Check Point IPS vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Check Point IPS and Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Check Point IPS vs. Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The integration is a valuable feature.""The number of the IPS protections is amazing - after the latest update I see more than 11000 in the SmartConsole.""The tool's most valuable feature is its detection panel. Managing and updating policies within Check Point IPS is easy and without issues. It provides a secure network.""IPS signatures can be set quite granularly depending on your environment. You can filter on performance impact, severity, and confidence which makes sizing and adapting easier.""We are able to define our own rules for detection.""It is also worth noting that many IPS signature comes with detailed background about the vulnerability, and potentially how the vulnerability would affect the network security.""IPS can protect our organization with any old vulnerabilities or if any vulnerability detected minutes ago IPS can protect us as per our configured policy.""The Check Point IPS module allows me granularity in creating rules."

More Check Point IPS Pros →

"I find the malware protection very handy.""With the IP address flag, I was able to see that I was being hacked. The moment there was an interaction between somebody on my network and that IP, the solution was able to flag it, and we were able to protect ourselves.""It's a monster, it's got so many beautiful features. We do deal with other firewalls and we've got a better idea of what other firewalls' capabilities are, any comparison with the Palo Alto I liked the quality of service on the applications that you can control the amount of bandwidth an application is allowed to consume. The best feature is the quality of the application quality of service.""For those who want a next-gen firewall that's easy to configure and easy to operate, I think you should go for Palo Alto.""Palo Alto Networks Threat Prevention is the market leader as far as security gateways and endpoint protection. Additionally, the threat database that is used is one of the best.""The most valuable feature of Palo Alto Threat Prevention for our company is the next generation firewall.""The application control and vulnerability protection are the most valuable features.""The most valuable features are that it's user-friendly, has interesting features, URL filtering, and threat prevention."

More Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention Pros →

Cons
"Having additional reports available would be helpful.""The installation documentation has room for improvement.""I hear from my admin that the firmware upgrade process is quite cumbersome.""It is generally good, but improving the performance would be the one thing I'd take a look at right now.""The price has room for improvement.""We have a lot of false positives and the list of IPs are not up to date in terms of their location.""The only thing they could maybe improve is that we notice right away that the performance decreases when we enable the IPS, especially beyond the CPU and memory usage. If you want to enable the IPS and you have a lot of traffic, it can have an impact. The performance could be improved.""I would like to have the possibility of adding features to this IPS solution in the future."

More Check Point IPS Cons →

"The application’s pricing and dashboard need improvement. It could be user-friendly.""Palo Alto Networks Threat Prevention could improve the commercial offing. Other solutions, such as Fortinet provide better commercial features.""The documentation needs to be improved. I need better information about how to configure it and what the best practices are.""The technology firewall anomaly network could stand improvement.""The initial setup is complex.""The cost involves the price of the hardware, which is expensive. However, most of the Palo Alto solutions are expensive.""Mission learning techniques should continue to expand and detect unknown threats on the fly.""Sometimes when you want to group a set of ports, and communicate with Palo Alto, you cannot group TCP and UDP ports together. This needs to be adjusted."

More Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "I think that the price of support is around $40,000 USD or $50,000 USD per year."
  • "The price of this product should be reduced."
  • "Enabling IPS does not require any additional license purchase from OEM, as it comes by default with the NGFW bundle."
  • "The pricing for Check Point IPS is competitive and brings good value for the money."
  • "The module has a considerable cost but you can save by purchasing a package with several modules instead of making a single purchase."
  • "Pricing for this solution is negotiable and I'm happy with our pricing."
  • "There is a license needed to use the Check Point IPS which is not expensive. However, the Check Point IPS device is expensive."
  • "You can pay for Check Point IPS yearly, or you can go with a three-year license. There's no extra cost apart from the standard licensing fee."
  • More Check Point IPS Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The pricing and the licensing are pretty competitive at this stage. As a reseller, I would like to see the price come down a little bit so I can compete better against other firewalls because we do that all the time."
  • "It's not too expensive."
  • "It is an expensive solution and I would like to see a drop in price."
  • "If you want to have all of the good features then you have to pay extra for licensing."
  • "The pricing has improved with the newer generation of their Firewalls, but the price could always be lower."
  • "The pricing could be lower."
  • "Palo Alto Networks Threat Prevention could improve by having consistent pricing at system levels."
  • "The cost involves the price of the hardware, which is expensive. However, most of the Palo Alto solutions are expensive."
  • More Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) solutions are best for your needs.
    768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:It offers robust protection with features such as Next Generation firewall capabilities, mobile solutions, and proactive threat prevention.
    Top Answer:Enhancements are necessary for the proficiency of notifications in the event of a Social Security incident, whether through email or alternative channels such as SMS.
    Top Answer:Arbor would be the best bid, apart from Arbor, Palo Alto and Fortinet have good solutions. As this is an ISP, I would prefer Arbor.
    Ranking
    Views
    5,858
    Comparisons
    4,065
    Reviews
    27
    Average Words per Review
    430
    Rating
    8.4
    Views
    4,278
    Comparisons
    3,183
    Reviews
    8
    Average Words per Review
    396
    Rating
    8.6
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Check Point Intrusion Prevention System
    Learn More
    Overview

    Check Point IPS is an intrusion prevention system that aims to detect and prevent attempts to exploit weaknesses in vulnerable systems or applications. The solution provides complete, integrated, next-generation firewall intrusion prevention capabilities at multi-gigabit speeds with a low false positive rate and high security. It helps organizations secure their enterprise network, and protect servers and critical data against known and unknown automated malware, blended threats, and other threats.

    Check Point IPS Features

    Check Point IPS has many valuable key features. Some of the most useful ones include:

    • Real-time protections: IPS is constantly updated with new defenses against emerging threats. Because the solution’s IPS protections are pre-emptive, it provides organizations with defenses before exploits are created or vulnerabilities are even discovered.
    • Virtual patching: The solution combines robust IPS functionality with a concerted patching strategy, allowing network administrators to secure networks between upgrades and patches.
    • Flexible deployment: Check Point IPS was designed to be deployed easily and efficiently.
    • 360 visibility and reporting: To help users achieve an unmatched level of visibility that detects and prevents threats, Check Point IPS integrates with SmartEvent, enabling security operations center (SOC) staff to respond to high-priority events first.

    Check Point IPS Benefits

    There are many benefits to implementing Check Point IPS. Some of the biggest advantages the solution offers include:

    • Efficient: Check Point IPS includes acceleration technologies that let you safely enable IPS. Additionally, its low false positive rate can save a lot of time.
    • Secure: The solution delivers thousands of signature and behavioral preemptive protections, making it a very secure tool.
    • Unified: With Check Point IPS, users can Enable IPS on any Check Point security gateway, thereby reducing Total Cost of Ownership (TCO).

    Reviews from Real Users

    Check Point IPS is a solution that stands out when compared to many of its competitors. Some of its major advantages are that it has granularity capabilities for rule creation, quick updates of signatures, and a helpful mechanism that allows users to turn IPS signatures to a different mode automatically.

    A System and Network Administrator at Auriga mentions, “The Check Point IPS module allows me granularity in creating rules. I can specify which definition to apply and to which scope or network.” The reviewer also adds, “I can create multiple profiles, which is helpful.”

    “The quick updates of the signatures when a new threat is identified are great. For instance, when Microsoft releases patches, we usually see new signatures for those issues that have to be patched in a day. This gives us time to test/deploy the patches while already being protected from the threats. Also, it's very good with reporting. I can generate reports for management automatically based on the threats of the last day/week/whatever is needed,” says a Systems en networks engineer at CB.

    Another PeerSpot user, a Network Engineer at VSP Vision Care, writes, “The mechanism where you can let the system automatically turn the IPS signature to a different mode (prevent / monitor / inactive) is a nice feature that allows us to easily adjust the balance between security protection and the risk of business impact.”

    Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention is a cloud-based security service that combines cutting-edge technologies, including machine learning, artificial intelligence, and expert human monitoring, to effectively thwart advanced threats like malware, zero-day attacks, and command-and-control threats. It offers inline protection, scrutinizing all network traffic irrespective of port, protocol, or encryption. An integral component of Palo Alto Networks' security platform, it enjoys widespread adoption across diverse organizations. With its robust security capabilities, it's an ideal choice for entities of all sizes, particularly those in high-risk sectors such as finance, healthcare, and government agencies, seeking to safeguard their networks from a broad spectrum of advanced threats.

    Sample Customers
    Morton Salt, Medical Advocacy and Outreach, BH Telecom, Lightbeam Health Solutions, X by Orange, Cadence, Nihondentsu, Datastream Connexion, Good Sam, Omnyway, FIASA, Pacific Life, Banco del Pacifico, Control Southern, Xero, Centrify
    University of Arkansas, JBG SMITH, SkiStar AB, TRI-AD, Temple University, Telkom Indonesia
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Security Firm21%
    Computer Software Company15%
    Financial Services Firm13%
    Government10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company16%
    Comms Service Provider9%
    Financial Services Firm8%
    Security Firm7%
    REVIEWERS
    Comms Service Provider27%
    Financial Services Firm27%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Aerospace/Defense Firm7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company17%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    Government8%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business44%
    Midsize Enterprise25%
    Large Enterprise31%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business27%
    Midsize Enterprise18%
    Large Enterprise55%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise18%
    Large Enterprise59%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business22%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise61%
    Buyer's Guide
    Check Point IPS vs. Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Check Point IPS vs. Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Check Point IPS is ranked 3rd in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) with 45 reviews while Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention is ranked 6th in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) with 24 reviews. Check Point IPS is rated 8.6, while Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Check Point IPS writes "Great for detection and access with the capabilities of defining specific rules". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention writes "A good amount of granularity and advanced URL filtering capabilities". Check Point IPS is most compared with Darktrace, Palo Alto Networks URL Filtering with PAN-DB, Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System, Cisco NGIPS and Fortinet FortiGate IPS, whereas Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention is most compared with Fortinet FortiGate IPS, Arista NDR, Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall, Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System and Darktrace. See our Check Point IPS vs. Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention report.

    See our list of best Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) vendors.

    We monitor all Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.