Cisco TelePresence vs Pexip comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Cisco Logo
1,047 views|589 comparisons
83% willing to recommend
Pexip Logo
426 views|237 comparisons
0% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Cisco TelePresence and Pexip based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Zoom Video Communications, Cisco, TeamViewer and others in Virtual Meetings.
To learn more, read our detailed Virtual Meetings Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"It was stable. So, I would rate the stability a ten out of ten.""Telepresence's most valuable feature is keeping highly paid employees, such as executives, on the ground instead of wasting time flying around the world. So if you have the right telepresence plan and form, it's not just the video cameras and the systems behind them, it's the way you lay out your meeting room.You can have multiple offices interconnecting in a single meeting, and it looks like everybody's in the same big conference room together because the telepresence yields such a fantastic amount of clarity.""The configuration is a valuable.""PresenterTrack cameras improve the meeting experience.""The most valuable features of Cisco TelePresence are the basic standard features and the ease of use. Additionally, the configuration and integration are exemplary.""The SpeakerTrack feature is the most valuable feature.""TelePresence allows our customers to have a quick meeting while traveling and still be effective. It saves time and money.""We have a dual screen option to enable video and content sharing."

More Cisco TelePresence Pros →

"The solution offers a very user-friendly experience."

More Pexip Pros →

Cons
"I was in touch with one of our clients and they mentioned that they would like to have a holographic video conferencing. It would be great if that feature would be added.""I would rate my experience with the initial setup a three out of ten, with ten being expensive. It was complex with badges and certificates. Too crazy.""The calling features can be improved.""The tool is expensive.""The price of Cisco TelePresence overall should be reduced.""MX800 comes only with one available DVI port. A few more HDMI ports will improve the system's capability."

More Cisco TelePresence Cons →

"Since they use a capacity license model, the problem is you have to do a first step proof of concept to see how many calls you have."

More Pexip Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Cisco TelePresence license is expensive and should be reduced. There is only a cost for the license and it is annually."
  • "I will rate the tool's pricing an eight out of ten."
  • "The pricing is expensive, therefore I rate it an eight out of ten."
  • "We used high definition, 1080p, but again, it required license purchases. For example, with three licenses (TP licenses), each allowing one 1080p screen, if I had six participants, I'd need to lower the resolution to 720p or lower to accommodate more participants. More licenses meant more cost."
  • More Cisco TelePresence Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Virtual Meetings solutions are best for your needs.
    768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:It was stable. So, I would rate the stability a ten out of ten.
    Top Answer:There can be some features to enhance the collaboration. For example, with 50 participants using physical devices, some might want to join from other software like Teams, Link, or Skype. That wasn't… more »
    Top Answer:Overall, I would rate the solution a seven out of ten.
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    9th
    out of 63 in Virtual Meetings
    Views
    1,047
    Comparisons
    589
    Reviews
    5
    Average Words per Review
    340
    Rating
    7.6
    22nd
    out of 63 in Virtual Meetings
    Views
    426
    Comparisons
    237
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    TelePresence
    Learn More
    Overview
    Cisco TelePresence Server brings multiparty video to unified communications deployments. Its flexible video, audio, and content-sharing capabilities allow users to participate in video conferences with multiple parties. Users can easily create, launch, and join meetings using standards-based video endpoints. Or their mobile devices or Cisco WebEx clients. Or even third-party video endpoints. The server provides high-quality, standards-based video conferencing for mobile, desktop, and room systems.

    Pexip simplifies video communication across borders, businesses and platforms.

    High-quality video meetings
    Reliable, high-performing video experience for both you and your guests. Every time.

    Total interoperability
    Connect all your video conferencing technology with a single solution. Support tools like Microsoft Teams, Google Hangouts Meet, or Skype for Business in the same workflow as meeting room systems and mobile, desktop, or web users.

    Flexible deployments
    A cloud-native platform provided as a service or deployed as a self-hosted solution either on-premises or in any cloud environment.

    Sample Customers
    Afni, AGCO, Bellevue, Came Group, Children's Hospital of Orange County (CHOC Children's), Del Papa Distributing, Instituto Zaldivar, ING Bank, Moffitt Cancer Center, Park Nicollet, Pentana Solutions Australia, San Jose State University, Sub-Zero Wolf, Transwestern and Metropolis Investment Holdings, Vital Images
    PayPal, Nordea, Vodafone, Spotify, Intel
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company12%
    Government11%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    University9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Government17%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Retailer10%
    Construction Company8%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business29%
    Midsize Enterprise29%
    Large Enterprise43%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business20%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise68%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business11%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise72%
    Buyer's Guide
    Virtual Meetings
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Zoom Video Communications, Cisco, TeamViewer and others in Virtual Meetings. Updated: April 2024.
    768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Cisco TelePresence is ranked 9th in Virtual Meetings with 7 reviews while Pexip is ranked 22nd in Virtual Meetings. Cisco TelePresence is rated 8.0, while Pexip is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Cisco TelePresence writes "A scalable solution that needs some improvement in pricing and stability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Pexip writes "Well-priced, user-friendly, and offers many great features". Cisco TelePresence is most compared with Zoom, Webex, Polycom RealPresence Clariti and Cisco Meeting Server, whereas Pexip is most compared with Cisco Meeting Server and BlueJeans Rooms.

    See our list of best Virtual Meetings vendors.

    We monitor all Virtual Meetings reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.