Exabeam and GitGuardian compete in the cybersecurity solutions category. Exabeam has an edge in threat detection with its advanced analytics, while GitGuardian is superior in secrets management due to its efficient collaboration features between developers and security teams.
Features: Exabeam provides advanced behavioral analytics, timeline-based analysis, and easy integration with AWS, ensuring effective threat detection. GitGuardian focuses on secrets detection, offering swift alerts and promoting collaboration through its "Dev in the loop" feature, which enables rapid detection and remediation of exposed secrets.
Room for Improvement: Exabeam could benefit from enhancing its flexibility and flow analysis, reducing response times, and refining dashboard customization. Users experience frequent false positives and report limited integration features. GitGuardian needs to improve user onboarding and expand its reporting metrics. Additional improvements are necessary in historical scanning and integration updates.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Exabeam offers both on-premises and cloud deployment options but faces criticism for slow customer support, particularly in specific regions. GitGuardian, which offers numerous deployment options, generally has more positive customer service feedback, though it does encounter technical support issues in some regions.
Pricing and ROI: Exabeam's pricing is viewed as reasonable; however, some users find it expensive. It is valued for reducing operational expenses due to its enhanced security features. GitGuardian's pricing is also reasonable, with higher costs for larger teams. ROI is appreciated for its critical role in security and efficient secrets detection. Both platforms offer competitive pricing, catering to distinct organizational needs.
Exabeam offers more machine learning models that detect anomalies.
I can certainly say that we have saved significant time and resources in terms of people and automation.
The majority of our incidents for critical detectors and important secret types are remediated automatically or proactively by developers through GitGuardian's notification system, without security team involvement.
Even with TAM support from Exabeam, many issues go unresolved.
It effectively helps us with credentials security and has been performing satisfactorily.
I would rate their technical support a nine out of ten.
I would rate the technical support as excellent.
In terms of scalability, I would rate it around a ten out of ten, as it handles all the repositories and commit activity we have.
I would rate it a ten out of ten for scalability.
Currently, what GitGuardian Platform is doing works effectively.
These problems were not frequent, and the last six to eight months have been stable.
We set up a lot of the repository, so GitGuardian is a required check.
The SaaS platform has experienced two significant moments of downtime or instability in the last six months, requiring notices and retrospectives.
I would rate the stability of the GitGuardian Platform as excellent with no downtimes.
Exabeam needs to improve its documentation and provide more customization for dashboards and case management.
I have explored the SaaS version; it offers many new features.
Another thing that would be good to see is some more metrics on the usage of the GitGuardian pre-push hooks.
The self-healing activity by developers isn't reflected in the analytics, requiring us to collect this data ourselves.
We are looking for better metrics and audit data, wanting more features such as knowing which users are creating the most secrets or committing the most secrets, what repository, what directory, and who is not checking in secrets.
Overall, the secret detection sector is expensive, but we are happy with the value we get.
It's fairly priced, as it performs a lot of analysis and is a valuable tool.
Exabeam's AI capabilities, like the natural language mode, convert natural language into Exabeam queries, enhancing ease of use.
The product offers useful features like the dashboard, timeline, and session views, which enhance our security tools.
One of the best features of the solution is the ability to use pre-push hooks.
A high number of our exposures are remediated by developers before security needs to step in, as the self-healing playbook process engages them automatically.
GitGuardian Platform performs the capability to detect secrets in real time exceptionally, as it activates from the commit and can detect it immediately.
Exabeam Fusion is a cloud-delivered solution that that enables you to:
-Leverage turnkey threat detection, investigation, and response
-Collect, search and enhance data from anywhere
-Detect threats missed by other tools, using market-leading behavior analytics
-Achieve successful SecOps outcomes with prescriptive, threat-centric use case packages
-Enhance productivity and reduce response times with automation
-Meet regulatory compliance and audit requirements with ease
GitGuardian is an advanced secrets security platform that strengthens Non-Human Identity security and ensures compliance with industry standards by detecting and managing secrets in development environments.
GitGuardian integrates Secrets Security and Secrets Observability, facilitating the detection of compromised secrets and managing legitimate secrets' lifecycle. Supporting over 450 types of secrets, the platform offers public monitoring for leaked data and employs honeytokens as an added defense. Trusted by over 600,000 developers, organizations such as Snowflake and ING rely on GitGuardian for robust secrets protection.
What features define GitGuardian?In sectors like healthcare and telecommunications, GitGuardian is implemented for detecting and managing the exposure of sensitive information in code repositories. Teams benefit from its ability to integrate with platforms such as GitHub, allowing for immediate alerts and efficient remediation of security risks, enhancing application security by safeguarding operational environments.
We monitor all Threat Intelligence Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
