Exabeam and Cortex XSIAM compete in the security logging and threat detection category. Exabeam is noted for user-friendliness and cost efficiency, whereas Cortex offers deeper integration and a streamlined detection process.
Features: Exabeam includes advanced analytics for improved security monitoring, user-friendly behavior analysis, and robust session-building capabilities. Cortex XSIAM provides a unified architecture that leverages machine learning for threat identification, efficient incident response, and integrates seamlessly with other Palo Alto products.
Room for Improvement: Exabeam needs enhancement in reducing false positives, better documentation, and improved API interaction. It also requires flexible global support and dashboard customization. Cortex XSIAM could optimize performance, enhance attack surface management, and increase integration capabilities. Both platforms struggle with technical support availability and response times outside key markets.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Exabeam allows both on-premises and cloud deployments, while Cortex XSIAM is cloud-based, which may restrict user flexibility. Exabeam has inconsistent customer service with variable response times, whereas Cortex generally receives positive feedback for more reliable support experiences.
Pricing and ROI: Exabeam provides a flexible pricing model that helps reduce operational costs and is often seen as competitive. Its cost is typically rated between six and seven out of ten. Cortex XSIAM offers competitive pricing, especially with specific contracts, although additional features can increase expenses. Both solutions provide a favorable return on investment, with Exabeam consolidating monitoring tools and reducing costs by up to 20%.
Exabeam offers more machine learning models that detect anomalies.
With premium support, core Palo Alto technical experts handle issues directly.
It is ineffective in terms of responding to basic queries and addressing future requirements.
The Palo Alto support team is fully responsive and helpful.
Even with TAM support from Exabeam, many issues go unresolved.
Without proper integration, scaling up with more servers is meaningless.
Cortex XSIAM is highly scalable.
The product was easy to install and set up and worked right.
Overall, Cortex XSIAM is stable.
These problems were not frequent, and the last six to eight months have been stable.
Cortex XSIAM is on the expensive side and requires substantial improvement in pricing.
Obtaining validation for integrations from Palo Alto takes around eight months, which is quite long.
Cortex XSIAM needs improvements in terms of data onboarding, parsers, and third-party integration supports.
I have explored the SaaS version; it offers many new features.
Exabeam needs to improve its documentation and provide more customization for dashboards and case management.
Cortex XSIAM is pretty expensive, and the licensing process is not very comfortable.
The first impression is that XSIAM would be more expensive than others we tried.
The product is very expensive.
The advanced visualization capabilities of the product are important for understanding security trends in an organization.
Cortex XSIAM allows us to onboard almost every device, whether they are on-prem or on SaaS.
The flexibility for creating manual workflows stands out.
Exabeam's AI capabilities, like the natural language mode, convert natural language into Exabeam queries, enhancing ease of use.
The product offers useful features like the dashboard, timeline, and session views, which enhance our security tools.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Cortex XSIAM | 2.9% |
| Exabeam | 1.6% |
| Other | 95.5% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 9 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 2 |
| Large Enterprise | 3 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 12 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 7 |
Cortex XSIAM acts as a critical element for SOC foundations, integrating SIEM and EDR capabilities, valued for threat detection and seamless security orchestration with Palo Alto Networks products.
Organizations find Cortex XSIAM beneficial for SOC foundations due to its capability to integrate SIEM and EDR tools, facilitating data collection, detection, and response. It connects with third-party data sources while reducing management effort and offering cost-effective alternatives to competitors like CrowdStrike and Trend Micro. Featuring automation and integration with Palo Alto Networks products, Cortex XSIAM enhances threat detection. Unified architecture allows a comprehensive view of attacks, further supported by machine learning and integration with existing vendor solutions, ensuring that users gain insights without significant manual log analysis.
What are Cortex XSIAM's key features?
What benefits are evident in Cortex XSIAM reviews?
Industries implement Cortex XSIAM mainly in technology-driven sectors where centralized endpoint protection and automation of forensic investigation are paramount. By integrating several third-party systems for incident response, companies in competitive markets leverage its attributes for heightened operational security efficiency. However, users note areas for improvement, such as Attack Surface Management and integration enhancements, to better suit tech-heavy industries needing extensive connectivity with cybersecurity solutions.
Exabeam Fusion is a cloud-delivered solution that that enables you to:
-Leverage turnkey threat detection, investigation, and response
-Collect, search and enhance data from anywhere
-Detect threats missed by other tools, using market-leading behavior analytics
-Achieve successful SecOps outcomes with prescriptive, threat-centric use case packages
-Enhance productivity and reduce response times with automation
-Meet regulatory compliance and audit requirements with ease
We monitor all Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
