We performed a comparison between Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop and Couchbase based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two NoSQL Databases solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The scalability of Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop is excellent."
"We also really like the Cloudera community. You can have any question and will have your answer within a few hours."
"We experienced many issues when we started working with Hadoop 3.0 in the Cloudera 6.0 version, so there are a lot of things that need to improve. I believe they are working on that."
"The data science aspect of the solution is valuable."
"The solution is reliable and stable, it fits our requirements."
"The most valuable feature is Kubernetes."
"The product is completely secure."
"The solution's most valuable feature is the enterprise data platform."
"It is pretty stable."
"The valuable features of Couchbase are the many documents and index types, and they made a lot of features available enabling us to use it as a complete solution for our needs."
"The whole stack is valuable, but the portion of the stack that we're finding really handy is the analytics engine because that allows us to take and pre-build views."
"It can scale horizontally, and we are looking to expand our capacity."
"Sync Gateway is a great feature that supports the mobile application."
"The most valuable feature of Couchbase is document indexing. It is better than MongoDB. Additionally, the solution is easy to use."
"The most valuable features are the ease of application and the merging of data."
"The principal advantage of Couchbase is that we can have multiple database paradigms in the same product, without deploying multiple databases. We also like that it has lower latency, when compared to its competitor: Cassandra."
"The price of this solution could be lowered."
"There are multiple bugs when we update."
"The procedure for operations could be simplified."
"We experienced many issues when we started working with Hadoop 3.0 in the Cloudera 6.0 version, so there is a lot of things that need to improve."
"Without the big data environment, we cannot store all of this data live. We have billions of records and terabytes of storage to be used. It's not an option actually for us to have a big data environment."
"Currently, we are using many other tools such as Spark and Blade Job to improve the performance."
"They should focus on upgrading their technical capabilities in the market."
"It would be useful if Cloudera had more tools like SQL Engines that offer the traditional relational database. We have to do a lot of work preparing the data outside Cloudera before getting it into the platform."
"One thing that could improved upon is the level of concurrency. The documentation for this solution could also be improved."
"The failover and failback could be a bit easier. When I looked at it last time, it had to be manually done. It also took over an hour for us to rebalance all the nodes."
"Needs some capacity planning to deal with too much memory, CPUs and displays."
"It's easy to deploy. Where the challenge comes in is when you start putting data in, doing the indexes, and doing the integration with systems. Integration is one of their weakest points. Natively, there should be a wide range of integration options to be able to get data in."
"The performance could be quicker and better, especially in the querying process."
"It is very difficult to load the backup of the older version to the newer version."
"Couchbase could improve the design of the UI because it should be optimized for viewing statistics or a similar feature."
"The scripting language for this solution could be improved. A big selling point is that they're like SQL server but there is still quite a lot of missing functionality."
More Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop Pricing and Cost Advice →
Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop is ranked 5th in NoSQL Databases with 46 reviews while Couchbase is ranked 2nd in NoSQL Databases with 10 reviews. Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop is rated 7.8, while Couchbase is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop writes "Good end-to-end security features and we like that it's cloud independent". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Couchbase writes "No SQL cloud based solution used to manage unstructured data and push out large volumes of metrics at a low latency". Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop is most compared with Amazon EMR, HPE Ezmeral Data Fabric, Apache Spark, Cassandra and Oracle NoSQL, whereas Couchbase is most compared with MongoDB, Cassandra, ScyllaDB, CouchDB and Apache HBase. See our Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop vs. Couchbase report.
See our list of best NoSQL Databases vendors.
We monitor all NoSQL Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.