Find out in this report how the two Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
With premium support, core Palo Alto technical experts handle issues directly.
It is ineffective in terms of responding to basic queries and addressing future requirements.
I would rate the support of Palo Alto a nine out of ten.
Without proper integration, scaling up with more servers is meaningless.
Cortex XSIAM is highly scalable.
The product was easy to install and set up and worked right.
Overall, Cortex XSIAM is stable.
Cortex XSIAM is on the expensive side and requires substantial improvement in pricing.
Cortex XSIAM needs improvements in terms of data onboarding, parsers, and third-party integration supports.
In terms of incident response automation, it is quite poor due to the lack of integration with all security tools, making manual intervention necessary.
Price is always a consideration, so the price would be nice if it were lower.
The product is very expensive.
The first impression is that XSIAM would be more expensive than others we tried.
Cortex XSIAM is pretty expensive, and the licensing process is not very comfortable.
They nearly always bill it in dollars, so if it can be billed in our currency, that would be helpful and fixed in our currency.
The advanced visualization capabilities of the product are important for understanding security trends in an organization.
Cortex XSIAM allows us to onboard almost every device, whether they are on-prem or on SaaS.
Its signature-less subscriptions and robust detection power stand out in improving threat detection.
Sentinel's best features include that it's a very easy product to use.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Cortex XSIAM | 2.9% |
| Sentinel | 3.8% |
| Other | 93.3% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 9 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 2 |
| Large Enterprise | 3 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 9 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 7 |
Cortex XSIAM acts as a critical element for SOC foundations, integrating SIEM and EDR capabilities, valued for threat detection and seamless security orchestration with Palo Alto Networks products.
Organizations find Cortex XSIAM beneficial for SOC foundations due to its capability to integrate SIEM and EDR tools, facilitating data collection, detection, and response. It connects with third-party data sources while reducing management effort and offering cost-effective alternatives to competitors like CrowdStrike and Trend Micro. Featuring automation and integration with Palo Alto Networks products, Cortex XSIAM enhances threat detection. Unified architecture allows a comprehensive view of attacks, further supported by machine learning and integration with existing vendor solutions, ensuring that users gain insights without significant manual log analysis.
What are Cortex XSIAM's key features?
What benefits are evident in Cortex XSIAM reviews?
Industries implement Cortex XSIAM mainly in technology-driven sectors where centralized endpoint protection and automation of forensic investigation are paramount. By integrating several third-party systems for incident response, companies in competitive markets leverage its attributes for heightened operational security efficiency. However, users note areas for improvement, such as Attack Surface Management and integration enhancements, to better suit tech-heavy industries needing extensive connectivity with cybersecurity solutions.
Sentinel is a full-featured Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) solution that simplifies the deployment, management and day-to-day use of SIEM, readily adapts to dynamic enterprise environments and delivers the true "actionable intelligence" security professionals need to quickly understand their threat posture and prioritize response.
We monitor all Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
