Discover the top alternatives and competitors to HPE Synergy based on the interviews we conducted with its users.
The top alternative solutions include Dell PowerEdge Rack Servers, Dell PowerEdge M, and Cisco UCS B-Series.
The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Alternatives Report
Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Hewlett Packard Enterprise, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Dell PowerEdge Rack Servers offer scalable, reliable solutions ideal for traditional server environments with excellent support and integrated cybersecurity. In comparison, HPE Synergy's composable infrastructure provides flexibility and resource-efficient management, suitable for businesses seeking a modern, adaptable system.
Dell PowerEdge M excels in virtualization with robust scalability and energy efficiency, suitable for scientific workloads. In comparison, HPE Synergy's composable infrastructure allows dynamic resource management, enhancing adaptability for varied datacenter needs with improved scalability and integration through HPE OneView management.
Dell PowerEdge M features competitive setup costs while HPE Synergy offers scalable options at a higher expense, reflecting distinct initial investment thresholds for these enterprise solutions.
Dell PowerEdge M features competitive setup costs while HPE Synergy offers scalable options at a higher expense, reflecting distinct initial investment thresholds for these enterprise solutions.
Cisco UCS B-Series excels in scalability and virtualization capabilities, offering efficient system management and reduced cabling. In comparison, HPE Synergy provides composability for flexible resource allocation and modular design. Cisco offers strong networking performance; however, HPE emphasizes simplified infrastructure management.
The setup cost for Cisco UCS B-Series is often noted as high due to its comprehensive infrastructure, while HPE Synergy is praised for a more flexible pricing model, allowing for gradual investment in modular components.
The setup cost for Cisco UCS B-Series is often noted as high due to its comprehensive infrastructure, while HPE Synergy is praised for a more flexible pricing model, allowing for gradual investment in modular components.
Supermicro SuperBlade is preferred for cost-effective performance and a high-density design. In comparison, HPE Synergy offers advanced features like composable infrastructure and scalability. Supermicro appeals to budget-conscious buyers, while HPE delivers long-term ROI through superior technological integration.
HPE Synergy offers dynamic resource allocation and VMware integration, ideal for scalability and flexibility. In comparison, Lenovo Flex System emphasizes stability and efficient space utilization with high-density blade servers, suitable for those prioritizing performance and resource efficiency before expansion.
HPE Synergy excels in composability for flexible resource reuse, appealing to efficiency-focused tech buyers with cost-saving potential. In comparison, Cisco UCS E-Series provides network reliability and stable integration, attracting those prioritizing manageability and stable network provisioning in their IT infrastructure solutions.
HPE Synergy has lower setup costs compared to Cisco UCS E-Series Servers, highlighting its cost efficiency for initial deployment. Cisco UCS E-Series, however, is positioned at a higher price point, reflecting a more premium setup investment.
HPE Synergy has lower setup costs compared to Cisco UCS E-Series Servers, highlighting its cost efficiency for initial deployment. Cisco UCS E-Series, however, is positioned at a higher price point, reflecting a more premium setup investment.
HPE Synergy offers scalability and flexible architecture suitable for diverse applications. In comparison, Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series is ideal for its efficient power consumption and robust performance. HPE's strong customer support contrasts with Fujitsu's focus on cost-effectiveness and energy efficiency.
HPE Synergy's setup cost is higher due to its advanced infrastructure, while Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series offers a more budget-friendly setup, emphasizing cost-effectiveness over premium features.
HPE Synergy's setup cost is higher due to its advanced infrastructure, while Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series offers a more budget-friendly setup, emphasizing cost-effectiveness over premium features.
