Arista Networks Platform vs Cisco Nexus comparison

Arista Networks Platform and Cisco Nexus compete in the networking equipment category. Arista Networks Platform appears to have the upper hand due to its ease of configuration and high throughput.

Features: Arista Networks Platform is noted for its ease of configuration, stability, and high throughput. The Linux shell used for troubleshooting, along with a unified operational system, greatly simplifies integration. CloudVision, their management platform, ensures seamless deployment. Cisco Nexus offers modularity and flexibility, with high port density and robust configuration options. It integrates well with virtual switches and supports layer-two switching, providing a reliable framework for complex data center environments.

Room for Improvement: Arista Networks Platform could improve by enhancing documentation, integrating more intent-based networking solutions, and reducing pricing. Better integration with new products and a more stable codebase are also desired. Cisco Nexus requires improved documentation, simplified licensing, and enhanced AI integration. Its high cost and complex licensing structure are persistent issues, alongside a need for improved stability and faster tech support responsiveness.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both Arista Networks Platform and Cisco Nexus primarily offer on-premises deployment. Arista is recognized for its streamlined technical support, noted for quick issue resolution. Cisco Nexus is appreciated for its comprehensive technical assistance, though users express a need for more detailed documentation and explanations. Arista's response times and simplicity in support are well-regarded, while Cisco is valued for thorough assistance.

Pricing and ROI: Arista Networks Platform is perceived as expensive, often 40% more than Cisco, but it offers long-term cost-saving advantages in global deployments. Cisco Nexus tends to be more affordable initially, with competitive pricing due to large discounts, although its complex licensing and ongoing service costs remain key concerns. While Arista's higher upfront cost may be offset by reduced maintenance expenses over time, Cisco offers a competitive alternative with manageable initial costs.