"I find the security frameworks and security tools valuable. I think they're good in the infrastructure of the code security. They are also good at threat protection."
"The customization is excellent."
"From a compliance and visibility reporting perspective, the fact that it can be applicable for multi-cloud environments is very helpful."
"Technical support could be better. It could also be easier, more user-friendly, and intuitive. The API keys aren't easy to understand, and the cloud layouts aren't intuitive and user-friendly. We should be able to integrate IM governance and APIs into non-compliant workloads like legacy solutions."
"The general input I have is that there is an opportunity for them to better align with other similar tools and better align with similar capabilities that cloud suppliers deliver natively."
"It would be ideal if there was customization with a focus on specific cybersecurity areas or capabilities."
Earn 20 points
DivvyCloud is ranked 18th in Cloud Management with 1 review while Fugue is ranked 17th in Cloud Management with 2 reviews. DivvyCloud is rated 8.0, while Fugue is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of DivvyCloud writes "A stable cybersecurity solution with useful security frameworks and tools". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Fugue writes "Easy to set up with good flexibility in customization and good reporting". DivvyCloud is most compared with , whereas Fugue is most compared with Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, Orca Security, BMC Helix Cloud Security and CloudCheckr CMx High Security.
See our list of best Cloud Management vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
