DATPROF vs Informatica Persistent Data Masking comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between DATPROF and Informatica Persistent Data Masking based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Data Masking solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed DATPROF vs. Informatica Persistent Data Masking Report (Updated: September 2023).
745,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"We have some customers who are in both SAP and non-SAP. When we do scrambling for different applications, it is extremely important that DATPROF and the SAP applications talk to each other and synchronize. Otherwise... [an] identity [can be] lost, from a name perspective.""The most valuable feature is that it's easy to use... We were able to quickly port a JD Edwards application into the DATPROF solution and we were able to scramble the data in that application. It's a single tool that helps us to do that across applications.""Its ease of use is valuable. It's pretty straightforward. With minimal training or with minimal guidance, it can be used.""We can create synthetic test data for our different development teams without needing production data, which is an excellent capability."

More DATPROF Pros →

"Informatica provides a comprehensive solution for on-the-fly or real-time data masking.""Informatica is user-friendly, stable, and scalable. These three aspects are the most valuable for us. If we can make it work well with the CRM, we can continue or try again this year to complete that part of the project. I am confident that this kind of solution is what we need because we have a third-party resource that works in the development.""Informatica Persistent Data Masking can mask production data for different users, ensuring that only authorized individuals can access sensitive information."

More Informatica Persistent Data Masking Pros →

Cons
"I feel that we have to do a lot of reworking of the template implementations... Maybe it is a limitation, but as a customer, it feels like we need to start from scratch every time. It would help if we could reuse at least some of what we have already done.""The synthetic data-generating element of the tool is relatively new, so we sometimes encounter bugs, though when we inform DATPROF, they act quickly to fix any issues. Of course, the fewer bugs we face, the better.""From what I know, there are some challenges with respect to the number of data formats that can be made available. This is something that can be improved.""They could improve the solution by expanding the APIs. If there were options to integrate it with other solutions, that would help."

More DATPROF Cons →

"Informatica should simplify the rules for setting classifications and user access management permissions. It's too complex to define, configure, and make work.""Once the data is masked, we won't be able to reverse it back to its original value.""Informatica's support understands the solution, but they lack the experience we need for our use case. That was one thing that we prioritized when we started searching for this kind of solution."

More Informatica Persistent Data Masking Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "I'm not part of the financial team, but as far as I understand, the price is very reasonable compared to the competitors."
  • "It's very competitive. There is a good price-to-feature relation. It doesn't give us the feeling that we are overspending on something. It provides the right value at the right price. It's worth it."
  • More DATPROF Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Masking solutions are best for your needs.
    745,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Its ease of use is valuable. It's pretty straightforward. With minimal training or with minimal guidance, it can be used.
    Top Answer:It's very competitive. There is a good price-to-feature relation. It doesn't give us the feeling that we are overspending on something. It provides the right value at the right price. It's worth it.
    Top Answer:From what I know, there are some challenges with respect to the number of data formats that can be made available. This is something that can be improved. With respect to mainframe platforms, the… more »
    Top Answer:Informatica Persistent Data Masking can mask production data for different users, ensuring that only authorized individuals can access sensitive information.
    Top Answer:I think there's only one area that could be improved. Currently, when we apply the Data Masking rate, we don't have a way to view the masked data. It would be helpful if there was a feature to allow… more »
    Top Answer:Test data management is a common use case. When conducting testing in lower environments, we want to avoid exposing sensitive information. To achieve this, we use Data Masking to modify the data. For… more »
    Ranking
    2nd
    out of 30 in Data Masking
    Views
    1,428
    Comparisons
    309
    Reviews
    5
    Average Words per Review
    1,126
    Rating
    8.8
    6th
    out of 30 in Data Masking
    Views
    418
    Comparisons
    253
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    695
    Rating
    7.5
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    DATPROF Privacy, DATPROF Test Data Management
    Data Masking, Informatica Data Masking
    Learn More
    Overview

    At DATPROF we see and understand the struggle and challenge of software development teams with test data. These data issues have different appearances. It can be in finding or understanding your test data: which set of data should be used to cover your test cases properly? Or it can be getting in control of your test data: do you also have a “test data ghost” - sometimes your test data is there and a second later in can be gone. Or it can be about the challenge of getting compliant without losing the representativeness of data in your development stages. And then there are things called data or databases. Software development teams need to work with test data, but they generally don’t spend too much time on databases or data content in flat formats. Software teams rather spend time in delivering beautiful new code or validating the quality of the software code, as you should. That’s what you love, and that “database thing”, well that’s a need-to-have.

    We envision to solve this issue. We want to make sure your life is once again centred upon delivering or validating software code and quality. We take care that test data is easy accessible and readily available, so you can take care of software quality.

    We improve and innovate our test data software with the latest technologies every single day to support medium to large size organizations to ensure an even better fit with our DATPROF products. The DATPROF test data management suite is module based, so it enables you to select and deploy the modules that fits your needs in your digital transformation stage.

    DATPROF delivers products for:

    • Obfuscating, generating or masking databases and flat files;
    • Extracting or filtering specific data content with our patented subset algorithm;
    • Discovering, profiling and analysing solutions for understanding your test data,
    • Automating, integrating and orchestrating test data provisioning into your CI/CD pipelines and
    • Delivering a portal where test data can be refreshed within a few mouse clicks.

    For more information visit: www.datprof.com

    De-identify, de-sensitize, and anonymize sensitive data from unauthorized access for application users, business intelligence, application testing, and outsourcing.

    Offer
    Learn more about DATPROF
    Learn more about Informatica Persistent Data Masking
    Sample Customers
    APG, UWV, VGZ, DUO, Admiral Group, Heineken, Region Stockholm, Green Shield Canada, BestPass, CalPERS, Birmingham City Council, Nest Pensions
    Vale, Hot Telecommunication, UPMC
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Manufacturing Company43%
    Insurance Company14%
    Government14%
    Transportation Company14%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm29%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Insurance Company7%
    Government6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm26%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Government10%
    Insurance Company9%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business20%
    Large Enterprise80%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business21%
    Midsize Enterprise8%
    Large Enterprise71%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise74%
    Buyer's Guide
    DATPROF vs. Informatica Persistent Data Masking
    September 2023
    Find out what your peers are saying about DATPROF vs. Informatica Persistent Data Masking and other solutions. Updated: September 2023.
    745,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    DATPROF is ranked 2nd in Data Masking with 4 reviews while Informatica Persistent Data Masking is ranked 6th in Data Masking with 3 reviews. DATPROF is rated 8.8, while Informatica Persistent Data Masking is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of DATPROF writes "Eliminated compliance issues for non-SAP applications, and gives us real, comprehensive data masking". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Informatica Persistent Data Masking writes "It's useful for extracting data from production for testing". DATPROF is most compared with Delphix, Broadcom Test Data Manager, K2View and Qlik Gold Client, whereas Informatica Persistent Data Masking is most compared with IBM Security Guardium Data Protection, Imperva SecureSphere Database Security, IBM InfoSphere Optim, Oracle GoldenGate and Protegrity Data Security. See our DATPROF vs. Informatica Persistent Data Masking report.

    See our list of best Data Masking vendors.

    We monitor all Data Masking reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.