Contrast Security Assess vs ReversingLabs comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Contrast Security and ReversingLabs are both solutions in the Application Security Tools category. Contrast Security is ranked #17 with an average rating of 7.8, while ReversingLabs is ranked #42. Contrast Security holds a 1.7% mindshare in AS, compared to ReversingLabs’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Contrast Security users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of ReversingLabs users who would recommend it.

Contrast Security Assess

Read 15 Contrast Security Assess reviews

5,122 Views
3,739 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

ReversingLabs

Read 4 ReversingLabs reviews

6,115 Views
1,529 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Contrast Security Assess

ReversingLabs

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

Contrast Security Assess and ReversingLabs are significant players in the security solutions market. While both feature strong capabilities, ReversingLabs seems to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive malware analysis and threat intelligence capabilities.

Features: Contrast Security Assess is known for its seamless integration, detailed security insights, and comprehensive visibility, allowing users to effectively monitor and manage security risks. ReversingLabs stands out with extensive malware analysis features, rich threat intelligence, and broad capabilities, offering a deep-dive security analysis that is highly valued by users.

Room for Improvement: User feedback suggests that Contrast Security Assess could improve reporting functionalities and expand support options to enhance user experience. Its dashboard usability is another area that could be refined. ReversingLabs could benefit from a simplified setup process, improvements in user interface clarity, and reduced complexity in managing updates to address user concerns.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Contrast Security Assess is praised for easy deployment across different environments, but users express a need for more responsive customer support. ReversingLabs, although having a more complex deployment process, is appreciated for providing responsive customer service, which is a strength users rely on despite deployment complexities.

Pricing and ROI: Users find Contrast Security Assess to offer competitive pricing and a good ROI, appreciating its cost-effective structure. ReversingLabs has a higher cost which users find justified by its robust features, delivering comprehensive security benefits essential for those requiring advanced threat detection capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Contrast Security Assess vs. ReversingLabs Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Contrast Security Assess vs. ReversingLabs

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 915,341 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Contrast Security Assess

Ranking in Application Security Tools

17th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (12th)

ReversingLabs

Ranking in Application Security Tools

42nd

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Anti-Malware Tools (42nd), Container Security (50th), Software Composition Analysis (SCA) (24th), Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP) (27th), Software Supply Chain Security (19th)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of Contrast Security Assess is 1.7%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ReversingLabs is 0.9%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Contrast Security Assess	1.7%
ReversingLabs	0.9%
Other	97.4%

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

Ryan Flake

Threat & Vulnerability Management Senior Analyst at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Real-time assessments have improved remediation speed and reduced time spent on authentication issues

I do find that here and there with Contrast Security Assess there are user interface issues, particularly with how they work with libraries. The way that it works is people have access to library data for all applications, not just the applications that they should have access to. However, they are trying to fix that. The way the libraries are handled with Contrast Security Assess could use some work. I know that there is an additional service tier that allows for more in-depth library data. These are small things. Contrast support has been great in fixing any issues or getting back to us with questions. They seem to really be dedicated to the product.

Read full review

Tim Craig

Forensic Lead, Global Security Fusion Center at a insurance company with 10,001+ employees

Very good malware and goodware repository and enables us to look more deeply at indicators of compromise

The automated static analysis of malware is the most valuable feature. Its detection abilities are very good. It hits all of the different platforms out there, platforms that see the items in the wild. Also, the solution’s object and file analysis provide us with actionable insights. Its malware and goodware repository is very good. It's very robust. It gets all of the different repositories that are out there that do analysis and brings them under one roof where we can statically analyze for those indicators of compromise and look at them more deeply. If we need to go deeper into things, we can do that.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Assess has an excellent API interface to pull APIs."

"No other tool does the runtime scanning like Contrast does. Other static analysis tools do static scanning, but Contrast is runtime analysis, when the routes are exercised. That's when the scan happens. This is a tool that has a very unique capability compared to other tools. That's what I like most about Contrast, that it's runtime."

"The solution is very accurate in identifying vulnerabilities. In cases where we are performing application assessment using Contrast Assess, and also using legacy application security testing tools, Contrast successfully identifies the same vulnerabilities that the other tools have identified but it also identifies significantly more. In addition, it has visibility into application components that other testing methodologies are unaware of."

"Contrast Security Assess has positively impacted my organization by improving the security features of our application."

"You cannot get much better than Contrast Security Assess for large deployments of applications and also critical applications."

"By far, the thing that was able to provide value was the immediate response while testing ahead of release, in real-time."

"Contrast Security Assess has positively impacted my organization by providing more control over secure software development."

"From a percentage perspective, somewhere around 90 percent of the time we used to spend has been given back to our team, because the false positive rate with Contrast is less than 5 percent."

More Contrast Security Assess pros

"As far as the malware repository is concerned, it's extensive. It's a good source for finding samples, where we are unable to find them on other channels or by leveraging other sources."

"As far as the availability of the content is generally concerned and the number of malicious programs that can be looked up in the repository, these are very extensive."

"The automated static analysis of malware is the most valuable feature. Its detection abilities are very good. It hits all of the different platforms out there, platforms that see the items in the wild."

"ReversingLabs has a large sample size."

"As far as static analysis information is concerned, we use most of the information that is available in order to determine whether or not we might be dealing with a malware variant. This includes information that is related to Java rules. This is also related to malware families indicated or specific malicious software variants that are labeled by name."

"We have complete faith that it can do that for us, and can do it at scale."

"It offers reports on a great many more file types than the other analysis solutions we have. It can give us a more in-depth analysis and better reporting on a larger number of file types. It also gives us a more comprehensive score on a number of things as well, and that's why we're using it as a front-end filter. It gives us more information... It's valuable because of its depth of information, as well as the breadth it gives us. There aren't a lot of tools that cover all of the different file types."

"We had nothing in the environment to do such analysis, so it's been a savior in many ways."

Cons

"I would like to see them come up with more scanning rules."

"Personalization of the board and how to make it appealing to an organization is something that could be done on their end. The reports could be adaptable to the customer's preferences."

"I think Contrast can also integrate with some AI tools and provide chat features if possible, so in case we have any more questions, we can chat with that chatbot and get remediations, which I believe would be a better enhancement to Contrast."

"The out-of-the-box reporting could be improved. We need to write our own APIs to make the reporting more robust."

"To instrument an agent, it has to be running on a type of application technology that the agent recognizes and understands. It's excellent when it works. If we're using an application that is using an unsupported technology, then we can't instrument it at all. We do use PHP and Contrast presently doesn't support that, although it's on their roadmap. My primary hurdle is that it doesn't support all of the technologies that we use."

"Contrast's ability to support upgrades on the actual agents that get deployed is limited. Our environment is pretty much entirely Java. There are no updates associated with that. You have to actually download a new version of the .jar file and push that out to your servers where your app is hosted. That can be quite cumbersome from a change-management perspective."

"The product's retesting part needs improvement. The tool also needs improvement in the suggestions provided for fixing vulnerabilities. It relies more on documentation rather than on quick fixes."

"The solution should provide more details in the section where it shows that third-party libraries have CVEs or some vulnerabilities."

More Contrast Security Assess cons

"While the company is very helpful, it would be very much appreciated to have extensive proof of concept scripts for the different APIs available, though not for all the APIs that we have purchased. Respective scripts are available, but those scripts which are available are typically not of very high quality."

"The product support could be better at times. Sometimes, the resources that they provide could be of higher quality."

"We would really like further integration with our threat intelligence platform, which is called ThreatConnect. We would also really like further integrations with an endpoint protection product we use called Tanium. The reason I mentioned both of these is that ReversingLabs claims to have extensive integrations with both of them, but they did not work for us."

"I would like to see if we could do a little bit more of bulk uploading of hash sets. Right now, I can only do them individually."

"The solution needs to improve integrations."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It's a tiered licensing model. The more you buy, as you cross certain quantity thresholds, the pricing changes. If you have a smaller environment, your licensing costs are going to be different than a larger environment... The licensing is primarily per application. An application can be as many agents as you need. If you've got 10 development servers and 20 production servers and 50 QA servers, all of those agents can be reporting as a single application that utilizes one license."

"The product's pricing is low. I would rate it a two out of ten."

"The good news is that the agent itself comes in two different forms: the unlicensed form and the licensed form. Unlicensed gives use of that software composition analysis for free. Thereafter, if you apply a license to that same agent, that's when the instrumentation takes hold. So one of my suggestions is to do what we're doing: Deploy the agent to as many applications as possible, with just the SCA feature turned on with no license applied, and then you can be more choosy and pick which teams will get the license applied."

"I like the per-application licensing model... We just license the app and we look at different vulnerabilities on that app and we remediate within the app. It's simpler."

"For what it offers, it's a very reasonable cost. The way that it is priced is extremely straightforward. It works on the number of applications that you use, and you license a server. It is something that is extremely fair, because it doesn't take into consideration the number of requests, etc. It is only priced based on the number of onboarded applications. It suits our model as well, because we have huge traffic. Our number of applications is not that large, so the pricing works great for us."

"You only get one license for an application. Ours are very big, monolithic applications with millions of lines of code. We were able to apply one license to one monolithic application, which is great. We are happy with the licensing. Pricing-wise, they are industry-standard, which is fine."

"The solution is expensive."

"We have a yearly contract based on the number of queries and malicious programs which can be processed."

"Currently, the license number of lookups that we purchased has not been reached yet, because the integration has only recently been completed. However, our usage is expected and planned to increase over the next couple of months."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Construction Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Comms Service Provider

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	11

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Contrast Security Assess?

I was not involved in the negotiation of pricing for Contrast Security Assess, but I am somewhat familiar with setup cost and licensing. Licensing costs are fairly high compared to other DAST and S...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Contrast Security Assess?

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Contrast Security Assess?

I would give Contrast Security Assess a score of 8 out of 10. That is a small little issue, but it is a great product and I would recommend it to others. There are a couple things that could be imp...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Veracode vs Contrast Security Assess

Compared 8% of the time

SonarQube vs Contrast Security Assess

Compared 6% of the time

Mend.io vs Contrast Security Assess

Compared 5% of the time

Quotium Seeker vs Contrast Security Assess

Compared 5% of the time

Oligo vs Contrast Security Assess

Compared 5% of the time

More Contrast Security Assess Competitors

JFrog Xray vs ReversingLabs

Compared 7% of the time

MetaDefender vs ReversingLabs

Compared 7% of the time

VirusTotal vs ReversingLabs

Compared 6% of the time

Black Duck SCA vs ReversingLabs

Compared 5% of the time

Wiz vs ReversingLabs

Compared 4% of the time

More ReversingLabs Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Contrast Security Assess

October 2026

Download Contrast Security Assess product report

Buyer's Guide

ReversingLabs

September 2026

Download ReversingLabs product report

Also Known As

Contrast Assess

ReversingLabs Titanium, ReversingLabs secure.software

Overview

Contrast Security Assess is an IAST platform known for accurate vulnerability detection. It integrates into development workflows, offering real-time insights into security issues with minimal false positives, supporting legacy applications and enhancing code security visibility.

Designed to integrate seamlessly into DevOps workflows, Contrast Security Assess automates real-time vulnerability detection and reduces false positives through its powerful IAST features. By continuously monitoring vulnerabilities, it provides a robust option for securing legacy applications and identifying vulnerabilities without lengthy scans. This cloud-hosted platform supports numerous programming languages, making it versatile for security testing across enterprise environments. Users benefit from detailed reports that pinpoint exact code locations requiring remediation, enhancing speed and efficiency in addressing security concerns.

What are the key features of Contrast Security Assess?

IAST Technology: Delivers accurate vulnerability detection with reduced false positives.
Seamless Integration: Integrates into development processes, supporting real-time vulnerability detection.
Open Source Security: Analyzes third-party libraries for vulnerabilities.
Continuous Monitoring: Provides valuable insights with real-time security feedback for developers.
API Interface: Enhances operational efficiency and streamlining with minimal false positives.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Enhanced Security Visibility: Offers comprehensive insights across application environments.
Speed and Efficiency: Quick identification and remediation of vulnerabilities accelerate development.
Operational Streamlining: Seamless integration into DevOps workflows improves productivity.
Legacy Application Support: Effective for securing existing applications with ongoing monitoring.

Companies in industries requiring high levels of application security, such as finance and healthcare, implement Contrast Security Assess for its ability to enhance visibility and detect vulnerabilities early in the development lifecycle. Its seamless integration with DevOps processes makes it ideal for environments that prioritize agility while maintaining stringent security standards.

Contrast Security

ReversingLabs delivers a cutting-edge solution for cybersecurity experts, specializing in advanced threat detection and response. It is trusted by industries focused on maintaining high security standards with its innovative use of technology.

ReversingLabs provides comprehensive support for identifying and mitigating threats using a robust intelligence platform. Its unique approach integrates threat detection with automated analysis tools, enhancing organizations' security frameworks. The transparency and depth in tracking files and binaries ensure that users have a clear understanding of potential issues in software and files. With an emphasis on speed and accuracy, it ensures threats are managed before they escalate.

What are the key features of ReversingLabs?

Threat Intelligence Platform: Integrates detailed malware analysis for proactive security measures.
Automated Analysis Tools: Speeds up threat detection and provides in-depth insights.
Comprehensive Data Management: Simplifies complex datasets for enhanced threat recognition.
Open Integration: Smoothly integrates with existing security infrastructures.

What benefits or ROI can users find in ReversingLabs?

Enhanced Security Capabilities: Strengthens defenses against emerging threats before damage occurs.
Efficiency in Detection: Reduces response time through rapid analysis and identification.
Cost Reduction: Minimizes resource allocation by automating the threat management process.
Scalability: Easily expands with growing security needs without added complexity.

ReversingLabs is widely implemented in industries such as finance and healthcare, where data protection is critical. Financial institutions utilize its threat detection to safeguard against data breaches, while healthcare providers rely on it to maintain patient confidentiality and protect sensitive information from cyber threats.

ReversingLabs

Sample Customers

Williams-Sonoma, Autodesk, HUAWEI, Chromeriver, RingCentral, Demandware.

Financial services, healthcare, government, manufacturing, oil & gas, telecommunications, information technology

Buyer's Guide

Contrast Security Assess vs. ReversingLabs

September 2026

Free Report: Contrast Security Assess vs. ReversingLabs

Find out what your peers are saying about Contrast Security Assess vs. ReversingLabs and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Contrast Security Assess vs. ReversingLabs report.

See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.