lacks flexibility, network visibility, and support for user needs, along with real-time capabilities and a more informative UI. Dashboard customization needs improvement. GitGuardian could improve its engineer usability, automatic feedback integration, and mobile app functionality, and it requires enhancements in historical scans and documentation.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Exabeam provides deployment across on-premises and public cloud, with mixed customer service experiences. Some users encounter slow responses and unresolved issues. GitGuardian supports on-premises, public cloud, and private cloud deployments, with generally positive technical support feedback, but both products need better regional support.
Pricing and ROI: Exabeam is considered costly, but users highlight a good ROI due to reduced monitoring costs and anomaly detection features. GitGuardian offers competitive pricing with a good cost-benefit perception, efficiently managing secrets detection, preventing security incidents, and offering scalable licensing options.
Exabeam offers more machine learning models that detect anomalies.
I can certainly say that we have saved significant time and resources in terms of people and automation.
The majority of our incidents for critical detectors and important secret types are remediated automatically or proactively by developers through GitGuardian's notification system, without security team involvement.
Even with TAM support from Exabeam, many issues go unresolved.
It effectively helps us with credentials security and has been performing satisfactorily.
I would rate their technical support a nine out of ten.
I would rate the technical support as excellent.
In terms of scalability, I would rate it around a ten out of ten, as it handles all the repositories and commit activity we have.
I would rate it a ten out of ten for scalability.
Currently, what GitGuardian Platform is doing works effectively.
These problems were not frequent, and the last six to eight months have been stable.
We set up a lot of the repository, so GitGuardian is a required check.
The SaaS platform has experienced two significant moments of downtime or instability in the last six months, requiring notices and retrospectives.
I would rate the stability of the GitGuardian Platform as excellent with no downtimes.
Exabeam needs to improve its documentation and provide more customization for dashboards and case management.
I have explored the SaaS version; it offers many new features.
Another thing that would be good to see is some more metrics on the usage of the GitGuardian pre-push hooks.
The self-healing activity by developers isn't reflected in the analytics, requiring us to collect this data ourselves.
We are looking for better metrics and audit data, wanting more features such as knowing which users are creating the most secrets or committing the most secrets, what repository, what directory, and who is not checking in secrets.
Overall, the secret detection sector is expensive, but we are happy with the value we get.
It's fairly priced, as it performs a lot of analysis and is a valuable tool.
Exabeam's AI capabilities, like the natural language mode, convert natural language into Exabeam queries, enhancing ease of use.
The product offers useful features like the dashboard, timeline, and session views, which enhance our security tools.
One of the best features of the solution is the ability to use pre-push hooks.
A high number of our exposures are remediated by developers before security needs to step in, as the self-healing playbook process engages them automatically.
GitGuardian Platform performs the capability to detect secrets in real time exceptionally, as it activates from the commit and can detect it immediately.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| GitGuardian Platform | 0.9% |
| Exabeam | 0.9% |
| Other | 98.2% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 12 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 7 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 10 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 9 |
| Large Enterprise | 13 |
Exabeam Fusion is a cloud-delivered solution that that enables you to:
-Leverage turnkey threat detection, investigation, and response
-Collect, search and enhance data from anywhere
-Detect threats missed by other tools, using market-leading behavior analytics
-Achieve successful SecOps outcomes with prescriptive, threat-centric use case packages
-Enhance productivity and reduce response times with automation
-Meet regulatory compliance and audit requirements with ease
GitGuardian is a comprehensive platform focused on enhancing Non-Human Identity security by integrating Secrets Security and Secrets Observability to detect and manage secrets across development environments.
As cybersecurity threats increasingly target NHIs like service accounts and applications, GitGuardian offers a robust solution by supporting over 450 types of secrets and deploying honeytokens for additional defense. Trusted by leading organizations and developers, its monitoring and quick alert system enable effective detection and management of sensitive data, strengthening operational security across platforms.
What are the key features of GitGuardian?In the tech industry, GitGuardian is employed to safeguard APIs and sensitive credentials across code repositories like GitHub. Companies benefit from instant alerts and integrations with tools like Slack, effectively managing risks and enhancing security policies. While popular in sectors dependent on development agility, there is room for further improvement in customization and integration to meet specific industry needs.
We monitor all Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
