No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

ChatGPT Team - Enterprise vs Slalom comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 15, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

ChatGPT Team - Enterprise
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.0
Number of Reviews
21
Ranking in other categories
AI Writing Tools (2nd), AI Code Assistants (6th), Large Language Models (LLMs) (2nd), AI Proofreading Tools (2nd)
Slalom
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
AI Professional Services (12th), AI Software Development Services (5th)
 

Mindshare comparison

While both are Artificial Intelligence (AI) solutions, they serve different purposes. ChatGPT Team - Enterprise is designed for Large Language Models (LLMs) and holds a mindshare of 8.9%, up 5.1% compared to last year.
Slalom, on the other hand, focuses on AI Professional Services, holds 2.7% mindshare, down 10.9% since last year.
Large Language Models (LLMs) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
ChatGPT Team - Enterprise8.9%
Google Gemini AI15.9%
Blackbox.ai14.8%
Other60.4%
Large Language Models (LLMs)
AI Professional Services Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Slalom2.7%
Accenture AI services3.2%
DXHUB2.9%
Other91.2%
AI Professional Services
 

Featured Reviews

Neha Chhangani - PeerSpot reviewer
Business Analyst at a startup based organization
Collaborative workspace has transformed our content creation and daily team productivity
There is scope for improvement in ChatGPT Team - Enterprise regarding more customization of team behavior. Teams often want even finer control over how the assistant responds, including industry-specific tones, branding voice, or response constraints that apply only to certain teams within the organization. While the shared workspace is powerful, deeper integration with internal enterprise systems could enhance accuracy and relevance. Current team history features are useful, but some teams want more granular control over what is shared or archived, especially when dealing with sensitive topics. More flexible memory settings at the project or chat level and better usage analytics would be beneficial. Admins often want richer insights into how the team is using the platform, not just overall usage but impact metrics tied to business outcomes. Real-time collaboration is great, but there is room to grow in how teams co-author and annotate AI outputs together. Additional improvements would include domain-specific models. Some teams operate in highly specialized domains and want models tuned to their field. The option to load domain-specific language packs or fine-tuned models within the enterprise environment would be valuable. Teams sometimes want clearer insight into why the assistant responded a certain way, especially on complex queries, so adding an explain-why feature with brief reasoning steps or confidence indicators for responses would improve understanding. For ultra-sensitive deployments, some organizations prefer tools that can run without cloud dependency, so having a secure on-premise or private cloud deployment option with the same collaboration compatibilities would be beneficial. Further improvements needed for ChatGPT Team - Enterprise include the AI better understanding inter-team context. This would involve recognizing when a query relates to a previous project or department-specific knowledge to reduce repeated explanations or clarifications. While it handles many languages, more robust enterprise-grade multilingual capabilities, including idiomatic expressions and regional business terminologies, would help global teams collaborate more effectively. Allowing the AI to tailor responses based on the user's role makes output more precise and immediately actionable. For highly sensitive projects, having a secure offline mode or on-premises deployment would increase adoption in regulated industries.
Use Slalom?
Leave a review
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Large Language Models (LLMs) solutions are best for your needs.
886,976 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Comms Service Provider
10%
Financial Services Firm
9%
University
9%
Computer Software Company
9%
Construction Company
54%
Comms Service Provider
6%
Insurance Company
6%
Manufacturing Company
4%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business11
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise11
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with ChatGPT?
ChatGPT Team - Enterprise is already a powerful language model tool, but I think there could be a few areas of improvement. One key area is greater transparency and control over model reasoning. Al...
What is your primary use case for ChatGPT?
I have been using ChatGPT Team - Enterprise for the last three years. My main use of ChatGPT Team - Enterprise as a professor centers on research documentation, advanced data analytics, and code ge...
What advice do you have for others considering ChatGPT?
As an experienced person with more than 15 years in the field, my advice to others looking into using ChatGPT Team - Enterprise is to start with clearly defined use cases first. Organizations that ...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

Rockset
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

1. Adobe 2. Cisco 3. Comcast 4. DoorDash 5. Expedia 6. Facebook 7. GitHub 8. IBM 9. Lyft 10. Microsoft 11. Netflix 12. Oracle 13. Pinterest 14. Reddit 15. Salesforce 16. Slack 17. Spotify 18. Square 19. Target 20. Twitter 21. Uber 22. Verizon 23. Visa 24. Walmart 25. Yelp 26. Zoom 27. Airbnb 28. Dropbox 29. eBay 30. Google 31. LinkedIn 32. Amazon
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Google, OpenAI, Cohere and others in Large Language Models (LLMs). Updated: April 2026.
886,976 professionals have used our research since 2012.