Dell CloudIQ vs Elastic Observability comparison

Dell Technologies and Elastic are both solutions in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category. Dell Technologies is ranked #33 with an average rating of 8.3, while Elastic is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.7. Dell Technologies holds a 0.9% mindshare in IM, compared to Elastic’s 2.0% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Dell Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of Elastic users who would recommend it.

Dell CloudIQ

Read 10 Dell CloudIQ reviews

1,456 Views
1,398 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Elastic Observability

Read 29 Elastic Observability reviews

8,436 Views
3,374 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Dell CloudIQ

Elastic Observability

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

Dell CloudIQ and Elastic Observability are products in IT infrastructure and application monitoring. Elastic Observability has the upper hand due to its advanced features and integration capabilities.

Features: Dell CloudIQ offers robust analytics for predictive insights, strong customer support, and comprehensive pricing. It empowers IT operations with actionable data. Elastic Observability provides unified visibility across data sources, is scalable, and integrates with various platforms, making it suitable for environments requiring extensive integration.

Room for Improvement: Dell CloudIQ could enhance its integration capabilities, offer more sophisticated predictive analytics features, and improve user interface customization. Elastic Observability might improve initial deployment processes, simplify its complex configuration requirements, and streamline its user interface for easier navigation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Dell CloudIQ is recognized for its straightforward deployment, which minimizes setup complexity and enhances customer service. Elastic Observability, while more complex in initial setup, compensates with extensive documentation and robust support resources that support a self-service deployment model.

Pricing and ROI: Dell CloudIQ offers competitive pricing that focuses on value with its predictive analysis capabilities, contributing to efficient resource management and better long-term ROI. Elastic Observability, although sometimes seen as higher in cost, offers significant ROI through its rich feature set and optimization across complex infrastructures, making it a compelling choice for extensive observability needs.

To learn more, read our detailed Dell CloudIQ vs. Elastic Observability Report (Updated: January 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Dell CloudIQ vs. Elastic Observability

January 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 880,685 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Dell CloudIQ

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

33rd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

5.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Elastic Observability

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

9th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (6th), Log Management (14th), Container Monitoring (4th), Cloud Monitoring Software (7th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the mindshare of Dell CloudIQ is 0.9%, down from 1.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Elastic Observability is 2.0%, down from 4.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Infrastructure Monitoring Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Elastic Observability	2.0%
Dell CloudIQ	0.9%
Other	97.1%

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

Featured Reviews

ClaudioSalgado

IT Architect Consultant at RTFM

Has proactive monitoring with predictive insights and a user-friendly interface

Some of the most valuable features of CloudIQ include its health status alerts, which allow you to see quickly if there is something that needs immediate attention, preventing the need to check each system individually. It provides a status with traffic light colors, where red indicates danger, yellow means attention is needed, and green represents normal conditions to easily understand the health of the environment. The quick overview aids in decision-making. Additionally, CloudIQ's predictive capabilities, which are enhanced by artificial intelligence, have improved operational efficiency by providing proactive information to prevent issues before they arise.

Read full review

Mohammed-Abdelalim

Assistant Vice President at QualityKiosk Technologies Pvt. Ltd.

Has provided powerful customization for unique monitoring needs but needs more out-of-the-box capabilities

In my opinion, the best features of Elastic Observability are their flexibility to integrate with other existing systems and the ability to build a unified monitoring tool that can integrate with existing ones and end-to-end user journeys which require a lot of customizations. The greatest feature in Elastic is the ability to customize. This is similar to my comments about customizable dashboards in Elastic because it's visible to the analyst. However, it's very great. Customizing these dashboards can meet the customer's specific use cases and specific stories that they have in their environment, their special environment that doesn't look like other environments. The dashboarding in Elastic is highly customizable to the level of logos. If the customer wants his company logo in the dashboard, it can be done.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The dashboard is clear and user-friendly."

"The tool for forecasting capacity is valuable."

"The dashboard is clear and user-friendly."

"It's convenient because you can access it from a mobile device without needing a laptop."

"Mobile application is the most valuable feature for us. We can monitor all the storages on our phones. It's really good."

"Fewer vulnerabilities have been observed in the four years we have used the solution."

"CloudIQ allows us to monitor our servers centrally, and we can receive notifications in case of issues, like a potential hard drive failure."

"Has really nice roll-up dashboards."

More Dell CloudIQ pros

"Elastic provides built-in features for queries and report generation. It's a very good tool for monitoring integration capabilities."

"I recommend Elastic Observability for its completeness of vision and wide ecosystem."

"I have built a mini business intelligence system based on Elastic Observability."

"Good design and easy to use once implemented."

"It is very stable, and I would rate it ten out of ten based on my interaction with it."

"The architecture and system's stability are simple."

"I think Elastic Observability is already in very good shape."

"It has always been a stable solution."

More Elastic Observability pros

Cons

"There is a need for improvement in predictive maintenance, which I assume is somewhat AI-driven."

"Supporting legacy systems is an area that can be improved."

"The reporting capabilities of this solution could be improved."

"Doesn't do well in terms of integrating with technologies other than Dell."

"I think the remediation could have been better."

"It can improve the reporting facility to create custom reports or dashboards."

"If you have a heterogeneous environment, there might be some limitations in coverage since CloudIQ is primarily designed for Dell-based infrastructures."

"The main limitation of CloudIQ is that it is intended to be used exclusively with Dell hardware."

More Dell CloudIQ cons

"The auto-discovery isn't nearly as good. That's a big portion of it. When you drop the agent onto the JVM and you're trying to figure things out, having to go through and manually do all that is cumbersome."

"The interface could be improved."

"Simplifying the parsing of logs and manual efforts would also be beneficial."

"When opening tickets, we cannot use our team mailbox."

"The cost must be made more transparent."

"Improving code insight related to infrastructure and network, particularly focusing on aspects such as firewalls, switches, routers, and testing would be beneficial."

"It lacked some capabilities when handling on-prem devices, like network observability, package flow analysis, and device performance data on the infrastructure side."

"Elastic Observability is reactive rather than proactive. It should act as an ITSM tool and be able to create tickets and alerts on Jira."

More Elastic Observability cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I believe it is a free product because we don't pay for it."

"The solution is more expensive than NetApp which offers file systems in various price ranges."

"One needs to pay for the licenses, and it is an annual subscription model right now."

"Users have to pay for some features, like the alerts on different channels, because they are unavailable in different source versions."

"The product is not that cheap."

"So far, there are just the standard licensing fees. Several of the components are embedded in the license or are even open source. They're even free depending on what you use, which makes it even more appealing to someone that is discussing pricing of the solution."

"There are two types: cloud and SaaS. They charge based on data ingestion, ingest rate, hard retention, and warm retention. I believe it costs around $25,000 annually to ingest 30GB of data daily. That is the SaaS version. There is also a self-managed license where the customer manages their own infrastructure on-prem. In such cases, there are three license tiers that respectively cost $5,000 annually per node, $7,000 per node, and $12,500 per node."

"Since we are a huge company, Elastic Observability is an affordable solution for us."

"The product’s pricing needs improvement."

"We have been using the open-source version."

More Elastic Observability pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

880,685 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

Financial Services Firm

16%

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	8

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	16

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Dell CloudIQ?

It can improve the reporting facility to create custom reports or dashboards.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Dell CloudIQ?

I use it for monitoring environment security today. I look at security, capacity, and availability in our environment.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Dell CloudIQ?

I would rate the overall product an eight out of ten.

See all answers

What do you like most about Elastic Observability?

Elastic Observability significantly improves incident response time by providing quick access to logs and data across various sources. For instance, searching for specific keywords in logs spanning...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Elastic Observability?

The problem is their licensing model, which is a bit confusing. Many customers struggle to understand their total cost of ownership because Elastic licensing is not dependent on easy, quantifiable ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Elastic Observability?

After careful consideration about areas for improvement in Elastic Observability, aspects such as pricing, customization, implementation, and scalability could be improved. As a user of the system,...

See all answers

Comparisons

NetApp Data Infrastructure Insights vs Dell CloudIQ

Compared 25% of the time

HPE OneView vs Dell CloudIQ

Compared 17% of the time

Cisco Intersight vs Dell CloudIQ

Compared 12% of the time

eG Enterprise vs Dell CloudIQ

Compared 6% of the time

OpsRamp vs Dell CloudIQ

Compared 5% of the time

More Dell CloudIQ Competitors

Sentry vs Elastic Observability

Compared 8% of the time

Dynatrace vs Elastic Observability

Compared 8% of the time

New Relic vs Elastic Observability

Compared 7% of the time

Grafana vs Elastic Observability

Compared 7% of the time

Zabbix vs Elastic Observability

Compared 6% of the time

More Elastic Observability Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

December 2025

Download Dell CloudIQ product report

Buyer's Guide

Elastic Observability

January 2026

Download Elastic Observability product report

Overview

CloudIQ is a no cost Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) offering that provides a simple monitoring interface for an unlimited number of Unity systems. CloudIQ accesses data in near real time to enable monitoring and troubleshooting for Unity systems.

Dell Technologies

Elastic Observability offers a comprehensive suite for log analytics, application performance monitoring, and machine learning. It integrates seamlessly with platforms like Teams and Slack, enhancing data visualization and scalability for real-time insights.

Elastic Observability is designed to support production environments with features like logging, data collection, and infrastructure tracking. Centralized logging and powerful search functionalities make incident response and performance tracking efficient. Elastic APM and Kibana facilitate detailed data visualization, promoting rapid troubleshooting and effective system performance analysis. Integrated services and extensive connectivity options enhance its role in business and technical decision-making by providing actionable data insights.

What are the most important features of Elastic Observability?

Centralized Logging: Streamlines the collection, analysis, and storage of log data.
Powerful Search: Provides robust search capabilities for quick access to relevant information.
Scalability: Supports growing data needs across diverse environments.
Real-time Telemetry: Ensures up-to-date insights and monitoring.
Platform Integration: Seamlessly connects with services like Teams and Slack.
Data Visualization: Enhances visibility with Elastic APM and Kibana.

What benefits and ROI should users explore in reviews?

Cost-effectiveness: Offers significant savings through efficient data management.
Rapid Incident Response: Minimizes downtime with quick troubleshooting tools.
Comprehensive Insights: Supports better business decisions with detailed data analysis.
Performance Tracking: Enables assessment of system effectiveness and improvements.

Elastic Observability is employed across industries for critical operations, such as in finance for transaction monitoring, in healthcare for secure data management, and in technology for optimizing application performance. Its data-driven approach aids efficient event tracing, supporting diverse industry requirements.

Elastic

Sample Customers

North Carolina State University

PSCU, Entel, VITAS, Mimecast, Barrett Steel, Butterfield Bank

Buyer's Guide

Dell CloudIQ vs. Elastic Observability

January 2026

Free Report: Dell CloudIQ vs. Elastic Observability

Find out what your peers are saying about Dell CloudIQ vs. Elastic Observability and other solutions. Updated: January 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

880,685 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Dell CloudIQ vs. Elastic Observability report.

See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.