Eggplant Test vs Liquidware Stratusphere UX comparison

Keysight Technologies and Liquidware are both solutions in the Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) category. Keysight Technologies is ranked #13 with an average rating of 7.3, while Liquidware is ranked #8 with an average rating of 9.0. Keysight Technologies holds a 0.7% mindshare in DEM, compared to Liquidware’s 2.4% mindshare. Additionally, 80% of Keysight Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Liquidware users who would recommend it.

Eggplant Test

Read 19 Eggplant Test reviews

3,466 Views
69 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Liquidware Stratusphere UX

Read 3 Liquidware Stratusphere UX reviews

411 Views
411 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Eggplant Test

Liquidware Stratusphere UX

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 3, 2024

Liquidware Stratusphere UX and Eggplant Test compete in user experience monitoring and software testing. Eggplant Test holds the upper hand due to its robust features and perceived value, aligning better with higher price points.

Features: Liquidware Stratusphere UX provides detailed user experience metrics, comprehensive diagnostics, and performance analytics, focusing on virtual environments. Eggplant Test offers advanced automation testing features, ease of use, and flexibility in testing across platforms, emphasizing automated functional testing.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Liquidware Stratusphere UX is easy to deploy with dedicated support for virtual desktop environments. Eggplant Test's cloud-based deployment allows flexibility with integrations and caters to diverse testing scenarios with efficient customer service.

Pricing and ROI: Liquidware Stratusphere UX is competitively priced, offering a good ROI through enhanced user experience insights. Eggplant Test has a higher setup cost, justified by advanced testing capabilities that provide significant ROI, focusing on high-value testing functions.

To learn more, read our detailed Eggplant Test vs. Liquidware Stratusphere UX Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Eggplant Test vs. Liquidware Stratusphere UX

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 872,837 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Eggplant Test

Ranking in Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM)

13th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Test Management Tools (9th), Test Automation Tools (12th)

Liquidware Stratusphere UX

Ranking in Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM)

8th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

5.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2025, in the Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) category, the mindshare of Eggplant Test is 0.7%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Liquidware Stratusphere UX is 2.4%, down from 3.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Liquidware Stratusphere UX	2.4%
Eggplant Test	0.7%
Other	96.9%

Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM)

Featured Reviews

Mirza Hussain

Engineer at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

Has required frequent manual adjustments due to screen resolution but supports simple automation with minimal effort

I would prefer more UFT because it has VB scripting capabilities. While Eggplant Test also has this feature, it's not very user-friendly. I prefer the features of UFT compared to Eggplant Test. When needing to do quick automation, I would prefer Eggplant Test, but otherwise, I would always choose UFT. It depends on the complexity of the tasks. For big problems and complex automation tasks, I would prefer UFT because it has more flexibility and is more effective. With Eggplant Test, if you have very low complexity automation, such as simple click sequences and validation, then it would be preferable; with more complexity, I would not recommend Eggplant Test.

Read full review

Manjit Chakravarty

Solutions Architect at Capgemini India

Good performance monitoring, stable, and scalable

The main challenge for this solution is its lack of availability for training and in-depth troubleshooting steps. I have worked as an operations engineer, implementation engineer, and architect in India. However, the solution is not readily available to every customer. For example, if a company purchases a license and implements the solution, the BAU operation team may be unfamiliar with the product. The solution provides some free training and videos on its website, but it could improve its training and support for customers who purchase a license. Additionally, I have found it difficult to get support for production-related issues. The solution could improve its response time for these issues.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution is based on a Windows model, where adding users is just a few clicks. It is easy to manage users and add them."

"The best feature of Eggplant Test is that it's very easy to use; you just capture those pictures of the objects in your application and it's easy to automate."

"The most valuable features would be the image recognition and the OCR."

"We are able to now automate tests, which so far have been manual."

"It provides very strong cross-platform support."

"GUI testing is the strength of the tool. The tool works as expected, and the support response from eggPlant, as a company, has been quick and substantial."

"Its scalability is good. It is useful for desktop applications, and it also uses OCR and does image recognition."

"It is easy to set up."

More Eggplant Test pros

"There are a lot of customization options, such as creating your own tables and more. You have the option to make whatever you like and see whatever you want."

"I like Stratusphere's login metrics. It lets you drill down to exactly what you want to see."

"Performance monitoring is a valuable feature."

Cons

"I would like to see standardized actions already built into Eggplant. For example, "wait eight seconds". That way, I wouldn't need to create it as an action. Right now, I have to program that wait and describe it as an action so that everybody knows it is an action that waits eight seconds... That way, somebody who is not familiar with programming processes like "if-else", or "for", or "while", would be able, from the first moment, and without programming, to put some easy-to-use, standardized, actions in place."

"The language is too specific; it is just for Eggplant."

"They need to update the Linux. I think it's kind of an outdated Java Swing application."

"There was no free trial in it."

"Since there are very few customers in the Indian region, there is no training available, and it's challenging to find skilled talent."

"The execution times are a little slower, and the two-system architecture that we currently follow could be better replaced with a one-system architecture."

"Eggplant Test should emphasize on improving its offering in non-Windows environments."

"It has low productivity."

More Eggplant Test cons

"The time taken by the solution for the data to load should be improved. It was pretty high in some instances. The latency for some stuff to load up was pretty high."

"The main challenge for this solution is its lack of availability for training and in-depth troubleshooting steps."

"The dashboard is pretty lackluster compared to its competitors. They need to look at the competition and adopt some of those features. Liquidware could make the dashboarding more user-friendly and integrate scripting into the product."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is scalable, but it is a matter of money in the pocket. You can scale it, but then you have to have additional licenses. The licensing approach of eggPlant is not the best."

"It probably has a yearly license."

"Make a smart decision about the number of developer- and execution-only licenses you purchase to maximize your budget. We found that going heavier on execution-only licenses has been a way to reduce our costs and maximize our ability to benefit from the software."

"Eggplant Test is a very expensive solution."

"This solution is expensive when compared to the market. However, the reason it is more expensive is because of its stability, high performance, and for its support of any technology."

"End-to-end testing isn't possible for us because of the licensing problems. It's very expensive, so we only have two development/execution licenses."

"The license is based on the number of users. I don't know the current prices, but it's around four euros per user monthly. My customers consider it expensive."

"The price varies depending on our model type and the number of users or devices."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

872,837 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Computer Software Company

10%

Healthcare Company

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Educational Organization

12%

Healthcare Company

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	14

No data available

Questions from the Community

How do I choose between Selenium HQ and Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence?

Selenium HQ’s biggest advantage is that it is customizable. Its other most valuable feature is that the driver interface is really helpful and user-friendly; Selenium HQ makes it easy to navigate t...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Eggplant Manager?

The price of Eggplant Test is on the higher side, but the benefits it provides make it worth using.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Eggplant Manager?

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Tricentis Tosca vs Eggplant Test

Compared 18% of the time

Qt Squish vs Eggplant Test

Compared 13% of the time

Selenium HQ vs Eggplant Test

Compared 11% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs Eggplant Test

Compared 10% of the time

Ranorex Studio vs Eggplant Test

Compared 8% of the time

More Eggplant Test Competitors

ControlUp vs Liquidware Stratusphere UX

Compared 59% of the time

SysTrack vs Liquidware Stratusphere UX

Compared 22% of the time

Nexthink vs Liquidware Stratusphere UX

Compared 19% of the time

More Liquidware Stratusphere UX Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Eggplant Test

November 2025

Download Eggplant Test product report

Buyer's Guide

Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM)

October 2025

Download Liquidware Stratusphere UX product report

Also Known As

Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence, Eggplant DAI, Eggplant Automation Cloud, Eggplant Manager, Eggplant Mobile, Eggplant Customer Experience Insights

No data available

Overview

Across every industry, digital transformation is top of mind. New methods of developing software are driving fast change, and test teams are feeling the pressure. Increasing demand to release faster while maintaining the highest levels of quality is making the testing process more complex and harder to scale.

With AI-powered testing, Eggplant’s test and automation intelligence delivers the coverage you need to optimize the user experience, speed up release cycles, and improve your quality assurance process. Discover a fast, secure, and easy-to-use solution that tests any kind of software on any platform or device.

Keysight Technologies

Liquidware Stratusphere UX is a user experience monitoring and diagnostics solution that is designed to give users the tools they need to optimize and control the way they experience their digital workspaces. This solution is an industry leader because it contains many powerful tools that are designed to give administrators the maximum amount of insight into the inner workings of and control over the workspaces that they are charged with overseeing.

Liquidware Stratusphere UX Benefits

Some of the benefits that come from using Liquidware Stratusphere UX include:

Access to detailed data any time. Liquidware Stratusphere UX enables users to access critical metrics and data at all times. It is constantly scanning connected systems and culling data from them. This data is always available at the user’s fingertips.

Insight into trends and actual user experiences. Liquidware Stratusphere UX’s data collection capabilities focus on collecting data that helps administrators gain an understanding of trends that relate to user behavior. These insights make it possible for administrators to understand where some of the pain points in their digital workspaces may be. Once they have these insights, they can take the steps necessary to remediate without having to burn time and other resources by engaging in trial-and-error testing.

Digital workplace experience monitoring tools. Liquidware Stratusphere UX provides administrators with the ability to monitor their digital workspaces on all levels, keeping aware of everything all at once so that no issues catch them by surprise.

Maximum flexibility. Liquidware Stratusphere UX supports a number of platform options. Users can deploy physical devices, virtual machines, or a hybrid option.
Share data and collaborate on workspace optimization. Administrators and their teams can collaborate on maintaining peak performance in their networks even if they are not in the same place. Data from Liquidware Stratusphere UX can easily be exported and shared as reports with colleagues who may be working remotely.

Liquidware Stratusphere UX Features

When users choose to employ the Liquidware Stratusphere UX solution, they gain access to many different capabilities. These features include:

SpotCheck capability. Liquidware Stratusphere UX is designed with tools that enable users to drill down into the infrastructure employed. It gives administrators the ability to find issues they already know about as well as those that are only just beginning to develop. This feature analyzes the entirety of the digital architecture, providing administrators with a complete picture.

Machine Boot and Login Breakdown tools. Administrators can utilize these tools to keep track of these two critical functions. If there is any lag when users are attempting to start up their devices or log in, this tool will find it. Users can then diagnose the root cause of the problem and quickly take steps to remedy the issue.

Process optimization features. Liquidware Stratusphere UX employs a number of features that enable users to ensure that their digital workspaces run at peak efficiency. One such feature enables administrators to de-prioritize applications that users are not really using. This means that digital resources are being directed toward areas of true need instead of to applications that are not relevant to what the user is doing at the time.

Liquidware

Sample Customers

FUJIFILM Group, NEC Personal Computers

U.S. Defense Agency, Phoenix Central School District, Homesteaders Life, United Arab Bank, Rolls-Royce

Buyer's Guide

Eggplant Test vs. Liquidware Stratusphere UX

September 2025

Free Report: Eggplant Test vs. Liquidware Stratusphere UX

Find out what your peers are saying about Eggplant Test vs. Liquidware Stratusphere UX and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

872,837 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Eggplant Test vs. Liquidware Stratusphere UX report.

See our list of best Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) vendors.

We monitor all Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.