Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Cisco Nexus based on the interviews we conducted with its users.
The top alternative solutions include Dell PowerEdge R-Series, NETGEAR Switches, and Arista Networks Platform.
The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.
Cisco Alternatives Report
Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Cisco, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Cisco Nexus excels in networking capabilities, offering robust integration and features for scalability and speed. In comparison, Dell PowerEdge R-Series focuses on server management and adaptability, providing tools for remote management and computing power for high-performance workloads.
Cisco Nexus offers competitive setup costs, while Dell PowerEdge R-Series tends to demand a higher initial investment. The price difference highlights Cisco Nexus as a cost-effective solution in terms of setup expenses.
Cisco Nexus offers competitive setup costs, while Dell PowerEdge R-Series tends to demand a higher initial investment. The price difference highlights Cisco Nexus as a cost-effective solution in terms of setup expenses.
Netgear switches offer affordability and ease of setup, appealing to budget-conscious small businesses. In comparison, Cisco Nexus provides advanced data center features, justifying its higher cost for enterprises prioritizing high-speed performance and virtualization, despite complex licensing issues.
NETGEAR Switches have a lower setup cost, making them more budget-friendly, while Cisco Nexus involves a higher initial investment, reflecting its advanced features and capabilities.
NETGEAR Switches have a lower setup cost, making them more budget-friendly, while Cisco Nexus involves a higher initial investment, reflecting its advanced features and capabilities.
Arista Networks Platform offers low latency and ease of deployment, prioritizing simplicity and scalability. In comparison, Cisco Nexus emphasizes modularity and robust performance, with complexities in licensing. Arista is known for quick support responses, while Cisco provides high value in complex data center environments.
Arista Networks Platform features a competitively transparent setup cost, while Cisco Nexus presents a more traditional pricing model with potentially higher initial fees, highlighting a key difference in upfront investment between the two.
Arista Networks Platform features a competitively transparent setup cost, while Cisco Nexus presents a more traditional pricing model with potentially higher initial fees, highlighting a key difference in upfront investment between the two.
Cisco Nexus offers high-density port capacity, stability, and integration with its security products, appealing to organizations prioritizing feature-rich environments. In comparison, Juniper QFX Series provides cost-effective scalability and flexibility, attracting those needing effective EVPN solutions and lower power consumption in networking environments.
Cisco Nexus requires a higher setup cost with comprehensive integration, whereas Juniper QFX Series offers a more cost-effective installation, appealing to budget-conscious businesses.
Cisco Nexus requires a higher setup cost with comprehensive integration, whereas Juniper QFX Series offers a more cost-effective installation, appealing to budget-conscious businesses.
HPE ProCurve excels in pricing and support, appealing to budget-conscious buyers with strong customer service. In comparison, Cisco Nexus stands out with advanced features and superior scalability, ideal for complex environments requiring high performance and automation.
HPE ProCurve has a lower setup cost compared to Cisco Nexus, making it a budget-friendly choice. Cisco Nexus, with its higher setup cost, offers advanced features suitable for enterprises.
HPE ProCurve has a lower setup cost compared to Cisco Nexus, making it a budget-friendly choice. Cisco Nexus, with its higher setup cost, offers advanced features suitable for enterprises.
Cisco Nexus offers advanced features like VDCs and VRF, ideal for complex networks, but might be complex and costly. In comparison, Aruba Instant On provides simplicity and affordability, suitable for small businesses needing ease of management with essential networking functions.
ExtremeSwitching offers cost-effective solutions with flexible scalability, suitable for SMEs seeking robust security features. In comparison, Cisco Nexus provides advanced routing and high performance, ideal for data centers needing superior integration and reliability, despite higher costs.
ExtremeSwitching typically offers lower setup costs, providing a budget-friendly entry point, while Cisco Nexus tends to have higher initial expenses but delivers advanced features.
ExtremeSwitching typically offers lower setup costs, providing a budget-friendly entry point, while Cisco Nexus tends to have higher initial expenses but delivers advanced features.
Cisco Nexus is preferred for modularity, scalability, and integration. In comparison, Juniper MX Series focuses on robust routing capabilities and reliable hardware. Cisco offers advanced configurations, while Juniper benefits from a competitive pricing model, each catering to different networking needs.
Alcatel-Lucent OmniSwitch is favored for its cost-effective deployment and robust support, appealing to budget-conscious networks. In comparison, Cisco Nexus offers advanced features and scalability, attracting large-scale operations despite the higher initial investment due to its superior capabilities in complex IT environments.
Alcatel-Lucent OmniSwitch LAN Switches offer lower setup costs, making them a budget-friendly option, while Cisco Nexus incurs higher initial costs due to its advanced features and capabilities.
Alcatel-Lucent OmniSwitch LAN Switches offer lower setup costs, making them a budget-friendly option, while Cisco Nexus incurs higher initial costs due to its advanced features and capabilities.
Dell PowerSwitch N-Series attracts tech buyers with cost-effectiveness and ease of deployment, suitable for those prioritizing budget and simplicity. In comparison, Cisco Nexus appeals to those needing advanced features and scalability, justifying its higher investment with superior performance for complex environments.
Dell PowerSwitch N-Series offers lower setup costs, making it budget-friendly, while Cisco Nexus involves higher expenses, reflecting its advanced features.
Dell PowerSwitch N-Series offers lower setup costs, making it budget-friendly, while Cisco Nexus involves higher expenses, reflecting its advanced features.
Arista Campus LAN Switches offer cost-effective solutions prioritizing ease of use and quick setup, making them attractive for budget-conscious buyers. In comparison, Cisco Nexus provides advanced features and robust functionality, appealing to enterprises seeking comprehensive networking capabilities and strategic long-term investments.
Arista Campus LAN Switches offer a lower setup cost, while Cisco Nexus comes with a higher initial investment. The price difference highlights Arista as a more budget-friendly option compared to Cisco's premium pricing structure.
Arista Campus LAN Switches offer a lower setup cost, while Cisco Nexus comes with a higher initial investment. The price difference highlights Arista as a more budget-friendly option compared to Cisco's premium pricing structure.
Juniper QFabric appeals with its flat architecture enhancing performance and simplifying management. In comparison, Cisco Nexus offers extensive features supporting virtualization and security. Cisco Nexus's flexibility and support outweigh QFabric's initial cost benefits, urging tech buyers to consider long-term ROI.
Enterasys Campus LAN Switches attract tech buyers with cost-effectiveness and straightforward deployment. In comparison, Cisco Nexus appeals for its scalability and advanced virtualization. While Enterasys is favored for affordability and support, Cisco Nexus is chosen for extensive features and long-term investment value.
