We performed a comparison between ESET PROTECT Enterprise and Trend Vision One based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Extended Detection and Response (XDR) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The EDR and the way it automatically responds to ransomware and other attacks are valuable features."
"Scanning, vulnerability reporting, and the dashboard are the most valuable features."
"The incident threat response and its ability to facilitate effective remediation against threats are the standout features."
"The portal is quite user-friendly. There is integration with Office, Intune, and other products from the same portal. From there, we can see which policies are installed on a particular machine. We also can manage devices, groups, and tagging."
"We can automate routine tasks and write scripts to carry out difficult tasks, which makes things easier for us."
"The solution is well integrated with applications. It is easy to maintain and administer."
"The most valuable feature is probably the aggregation and correlation of the different telemetry points with Defender for Identity, Defender for Endpoint, and Defender for Cloud Apps. All of these various things are part of that portal. We've wanted that single pane of glass for years."
"Advanced hunting is good. I like that. We can drill down to lots of details."
"We can easily manage resources, disable or enable clients and update them."
"The most valuable features of ESET File Security are the performance and it doesn't take too many resources."
"ESET is better in some ways than other vendors because it fulfills many areas where we'd otherwise have to use different products."
"The solution offers a lot of configuration capabilities."
"The most valuable feature of ESET Protect is the security while accessing any transaction, such as online banking systems. When I access a banking website a new browser opens which is more secure, which I find very useful."
"The product enabled Zero-Day Protection for our environment. We never encountered any issues regarding threats."
"The solution doesn't have high memory usage."
"It's helped us with restrictions and knowing which users we can provide permissions to and which users we need to restrict."
"Scaling is not a problem at all."
"It has good vulnerability protection."
"For our day-to-day use cases, the correlation and attribution of different alerts are valuable. It is sort of an SIEM, but it is intelligent enough to run the queries and intentionally detect and prioritize attacks for you. At the end of the day, it is different data that you see. It correlates data for you and makes it meaningful. You can see that someone got an email and clicked a link. That link downloaded, for example, malware into the memory of the machine. From there, you can see that they started moving laterally to your environment. I quite like it because it gives visibility, so Workbench is what we use every day"
"The centralized visibility is good."
"It helps a lot to understand where the threat is coming from, where is it going, how is it being dealt with, et cetera."
"I appreciate the value of real-time activity monitoring."
"Its detection rate is valuable. It is really an easy product to install and manage. It is quite effective at what it does, and if needed, it can also be co-managed, which means 24 hours and seven days a week monitoring through a SOC."
"The solution is very easy to use."
"It would be beneficial to have a more seamless experience with everything consolidated in one place, particularly when dealing with aspects related to the Exchange console."
"Sometimes, configurations take much longer than expected."
"There could be a way to proactively monitor unusual activity ."
"The support team is not competent or responsive."
"At times, when we have an incident email and we click on the link for that incident, it opens a pop-up, but there is nothing. It has happened a couple of times."
"The design of the user interface could use some work. Sometimes it's hard to find the exact information you need."
"At times, there may be delays in the execution of certain actions and their effects."
"Automated playbooks and automated dashboards would be preferable to the way the data is currently being presented."
"Sometimes, the connection to the machine requires troubleshooting."
"The solution can be quite technical and therefore is challenging for new users."
"I would like to see more features on the reporting side of things."
"In the current version of ESET File Security, you cannot download a file, it always wants the real-time upload which you have to wait until the file is ready. This is annoying. In previous versions, you were able to use the downloaded engine."
"ESET Protect could improve the performance. The performance of the home computers and laptops becomes slow due to their heavy software load. It would be a benefit to make a lighter version of the software which does not have any impact on the performance of the computer's hardware."
"The availability and sustainability could also be improved."
"Its automation can be improved."
"In terms of management accounts, there's a lot of manuals that seem to be mixed up. Sometimes, it's a little bit confusing."
"Reporting could be a little bit better. They are working on it, and it is getting better."
"The support should be improved."
"It should integrate with more tools. There are a lot of tools that can do the PTP dump."
"Trend Micro doesn't have the next-generation firewall."
"When you deploy these tools from Trend Micro, the integration and getting them to work together, are among the more difficult pieces of the puzzle. But when you get that set up and working, you're glad you did."
"Having more variables within the playbook would be useful. It would allow us to have more refined playbooks for the business. It would allow us to take stronger action through a playbook. It will give us confidence to target a particular area of business where our risk tolerance might be higher or lower. We would like to have more granular playbooks."
"It would be better if it were more user-friendly. It would also be better if the implementation were more straightforward."
"The solution could always be made to be more secure."
ESET PROTECT Enterprise is ranked 16th in Extended Detection and Response (XDR) with 10 reviews while Trend Vision One is ranked 6th in Extended Detection and Response (XDR) with 43 reviews. ESET PROTECT Enterprise is rated 9.0, while Trend Vision One is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of ESET PROTECT Enterprise writes "Constantly improving their online resources to make it easier for new users to work with it". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trend Vision One writes "The integration of toolsets is key, enabling automation, and vendor has been tremendous partner for us". ESET PROTECT Enterprise is most compared with ESET Endpoint Protection Platform, Wazuh, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Avira Antivirus and Cybereason Next-Generation Antivirus, whereas Trend Vision One is most compared with CrowdStrike Falcon, Trend Vision One Endpoint Security, SentinelOne Singularity Complete, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint and Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks. See our ESET PROTECT Enterprise vs. Trend Vision One report.
See our list of best Extended Detection and Response (XDR) vendors and best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.
We monitor all Extended Detection and Response (XDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.