"The most valuable features are the counter features and the NoSQL schema. It also has good scalability. You can scale Cassandra to any finite level."
"The solution's database capabilities are very good."
"The time series data was one of the best features along with auto publishing."
"Some of the valued features of this solution are it has good performance and failover."
"The technical evaluation is very good."
"Cloudera is a very manageable solution with good support."
"The product as a whole is good."
"The file system is a valuable feature."
"I don't see any performance issues."
"The most valuable feature is Kubernetes."
"The solution is reliable and stable, it fits our requirements."
"We also really like the Cloudera community. You can have any question and will have your answer within a few hours."
"The most valuable feature is Impala, the querying engine, which is very fast."
"The solution is not easy to use because it is a big database and you have to learn the interface. This is the case though in most of these solutions."
"The disc space is lacking. You need to free it up as you are working."
"Fine-tuning was a bit of a challenge."
"Interface is not user friendly."
"The solution doesn't have joins between tables so you need other tools for that."
"Currently, we are using many other tools such as Spark and Blade Job to improve the performance."
"Without the big data environment, we cannot store all of this data live. We have billions of records and terabytes of storage to be used. It's not an option actually for us to have a big data environment."
"There are better solutions out there that have more features than this one."
"It would be useful if Cloudera had more tools like SQL Engines that offer the traditional relational database. We have to do a lot of work preparing the data outside Cloudera before getting it into the platform."
"The security of this solution could be improved. There should also be a way to basically have a blockchain enabled storage with the HDFS."
"It could be faster and more user-friendly."
"There is a maximum of a one-gigabyte block size, which is an area of storage that can be improved upon."
"The initial setup of Cloudera is difficult."
Cassandra is ranked 3rd in NoSQL Databases with 5 reviews while Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop is ranked 2nd in NoSQL Databases with 10 reviews. Cassandra is rated 8.4, while Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Cassandra writes "Great time series data feature but it requires third parties to join tables". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop writes "Performs well and the technical support is helpful, but the upgrade process needs to be consolidated". Cassandra is most compared with InfluxDB, Accumulo, Couchbase, Vertica and Neo4j, whereas Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop is most compared with HPE Ezmeral Data Fabric, Amazon EMR, Apache Spark, InfluxDB and MongoDB. See our Cassandra vs. Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop report.
See our list of best NoSQL Databases vendors.
We monitor all NoSQL Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.