CloudCheckr vs Google Cloud Billing comparison

Spot - A Flexera company and Google are both solutions in the Cloud Cost Management category. Spot - A Flexera company is ranked #11 with an average rating of 6.0, while Google is ranked #27. Spot - A Flexera company holds a 4.1% mindshare in CCM, compared to Google’s 1.2% mindshare. Additionally, 66% of Spot - A Flexera company users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Google users who would recommend it.

CloudCheckr

Read 8 CloudCheckr reviews

924 Views
536 Comparison Views

66% willing to recommend

Google Cloud Billing

Read 3 Google Cloud Billing reviews

215 Views
215 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

CloudCheckr

Google Cloud Billing

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 2, 2025

CloudCheckr and Google Cloud Billing are products competing in cloud expense management and optimization. Google Cloud Billing stands out due to its advanced feature set, providing comprehensive cloud management solutions, while CloudCheckr remains attractive with its pricing and support.

Features: CloudCheckr focuses on detailed security, compliance monitoring, and extensive cloud asset tracking, emphasizing multi-cloud environments. Google Cloud Billing is integrated with Google Cloud services, offering detailed cost reporting and forecasting within its ecosystem, highlighting an integrated approach compared to CloudCheckr's wide compatibility.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CloudCheckr offers flexible deployment across various cloud platforms, supported by solid customer service and comprehensive documentation. Google Cloud Billing is designed for seamless integration with Google Cloud, providing straightforward deployment for users within the Google ecosystem.

Pricing and ROI: CloudCheckr typically provides more competitive setup costs, promoting high ROI through cost savings and operational efficiency across multiple cloud providers. Google Cloud Billing may have higher initial costs, but its thorough cost management tools align with its platform’s capabilities, justifying the investment for Google Cloud users.

To learn more, read our detailed CloudCheckr vs. Google Cloud Billing Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

CloudCheckr vs. Google Cloud Billing

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 869,566 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CloudCheckr

Ranking in Cloud Cost Management

11th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Management (28th), Managed Cloud Services (7th)

Google Cloud Billing

Ranking in Cloud Cost Management

27th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Cloud Cost Management category, the mindshare of CloudCheckr is 4.1%, up from 4.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Google Cloud Billing is 1.2%, down from 1.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Cost Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
CloudCheckr	4.1%
Google Cloud Billing	1.2%
Other	94.7%

Cloud Cost Management

Featured Reviews

Peter Ramnath

Associate Director, ITSM & Onboarding at a computer software company with 201-500 employees

Provides recommendations regarding how cost and consumption can be adjusted, but the reporting and analytic capabilities are very limited

We are not happy with the product’s reporting capabilities. We are planning to change the solution. The security compliance feature doesn’t give much data because CloudCheckr has done a majority of its development on AWS. The majority of our clients are on Microsoft Azure. There are a lot of features and information available for Amazon, but not for Azure. The tool wasn't meeting our expectations. The reporting and analytic capabilities are very limited. There's no ability to do scheduled email reports. The report could only be sent to a single email address. The tool was not very usable. We had multiple clients and tasks to work with.

Read full review

PradeepKumar3

Director Technology Solutions at Redintegro Consulting Solution LLP

Simple to set up with helpful for cost management and good reliability

The only issue I faced was a while ago. My card was debited, or rather it was showing as debited when in actuality, it did not debit my card. After six months, they came back with back billing. Somebody should have verified the billing and immediately informed us. So yeah, However, six months is too late to identify such fault sightings. When I want to analyze the information, it would be better, since Google knows what I have used, to only show those items for analysis purposes. Especially when I look at a previous month's billing or usage across services. It's better to show the services which are used, not everything.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The best feature I like about CloudCheckr CMx High Security is its simplicity. I love that it's not rocket science to use the solution. Even if you're not familiar with the cloud, you can easily figure out how to use CloudCheckr CMx High Security. You can use AWS, you can use Azure, and you can use GCP with the solution because the integration is quite simple. You can also use multi-cloud with it, and you could see the billing part. You'll have complete visibility into your cost which I love about the solution. I also love that data on any security issues and vulnerabilities are available on the go with CloudCheckr CMx High Security. You don't need to do anything different. Just run the scan and you'll have all these open findings in the tool, in terms of the priority level, so if it's critical, it will tell you, "It's critical," and you need to fix it right away."

"The solution is mostly stable."

"The most valuable feature of CloudCheckr CMx High Security is granular reporting. Additionally, the user interface is easy to use."

"It's one of the leading players for cloud optimization. It's hard to find anything better."

"It will automatically suggest areas for optimization."

"The recommendation section is pretty helpful."

"The initial setup is straightforward."

"The solution is scalable for our purposes."

"It is a stable product."

"We use Google Cloud Billing to pay for or renew the license of our Google Workspace products."

"What I like most about this solution is that it's easy."

Cons

"What needs to be improved in CloudCheckr CMx High Security is integration. All the clouds are going quite fast, for example, all the cloud providers: Microsoft, Google, etc. CloudCheckr CMx High Security is good with AWS, no doubt about it, but with Azure and Google Cloud, I find that the solution is slow in that direction. If the vendor planned for CloudCheckr CMx High Security to be automated just for AWS, then it does make sense. If not, if the vendor is also targeting good integration with Google and Microsoft, then CloudCheckr CMx High Security integration needs improvement, in particular, it has to be faster. At the moment, its integration with Azure is not as good as its integration with AWS. With GCP, integration is nowhere."

"The solution needs to work better with larger capacities of data."

"Many features still need to be implemented in this tool."

"The reporting and analytic capabilities are very limited."

"The performance of the tool really needs to be improved."

"CloudCheckr CMx High Security is complex. There are a lot of menus, and if you do not know what you are looking for you can get lost. However, the interface is self-explanatory. It's easy to understand where to go to get what you want."

"The solution must improve its user interface."

"Self-healing could be a bit smoother and a bit cleaner, easier to access and more functional. That would help."

"When I want to analyze the information, it would be better, since Google knows what I have used, to only show those items for analysis purposes."

"Google Cloud Billing should have a more user-friendly interface."

"At times you will find that the computer engines are freezing or it's about to freeze without any notification or information and it's unable to diagnose where it is hung."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The cost is on par with other providers."

"A license is needed to use CloudCheckr CMx High Security, but because we are a managed service provider, the price of the license would vary. It depends on the type of cloud users we have, for example, it would be some type of percentage or monthly billing, etc."

"The solution is reasonably priced."

"The licensing fees are monthly and cost approximately $100.00."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Cost Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

17%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Educational Organization

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	5

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about CloudCheckr ?

The recommendation section is pretty helpful.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CloudCheckr ?

The price depends on the actual Azure consumption and what we feed into it. The cost is on par with other providers.

See all answers

What needs improvement with CloudCheckr ?

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Flexera Cloud Cost Management vs CloudCheckr

Compared 23% of the time

Cloudability vs CloudCheckr

Compared 17% of the time

Apptio One vs CloudCheckr

Compared 14% of the time

IBM Turbonomic vs CloudCheckr

Compared 13% of the time

AWS Cost Explorer vs CloudCheckr

Compared 12% of the time

More CloudCheckr Competitors

IBM Turbonomic vs Google Cloud Billing

Compared 100% of the time

More Google Cloud Billing Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

CloudCheckr

October 2025

Download CloudCheckr product report

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Cost Management

September 2025

Download Google Cloud Billing product report

Also Known As

CloudCheckr CMx High Security, CloudCheckr CMP

No data available

Overview

CloudCheckr CMx High Security is a cloud management platform that provides complete visibility into cost and security issues. The primary use cases are day-to-day operations, cloud management, identifying open vulnerabilities and issues from a security perspective, and cost management and optimization.

The solution is praised for its stability, simplicity, ease of use, scalability, excellent technical support, and granular reporting. CloudCheckr CMx High Security provides priority-level data on security issues and vulnerabilities, making it easy to identify critical issues that need immediate attention.

Spot - A Flexera company

Google Cloud's cost management tools provide the visibility, accountability, control, and intelligence you need so that you can scale your business in the cloud with confidence. Tailored to meet the needs of organizations of all sizes, these tools help reduce complexity and increase the predictability of your cloud costs.

Google

Sample Customers

Accenture, Logitech, Ingram, Cloudar, Infor, DXC, Cornell University, DLT, Lumen, Lightstream, Choice Hotels, B-Tech, SmileShark, PTP, Explicity, JCH Technology, Siemens Mobility

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

CloudCheckr vs. Google Cloud Billing

September 2025

Free Report: CloudCheckr vs. Google Cloud Billing

Find out what your peers are saying about CloudCheckr vs. Google Cloud Billing and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CloudCheckr vs. Google Cloud Billing report.

See our list of best Cloud Cost Management vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Cost Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.