No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop vs HPE Data Fabric comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Cloudera Distribution for H...
Ranking in Hadoop
2nd
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.3
Number of Reviews
51
Ranking in other categories
NoSQL Databases (10th)
HPE Data Fabric
Ranking in Hadoop
4th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.1
Number of Reviews
12
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Hadoop category, the mindshare of Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop is 14.7%, down from 25.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of HPE Data Fabric is 10.2%, down from 15.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Hadoop Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop14.7%
HPE Data Fabric10.2%
Other75.1%
Hadoop
 

Featured Reviews

SA
Head of Advaced Analytics & Intelligence; AGM at Alinma Bank
Integration of multiple features supports data analytics and processing
Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop provides numerous features and capabilities combined into one platform.The solution offers power processing and supports different file systems and query engines. It provides parallel processing for handling many requests. The platform includes role-based access control in Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop. It secures the data itself and provides users with different roles and privileges.
Hamid M. Hamid - PeerSpot reviewer
Data architect at Banking Sector
A stable and scalable tool that serves as a great database
The initial setup of HPE Ezmeral Data Fabric is easy. I am not sure how long it took to deploy HPE Ezmeral Data Fabric, but I haven't heard about any disadvantages when it comes to the time taken for the deployment. I remember that one of our company's clients who had purchased the product never mentioned the product's setup phase being complex. One of the drawbacks with HPE Ezmeral Data Fabric stems from the fact that the product's upgrade was not straightforward, and it was a complex process since one of the teams in my company who deals with the tool found the upgrade part to be tough. The solution is deployed on an on-premises model. My company has two dedicated staff members to look after the deployment and maintenance phases of HPE Ezmeral Data Fabric.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"We had a data warehouse before all the data. We can process a lot more data structures."
"The pricing is very competitive, it's not bad."
"In terms of scalability, if you have enough hardware you can scale out. Scalability doesn't have any issues."
"For enterprise organizations that can bear the cost, it's a good solution."
"The solution's most valuable feature is the enterprise data platform."
"Cloudera is a great product and, overall, there are many features."
"We also really like the Cloudera community. You can have any question and will have your answer within a few hours."
"Cloudera is a very manageable solution with good support."
"It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution."
"Initial setup is rather straightforward thanks to detailed documentation covering all the bases."
"The fact that the heavy computation is required on Big Data can be distributed across many nodes in a cluster, makes this solution a winner."
"My first choice is MapR, as it is more adaptable to different contexts, and it could be customized in some way to fit the different needs, and this is my first choice and my first advice to people who ask me about this particular platform."
"HPE Ezmeral Data Fabric can be accessed from any namespace globally as you would access it from a machine using an NFS."
"I like the administration part."
"Our customer purchased a paid support service and so far MapR has addressed our issues well."
"Outside of human error, MapR is probably the most stable of the major releases."
 

Cons

"The licensing was by node."
"Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop is not always completely stable in some cases, which can be a concern for big data solutions."
"I subscribe to Cloudera to get an enterprise version but I have found that I can get some of its features from other vendors that would be at a lower cost than Cloudera."
"The initial setup of Cloudera is difficult."
"Cloudera is not as easy, as it requires more DevOps resources than other solutions."
"I would like to see an improvement in how the solution helps me to handle the whole cluster."
"The Cloudera training has deteriorated significantly."
"The competitors provide better functionalities."
"The UI for administration still has a lot of manual work to set up the cluster and get it running."
"One weakness for MapR is the Kerberos support."
"Having the ability to extend the services provided by the platform to an API architecture, a micro-services architecture, could be very helpful."
"The biggest drawback is that it has vendor locking."
"HPE Ezmeral Data Fabric is not compatible with third-party tools."
"The product is not user-friendly."
"Installations and setups are still a bit cryptic and can be improved."
"The deployment could be faster. I want more support for the data lake in the next release."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price is very high. The solution is expensive."
"Cloudera requires a license to use."
"I wouldn't recommend CDH to others because of its high cost."
"The solution is fairly expensive."
"It is an expensive product."
"The solution is expensive."
"The tool is not expensive."
"When comparing with Oracle Sybase and SQL, it's cheaper. It's not expensive."
"HPE is flexible with you if you are an existing customer. They offer different models that might be beneficial for your organization. It all depends on how you negotiate."
"There is a need for my company to pay for the licensing costs of the solution."
"The tool's price is cheap and based on a usage basis. The solution's licensing costs are yearly and there are no extra costs."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Hadoop solutions are best for your needs.
902,270 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
23%
Construction Company
10%
Marketing Services Firm
8%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Financial Services Firm
18%
Construction Company
16%
Healthcare Company
10%
Comms Service Provider
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business16
Midsize Enterprise9
Large Enterprise32
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business4
Large Enterprise7
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop?
The price for Cloudera is average, yet it is very good compared to other solutions. It can be deployed on-premises, unlike competitors' cloud-only solutions.
What needs improvement with Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop?
If they could support modifying the data more easily than the current implementation, it would be beneficial.
What is your primary use case for Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop?
We use Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop for many use cases including analytics, storing huge data sets, and various data processing tasks.
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

No data available
MapR, MapR Data Platform
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

37signals, Adconion,adgooroo, Aggregate Knowledge, AMD, Apollo Group, Blackberry, Box, BT, CSC
Valence Health, Goodgame Studios, Pico, Terbium Labs, sovrn, Harte Hanks, Quantium, Razorsight, Novartis, Experian, Dentsu ix, Pontis Transitions, DataSong, Return Path, RAPP, HP
Find out what your peers are saying about Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop vs. HPE Data Fabric and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.
902,270 professionals have used our research since 2012.