IT Central Station is now PeerSpot: Here's why

Cisco TelePresence vs Pexip comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Cisco Logo
1,263 views|862 comparisons
Pexip Logo
368 views|305 comparisons
Buyer's Guide
Virtual Meetings
July 2022
Find out what your peers are saying about TeamViewer, Zoom Video Communications, 3CX and others in Virtual Meetings. Updated: July 2022.
622,645 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"TelePresence allows our customers to have a quick meeting while traveling and still be effective. It saves time and money.""The most valuable features of Cisco TelePresence are the basic standard features and the ease of use. Additionally, the configuration and integration are exemplary."

More Cisco TelePresence Pros →

"The solution offers a very user-friendly experience."

More Pexip Pros →

Cons
"The price of Cisco TelePresence overall should be reduced."

More Cisco TelePresence Cons →

"Since they use a capacity license model, the problem is you have to do a first step proof of concept to see how many calls you have."

More Pexip Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Cisco TelePresence license is expensive and should be reduced. There is only a cost for the license and it is annually."
  • More Cisco TelePresence Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Virtual Meetings solutions are best for your needs.
    622,645 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The most valuable features of Cisco TelePresence are the basic standard features and the ease of use. Additionally, the configuration and integration are exemplary.
    Top Answer:The price of Cisco TelePresence overall should be reduced.
    Top Answer:The solution offers a very user-friendly experience.
    Top Answer:From a pricing standpoint, it's cheaper than Cisco TMS. Users can decide on monthly or yearly licensing agreements. They have the option for both. They use a capacity license model.
    Top Answer:The solution is too big, too vast to really wrap your head around everything. There are too many directions it can go in. There aren't too many negatives. It's been an overall positive experience… more »
    Ranking
    15th
    out of 59 in Virtual Meetings
    Views
    1,263
    Comparisons
    862
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    236
    Rating
    8.0
    22nd
    out of 59 in Virtual Meetings
    Views
    368
    Comparisons
    305
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    TelePresence
    Learn More
    Overview
    Cisco TelePresence Server brings multiparty video to unified communications deployments. Its flexible video, audio, and content-sharing capabilities allow users to participate in video conferences with multiple parties. Users can easily create, launch, and join meetings using standards-based video endpoints. Or their mobile devices or Cisco WebEx clients. Or even third-party video endpoints. The server provides high-quality, standards-based video conferencing for mobile, desktop, and room systems.

    Pexip simplifies video communication across borders, businesses and platforms.

    High-quality video meetings
    Reliable, high-performing video experience for both you and your guests. Every time.

    Total interoperability
    Connect all your video conferencing technology with a single solution. Support tools like Microsoft Teams, Google Hangouts Meet, or Skype for Business in the same workflow as meeting room systems and mobile, desktop, or web users.

    Flexible deployments
    A cloud-native platform provided as a service or deployed as a self-hosted solution either on-premises or in any cloud environment.

    Offer
    Learn more about Cisco TelePresence
    Learn more about Pexip
    Sample Customers
    Afni, AGCO, Bellevue, Came Group, Children's Hospital of Orange County (CHOC Children's), Del Papa Distributing, Instituto Zaldivar, ING Bank, Moffitt Cancer Center, Park Nicollet, Pentana Solutions Australia, San Jose State University, Sub-Zero Wolf, Transwestern and Metropolis Investment Holdings, Vital Images
    PayPal, Nordea, Vodafone, Spotify, Intel
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Comms Service Provider31%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Government10%
    Manufacturing Company5%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Comms Service Provider29%
    Computer Software Company26%
    Educational Organization7%
    Government6%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business21%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise63%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise18%
    Large Enterprise57%
    Buyer's Guide
    Virtual Meetings
    July 2022
    Find out what your peers are saying about TeamViewer, Zoom Video Communications, 3CX and others in Virtual Meetings. Updated: July 2022.
    622,645 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Cisco TelePresence is ranked 15th in Virtual Meetings with 2 reviews while Pexip is ranked 22nd in Virtual Meetings with 1 review. Cisco TelePresence is rated 8.0, while Pexip is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Cisco TelePresence writes "Responsive support, reliable, and integrates well". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Pexip writes "Well-priced, user-friendly, and offers many great features". Cisco TelePresence is most compared with Webex, Zoom, Polycom RealPresence Clariti, Cisco Meeting Server and Skype for Business, whereas Pexip is most compared with Cisco Meeting Server.

    See our list of best Virtual Meetings vendors.

    We monitor all Virtual Meetings reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.