Check Point IPS vs Cisco Sourcefire SNORT comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Check Point Software Technologies Logo
5,858 views|4,065 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Cisco Logo
2,112 views|1,553 comparisons
94% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Check Point IPS and Cisco Sourcefire SNORT based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Check Point IPS vs. Cisco Sourcefire SNORT Report (Updated: March 2024).
767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The number of the IPS protections is amazing - after the latest update I see more than 11000 in the SmartConsole.""Some of the features for views and visualization are already predefined as default files.""The tool's most valuable feature is its detection panel. Managing and updating policies within Check Point IPS is easy and without issues. It provides a secure network.""The product's initial setup is easy.""There's less admin burden to detect these threats as Check Point IPS will do it all for you and suggest the best preventive actions to protect the network.""The integration is a valuable feature.""Check Point Intrusion Prevention System has great profiles, and we can continuously create, modify, activate, deactivate or configure any specific setting to allow the profile to focus on just one thing or for certain attacks.""The reports are useful in helping to verify the threats where we can see the level of severity in order to be able to take action."

More Check Point IPS Pros →

"It simplifies the configuration process by offering pre-defined base configurations, including security and connectivity settings.""It is quite an intelligent product.""The product is inexpensive compared to leading brands such as Palo Alto or Fortinet.""Cisco Sourcefire SNORT is easy to configure and the reporting is great. It's also very user-friendly.""The solution is stable.""The most valuable feature is the ability to automatically learn the traffic in our environment, and change the merit recommendations based on that.""The solution can be integrated with some network electors like Cisco Stealthwatch, Cisco ISE, and Active Directory to provide the client with authentication certificates.""It has a huge rate of protection. It's has a low level of positives and a huge rate of threat protection. It's easy to deploy and easy to implement. It has an incredible price rate compared to similar solutions."

More Cisco Sourcefire SNORT Pros →

Cons
"I would like the product to provide us with intelligence to understand what we really have in our environment.""It would be good to update the public documentation of Check Point so that we can generate improvements and best practices based on the documentation.""Enhancements are necessary for the proficiency of notifications in the event of a Social Security incident, whether through email or alternative channels such as SMS.""What I would like to improve in IPS would be the capacity of the hardware. I would also like to be able to sort signatures by severity. This would greatly impact how well I can manage my environment.""The cost is high.""Support is the biggest area for improvement.""When exceptions need to be done for certain profiles, it is easy to get them done, however, implementation on some general ones may cause some extra work as the IPS is not easy to overwrite.""The dashboard reports can be easier to generate and customize."

More Check Point IPS Cons →

"I did not experience any pain points that required improvement. Maybe a couple of false-positives, but that's about it.""The main dashboard of Cisco Sourcefire SNORT could improve.""The pricing needs to be improved. We have lots of low-budget clients around us. Budget constraints are always a deterrent in our market.""I would like to have analytics included in the suite.""If the price is brought down then everybody will be happy.""There are problems setting up VPNs for some regions.""With the next release, I would like to see some PBR, so that you can do the configuration with the features.""Performance needs improvement."

More Cisco Sourcefire SNORT Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "I think that the price of support is around $40,000 USD or $50,000 USD per year."
  • "The price of this product should be reduced."
  • "Enabling IPS does not require any additional license purchase from OEM, as it comes by default with the NGFW bundle."
  • "The pricing for Check Point IPS is competitive and brings good value for the money."
  • "The module has a considerable cost but you can save by purchasing a package with several modules instead of making a single purchase."
  • "Pricing for this solution is negotiable and I'm happy with our pricing."
  • "There is a license needed to use the Check Point IPS which is not expensive. However, the Check Point IPS device is expensive."
  • "You can pay for Check Point IPS yearly, or you can go with a three-year license. There's no extra cost apart from the standard licensing fee."
  • More Check Point IPS Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "We have a three-year license for this solution."
  • "Licensing for this solution is paid on a yearly basis."
  • "I don't know the exact amount, but most of the time when I go to a company with a proposition, they will say, "This thing that you are selling is good, but it's expensive. Why don't you propose something like FortiGate, Check Point, or Palo Alto?" Cisco device are expensive compared to other devices."
  • "The cost is per port and can be expensive but it does include training and support for three years."
  • More Cisco Sourcefire SNORT Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) solutions are best for your needs.
    767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:It offers robust protection with features such as Next Generation firewall capabilities, mobile solutions, and proactive threat prevention.
    Top Answer:Enhancements are necessary for the proficiency of notifications in the event of a Social Security incident, whether through email or alternative channels such as SMS.
    Top Answer:The product is inexpensive compared to leading brands such as Palo Alto or Fortinet.
    Top Answer:The product is inexpensive compared to leading brands such as Palo Alto or Fortinet. It is cheaper than Palo Alto and comparable to Fortinet. It also depends on Cisco’s discount. Sometimes it's… more »
    Top Answer:The solution has some stability issues. Also, it's complicated compared to other products like FortiGate.
    Ranking
    Views
    5,858
    Comparisons
    4,065
    Reviews
    27
    Average Words per Review
    430
    Rating
    8.4
    Views
    2,112
    Comparisons
    1,553
    Reviews
    5
    Average Words per Review
    392
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Check Point Intrusion Prevention System
    Sourcefire SNORT
    Learn More
    Overview

    Check Point IPS is an intrusion prevention system that aims to detect and prevent attempts to exploit weaknesses in vulnerable systems or applications. The solution provides complete, integrated, next-generation firewall intrusion prevention capabilities at multi-gigabit speeds with a low false positive rate and high security. It helps organizations secure their enterprise network, and protect servers and critical data against known and unknown automated malware, blended threats, and other threats.

    Check Point IPS Features

    Check Point IPS has many valuable key features. Some of the most useful ones include:

    • Real-time protections: IPS is constantly updated with new defenses against emerging threats. Because the solution’s IPS protections are pre-emptive, it provides organizations with defenses before exploits are created or vulnerabilities are even discovered.
    • Virtual patching: The solution combines robust IPS functionality with a concerted patching strategy, allowing network administrators to secure networks between upgrades and patches.
    • Flexible deployment: Check Point IPS was designed to be deployed easily and efficiently.
    • 360 visibility and reporting: To help users achieve an unmatched level of visibility that detects and prevents threats, Check Point IPS integrates with SmartEvent, enabling security operations center (SOC) staff to respond to high-priority events first.

    Check Point IPS Benefits

    There are many benefits to implementing Check Point IPS. Some of the biggest advantages the solution offers include:

    • Efficient: Check Point IPS includes acceleration technologies that let you safely enable IPS. Additionally, its low false positive rate can save a lot of time.
    • Secure: The solution delivers thousands of signature and behavioral preemptive protections, making it a very secure tool.
    • Unified: With Check Point IPS, users can Enable IPS on any Check Point security gateway, thereby reducing Total Cost of Ownership (TCO).

    Reviews from Real Users

    Check Point IPS is a solution that stands out when compared to many of its competitors. Some of its major advantages are that it has granularity capabilities for rule creation, quick updates of signatures, and a helpful mechanism that allows users to turn IPS signatures to a different mode automatically.

    A System and Network Administrator at Auriga mentions, “The Check Point IPS module allows me granularity in creating rules. I can specify which definition to apply and to which scope or network.” The reviewer also adds, “I can create multiple profiles, which is helpful.”

    “The quick updates of the signatures when a new threat is identified are great. For instance, when Microsoft releases patches, we usually see new signatures for those issues that have to be patched in a day. This gives us time to test/deploy the patches while already being protected from the threats. Also, it's very good with reporting. I can generate reports for management automatically based on the threats of the last day/week/whatever is needed,” says a Systems en networks engineer at CB.

    Another PeerSpot user, a Network Engineer at VSP Vision Care, writes, “The mechanism where you can let the system automatically turn the IPS signature to a different mode (prevent / monitor / inactive) is a nice feature that allows us to easily adjust the balance between security protection and the risk of business impact.”

    Snort is an open-source, rule-based, intrusion detection and prevention system. It combines the benefits of signature-, protocol-, and anomaly-based inspection methods to deliver flexible protection from malware attacks. Snort gained notoriety for being able to accurately detect threats at high speeds.

    Sample Customers
    Morton Salt, Medical Advocacy and Outreach, BH Telecom, Lightbeam Health Solutions, X by Orange, Cadence, Nihondentsu, Datastream Connexion, Good Sam, Omnyway, FIASA, Pacific Life, Banco del Pacifico, Control Southern, Xero, Centrify
    CareCore, City of Biel, Dimension Data, LightEdge, Lone Star College System, National Rugby League, Port Aventura, Smart City Networks, Telecom Italia, The Department of Education in Western Australia
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Security Firm21%
    Financial Services Firm13%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Government11%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company16%
    Comms Service Provider9%
    Financial Services Firm8%
    Security Firm7%
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company27%
    Financial Services Firm18%
    Comms Service Provider18%
    Government9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company19%
    Government9%
    Financial Services Firm8%
    Comms Service Provider7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business45%
    Midsize Enterprise26%
    Large Enterprise29%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business28%
    Midsize Enterprise18%
    Large Enterprise54%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business22%
    Midsize Enterprise39%
    Large Enterprise39%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise63%
    Buyer's Guide
    Check Point IPS vs. Cisco Sourcefire SNORT
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Check Point IPS vs. Cisco Sourcefire SNORT and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Check Point IPS is ranked 3rd in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) with 45 reviews while Cisco Sourcefire SNORT is ranked 13th in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) with 18 reviews. Check Point IPS is rated 8.6, while Cisco Sourcefire SNORT is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Check Point IPS writes "Great for detection and access with the capabilities of defining specific rules". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Cisco Sourcefire SNORT writes "An IPS solution for security and protection but lacks stability". Check Point IPS is most compared with Darktrace, Palo Alto Networks URL Filtering with PAN-DB, Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention, Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System and Vectra AI, whereas Cisco Sourcefire SNORT is most compared with Fortinet FortiGate IPS, Cisco NGIPS, Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention, Darktrace and Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System. See our Check Point IPS vs. Cisco Sourcefire SNORT report.

    See our list of best Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) vendors.

    We monitor all Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.