No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Boomi iPaaS vs E2E Bridge comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Boomi iPaaS
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.5
Number of Reviews
31
Ranking in other categories
Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (3rd), Business Orchestration and Automation Technologies (16th), AI Observability (17th)
E2E Bridge
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.7
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
Business-to-Business Middleware (19th)
 

Mindshare comparison

While both are Application Integration solutions, they serve different purposes. Boomi iPaaS is designed for Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) and holds a mindshare of 6.9%, down 10.7% compared to last year.
E2E Bridge, on the other hand, focuses on Business-to-Business Middleware, holds 1.9% mindshare, up 0.5% since last year.
Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Boomi iPaaS6.9%
MuleSoft Anypoint Platform6.7%
Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC)5.2%
Other81.2%
Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)
Business-to-Business Middleware Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
E2E Bridge1.9%
SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite10.4%
IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services9.7%
Other78.0%
Business-to-Business Middleware
 

Featured Reviews

SG
Associate at Ltim
Cloud integration has transformed projects and delivers faster, more secure business workflows
In my opinion, the best feature Boomi iPaaS offers is its user interface, which is easy to maintain, has a low cost, and offers low licensing costs, making it very easy to develop any integration. Regarding features, Boomi iPaaS performs best and is more stable. It also has easy support, allowing me to contact the Boomi support vendor team for assistance with atoms, molecules, runtimes, and clusters. Security-wise, it is also more secure, enabling the use of internal OAuth 2.0 tokens and basic authentication for high-level authentication, and I can integrate with third-party services to obtain authentication, with some banking projects in Boomi iPaaS using PayU, Razorpay, and various payment platform authentications. The positive impact of Boomi iPaaS on my organization has been significant, as after adopting it, I received many projects with the help of the Boomi vendor who brought me opportunities for Boomi iPaaS usage. Previously, I used TIBCO, MFT, and WebMethods, which were all very old systems. Boomi iPaaS is cloud-based and continues to update constantly, which has been very useful and led to more business. I can definitely say I see specific positive outcomes after moving to Boomi iPaaS, noting improvements in efficiency, cost savings, and faster project delivery. The connector-based licensing cost is very low compared to other integration tools, and for security purposes, it is helpful. I have observed significant good performance transitioning from old legacy systems to Boomi iPaaS.
it_user651531 - PeerSpot reviewer
ESB/ABAP developer at a retailer with 1,001-5,000 employees
You can build your model with a graphical interface using UML. Apart from some scripting, there is no coding.
An area of improvement is the stopping and starting of services from the Bridge server console. The only way to test services on the Bridge is to have them scheduled so that they run at a specific moment in time. It is, at this time, not possible to trigger this by hand from the console. It is possible to trigger it via the analyze tool, which is used to trace the service. It would be nice to have a simple way to test services without having to schedule them. This is no problem for a developer, but from the functional consultant point of view, the functional consultant needs to test the service and determine if it meets the requirements. It's not a big issue, but it would be nice to have.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Boomi iPaaS has substantially reduced operational costs by providing out-of-the-box connectors that expedite the integration process with enterprise systems."
"Low-code development is the most valuable feature."
"I like the tool's optimization feature."
"Boomi iPaaS has significantly impacted our ROI. We have automated complete order-to-cash processes for multiple customers, saving over 90 million dollars."
"We have a tight relationship with Boomi; we get support from Boomi then pass it on to our clients, and the support they provide us with is very good."
"Boomi iPaaS makes it easy to organize ETL procedures that populate data warehouses."
"The Salesforce and NetSuite Application specific “connectors” provide a layer of abstraction on top of the SOAP-based APIs to streamline integration development."
"The maturity of the product is significant."
"E2E is cheaper compared to IBM, Oracle, webMethods, and other middleware solutions."
"What I like about the Bridge is the way that you build your model with a graphical interface using UML."
 

Cons

"The IDE is lacking in the ability to script."
"The solution is complex. There's a few items and features that are hard to understand. They should work to simplify the functionality so new users don't struggle."
"Boomi, as a solution, is quite complex for a new user."
"There are still some areas that need improvement. For example, when updates are going on, the product becomes very slow."
"We encountered stability issues occasionally, one to two times a year."
"It does the job well and it's robust, however, it is needlessly overcomplicated, and the documentation could be better."
"They are lacking in some streaming features, and messaging features from a listener's point of view."
"They should create a custom connector option. With this, they could improve where the user can create the connector, based on their usage."
"Maybe they need to support more connectivity protocols."
"An area of improvement is the stopping and starting of services from the Bridge server console."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"When it comes to pricing, it's not so much about being less expensive as it is about how they don't tie to the hardware on the underlined VMware that you run on, as other vendors do"
"The pricing is a bit complex. While the entry fee may be lower than other solutions, it could be expensive depending on your usage."
"AtomSphere Integration's pricing is competitive, and I would rate it seven out of ten."
"The cost of the solution is in the neighborhood of $20,000 annually. There are no costs above the standard licensing fee."
"There could be an easy-to-understand licensing model."
"The Platinum package is good for licensing, but I’m not sure about the cost and improvements."
"This solution is very economical (based on the connections)."
"They do not charge by the number of people using the software (client-server model), but rather they charge based on the number of connections used. This makes it very cost effective."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions are best for your needs.
896,563 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
9%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Computer Software Company
8%
Outsourcing Company
7%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business10
Midsize Enterprise4
Large Enterprise16
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Boomi AtomSphere Integration?
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing indicates it is a little bit high but still reasonable.
What needs improvement with Boomi AtomSphere Integration?
In terms of improvements, there is not much to enhance, but I believe a more user-friendly UI, solid Agent Garden features, and more training initiatives to promote Boomi iPaaS would be beneficial....
What is your primary use case for Boomi AtomSphere Integration?
My main use case for Boomi iPaaS is integration, as I have been integrating Boomi iPaaS with many source and destination systems such as Salesforce. I use Boomi iPaaS as an integrator, connecting w...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

Boomi
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

DocuSign Inc., Innotas, Certent, Renesas Electronics America (REA), Kelly-Moore Paints, Mindjet, City of McKinney, Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers (RBA), Daylight Transport, A10 Networks
Agri Retail, dodenhof, PKZ, Nikon, Ypsomed, EVN, Landwirtschaftsverlag Mªnster, Intrum Justitia, UBS, B2BNet, Ammann, Antalis, Apareoo, Coutts, Franke, Swissgrid, UPC Cablecom, Vontobel
Find out what your peers are saying about Salesforce, Microsoft, Boomi and others in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS). Updated: May 2026.
896,563 professionals have used our research since 2012.