Ixia Hawkeye vs Splunk Observability Cloud comparison

Keysight Technologies and Splunk are both solutions in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category. Keysight Technologies is ranked #36 with an average rating of 10.0, while Splunk is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.7. Keysight Technologies holds a 0.2% mindshare in IM, compared to Splunk’s 1.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Keysight Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of Splunk users who would recommend it.

Ixia Hawkeye

Read 4 Ixia Hawkeye reviews

245 Views
163 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Splunk Observability Cloud

Read 52 Splunk Observability Cloud reviews

1,722 Views
1,018 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Ixia Hawkeye

Splunk Observability Cloud

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on May 11, 2025

Splunk Observability Cloud and Ixia Hawkeye are competitors in the observability and network performance monitoring sectors. Splunk Observability Cloud outperforms in integration and scalability, while Ixia Hawkeye offers superior network testing capabilities.

Features: Splunk Observability Cloud provides real-time data analytics with smooth integration across Splunk products. It offers comprehensive infrastructure and application performance monitoring, enabling quick identification of service anomalies. Ixia Hawkeye excels in detailed network performance analysis, proactive monitoring, and provides automated testing for in-depth network insights. Its network testing capabilities allow for precise problem detection and resolution.

Room for Improvement: Splunk Observability Cloud could benefit from enhanced user interface design to simplify navigation and potentially reduce complexity in configuration settings. Additional capabilities in network testing would augment its monitoring suite. Improved documentation, particularly for novice users, could enhance usability. Ixia Hawkeye should consider strengthening its application performance monitoring tools, integrating with more third-party platforms, and offering broader data visualization capabilities to match market expectations.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Splunk Observability Cloud is easy to deploy, especially for users already engaged with Splunk platforms, supported by extensive documentation. Its unified platform provides seamless integration benefits. Ixia Hawkeye offers straightforward setup with intuitive configuration tools, prioritizing flexibility in network testing environments and providing excellent support for smoother network testing processes.

Pricing and ROI: Splunk Observability Cloud entails a higher initial cost, which aligns with its extensive features and integration capabilities, promising significant long-term ROI. Ixia Hawkeye offers a cost-effective solution focusing on specialized network optimization, appealing to users seeking targeted network insights. Both provide value, with pricing reflective of each product's focus and capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Ixia Hawkeye vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Ixia Hawkeye vs. Splunk Observability Cloud

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,760 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Ixia Hawkeye

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

36th

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Unified Communications Monitoring (4th), Network Monitoring Software (34th)

Splunk Observability Cloud

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

9th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (10th), Cloud Monitoring Software (8th), Container Management (8th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the mindshare of Ixia Hawkeye is 0.2%, down from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Splunk Observability Cloud is 1.1%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

Featured Reviews

José Enrique Cano Rodriguez

Assistant Consultant at Tata Consultancy

A valuable tool for optimizing network performance and security with comprehensive network monitoring capabilities, user-friendly interface, and flexibility for scripting

Distinguishing itself from network management systems like SolarWinds Orion and Dataminer, Hawkeye offers a distinctive feature. It empowers network administrators to access specialized and detailed views for specific tests, including video streaming and performance related to specific applications like video games. In contrast, SolarWinds and Dataminer typically offer a more general evaluation of network health. Hawkeye's unique capability enables a detailed analysis of network performance through specific tests, allowing administrators to identify areas in need of improvement and take precise actions to enhance network performance.

Read full review

Lakshmi Padaga

Java Developer at U.S. Bank

Collaborates performance metrics with log data to pinpoint the exact cause of issues and offers error detection

Splunk APM is a robust tool with many capabilities. There are always areas for potential improvement to enhance its functionality and user experience. For Splunk APM, there could be simplified navigation, like streamlining the user interface to make navigation more intuitive for our users, especially those new to APM, which can enhance usability. We can provide more customization options for dashboards and visualizations to help users tailor the platform to their specific needs. There could be more integration capabilities with a wider range of third-party tools and platforms would also be beneficial. By focusing on these areas, Splunk APM can enhance its value proposition, improve user satisfaction, and better meet the evolving needs of organizations monitoring their application performance.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature is the deployment because it's very easy to deploy real flow through the network."

"It empowers network administrators to access specialized and detailed views for specific tests, including video streaming and performance related to specific applications like video games."

"Our customer was happiest with the price of this product."

"The ease of setup is the most valuable aspect of this solution. It's easy to set up and run tests."

"Splunk's dashboards are great."

"The best features in Splunk Observability Cloud are the metrics; I can see any logs or anything related to the server or services we want to monitor, and the metrics are a good function."

"The most valuable feature is log reporting."

"Splunk APM helps us to find errors immediately and resolve them."

"Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring reduces our mean time to resolve. We are more proactive than reactive."

"The solution's most valuable aspect is its ability to get information about all of the security measurements in my environment."

"It's a very easy-to-use solution."

"The solution's basic visibility is one of its most valuable features. So, it is a solution that is easy to use...The solution's initial setup process was straightforward."

More Splunk Observability Cloud pros

Cons

"Improvements in network performance are essential."

"You can't delete more than one thing at a time. It would be great to be able to highlight three out of five things and delete them, whether it's a test or an actual report."

"The customization of tests and even the results can be improved."

"Ixia has one flaw, which is that they do not print the license code on the paper licenses that are shipped to the customers."

"Regarding dashboard customization, while Splunk has many dashboard building options, customers sometimes need to create specific dashboards, particularly for applicative metrics such as Java and process terms. These categories of dashboards would be very helpful for customers."

"In Splunk Observability Cloud, I notice room for improvement in synthetic monitoring. It does not provide output based on server names."

"There are some predefined metrics.......we may want to create customized metrics."

"I would like to see an improvement and some innovation in the customer interface."

"It's a bit difficult to use. It takes some time to get into it and to get it to do what you would like it to do. It is not straightforward to use it."

"It does not have a user-friendly interface and it is difficult to use."

"The UI enhancements could be a way to improve the solution in the future."

"In the next release, I would like to see more integration with other solutions."

More Splunk Observability Cloud cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It cost us approximately 25,000 for two years. This is cheaper than ThousandEyes."

"In larger networks, the costs for licenses tend to be more reasonable, but for smaller networks, it appears relatively costly."

"Splunk offers a 14-day free trial and after that, we have to pay but the cost is reasonable."

"Licensing cost is the biggest argument I get from those divesting from Splunk. There are those within our organization who say we are going to go to other tools since Splunk is too expensive."

"Splunk has been fairly expensive, but it has been predictable."

"The solution's pricing is competitive. I rate the solution's pricing a seven out of ten. The price of the solution could be cheaper."

"It appears to be expensive compared to competitors."

"Splunk Observability Cloud is expensive."

"The pricing is reasonable."

"The pricing is based on several factors, including the scale of deployment."

More Splunk Observability Cloud pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,760 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Computer Software Company

13%

Energy/Utilities Company

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

18%

Computer Software Company

15%

Retailer

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Ixia Hawkeye?

It empowers network administrators to access specialized and detailed views for specific tests, including video streaming and performance related to specific applications like video games.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Ixia Hawkeye?

Improvements in network performance are essential.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Ixia Hawkeye?

Our objective is to evaluate the performance of GPON and DOCSIS networks which involves considering factors such as pricing, sales, and the technical aspects of conducting tests. To achieve this, v...

See all answers

What do you like most about SignalFx?

The most valuable feature is dashboard creation.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SignalFx?

There is room for improvement in the alerting system, which is complicated and has less documentation available. We sometimes encountered issues in setting up alerts. The custom detector could be m...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for SignalFx?

The main purpose of using Splunk APM is to optimize our application. We use Splunk APM primarily to understand how the application works, how it uses resources, and its response time in connection ...

See all answers

Comparisons

NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs Ixia Hawkeye

Compared 31% of the time

ThousandEyes vs Ixia Hawkeye

Compared 30% of the time

Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline vs Ixia Hawkeye

Compared 25% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs Ixia Hawkeye

Compared 14% of the time

More Ixia Hawkeye Competitors

Observe vs Splunk Observability Cloud

Compared 20% of the time

Dynatrace vs Splunk Observability Cloud

Compared 6% of the time

Splunk ITSI (IT Service Intelligence) vs Splunk Observability Cloud

Compared 6% of the time

Rancher Labs vs Splunk Observability Cloud

Compared 4% of the time

ServiceNow IT Operations Management vs Splunk Observability Cloud

Compared 4% of the time

More Splunk Observability Cloud Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Network Monitoring Software

April 2025

Download Ixia Hawkeye product report

Buyer's Guide

Splunk Observability Cloud

April 2025

Download Splunk Observability Cloud product report

Also Known As

No data available

Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring

Overview

Hawkeye quickly and effectively validates network performance, isolates problems, and proactively detects issues by running scheduled verification tests. Using a combination of hardware and software agents called Performance Endpoints, Hawkeye simulates application traffic and sends key performance metrics to a central console for fast action.

Keysight Technologies

Splunk Observability Cloud combines log search, data integration, and dashboards for seamless monitoring, enhancing infrastructure visibility and security. Its cloud integration and scalability support diverse environments, improving operational efficiency.

Splunk Observability Cloud offers comprehensive monitoring tools with user-friendly interfaces, enabling end-to-end infrastructure visibility. Its real-time alerting and predictive capabilities enhance security monitoring, while centralized dashboards provide cross-platform visibility. Users benefit from fast data integration and extensive insights into application performance. Despite its advantages, improvements could be made in integration with other tools, data reliability, scalability, and cost management. Users face challenges in configuration complexity and require better automation and endpoint protection features. Enhancing AI integration, alerts, and adaptation for high-throughput services could further improve usability.

What are the key features of Splunk Observability Cloud?

Log Search: Efficiently search and analyze log data for enhanced insights.
Data Integration: Fast integration across platforms for comprehensive visibility.
Custom Dashboards: Powerful and adaptable dashboards for real-time monitoring.
Cloud Integration: Seamless integration with cloud services for scalable solutions.
Application Performance Monitoring: Advanced tools for improving application performance.

What benefits and ROI should be expected?

Infrastructure Monitoring: Improved visibility and monitoring across infrastructure components.
Operational Efficiency: Enhancements in data analysis lead to efficient operations.
Business Resilience: Supports adaptability and swift responses to changing needs.
Security Management: Enhances threat identification and response through real-time alerts.
Compliance Support: Aids in meeting compliance and auditing requirements effectively.

In industries like finance and healthcare, Splunk Observability Cloud is implemented for application performance monitoring and infrastructure metrics. Its ability to track incidents and analyze machine data benefits network infrastructure, while distributed tracing and log analysis aid in tackling security threats. Organizations often integrate it for compliance and auditing purposes, enhancing visibility into network traffic and optimizing performance.

Splunk

Sample Customers

EMA

Sunrun, Yelp, Onshape, Tapjoy, Symphony Commerce, Chairish, Clever, Grovo, Bazaar Voice, Zenefits, Avalara

Buyer's Guide

Ixia Hawkeye vs. Splunk Observability Cloud

April 2025

Free Report: Ixia Hawkeye vs. Splunk Observability Cloud

Find out what your peers are saying about Ixia Hawkeye vs. Splunk Observability Cloud and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,760 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Ixia Hawkeye vs. Splunk Observability Cloud report.

See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.