No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

CA Unified Communications Monitor vs Cisco UCS Manager comparison

Broadcom and Cisco are both solutions in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category. Broadcom is ranked #61, while Cisco is ranked #31 with an average rating of 8.8. Broadcom holds a 0.6% mindshare in IM, compared to Cisco’s 1.3% mindshare. Additionally, 50% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Cisco users who would recommend it.
CA Unified Communications M...
Read 2 CA Unified Communications Monitor reviews
  • 2,146 Views
  • 1,288 Comparison Views
50% willing to recommend
Cisco UCS Manager
Read 27 Cisco UCS Manager reviews
  • 4,060 Views
  • 3,776 Comparison Views
96% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

CA Unified Communications Monitor and Cisco UCS Manager compete in communication and data center management. Cisco UCS Manager has the upper hand due to its feature depth, offering a better balance of cost and capabilities.

Features: CA Unified Communications Monitor offers network performance monitoring, real-time alerts for communication flow disruptions, and analytic tools to optimize network performance. Cisco UCS Manager provides server management, in-depth configuration controls, and integrated infrastructure solutions for data center oversight.

Room for Improvement: CA Unified Communications Monitor can enhance its customer support framework, expand its feature set for broader applicability, and improve integration with other systems. Cisco UCS Manager could benefit from simplifying its initial setup process, expanding its user interface options for better accessibility, and reducing the complexity of its configuration tools for new users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cisco UCS Manager has a structured deployment model that simplifies integration and is supported by proactive customer service. CA Unified Communications Monitor offers a straightforward deployment process but lacks the extensive support framework seen in Cisco's services.

Pricing and ROI: Cisco UCS Manager presents a higher initial setup cost, but offers significant ROI through its comprehensive feature set. CA Unified Communications Monitor has a more affordable initial setup but demonstrates a less pronounced ROI due to its narrower focus and capabilities.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. Cisco UCS Manager Report (Updated: June 2026).
Buyer's Guide
CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. Cisco UCS Manager
June 2026
Download the complete report
Helped 902,988 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

CA Unified Communications M...
Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring
61st
Average Rating
6.6
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
Unified Communications Monitoring (3rd), Network Monitoring Software (88th)
Cisco UCS Manager
Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring
31st
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
27
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2026, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the mindshare of CA Unified Communications Monitor is 0.6%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Cisco UCS Manager is 1.3%, down from 1.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
IT Infrastructure Monitoring Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Cisco UCS Manager1.3%
CA Unified Communications Monitor0.6%
Other98.1%
IT Infrastructure Monitoring
 

Featured Reviews

itarchit489981 - PeerSpot reviewer
itarchit489981
IT Architect at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees
Good end-to-end voice quality monitoring and offers valuable features
The solution should have automatic baseline detection. On the per hour, per base, per week. That's usually the best. And on a per individual CI level. I know that they're working on it and when that's available then we will definitely implement it because it will reduce the effort we need to maintain all the products. Right now we have to set thresholds for every location, and it needs to be actually dynamic so if we have better thresholding, we'll have faster alarms across all our locations. We won't have to expend effort on it by resetting or checking them on a regular basis.
Read full review
RC
Rob-Croxford
Consultant at rcnss
A market leader with an enhanced user interface for seamless experience
There is room for improvement in terms of cost and complexity to set up. It doesn't work straight out of the UCS, so someone who knows what they're doing is needed immediately, and it can be quite confusing. Some settings are still fairly well hidden, even the basic ones. Companies don't really understand how long it takes to set up. Also, when changes are pushed, it can take their phone line off the system for twenty minutes to half an hour. Out-of-the-box functionality is an issue, too. I know that my company is different, however, the basics are always the same. You do your tap lines, zip lines, and stuff like that, then you get your internal phone line system. That can all be automated and scripted, and it's probably part of the automation process. However, I haven't really seen it.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Good end-to-end monitoring"
"We use the solution to meet the needs of the customer."
"For us, it's very key to know the voice quality of the total solution, which is based on many components across many domains."
"If I had to choose between other submissions, I would choose the Cisco UCS every time."
"Cisco UCS Manager is a very useful product for managing our entire ecosystem for Cisco products."
"I can deploy something in my 50-odd servers all in one go, in parallel, whereas if I was to do that individually, it could be a nightmare."
"The flexibility and the ease in which the features can be expanded are the solution's most valuable aspects."
"A main feature of Cisco UCS Manager is its reliability, as all of the computing blades are in cluster mode, so we experience high availability and can easily add compute resources and beef up the computing solution."
"The most valuable features of Cisco UCS Manager include the visibility it provides and the ease of identifying issues within the Cisco environment."
"The solution is highly scalable, mainly because of the templates that make it easy for you to actually edit on the system."
"The interface is ergonomic and native. We can use UCS Manager to do all the configurations for the servers, including storage, networking, and all the other components we need inside the fabric. It's simple and flexible."
More Cisco UCS Manager pros
 

Cons

"The solution should have automatic baseline detection."
"All the features and functions of the solution can be improved, specifically the user experience."
"Cisco depends on other vendors like IBM and HP for the hardware. Cisco should improve its hardware manufacturing in regards to the UCS and the use of other vendor's hardware."
"The primary challenge we face is identifying the correct version to deploy during firmware upgrades or compute updates."
"Cisco UCS is expensive compared to others. The Cisco UCS Chassis is more expensive than a standalone server, but some companies require standalone servers because of their production load and affordability. You need to pay more if you require more features on the Blade or if you need more ports on the switch."
"There is room for improvement in terms of cost and complexity to set up. It doesn't work straight out of the UCS, so someone who knows what they're doing is needed immediately, and it can be quite confusing."
"The licensing cost for Cisco UCS Manager is around four out of ten. It is not cost-effective due to its high price, especially regarding memory expansion."
"The installation and upgrade sytems need to be improved."
"But the GUI needs some work."
"The pricing aspect should be addressed."
More Cisco UCS Manager cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"Cisco UCS Manager’s annual licensing fee is expensive."
"The pricing for Cisco UCS Manager is okay for its market, so it's a four out of five for me."
"You buy the hardware and then you get Cisco UCS Manager for free."
"Cisco UCS is more expensive than Dell and HP, but it is more reliable. I see less issues and it's quite stable."
"We need to take a license for each port, which amounts to a big sum."
"With product discounts which can be negotiated, the product is a great value."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
902,988 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
17%
Manufacturing Company
12%
Government
6%
Computer Software Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business8
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise19
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cisco UCS Manager?
My experience with the pricing of Cisco UCS Manager ( /products/cisco-ucs-manager-reviews ) is that it is reasonable. Recently, we acquired an excellent bundle with significant discounts, with offe...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Cisco UCS Manager?
For improvements, while the current graphical user interface is satisfactory, it could be further simplified for different tasks. While it has been improved from using Java to HTML, simplifying the...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Cisco UCS Manager?
Our primary use case involves working with Cisco UCS B-Series ( /products/cisco-ucs-b-series-reviews ), specifically the UCS X modular deployment. We are setting up a new deployment shortly.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

SolarWinds NPM vs CA Unified Communications Monitor Logo
SolarWinds NPM vs CA Unified Communications Monitor
Compared 10% of the time
Zabbix vs CA Unified Communications Monitor Logo
Zabbix vs CA Unified Communications Monitor
Compared 8% of the time
StackState vs CA Unified Communications Monitor Logo
StackState vs CA Unified Communications Monitor
Compared 8% of the time
BMC TrueSight vs CA Unified Communications Monitor Logo
BMC TrueSight vs CA Unified Communications Monitor
Compared 6% of the time
Icinga vs CA Unified Communications Monitor Logo
Icinga vs CA Unified Communications Monitor
Compared 6% of the time
More CA Unified Communications Monitor Competitors
Cisco Intersight vs Cisco UCS Manager Logo
Cisco Intersight vs Cisco UCS Manager
Compared 56% of the time
HPE OneView vs Cisco UCS Manager Logo
HPE OneView vs Cisco UCS Manager
Compared 5% of the time
Nutanix Prism vs Cisco UCS Manager Logo
Nutanix Prism vs Cisco UCS Manager
Compared 5% of the time
SolarWinds NPM vs Cisco UCS Manager Logo
SolarWinds NPM vs Cisco UCS Manager
Compared 4% of the time
Splunk Observability Cloud vs Cisco UCS Manager Logo
Splunk Observability Cloud vs Cisco UCS Manager
Compared 4% of the time
More Cisco UCS Manager Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. Ixia Hawkeye
June 2026
CA Unified Communications Monitor reportDownload CA Unified Communications Monitor product report
Buyer's Guide
Cisco UCS Manager
June 2026
Cisco UCS Manager reportDownload Cisco UCS Manager product report
 

Also Known As

CA UC Monitor
No data available
 

Overview

CA Unified Communications Monitor provides real-time insight into communication networks, ensuring seamless connectivity and performance.

Designed for efficient management of unified communications, CA Unified Communications Monitor helps organizations monitor, diagnose, and manage their network and communication services efficiently. It delivers critical network visibility, allowing IT teams to quickly identify and resolve performance issues. Built with scalability in mind, it supports environments of all sizes, adapting to evolving network demands.

What are the key features of CA Unified Communications Monitor?
  • Real-time Monitoring: Provides live updates and dashboards for continuous network performance oversight.
  • Scalability: Handles growing network demands effortlessly, supporting various organization sizes.
  • Comprehensive Reporting: Offers detailed analytics and reporting to help in troubleshooting and performance analysis.
  • Custom Alerts: Configures alerts for proactive issue management, ensuring quick response to potential disruptions.
What benefits can users expect when evaluating CA Unified Communications Monitor?
  • Improved Network Performance: Enhances overall communication quality by addressing bottlenecks promptly.
  • Cost Efficiency: Reduces downtime and maintenance costs through proactive monitoring and quick issue resolution.
  • Enhanced User Satisfaction: Ensures a seamless user experience with consistent communication services.
  • Operational Agility: Adapts easily to growing network needs, supporting efficient management processes.

Industries such as finance, healthcare, and education benefit significantly from CA Unified Communications Monitor implementation. It ensures stable connections for remote consultations in healthcare, supports financial data transmission, and enables interactive learning experiences in education. By facilitating uninterrupted and high-quality communications, it directly contributes to business continuity and improved operational outcomes.

Broadcom

Cisco UCS Manager enables streamlined operations through unified storage, networking, and computing management, offering enhanced reliability and flexibility.

Cisco UCS Manager provides enhanced management capabilities for infrastructures, simplifying server deployment and operations. Its user-friendly interface aids in easy configuration and visibility, including robust reporting. UCS Manager supports efficient firmware and OS updates for large deployments, ensuring smooth operations across physical and virtual environments.

What key features does Cisco UCS Manager offer?
  • Hardware Profile Association: Ensures seamless hardware configurations.
  • Unified Management: Centralizes control of storage, networking, and computing resources.
  • Service Profiles: Simplifies server deployment and management.
  • User-Friendly Dashboards: Provides intuitive interface and strong reporting.
  • High Availability: Facilitates resource expansion and stability.
What benefits are important when considering Cisco UCS Manager?
  • Operational Efficiency: Reduces downtime and enhances deployment speed.
  • Centralized Control: Streamlines management across blades and configurations.
  • Scalability: Supports mass deployments and expansion.
  • Visibility and Reporting: Improves infrastructure monitoring and analytics.

In industries managing extensive IT infrastructures, such as healthcare and finance, Cisco UCS Manager is crucial for optimizing server and network operations. It enables efficient creation of server profiles, integration with networking systems, and comprehensive monitoring, ensuring high availability and reduced setup time for complex environments.

Cisco
 

Sample Customers

BBVA Compass
Management Science Associates, Peak 10, Virtual Consulting Professionals
Buyer's Guide
CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. Cisco UCS Manager
June 2026
Free Report: CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. Cisco UCS Manager
Find out what your peers are saying about CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. Cisco UCS Manager and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.
DOWNLOAD NOW
902,988 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. Cisco UCS Manager report.
See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.