Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Eptica WCS Suite vs Sage CRM comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Eptica WCS Suite
Ranking in CRM
50th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Sage CRM
Ranking in CRM
27th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the CRM category, the mindshare of Eptica WCS Suite is 0.7%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Sage CRM is 0.7%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
CRM Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Sage CRM0.7%
Eptica WCS Suite0.7%
Other98.6%
CRM
 

Featured Reviews

Use Eptica WCS Suite?
Leave a review
VK
Deputy Manager - IT at Nidec Corporation
Useful to access data anytime and helpful in generating reports quickly
Speaking about the product's ability to improve sales processes, I would say that even though the tool offers project management capabilities along with ERP functionalities, my company doesn't use it for project management or HR-related areas. My company majorly uses the tool for finance, logistics, and inventory control. I haven't had the need for my company to not integrate the tool with other products. Though my company uses the product separately, we can export Sage CRM into Excel, after which the data can be integrated with other software products. Though the tool can be integrated with other products, my company doesn't do it because Sage CRM is enough for us. The analytical reporting part of the business product is good. The analytical reporting part of the product is used for financial years, along with the profit and loss reports and inventory reports. For the sales part in our company, we use the analytical reports generated by the product to help the sales people in a region-wise, sales-wise and product-wise manner. In my company, one of the teams will be changing from Sage CRM to Microsoft Dynamics. I recommend the product to others who plan to use it, especially since it is a tool suitable for medium-sized companies and not for enterprise-sized businesses. Medium-sized companies can use the product since it is an economical and reliable tool. I rate the tool a nine out of ten.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which CRM solutions are best for your needs.
879,853 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparison Review

it_user9726 - PeerSpot reviewer
Architect at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Oct 5, 2013
WCS vs Hybris vs ATG - Feature Smackdown
They say "Beauty is in the eyes of the beholder", so if you are a purist in one of these technologies you would probably never agree to my comparison matrix, However these are my personal opinion, From my experience standpoint I have longest exposure to WCS Commerce Suite and the least with ATG…
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business3
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise2
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about Sage CRM?
The solution's technical support is fast to respond.
What needs improvement with Sage CRM?
The product could be improved by modernizing the charts and analytics. Additionally, the export features and interactivity of the charts need enhancement.
 

Also Known As

WCS Suite
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Easyroommate, L'Occitane en Provence, Vivastreet, Ageas Insurance Solutions, Britannia Hotels Group
Avis, Fuji Xerox, Formula 1
Find out what your peers are saying about Salesforce, Microsoft, SAP and others in CRM. Updated: January 2026.
879,853 professionals have used our research since 2012.