DX NetOps vs Entuity comparison

Broadcom and Park Place Technologies are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Broadcom is ranked #37 with an average rating of 8.8, while Park Place Technologies is ranked #67. Broadcom holds a 0.7% mindshare in NMS, compared to Park Place Technologies’s 0.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Park Place Technologies users who would recommend it.

DX NetOps

Read 10 DX NetOps reviews

1,841 Views
1,638 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Entuity

Read 11 Entuity reviews

1,747 Views
1,625 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

DX NetOps

Entuity

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

Entuity and DX NetOps compete in the network management solutions category. Data suggests DX NetOps holds an edge in feature comprehensiveness, while Entuity is advantageous in pricing and customer service.

Features: Entuity provides real-time analytics, intuitive customization, and integrated dashboards. These features cater to businesses seeking straightforward analytics and adaptability. DX NetOps offers comprehensive network visualization, extensive automation, and detailed reporting capabilities, making it suitable for complex infrastructures.

Room for Improvement: Entuity can enhance its advanced networking features, expand automation capabilities, and offer more training resources. DX NetOps might improve in areas such as simplifying its user interface, reducing setup complexity, and offering more competitive pricing.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Entuity is known for quicker deployment and a straightforward setup, backed by responsive customer service. DX NetOps offers detailed deployment processes with extensive support resources and expert training to maximize its capabilities.

Pricing and ROI: Entuity offers an economical setup cost with quicker ROI due to budget-friendly pricing. DX NetOps, while initially more expensive, provides higher long-term returns through its extensive feature set and potential for deeper insights.

To learn more, read our detailed DX NetOps vs. Entuity Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

DX NetOps vs. Entuity

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 885,376 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

DX NetOps

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

37th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

AIOps (18th)

Entuity

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

67th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of DX NetOps is 0.7%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Entuity is 0.7%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
DX NetOps	0.7%
Entuity	0.7%
Other	98.6%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Balabrahmam_Chakka

Senior Program Manager at Tata Consultancy Services

Has provided topological insights and dashboard-driven network visibility across complex environments

DX NetOps can be improved by expanding its integrations with different tools, as it can currently integrate with Spectrum and other Broadcom products. It would be beneficial to gain integration capabilities with tools such as New Relic or SolarWinds. Integration with DX NetOps occurs through API, which fetches metrics from those tools, and this is currently happening in our area, with DX NetOps receiving data not only from Spectrum but also from New Relic and SolarWinds. DX NetOps could be improved by providing more communication methods beyond SNMP traps to accommodate different private clouds, especially as customers increasingly adopt vendor-specific clouds. For example, Sainsbury's uses SAP cloud, SAS, and Oracle cloud, where monitoring is not currently possible through DX NetOps and Spectrum, which are limited to certain mechanisms. Within the organization, SNMP is usable, but to display metrics from outside the organization, different communication methods such as agent-based connections, TCP/IP, or secured connections are necessary—features not currently available in DX NetOps and Spectrum.

Read full review

Ahmed Salman

Performance & Monitoring Supervisor at Saudi Telecom Company

A good solution for network monitoring and support management, but there is no centralized database

There is no centralized database. It is an issue if you use a local database and have multiple borders. However, if you have an external database, you can keep the same old data from an old border up to 100 borders. In addition, if we want to create an ABI or use an ABI to connect data, there is no competition when we ask for support. If we want to modify the calculation matrix or equation, we have to raise a professional service. Other competitors like Micro Focus, a network management system, have a new supportability matrix in the market every quarter.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The AI is the best feature in this solution."

"DX NetOps network monitoring and fault tolerance are the absolute best in the market, especially for the Indian market."

"The product features include automation through AI, allowing out-of-the-box analysis of performance data, building baseline trends, and enabling configuration of dynamic thresholds relative to collected data."

"The best features I've seen so far with DX NetOps are that it can work with large scale systems, and it has a lot of functionalities and matrices."

"It is straightforward to configure, and you can quickly gather data from your infrastructure."

"I rate the stability of the product as ten on a scale of one to ten, indicating that it is very stable."

"Real-time insights through DX NetOps benefit diagnosing and resolving network issues since Spectrum has all sorts of details, but it lacks dashboards and a readable tabular format."

"The solution is stable."

More DX NetOps pros

"This is a product that is easy to deploy and maintain with a positive end-user experience."

"We went for this solution because it comes with a lot of features; it's an all-in-one solution, which means we don't have to go for multiple solutions."

"One of the most valuable features of Entuity is the user interface."

"The setup was very simple and took about an hour."

"We are able to receive a visualized monitoring of the network infrastructure which is very helpful."

"Event management and the geographical Google API-based network topology are the most valuable features of Entuity."

"We find the SurePath component of this solution to be very valuable, as it gives us the path to whatever we are configuring."

"The initial setup of Entuity is easy and the full process took approximately 30 minutes."

More Entuity pros

Cons

"The hardware requirements can be improved."

"DX NetOps could be improved by providing more communication methods beyond SNMP traps to accommodate different private clouds, especially as customers increasingly adopt vendor-specific clouds."

"DX NetOps is somewhat convoluted, and some of the programming constructs can be documented or driven through languages such as Python, Perl, and shell scripting, but they have their proprietary language, which may not be very user-friendly."

"It would be useful to have more AI features."

"One improvement that could make the product better is to streamline its modules into a more cohesive solution."

"The licensing cost of DX NetOps is expensive, not very affordable, and on the top of the price range in the market."

"Lacks dashboards and better integration with other solutions."

"Technical support could be more responsive."

More DX NetOps cons

"What might be improved for the user may be the depth of insight into the events that do happen and the ease of integration."

"Entuity can improve the fetching of device configuration. The solution uses scripts and I could not understand them or find any recourses on the internet to learn about the language that is used in the script."

"It should support IPAM or IP Address Management. When we are managing networks, if IPAM also becomes a part of this, we do not have to look for a separate solution."

"In the most recent versions, Entuity has removed the Explorer navigation feature. This was very useful, and Entuity would be improved by restoring it."

"Entuity could improve by having more integration because now network management is not a standalone solution."

"A typical user might want to see even more depth to the standard reporting and ease of integration."

"If we want to modify the calculation matrix or equation, we have to raise a professional service."

"Entuity could improve by having more integration because now network management is not a standalone solution. You have to integrate it with your network, applications, and everything else. We have to collect that information from those solutions or relevant managers. Additionally, the SLA dashboard should be improved."

More Entuity cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"We have 400 licenses and we are only using 150 licenses."

"Entuity's licensing is very highly-priced."

"It can be comparatively expensive but that is because it is comprehensive."

"Entuity is not an expensive solution."

"It varies and depends on the quantity. It's worth the cost."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

885,376 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

18%

Computer Software Company

10%

Construction Company

Healthcare Company

Financial Services Firm

22%

University

Government

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	5

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	3

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for DX NetOps?

The pricing is fair for the level of enterprise capability it provides. Proper sizing and planning during deployment helps optimise licensing and overall cost. Anyone adopting it should account for...

See all answers

What needs improvement with DX NetOps?

I would like DX NetOps to integrate with all Broadcom products in the future to make it closer to a rating of 10. I would particularly like it to integrate with the Symantec portfolio and the Carbo...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for DX NetOps?

I use DX NetOps for large-scale network monitoring, fault detection, and performance analysis. My work involves evaluating how well it handles distributed environments, event correlation, and proac...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

WhatsUp Gold vs DX NetOps

Compared 11% of the time

LogicMonitor vs DX NetOps

Compared 11% of the time

ManageEngine OpManager vs DX NetOps

Compared 11% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs DX NetOps

Compared 7% of the time

DX Spectrum vs DX NetOps

Compared 6% of the time

More DX NetOps Competitors

SolarWinds NPM vs Entuity

Compared 27% of the time

LogicMonitor vs Entuity

Compared 20% of the time

SolarWinds Network Device Monitor vs Entuity

Compared 9% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs Entuity

Compared 6% of the time

SolarWinds NetFlow Traffic Analyzer vs Entuity

Compared 5% of the time

More Entuity Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

DX NetOps

March 2026

Download DX NetOps product report

Buyer's Guide

Entuity

March 2026

Download Entuity product report

Overview

DX NetOps by CA Technologies, a Broadcom company, improves your time to value through advanced AI capabilities and unified network visibility that delivers simplified NetOps intelligence into the user experience that traverses modern architectures. DX NetOps accomplishes this through high scale, unified network monitoring that enables full-stack analytics for assuring traditional and modern architectures. DX NetOps converts inventory, topology, device metrics, faults, flow and packet analysis into actionable intelligence for network operations teams. Complimented by our AIOps solution, DX NetOps enables IT teams to establish proactive, autonomous remediation capabilities across the applications, infrastructure, and networks that fuel superior user experiences.

Broadcom

Entuity network management software continually monitors network bandwidth, network error rate and network congestion, which are all factors that impact overall network throughput. Events can be raised in response to abnormal traffic to allow remedial action before users are impacted. The Entuity network monitor continually evaluates network latency and network jitter to calculate MOS and ICPIF scores. Events can be raised when these scores are unacceptable for business application, voice and video performance. Key Features include: Root Cause Analysis, Event Management, Flow Monitoring & Analysis, Application Path Monitoring and Network Performance Monitoring.

Park Place Technologies

Sample Customers

Fujitsu

Tait Communications, Vattenfall, Discovery, University of Minnesota, Pernod Ricard, Electric Car

Buyer's Guide

DX NetOps vs. Entuity

March 2026

Free Report: DX NetOps vs. Entuity

Find out what your peers are saying about DX NetOps vs. Entuity and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

885,376 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our DX NetOps vs. Entuity report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.