Cisco TelePresence vs TeamViewer comparison

Read 110 TeamViewer reviews

14,454 Views
3,180 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Cisco TelePresence

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 19, 2026

Cisco TelePresence and TeamViewer Business compete in video conferencing and remote collaboration. TeamViewer Business appears to have an edge due to its flexible features and cost efficiency.

Features: Cisco TelePresence offers immersive high-definition video conferencing with robust security and complete directory access. TeamViewer Business provides enhanced remote access, versatile platform integration, and a high level of security with session recording.

Room for Improvement:Cisco TelePresence could benefit from simplifying setup and reducing infrastructure costs. Improving adaptability to various team sizes and offering more flexible service models could enhance its appeal. Meanwhile, TeamViewer Business could improve its customization options, streamline its file transfer process, and enhance large-scale deployment capabilities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cisco TelePresence has a complex setup requiring significant investment and offers quality customer service. TeamViewer Business offers straightforward deployment with quick access, minimal setup, and responsive support.

Pricing and ROI: Cisco TelePresence requires a higher initial investment due to hardware needs, offering substantial ROI for permanent setups. TeamViewer Business is more cost-effective with lower setup costs and flexible subscriptions, providing quick ROI with efficient remote access capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Cisco TelePresence vs. TeamViewer Report (Updated: August 2026).

Cisco TelePresence vs. TeamViewer

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 909,725 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cisco TelePresence

Ranking in Virtual Meetings

9th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

TeamViewer

Ranking in Virtual Meetings

2nd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

110

Ranking in other categories

Remote Access (1st), Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) (3rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Virtual Meetings category, the mindshare of Cisco TelePresence is 2.9%, up from 2.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of TeamViewer is 3.7%, down from 7.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Virtual Meetings Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
TeamViewer	3.7%
Cisco TelePresence	2.9%
Other	93.4%

Virtual Meetings

Featured Reviews

OSCAR DE LA PENA

Senior Solution Architect at Ricoh España, S.L.U.

One-click meeting access and seamless integration enhance video conferencing experience

Cisco TelePresence could improve the WebRTC connections, as they are quite slow. The end user experiences delays when using WebRTC, sometimes taking one minute or more to receive a connection. This issue is mainly due to Cisco taking a long time to download and start the WebRTC client on their devices. Ensuring it is embedded in the device could help.

Read full review

Shubham-Agarwal

Manager - Projects at Cognizant

Remote access has cut critical issue resolution time and supports faster production troubleshooting

Perhaps on the UI side of TeamViewer because we are connecting to different remote desktop connections or remote server connections. Whenever we are working on one of the production issues and we open multiple connections, it is very hectic or confusing to jump from one server to another server. Perhaps on the UI side, if they can improve something related to the view sessions or which session is connected to which remote server, that would be helpful. Perhaps something related to the authentication because it should have a proper authentication mechanism. Every developer should not access TeamViewer or the remote desktop by using TeamViewer. We always have a proper authentication or multifactor authentication mechanism in place, so only those on on-call support or P1 support at that time can access the remote server, but not anyone else. I chose nine out of 10 because sometimes we face the session timeout issue. Suppose during the production support, we connect to one of the remote servers, and if it is idle for approximately 10 or 15 minutes, the session timeout happens. We have to follow the same authentication mechanism to connect to the remote server again. During the session timeout, it delays our process or the troubleshooting steps, which is the reason I have given nine out of 10 instead of 10.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Superior video and audio experience."

"The SpeakerTrack feature is the most valuable feature."

"PresenterTrack cameras improve the meeting experience."

"The speaker tracker feature in Cisco Telepresence is highly valuable, especially the ability to track multiple participants and change focus during meetings."

"Telepresence's most valuable feature is keeping highly paid employees, such as executives, on the ground instead of wasting time flying around the world. So if you have the right telepresence plan and form, it's not just the video cameras and the systems behind them, it's the way you lay out your meeting room.You can have multiple offices interconnecting in a single meeting, and it looks like everybody's in the same big conference room together because the telepresence yields such a fantastic amount of clarity."

"If at any point we require any support or our team requires any support, we just call into the Cisco support with their call-in number and they are very good."

"Cisco is a leader in video conferencing solutions because they apply the latest technologies to their devices and services, such as artificial intelligence and versatile functionalities."

"TelePresence allows our customers to have a quick meeting while traveling and still be effective. It saves time and money."

More Cisco TelePresence pros

"It’s pretty dependable and very easy to use."

"It was worth the investment. You can do file transfers and video calls with it. You can do a lot of copy paste stuff. E.g., if I have a file and want to place it on somebody's machine, I can just copy it off of mine and paste it right on their machine. I don't have to put it in a Dropbox account and have them log into it to pull it off. I can do all that right through TeamViewer. When you're looking at the TeamViewer screen, you think you are working on your own machine."

"TeamViewer Business has positively impacted my organization by giving us the ability to provide clients with a good experience and to fix bugs quickly while accessing their computers."

"The best feature is the remote access and being able to control another person's computer when you're showing them something, or teaching them how to do something during training, or fixing a problem they're having."

"Unattended access with single login."

"It's worth every penny; I would recommend it any time."

"From my perspective, the most important is the login, and in my opinion, the user interface is good."

"Saving users in the interface has helped our workflow and made things easier for our team because we use it every single day, and we would struggle to support our teams effectively without TeamViewer Business; it has made things much easier."

More TeamViewer pros

Cons

"The tool is expensive."

"MX800 comes only with one available DVI port. A few more HDMI ports will improve the system's capability."

"I was in touch with one of our clients and they mentioned that they would like to have a holographic video conferencing. It would be great if that feature would be added."

"Cisco TelePresence license is expensive and should be reduced."

"Cisco TelePresence could improve its integration capabilities."

"The calling features can be improved."

"Cisco TelePresence could improve the WebRTC connections, as they are quite slow."

"I would rate my experience with the initial setup a three out of ten, with ten being expensive. It was complex with badges and certificates. Too crazy."

"TeamViewer could improve by adding support for other operating systems, such as Linux and CAKE."

"The voice chat could be better."

"Sometimes we'll have a device in the field, and I'll click on remote control and it says "Can't authenticate." I'll double click in a different part of the TeamViewer interface and it'll say "Can't authenticate." Then I'll do it a third time and it connects. It's possible that it's just bad luck. It's also very possible that it's some bug within TeamViewer..."

"The one area which needs improvement for both the standalone and enterprise versions would be inter-operability between versions."

"One thing I have noticed is that TeamViewer does not work so well when the machine you are trying to connect to remotely is not running the same version as your machine."

"On occasion, when remote connection process can't connect to a machine, the error messages aren't always helpful to tell you why you can't connect, as the message doesn't help troubleshoot whether it is too slow, too much interference, etc. I usually have to run to another computer and figure out what is going on, then restart it. The diagnostics could be improved."

"It should have ability to display notes in the computer list."

"Sometimes it lags."

More TeamViewer cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is expensive, therefore I rate it an eight out of ten."

"Cisco TelePresence license is expensive and should be reduced. There is only a cost for the license and it is annually."

"The price of Cisco Telepresence is high, especially in Brazil. However, the quality of the product justifies the cost."

"We used high definition, 1080p, but again, it required license purchases. For example, with three licenses (TP licenses), each allowing one 1080p screen, if I had six participants, I'd need to lower the resolution to 720p or lower to accommodate more participants. More licenses meant more cost."

"I will rate the tool's pricing an eight out of ten."

"We're using the free version. We do not pay any licensing fees."

"We use the free version of TeamViewer."

"The solution's pricing is reasonable."

"I rate pricing a ten on a scale from one to ten, where one is low and ten is high. There are no additional costs attached to the licensing of the solution."

"The solution has a pilot feature that is expensive. The overall price of the solution can be cheaper."

"I used the free version of TeamViewer."

"It does what I need it to do but I think it's expensive. It wasn't easy for me to get approval from the company to get it... It's costing us about $700 a year, per license."

"The price was cheaper than what we were previously paying. At the time that we went with TeamViewer, we were using ShareConnect. The TeamViewer package was about half the cost and able to have a bigger number of users."

More TeamViewer pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Virtual Meetings solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Performing Arts

11%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Construction Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Construction Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	5

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	44
Midsize Enterprise	37
Large Enterprise	39

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Cisco TelePresence?

What advice do you have for others considering Cisco TelePresence?

Cisco is a leader in video conferencing solutions because they apply the latest technologies to their devices and services, such as artificial intelligence and versatile functionalities. Security i...

What is your primary use case for Cisco TelePresence?

My primary use case for Cisco TelePresence ( /products/cisco-telepresence-reviews ) is providing video conferencing solutions for internal and external users, especially for enterprises. I am a par...

Should I choose Teamviewer Tensor over the regular Teamviewer?

The number one advantage of TeamViewer for me is its ease of use, specifically as it relates to the client side. By far, one of its best features is the remote access it provides. I can control som...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for TeamViewer?

The pricing, setup cost, and licensing for TeamViewer Business are relatively very competitive and cost-effective.

What needs improvement with TeamViewer?

I believe latency can be optimized, and security control sometimes goes over the top and feels excessive. Virus scanning while file sharing is not provided, which is a concern as we frequently depl...

Microsoft Teams vs Cisco TelePresence

Comparisons

Compared 14% of the time

Webex vs Cisco TelePresence

Compared 10% of the time

Zoom Workplace Business vs Cisco TelePresence

Compared 10% of the time

LifeSize vs Cisco TelePresence

Compared 9% of the time

Polycom RealPresence Clariti vs Cisco TelePresence

Compared 8% of the time

More Cisco TelePresence Competitors

BeyondTrust Remote Support vs TeamViewer

Compared 6% of the time

Microsoft Remote Desktop Services vs TeamViewer

Compared 5% of the time

LogMeIn Rescue vs TeamViewer

Compared 4% of the time

ScreenConnect vs TeamViewer

Compared 3% of the time

Check Point Remote Access VPN vs TeamViewer

Compared 3% of the time

More TeamViewer Competitors

Product Reports

Download Cisco TelePresence product report

Virtual Meetings

August 2026

Download TeamViewer product report

July 2026

Also Known As

TelePresence

TeamViewer Tensor

Overview

Cisco TelePresence offers a powerful communication platform for businesses, featuring high meeting clarity, easy integration, and user-friendly operation, making it suitable for real-time video collaborations.

Cisco TelePresence provides advanced video conferencing capabilities ideal for connecting teams across different locations. Its integration with Microsoft Teams and ease of use are key highlights. While high-definition capabilities depend on licenses, the platform still provides robust video quality through dual cameras. Despite requiring improvements in port availability and integration with other software platforms, its one-button-to-push and complete directory access enable uninterrupted communication.

What are the key features of Cisco TelePresence?

Meeting Clarity: Ensures high-quality video and audio for effective communication.
Dual Cameras: Provides flexibility and enhanced visual experience.
Integration with Microsoft Teams: Seamlessly connects meeting environments for improved productivity.
SpeakerTrack: Automatically tracks and focuses on the speaker for a more engaging meeting.
One-Button-to-Push: Simplifies joining meetings, enhancing user convenience.

What benefits and ROI should users consider?

Reduced Travel Costs: Enables face-to-face communication without physical travel.
Enhanced Collaboration: Increases interaction and engagement across teams and locations.
Time Efficiency: Facilitates quick meetings and decision-making processes.
High Quality Communication: Maintains clear and effective video and audio transmission.

Cisco TelePresence is widely implemented in industries to improve communication in boardrooms, client meetings, and training sessions. Enterprises utilize the platform for end-to-end video conferencing, ensuring teams and partners are effectively connected, thus reducing travel time and costs significantly. Its seamless integration streamlines collaboration efforts across the globe, adapting to varying communication needs across diverse sectors.

Cisco

TeamViewer offers a license type mainly for small teams, focusing on remote connectivity solutions. It includes TeamViewer Remote and TeamViewer Tensor, catering to both small businesses and large enterprises with specialized needs.

TeamViewer Business isn't standalone but a primary license for small teams. Its remote connectivity suite includes TeamViewer Remote and TeamViewer Tensor, the latter offering enhanced features for enterprises. It enables secure, high-speed remote access, collaboration, and troubleshooting. Major users suggest aligning product descriptions and improvement in interfaces and user experiences.

What are the key features of TeamViewer?

High-speed and secure remote access: Fast connections with strong security measures.
Robust collaboration tools: Enhances team productivity remotely.
Screen sharing: Easy display sharing for presentations and meetings.
Session recording: Documentation and review of remote sessions.
Easy integration: Seamless compatibility with other platforms and tools.

What benefits do users highlight?

Improved workflow: Streamlines processes and reduces downtime.
Efficient troubleshooting: Quick resolutions to technical issues.
Compliance assurance: Meets necessary security standards and regulations.
Time and resource savings: Minimizes the need for physical presence and travel.

Organizations use TeamViewer for remote desktop connectivity to manage and solve IT issues. It allows technical support, collaboration, and training with real-time assistance and secure access. By enabling remote support for employees and customers, it ensures efficient issue resolution across industries, such as healthcare, finance, and education.

Sample Customers

Afni, AGCO, Bellevue, Came Group, Children's Hospital of Orange County (CHOC Children's), Del Papa Distributing, Instituto Zaldivar, ING Bank, Moffitt Cancer Center, Park Nicollet, Pentana Solutions Australia, San Jose State University, Sub-Zero Wolf, Transwestern and Metropolis Investment Holdings, Vital Images

Porsche Informatik, Philips, DHL, Intel, Motorola, Microsoft, IBM, Siemens, Fujitsu, American Red Cross