


Cisco Secure Endpoint and Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response compete in the cybersecurity sector. Cisco Secure Endpoint seems to have the upper hand in integration capabilities, especially within Cisco’s ecosystem, while Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response excels in malware detection and threat prevention.
Features: Cisco Secure Endpoint integrates seamlessly with other Cisco platforms providing real-time threat prevention and strong SIEM integration. Its network coverage and ease of use for existing Cisco customers are notable. Its cloud-based management allows for comprehensive universal access. Kaspersky offers detailed threat prevention, centralized management, and excellent malware detection. It provides strong file visibility and uses AI-driven threat detection, offering a comprehensive approach for organizations requiring robust security measures.
Room for Improvement: Cisco Secure Endpoint could enhance its third-party tool integration and improve event notifications and user interface usability. Further development in out-of-the-box SIEM integration is necessary. Kaspersky could improve its user interface, documentation, and patch management. Enhancing network detection capabilities, external system integration, improving technical support, and reducing response times would benefit its user experience.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cisco Secure Endpoint is praised for seamless deployment across cloud environments and robust technical support, making troubleshooting manageable for users. In contrast, Kaspersky is mainly on-premises with some cloud functions, receiving mixed reviews on deployment ease. Its customer support is inconsistent, with criticisms on response time and issue resolution expertise.
Pricing and ROI: Cisco Secure Endpoint offers competitive enterprise agreement pricing, providing substantial ROI through operational efficiency despite initial costs. Its integration capabilities justify the investment for many. Meanwhile, Kaspersky offers a cost-effective approach for threat mitigation, though perceived as having higher pricing due to its advanced features. While users see value in its security, premium pricing concerns limit its perceived ROI compared to Cisco’s offering.
They appreciate the rich telemetry data from the solution, as it provides in-depth threat identification.
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks helps to reduce my total cost of ownership significantly.
In Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks, most of the remediation is automated and the accuracy is quite good.
The technical support from Palo Alto deserves a mark of ten because they reach out within an hour whenever assistance is needed.
There is no back and forth, and they know what we are asking for and come up with the best resolution for a solution.
If any of these services are missed, it becomes a problem in terms of support tickets, follow-up, or special configuration that needs to be done in the system.
Cisco has good technical support, especially considering these are newer solutions compared to traditional routing and switching products.
You can onboard 10,000 endpoints in just hours, which demonstrates the excellent scalability of this product.
Activating the newly purchased licenses is instantaneous, allowing installations without adjustments since it's cloud-based.
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks can be expanded anytime by purchasing another license without any issues related to scalability.
Cisco Secure Endpoint is definitely scalable.
Cortex remains fast and responsive, even with increasing data and alerts.
The thresholds we've seen on our firewall boxes at some instances reached 80% to 85%, but even at that level of utilization, we don't observe any latency or any issues reported with respect to accessing the application.
Cortex XDR is stable, offering high quality and reliable performance.
We have not encountered any problems.
Improving reporting and dashboard customization, along with the addition of real-time and exportable reports, would help SOC teams greatly.
The inclusion of this feature would allow the application of DLP policies alongside antivirus policies via a single agent and console, making it more competitive as other OEMs often offer DLP solutions as part of their antivirus products.
If the per GB data could be provided at a certain level free of cost or at the same cost which the customer is taking for the entire bundle, that would be better.
The forensic capabilities need enhancement, especially for deep forensic data collection.
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response stops certain things. However, it does not take me to the file, and it is not user-friendly.
The pricing on SentinelOne is far more reasonable and cheaper than Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks.
I would say it is definitely not a cheap product, considering how mature it is and how scalable all Palo Alto products are together.
Cortex XDR is perceived as expensive by some customers, yet offers dynamic pricing.
Cisco is aggressive in pricing, making it competitive and sometimes even cheaper than other good products like CrowdStrike, Microsoft Defender, or SentinelOne.
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response is cheap.
It incorporates AI for normal behavior detection, distinguishing unusual operations.
The product provides automation responses in case of a threat attack, severity assessments, centralized manageability, and comprehensive compliance features, resulting in reduced costs.
It includes machine learning to easily analyze data and detect complex threats across endpoints, networks, or clouds.
Cisco Secure Endpoint is very good in machine learning, which allows it to secure offline contents even if not connected to the internet.
The main network is being monitored through the firewall at that level.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks | 3.4% |
| Cisco Secure Endpoint | 1.3% |
| Kaspersky Next XDR Expert | 1.0% |
| Other | 94.3% |



| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 46 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 20 |
| Large Enterprise | 49 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 21 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 15 |
| Large Enterprise | 21 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 7 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 6 |
| Large Enterprise | 6 |
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks provides advanced threat detection with AI-driven endpoint protection and seamless integration, ensuring multi-layered security and automatic threat response.
Cortex XDR is designed to safeguard endpoints against malware and suspicious activities. It offers advanced threat detection and response capabilities using behavioral analysis, AI, and machine learning. It seamlessly integrates with security infrastructures, providing endpoint security, firewall integration, and enhanced visibility in both cloud-based and on-premises environments.
What are the key features of Cortex XDR?Organizations in diverse sectors deploy Cortex XDR to protect against malware, leveraging its advanced threat detection capabilities. Its integration with existing security infrastructures appeals to those seeking comprehensive protection in both cloud and on-premises environments, providing enhanced visibility and threat intelligence.
Cisco Secure Endpoint offers robust endpoint security with real-time threat prevention and cloud-based management. It is designed for seamless integration with Cisco products, delivering comprehensive protection and ease of use.
Cisco Secure Endpoint provides real-time threat detection, analytics, and rapid response capabilities. Its ease of use, integrated features like sandboxing and Device and File Trajectory, and its incorporation with Talos make it effective for threat hunting and endpoint protection. With strong machine learning and seamless integration with other tools, it addresses threat prevention and network visibility. However, there is room for improvement in AI features, SIEM API integration, user interface simplification, and cost reduction. Enhanced dashboards, reporting, and support are also areas for potential enhancement.
What are the primary features of Cisco Secure Endpoint?In industries such as finance, healthcare, and manufacturing, Cisco Secure Endpoint is vital for maintaining endpoint security and malware protection. Organizations use it within managed security services, integrating with tools like Umbrella for DNS security. It provides visibility into malware activities and supports threat hunting for devices beyond corporate networks. Deployed on workstations, servers, and laptops, it efficiently logs and blocks malicious actions, ensuring a secure environment.
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response integrates antivirus, threat response, and EDR with high detection rates, behavior detection, and device control. It supports centralized management for seamless operation across remote and on-premise servers.
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response offers a robust platform featuring automated responses, advanced reporting, and customizable policies. Users appreciate its lightweight agent and compatibility, though many report issues with stability and resource intensity. While effective in malware detection and incident response, challenges remain in configuration, integration, and efficient patch management. Zero-day detection and cloud version stability have room for improvement. However, its capabilities make it highly recommended in regions like Pakistan.
What are the key features of Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response?In industries prioritizing security, such as finance and healthcare, Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response aids in threat hunting and behavior analysis. It integrates with SIEM systems, allowing precise encryption, targeted attack protection, and device management. Deployed on servers, workstations, and mobile devices, it's particularly esteemed in areas like Pakistan for its robust capabilities.
We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.