CA Unified Communications Monitor vs Cisco UCS Manager comparison

Broadcom and Cisco are both solutions in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category. Broadcom is ranked #69, while Cisco is ranked #17 with an average rating of 8.7. Broadcom holds a 0.3% mindshare in IM, compared to Cisco’s 1.2% mindshare. Additionally, 50% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Cisco users who would recommend it.

CA Unified Communications M...

Read 2 CA Unified Communications Monitor reviews

436 Views
266 Comparison Views

50% willing to recommend

Cisco UCS Manager

Read 27 Cisco UCS Manager reviews

1,749 Views
1,539 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

CA Unified Communications M...

Cisco UCS Manager

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

CA Unified Communications Monitor and Cisco UCS Manager compete in communication and data center management. Cisco UCS Manager has the upper hand due to its feature depth, offering a better balance of cost and capabilities.

Features: CA Unified Communications Monitor offers network performance monitoring, real-time alerts for communication flow disruptions, and analytic tools to optimize network performance. Cisco UCS Manager provides server management, in-depth configuration controls, and integrated infrastructure solutions for data center oversight.

Room for Improvement: CA Unified Communications Monitor can enhance its customer support framework, expand its feature set for broader applicability, and improve integration with other systems. Cisco UCS Manager could benefit from simplifying its initial setup process, expanding its user interface options for better accessibility, and reducing the complexity of its configuration tools for new users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cisco UCS Manager has a structured deployment model that simplifies integration and is supported by proactive customer service. CA Unified Communications Monitor offers a straightforward deployment process but lacks the extensive support framework seen in Cisco's services.

Pricing and ROI: Cisco UCS Manager presents a higher initial setup cost, but offers significant ROI through its comprehensive feature set. CA Unified Communications Monitor has a more affordable initial setup but demonstrates a less pronounced ROI due to its narrower focus and capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. Cisco UCS Manager Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. Cisco UCS Manager

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 869,760 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CA Unified Communications M...

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

69th

Average Rating

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Unified Communications Monitoring (5th), Network Monitoring Software (95th)

Cisco UCS Manager

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

17th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the mindshare of CA Unified Communications Monitor is 0.3%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Cisco UCS Manager is 1.2%, down from 1.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Infrastructure Monitoring Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Cisco UCS Manager	1.2%
CA Unified Communications Monitor	0.3%
Other	98.5%

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

Featured Reviews

itarchit489981

IT Architect at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees

Good end-to-end voice quality monitoring and offers valuable features

The solution should have automatic baseline detection. On the per hour, per base, per week. That's usually the best. And on a per individual CI level. I know that they're working on it and when that's available then we will definitely implement it because it will reduce the effort we need to maintain all the products. Right now we have to set thresholds for every location, and it needs to be actually dynamic so if we have better thresholding, we'll have faster alarms across all our locations. We won't have to expend effort on it by resetting or checking them on a regular basis.

Read full review

Edwin Mwosa

IT Infrastructure Manager at KTDA

Enhanced network oversight with rapid issue identification and good efficiency

We mainly use Cisco UCS Manager to integrate and manage our Cisco switches across the building. We also utilize it for network integration. It provides an integrated solution for our Cisco environment, streamlining our operations and managing multiple Cisco devices like switches and routers Cisco…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We use the solution to meet the needs of the customer."

"Good end-to-end monitoring"

"The solution is highly scalable, mainly because of the templates that make it easy for you to actually edit on the system."

"One of the valuable features is the user interface base."

"What I like most about Cisco UCS Manager is the ease of administration. It also allows the central management of maintenance, installation, and configuration activities."

"The flexibility and the ease in which the features can be expanded are the solution's most valuable aspects."

"The most valuable features of Cisco UCS Manager include the visibility it provides and the ease of identifying issues within the Cisco environment."

"From a usability and functionality perspective, Cisco UCS Manager is very good."

"Cisco UCS Manager is overall a good package because it gives a GUI interface and a CLI."

"Cisco Infrastructure is one of the top vendors and no one can beat them in terms of switching and routing."

More Cisco UCS Manager pros

Cons

"All the features and functions of the solution can be improved."

"The solution should have automatic baseline detection."

"The interface and the way it is constructed is very complex. They should work to simplify it. It's quite difficult for somebody who doesn't know the product very well. Users should be able to get proficient with it faster. There's definitely room for improvement there."

"The pricing aspect should be addressed."

"Cisco UCS is expensive compared to others. The Cisco UCS Chassis is more expensive than a standalone server, but some companies require standalone servers because of their production load and affordability. You need to pay more if you require more features on the Blade or if you need more ports on the switch."

"The integration with other solutions could be better. I think Cisco can only integrate using Intersight. There is a second interface available as a SaaS platform, in the cloud, or on-premise. It's based on the Redfish protocol, which is standard for all the B-series servers in the market. We can integrate other solutions using API."

"I found it a bit of a challenge to get training on UCSM. I've been trying to get that for some time now. I feel like I have to figure it out a lot of things myself. For years I've to log calls with support whenever I've got challenges that I cannot resolve. If I had some training or more manuals, I'd be better able to handle more things on my own."

"There is room for improvement in terms of cost and complexity to set up. It doesn't work straight out of the UCS, so someone who knows what they're doing is needed immediately, and it can be quite confusing."

"In the next release, I would like to see improvements made to their security."

"We have three data centers and if we could manage all three data centers using one interface, it would be great."

More Cisco UCS Manager cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"Cisco UCS is more expensive than Dell and HP, but it is more reliable. I see less issues and it's quite stable."

"Cisco UCS Manager’s annual licensing fee is expensive."

"With product discounts which can be negotiated, the product is a great value."

"We need to take a license for each port, which amounts to a big sum."

"The pricing for Cisco UCS Manager is okay for its market, so it's a four out of five for me."

"You buy the hardware and then you get Cisco UCS Manager for free."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,760 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Computer Software Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	18

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Cisco UCS Manager?

When one server fails, we can attach the service profile to a new server, which saves a lot of time.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cisco UCS Manager?

My experience with the pricing of Cisco UCS Manager ( /products/cisco-ucs-manager-reviews ) is that it is reasonable. Recently, we acquired an excellent bundle with significant discounts, with offe...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cisco UCS Manager?

For improvements, while the current graphical user interface is satisfactory, it could be further simplified for different tasks. While it has been improved from using Java to HTML, simplifying the...

See all answers

Comparisons

Icinga vs CA Unified Communications Monitor

Compared 43% of the time

Precisely Network Management vs CA Unified Communications Monitor

Compared 31% of the time

ITRS Geneos vs CA Unified Communications Monitor

Compared 27% of the time

More CA Unified Communications Monitor Competitors

Cisco Intersight vs Cisco UCS Manager

Compared 75% of the time

Nutanix Prism vs Cisco UCS Manager

Compared 8% of the time

HPE OneView vs Cisco UCS Manager

Compared 7% of the time

Everbridge IT Alerting vs Cisco UCS Manager

Compared 4% of the time

Zabbix vs Cisco UCS Manager

Compared 4% of the time

More Cisco UCS Manager Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. ScienceLogic

September 2025

CA Unified Communications Monitor report

Download CA Unified Communications Monitor product report

Buyer's Guide

Cisco UCS Manager

October 2025

Download Cisco UCS Manager product report

Also Known As

CA UC Monitor

No data available

Overview

CA Unified Communications Monitor is a unified communications monitoring solution that evaluates and reports on the network’s support of real-time applications in multi-vendor environments, so that Network Administrators can optimize the network’s quality of service and end user experience.

Broadcom

Cisco UCS Manager helps significantly reduce management and administration expenses by automating routine tasks to increase operational agility. Customers can extend the benefits of Cisco UCS Manager globally across an enterprise to thousands of servers in multiple domains with Cisco UCS Central Software.

Cisco

Sample Customers

BBVA Compass

Management Science Associates, Peak 10, Virtual Consulting Professionals

Buyer's Guide

CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. Cisco UCS Manager

September 2025

Free Report: CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. Cisco UCS Manager

Find out what your peers are saying about CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. Cisco UCS Manager and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

869,760 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. Cisco UCS Manager report.

See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.