CA Unified Communications Monitor vs Cisco UCS Manager comparison

Broadcom and Cisco are both solutions in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category. Broadcom is ranked #61, while Cisco is ranked #31 with an average rating of 8.8. Broadcom holds a 0.6% mindshare in IM, compared to Cisco’s 1.3% mindshare. Additionally, 50% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Cisco users who would recommend it.

CA Unified Communications M...

Read 2 CA Unified Communications Monitor reviews

2,146 Views
1,288 Comparison Views

50% willing to recommend

Cisco UCS Manager

Read 27 Cisco UCS Manager reviews

4,060 Views
3,776 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

CA Unified Communications M...

Cisco UCS Manager

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

CA Unified Communications Monitor and Cisco UCS Manager compete in communication and data center management. Cisco UCS Manager has the upper hand due to its feature depth, offering a better balance of cost and capabilities.

Features: CA Unified Communications Monitor offers network performance monitoring, real-time alerts for communication flow disruptions, and analytic tools to optimize network performance. Cisco UCS Manager provides server management, in-depth configuration controls, and integrated infrastructure solutions for data center oversight.

Room for Improvement: CA Unified Communications Monitor can enhance its customer support framework, expand its feature set for broader applicability, and improve integration with other systems. Cisco UCS Manager could benefit from simplifying its initial setup process, expanding its user interface options for better accessibility, and reducing the complexity of its configuration tools for new users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cisco UCS Manager has a structured deployment model that simplifies integration and is supported by proactive customer service. CA Unified Communications Monitor offers a straightforward deployment process but lacks the extensive support framework seen in Cisco's services.

Pricing and ROI: Cisco UCS Manager presents a higher initial setup cost, but offers significant ROI through its comprehensive feature set. CA Unified Communications Monitor has a more affordable initial setup but demonstrates a less pronounced ROI due to its narrower focus and capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. Cisco UCS Manager Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. Cisco UCS Manager

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 902,988 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CA Unified Communications M...

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

61st

Average Rating

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Unified Communications Monitoring (3rd), Network Monitoring Software (88th)

Cisco UCS Manager

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

31st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2026, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the mindshare of CA Unified Communications Monitor is 0.6%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Cisco UCS Manager is 1.3%, down from 1.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Infrastructure Monitoring Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Cisco UCS Manager	1.3%
CA Unified Communications Monitor	0.6%
Other	98.1%

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

Featured Reviews

itarchit489981

IT Architect at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees

Good end-to-end voice quality monitoring and offers valuable features

The solution should have automatic baseline detection. On the per hour, per base, per week. That's usually the best. And on a per individual CI level. I know that they're working on it and when that's available then we will definitely implement it because it will reduce the effort we need to maintain all the products. Right now we have to set thresholds for every location, and it needs to be actually dynamic so if we have better thresholding, we'll have faster alarms across all our locations. We won't have to expend effort on it by resetting or checking them on a regular basis.

Read full review

Rob-Croxford

Consultant at rcnss

A market leader with an enhanced user interface for seamless experience

There is room for improvement in terms of cost and complexity to set up. It doesn't work straight out of the UCS, so someone who knows what they're doing is needed immediately, and it can be quite confusing. Some settings are still fairly well hidden, even the basic ones. Companies don't really understand how long it takes to set up. Also, when changes are pushed, it can take their phone line off the system for twenty minutes to half an hour. Out-of-the-box functionality is an issue, too. I know that my company is different, however, the basics are always the same. You do your tap lines, zip lines, and stuff like that, then you get your internal phone line system. That can all be automated and scripted, and it's probably part of the automation process. However, I haven't really seen it.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"For us, it's very key to know the voice quality of the total solution, which is based on many components across many domains."

"We use the solution to meet the needs of the customer."

"Good end-to-end monitoring"

"Cisco UCS Manager is overall a good package because it offers a GUI interface and a CLI."

"Cisco UCS has different layers of security, and you can do multiple installations of your LIAMs on top of the server and Blade. You can install VMware, Windows Server, Hyper-V, etc."

"When one server fails, we can attach the service profile to a new server, which saves a lot of time."

"Cisco UCS Manager is recommended for its ease of deployment and management capabilities."

"The solution offers quite good stability; we haven't had a problem at all with it."

"For the blade architecture and ease of use, I consider Cisco UCS Manager the best option on the market at the moment."

"Technical support has been good so far. We haven't had any issues with them. We're satisfied with the level of service they provide our company."

"We can configure the Cisco UCS Manager, the profiles and interactions with the resource we manage."

More Cisco UCS Manager pros

Cons

"The solution should have automatic baseline detection."

"All the features and functions of the solution can be improved, specifically the user experience."

"We faced issue with Nexus vem licensing issue which makes our complete DC went isolated in connect"

"I found it a bit of a challenge to get training on UCSM. I've been trying to get that for some time now. I feel like I have to figure it out a lot of things myself. For years I've to log calls with support whenever I've got challenges that I cannot resolve. If I had some training or more manuals, I'd be better able to handle more things on my own."

"The primary challenge we face is identifying the correct version to deploy during firmware upgrades or compute updates."

"Cisco UCS Manager should have a simplified deployment in the sense of not having multiple machines, demilitarized zones, and on-premise options."

"The pricing can be better."

"I would like to see improved visibility into the operating system, enabling us to identify issues directly from the operating system itself."

"There is room for improvement in the software part of Cisco UCS Manager. It should be more user-friendly, especially when creating policies."

"The solution's pricing is high and could be reduced."

More Cisco UCS Manager cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"Cisco UCS is more expensive than Dell and HP, but it is more reliable. I see less issues and it's quite stable."

"With product discounts which can be negotiated, the product is a great value."

"Cisco UCS Manager’s annual licensing fee is expensive."

"The pricing for Cisco UCS Manager is okay for its market, so it's a four out of five for me."

"You buy the hardware and then you get Cisco UCS Manager for free."

"We need to take a license for each port, which amounts to a big sum."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

902,988 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

17%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Government

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	19

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cisco UCS Manager?

My experience with the pricing of Cisco UCS Manager ( /products/cisco-ucs-manager-reviews ) is that it is reasonable. Recently, we acquired an excellent bundle with significant discounts, with offe...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cisco UCS Manager?

For improvements, while the current graphical user interface is satisfactory, it could be further simplified for different tasks. While it has been improved from using Java to HTML, simplifying the...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Cisco UCS Manager?

Our primary use case involves working with Cisco UCS B-Series ( /products/cisco-ucs-b-series-reviews ), specifically the UCS X modular deployment. We are setting up a new deployment shortly.

See all answers

Comparisons

SolarWinds NPM vs CA Unified Communications Monitor

Compared 10% of the time

Zabbix vs CA Unified Communications Monitor

Compared 8% of the time

StackState vs CA Unified Communications Monitor

Compared 8% of the time

BMC TrueSight vs CA Unified Communications Monitor

Compared 6% of the time

Icinga vs CA Unified Communications Monitor

Compared 6% of the time

More CA Unified Communications Monitor Competitors

Cisco Intersight vs Cisco UCS Manager

Compared 56% of the time

HPE OneView vs Cisco UCS Manager

Compared 5% of the time

Nutanix Prism vs Cisco UCS Manager

Compared 5% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs Cisco UCS Manager

Compared 4% of the time

Splunk Observability Cloud vs Cisco UCS Manager

Compared 4% of the time

More Cisco UCS Manager Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. Ixia Hawkeye

June 2026

CA Unified Communications Monitor report

Download CA Unified Communications Monitor product report

Buyer's Guide

Cisco UCS Manager

June 2026

Download Cisco UCS Manager product report

Also Known As

CA UC Monitor

No data available

Overview

CA Unified Communications Monitor provides real-time insight into communication networks, ensuring seamless connectivity and performance.

Designed for efficient management of unified communications, CA Unified Communications Monitor helps organizations monitor, diagnose, and manage their network and communication services efficiently. It delivers critical network visibility, allowing IT teams to quickly identify and resolve performance issues. Built with scalability in mind, it supports environments of all sizes, adapting to evolving network demands.

What are the key features of CA Unified Communications Monitor?

Real-time Monitoring: Provides live updates and dashboards for continuous network performance oversight.
Scalability: Handles growing network demands effortlessly, supporting various organization sizes.
Comprehensive Reporting: Offers detailed analytics and reporting to help in troubleshooting and performance analysis.
Custom Alerts: Configures alerts for proactive issue management, ensuring quick response to potential disruptions.

What benefits can users expect when evaluating CA Unified Communications Monitor?

Improved Network Performance: Enhances overall communication quality by addressing bottlenecks promptly.
Cost Efficiency: Reduces downtime and maintenance costs through proactive monitoring and quick issue resolution.
Enhanced User Satisfaction: Ensures a seamless user experience with consistent communication services.
Operational Agility: Adapts easily to growing network needs, supporting efficient management processes.

Industries such as finance, healthcare, and education benefit significantly from CA Unified Communications Monitor implementation. It ensures stable connections for remote consultations in healthcare, supports financial data transmission, and enables interactive learning experiences in education. By facilitating uninterrupted and high-quality communications, it directly contributes to business continuity and improved operational outcomes.

Broadcom

Cisco UCS Manager enables streamlined operations through unified storage, networking, and computing management, offering enhanced reliability and flexibility.

Cisco UCS Manager provides enhanced management capabilities for infrastructures, simplifying server deployment and operations. Its user-friendly interface aids in easy configuration and visibility, including robust reporting. UCS Manager supports efficient firmware and OS updates for large deployments, ensuring smooth operations across physical and virtual environments.

What key features does Cisco UCS Manager offer?

Hardware Profile Association: Ensures seamless hardware configurations.
Unified Management: Centralizes control of storage, networking, and computing resources.
Service Profiles: Simplifies server deployment and management.
User-Friendly Dashboards: Provides intuitive interface and strong reporting.
High Availability: Facilitates resource expansion and stability.

What benefits are important when considering Cisco UCS Manager?

Operational Efficiency: Reduces downtime and enhances deployment speed.
Centralized Control: Streamlines management across blades and configurations.
Scalability: Supports mass deployments and expansion.
Visibility and Reporting: Improves infrastructure monitoring and analytics.

In industries managing extensive IT infrastructures, such as healthcare and finance, Cisco UCS Manager is crucial for optimizing server and network operations. It enables efficient creation of server profiles, integration with networking systems, and comprehensive monitoring, ensuring high availability and reduced setup time for complex environments.

Cisco

Sample Customers

BBVA Compass

Management Science Associates, Peak 10, Virtual Consulting Professionals

Buyer's Guide

CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. Cisco UCS Manager

June 2026

Free Report: CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. Cisco UCS Manager

Find out what your peers are saying about CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. Cisco UCS Manager and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

902,988 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. Cisco UCS Manager report.

See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.