No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Epicor Kinetic vs Oracle E-Business Suite comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Epicor Kinetic
Ranking in Enterprise Resource Planning for Manufacturing
2nd
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
3.8
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Oracle E-Business Suite
Ranking in Enterprise Resource Planning for Manufacturing
1st
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
157
Ranking in other categories
Field Service Management (1st), ERP (4th), Activity Based Costing Software (1st), Benefits Administration (3rd), Product Configuration and Quoting (2nd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Enterprise Resource Planning for Manufacturing category, the mindshare of Epicor Kinetic is 9.3%, down from 16.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle E-Business Suite is 12.7%, down from 23.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Enterprise Resource Planning for Manufacturing Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Oracle E-Business Suite12.7%
Epicor Kinetic9.3%
Other78.0%
Enterprise Resource Planning for Manufacturing
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer2391117 - PeerSpot reviewer
Erp Lead at a university with 5,001-10,000 employees
Improved daily operations with familiar ERP workflows but have needed better support and innovation
Overall, they have upgraded the user interface from Classic, which was Windows Classic, to a new UI. However, in the version we are using, there is no functionality change; only the UI has changed. There is no efficiency improvement, no better performance, no better operation flow, and no workflow change. The operations are merely a superficial change that is a little bit complicated. Our company has used Epicor for around 20 years, and there has not been much change in the last 12 to 15 years. Epicor Kinetic has a module-based pricing model. As customers, we have the license, but we cannot perform the certification; only their employees can do certification. They do not give certification to customers. Additionally, each module you add requires additional payment. For example, the HR module is not good, and the CRM is not good either. We already have it, but we cannot use it because it is not suitable for us. We use other modules such as engineering and finance, but we are not using them in full-fledged capacity. We are paying for six or seven modules but only use two or three, and if we want to use other modules, we have to pay extra. In the bundle they provide, only three or four modules are useful for us, and the others are not. We still have them, but we cannot exchange them for something else that might be advanced project management. Epicor Kinetic does not have anything regarding AI and machine learning. Currently, there is not really any integration in our systems; however, this may happen in the future since it is an ERP system. Everything is in one system, but we do not really have any integration currently. I believe they do have a REST API, but we have not integrated anything with it.
Md. Mazharul Islam - PeerSpot reviewer
Incharge Corporate Accounts & ERP System at General Pharmaceuticals Limited.
Has connected financial data across departments and improved future cash flow planning
I would like to improve the integration with other solutions, as I need everything integrated, like the HR module, purchase module, SCM, production, and engineering. Each and every module should be connected to the finance module, and I think Oracle provides the right solution. Also, SAP, IFS, or Microsoft Dynamics 365 offer some solutions, but I am not as happy with them as I am with Oracle. I believe that Oracle E-Business Suite could improve by transitioning from Java-based scripts in our system to a web-based environment. While Oracle already has JD Edwards available in web-based format, I think it needs to be smoother for optimization and presentation in the future. In comparison, IFS is fully web-based, and all applications are sufficiently good and user-friendly. We are developing and trying to improve to a web-based setup, but it is currently too costly.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Epicor Kinetic provides valuable functionalities for us as an ERP tool."
"Epicor Kinetic's user interface helps with planning and operation management as it has a module for planning and scheduling which is integrated."
"What we like about Oracle E-Business Suite is that we didn't find any issues with it."
"I like Oracle ERP for streamlining the entire process from PRTL and invoice payments."
"Basically, the most valuable feature is the suite; basically, your integration between APAR, PO, fixed assets."
"Oracle EBS provides the customer with faster financial closing because of its accurate calculations."
"You can group them into the BIs, which is business intelligence. You get your own key performance indicators and build your own reports or you could have your own screens, and it changes in real time."
"The reporting capabilities keep us from having to run every report for our users as they can go in and run the reports themselves."
"The complete product suite is good. The financials are good, it is the best product I've been working with is Oracle Financial. Supply chain manufacturing is very comprehensive and the connectivity, between all the modules, is seamless. They are all communicated well with one another."
"Before, we used a lot of manpower in our operations, in the backend, but this is a service. We have eliminated some unnecessary processes."
 

Cons

"The weak point for us would be that we don't have enough resources to work on Epicor, so we are relying on partners which are outside the country and Epicor themselves."
"There is no efficiency improvement, no better performance, no better operation flow, and no workflow change."
"The system has bugs, is not user friendly, and requires too much customization."
"We have dealt with customer service, and it was awful. For a system this size, it felt like we were merely buying software from them."
"In SAP, when customization or work is done in an instance, it can be automatically copied to the production instance. Such automation would be a very good future addition to Oracle."
"Typically when we do conversions from Oracle forms applications, oracle forms is quite good with that multi row update and that in the past has been a weakness with APEX."
"The UI interface is not great."
"They don't have built-in bank integrations, which would be very helpful."
"The initial setup is not simple, it's quite complex, very difficult."
"It's difficult for some customers to understand in the beginning. A user really has to understand the processes."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"Oracle prices are better in Vietnam and more flexible. If we need to customize something in Oracle, it's very flexible and easy to customize."
"The pricing is high."
"It's quite expensive, even though they gave us a discount."
"E-Business Suite's pricing could be lower."
"Oracle generally gives a lot of discounts."
"Oracle E-Business Suite is heavy subscriptions based and the solution's upgrades, under the technology licensing, are quite costly. Additionally, support is an extra cost. The price of the solution could be reduced."
"This product is more expensive if you compare it to SAP."
"Find a best Oracle partner and get a better discount."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Resource Planning for Manufacturing solutions are best for your needs.
915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Construction Company
10%
Outsourcing Company
10%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Financial Services Firm
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business42
Midsize Enterprise34
Large Enterprise114
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Epicor Kinetic?
Regarding improvements about Epicor Kinetic, I think the interface is very easy to navigate and learn, and the data migration tools are available so you can migrate the data without a hassle. The c...
What is your primary use case for Epicor Kinetic?
The typical use cases for Epicor Kinetic include manufacturing, as we are using it for manufacturing, finance, supply chain, and engineering.
What advice do you have for others considering Epicor Kinetic?
I am still familiar with Epicor and am looking for ways to implement it. I am looking to work with the on-premises version, but Epicor is changing the licensing model as they are moving everything ...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle E-Business Suite?
The pricing for Oracle E-Business Suite is varying high, depending on the country. For small businesses or those generating low revenue, it is often expensive. However, for governments or multinati...
What needs improvement with Oracle E-Business Suite?
Oracle E-Business Suite has already provided many solutions and continues to do so for implementers and consultancy firms. They offer many benefits through easy steps, support forums, and communiti...
What is your primary use case for Oracle E-Business Suite?
I am working on an ERP solution that Oracle provides, which is Oracle E-Business Suite. Oracle E-Business Suite contains many modules that cover tax, finance, HR, projects, and many solutions they ...
 

Also Known As

No data available
Oracle EBS, OEBS
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Colab, Portobello, Saudi Telecom Company, DG Khan Cement, Dubai Holding
Find out what your peers are saying about Epicor Kinetic vs. Oracle E-Business Suite and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.
915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.