We performed a comparison between Broadcom Test Data Manager and DATPROF based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Test Data Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Data generation, data masking, and data subsetting are three key features of this tool."
"Broadcom TDM's best feature is the self-service portal."
"The solution is very user-friendly. For instance, if I wanted to create a project with Data Generation, Data sub-setting, Selective sub-setting, and Data Marketing, it can be easily done in TDM. And if you want to export these project definitions from one system to another, it can be done with just one click."
"We can create synthetic test data for our different development teams without needing production data, which is an excellent capability."
"We have some customers who are in both SAP and non-SAP. When we do scrambling for different applications, it is extremely important that DATPROF and the SAP applications talk to each other and synchronize. Otherwise... [an] identity [can be] lost, from a name perspective."
"The most valuable feature is that it's easy to use... We were able to quickly port a JD Edwards application into the DATPROF solution and we were able to scramble the data in that application. It's a single tool that helps us to do that across applications."
"Its ease of use is valuable. It's pretty straightforward. With minimal training or with minimal guidance, it can be used."
"I would request to extend the data source support because there are a lot of cloud-native SaaS-based solutions in the market. Like, Azure has its data sources, Amazon-specific data sources, and there are a lot of proprietary data sources outside as well. I recommend the team to expand the data source support."
"I would say implementing test data management requires a lot of effort and time...Even if you have experienced people, it takes time."
"Broadcom TDM takes a long time to import documents, which wastes time that could be spent on other things."
"From what I know, there are some challenges with respect to the number of data formats that can be made available. This is something that can be improved."
"I feel that we have to do a lot of reworking of the template implementations... Maybe it is a limitation, but as a customer, it feels like we need to start from scratch every time. It would help if we could reuse at least some of what we have already done."
"The synthetic data-generating element of the tool is relatively new, so we sometimes encounter bugs, though when we inform DATPROF, they act quickly to fix any issues. Of course, the fewer bugs we face, the better."
"They could improve the solution by expanding the APIs. If there were options to integrate it with other solutions, that would help."
Broadcom Test Data Manager is ranked 2nd in Test Data Management with 3 reviews while DATPROF is ranked 3rd in Test Data Management with 4 reviews. Broadcom Test Data Manager is rated 9.0, while DATPROF is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Broadcom Test Data Manager writes "An user-friendly, stable, and scalable solution offering Kubernetes edition". On the other hand, the top reviewer of DATPROF writes "Eliminated compliance issues for non-SAP applications, and gives us real, comprehensive data masking". Broadcom Test Data Manager is most compared with Delphix, IBM InfoSphere Optim Test Data Management (TDM), Informatica Test Data Management (TDM), Tricentis Tosca and BMC Compuware File-AID, whereas DATPROF is most compared with Delphix, K2View and Qlik Gold Client. See our Broadcom Test Data Manager vs. DATPROF report.
See our list of best Test Data Management vendors and best Data Masking vendors.
We monitor all Test Data Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
