Bonita vs IBM Case Foundation comparison

Bonitasoft and IBM are both solutions in the Business Process Management (BPM) category. Bonitasoft is ranked #23 with an average rating of 7.0, while IBM is ranked #27 with an average rating of 8.0. Bonitasoft holds a 2.2% mindshare in BPM, compared to IBM’s 0.8% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of Bonitasoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 86% of IBM users who would recommend it.

Bonita

Read 27 Bonita reviews

3,336 Views
2,602 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

IBM Case Foundation

Read 14 IBM Case Foundation reviews

689 Views
689 Comparison Views

86% willing to recommend

Bonita

IBM Case Foundation

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

Bonita and IBM Case Foundation are competing products in the BPM industry. Bonita seems to have the upper hand in affordability and flexibility, while IBM Case Foundation offers a robust feature set for enterprise-level tasks.

Features: Bonita is recognized for its open-source flexibility, ease of integration across systems, and provides visual modeling tools for process creation. IBM Case Foundation offers advanced data analytics, scalability, and robust enterprise-level capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Bonita could enhance its support services and refine the user interface for larger implementations. More enterprise-level features could also add value. IBM Case Foundation could improve ease of use, reduce initial setup complexity, and offer more economical pricing plans for smaller businesses.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Bonita is lauded for straightforward deployment, quick implementation, and support through community forums. In contrast, IBM Case Foundation requires more extensive setup but provides dedicated support services and detailed documentation.

Pricing and ROI: Bonita's cost-effective model and low initial investment make it appealing for startups, offering rapid ROI through cost savings. IBM Case Foundation, while more expensive upfront, concentrates on long-term value, making it suitable for large enterprises with demanding needs.

To learn more, read our detailed Bonita vs. IBM Case Foundation Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Bonita vs. IBM Case Foundation

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,114 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Bonita

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

23rd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Design (13th), Process Automation (21st)

IBM Case Foundation

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

27th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of Bonita is 2.2%, down from 3.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM Case Foundation is 0.8%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Management (BPM) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Bonita	2.2%
IBM Case Foundation	0.8%
Other	97.0%

Business Process Management (BPM)

Featured Reviews

Mohamed Guermazi

Technical Director / Project Manager at I-way

The user interface is easy to use, and the product performs well, but the dashboard and the monitoring features are limited

We use the product to design workflows. We model and install them on the server. We use the Community edition The modeling features are easy. The performance of the tool is good. The user interface is easy to use. I have used the product for complex processes and sub-processes successfully. The…

Read full review

Khalid Tamim

Senior Systems Consultant at Saudi Telecom Company

User experience reveals stability and easy deployment, though improvements in integration options are needed

We are still working with DataPower Gateway with IBM solutions, but they will move to webMethods from DataPower, IBM. We still use IBM FileNet for the FileNet. We have already integrated IBM Case Foundation with IBM Content Management and are using IBM Content Navigator as an interface in Content Engine and Content Management for lifecycle documents. I do not use analytics for operational insights. We work in banking, but not in healthcare. Currently, my customers are using it on-premises, and security-wise it is fine. For Saudi Arabia, 300 users represent a medium business. I recommend IBM Case Foundation; it is the best in BPM solutions, and I support it. It is the best because it has stability, very good stability. IBM has good stability, and performance-wise it is also easy for deployment. From the GUI, you can make many changes, and it is low code; we did not write much code because the BPM design is a very good solution. My total rating for IBM Case Foundation is 8.5 out of 10.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Process automation with Bonita BPM is really easy."

"I really enjoy using the workflow management."

"Development of forms and flows."

"The user interface is easy to use."

"Bonita is simple and lightweight and is flexible to integrate with third-party systems. The UI is now flexible, whereas it was previously rigid. Any technology can be used as a frontend, including ReactJS, Angular, and others."

"The solution is stable. Even the older versions are stable."

"Its user-friendliness, along with the availability of comprehensive and clear documentation on the website is the most valuable."

"The user interface is better than all of the open-source BPMs that I have tried."

More Bonita pros

"The solution is scalable."

"The most valuable feature is the content manager part of the file as it is very stable, robust, and reliable."

"The most valuable features are those involving decision making, analysis, and anything related to event documents because those processes are related to content as well."

"Flexible and the ability to divide search screens, and to search for documents. The ECM feature inside the system is great."

"The client and the IBM content navigation are the solution's most valuable features."

"It provides us the capability of producing business processes for documents that are launched immediately when a document comes into the repository."

"The content management is great."

"It's very easy."

More IBM Case Foundation pros

Cons

"I would like to improve the product's load balancing."

"The main issue with Bonita is that the workspace crashes sometimes."

"There is a considerable learning curve."

"I should be able to park the tasks that are within a process in a kind of container, and dynamically, a super admin should be able to connect these processes. This kind of feature might be helpful."

"It is missing some important features that other products have."

"Installation could be made easier."

"It would be nice to have a wizard to help walk through the development process and create a backbone."

"There could be an improvement in IoT connectivity."

More Bonita cons

"Once a workflow is launched then it stays static forever, which is a problem because if there is a change in the business then you cannot change the workflow."

"The service as it currently stands is out-of-date and lacks flexibility."

"We are now using microservices but there are some areas where the coordination with FileNet is problematic."

"IBM needs to update the user interfaces of all its products to make them more intuitive and accessible to beginners. Compared to Microsoft products, IBM solutions are less user-friendly. IBM programs are hard to master. It's a problem in my region because it's hard to find IT staff who can work with IBM."

"The solution can be quite expensive."

"There are some features that could be enhanced like the document viewer"

"90% of the feedback we receive states that the UI is not very user-friendly."

"The interface needs to be more user-friendly."

More IBM Case Foundation cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"You pay an annual fee and can have an unlimited number of processes and users."

"The product's pricing is acceptable. Pricing is yearly."

"The Enterprise edition is very expensive."

"The price is fair for what we are using the solution for."

"have installed the image of Bonita BPM on Amazon AWS and there is just one option to use and pay for."

"We are using the Community Version, which can be used free of charge."

"The price of the solution is reasonable."

"I believe this is a very good financial choice."

More Bonita pricing and cost advice

"IBM Case Foundation is a little expensive."

"This is not an expensive solution and we are using the standard license."

"The price falls in the middle range—not overly expensive but not extremely affordable either."

"Pricing is in the mid-range, it is not cheap, but it's not expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Computer Software Company

12%

Government

Manufacturing Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	14
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	11

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	6

Questions from the Community

How does Bonita compare with Camunda Platform?

One of the things we like best about Bonita is that you can create without coding - it is a low-code platform. With Bonita, you can build the entire mechanism using the GUI, it’s that simple. You c...

See all answers

What do you like most about Bonita?

The user interface is easy to use.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Bonita?

The Enterprise edition is very expensive.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM Case Foundation?

The tool is expensive for my customers; it is very expensive, more than other solutions. Some customers say it is more expensive. The license cost for Cloud Pak is per user and increases with the n...

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM Case Foundation?

We face some challenges with IBM Case Foundation from our customers, particularly with administration and configuration. We face many issues and open tickets with IBM regarding that, especially som...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for IBM Case Foundation?

My customer's main use cases for IBM Case Foundation include banking, such as Bank Alryad, and the state Ministry of OI. There are many banks in Saudi Arabia in the banking sector. In the banking s...

See all answers

Comparisons

Camunda vs Bonita

Compared 30% of the time

Bizagi vs Bonita

Compared 12% of the time

Flowable vs Bonita

Compared 5% of the time

Apache Airflow vs Bonita

Compared 5% of the time

IBM BPM vs Bonita

Compared 4% of the time

More Bonita Competitors

IBM Business Automation Workflow vs IBM Case Foundation

Compared 19% of the time

Pega Platform vs IBM Case Foundation

Compared 17% of the time

ARIS BPA vs IBM Case Foundation

Compared 16% of the time

OpenText MBPM vs IBM Case Foundation

Compared 14% of the time

iGrafx Process360 Live Platform vs IBM Case Foundation

Compared 10% of the time

More IBM Case Foundation Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Bonita

January 2026

Download Bonita product report

Buyer's Guide

IBM Case Foundation

January 2026

Download IBM Case Foundation product report

Also Known As

Bonita BPM

Case Foundation, FileNet Business Process Manager

Overview

Bonitasoft helps innovative companies worldwide deliver better digital user experiences for customers and employees. The extensible and open Bonita application platform unleashes the full potential of multidisciplinary development teams to create Living Apps: applications that allow continuous and incremental improvement, connecting tailored user interfaces with reliable back-office operations.

Bonitasoft

IBM Case Foundation is for organizations that need to harness unstructured information and integrate it with business processes to drive critical business decisions. It enables organizations to create, manage and optimize case-based processes and is designed to decrease development costs while significantly improving process performance. Case Foundation links specific pieces of content with a structured workflow. It's an on ramp for organizations that choose to move from document-centric workflow solutions to the advanced capabilities of IBM Case Manager.

IBM

Sample Customers

With more than 1000 customers in 75 countries, and its ecosystem of more than 120,000 members, Bonitasoft is the largest provider of open-source Business Process Management, Low-code and Digital Transformation software worldwide.

Suncorp Group Limited

Buyer's Guide

Bonita vs. IBM Case Foundation

December 2025

Free Report: Bonita vs. IBM Case Foundation

Find out what your peers are saying about Bonita vs. IBM Case Foundation and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Bonita vs. IBM Case Foundation report.

See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.