No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

BMC IT Business Management OnDemand [EOL] vs Microsoft Project Server comparison

BMC and Microsoft are both solutions in the Project Portfolio Management category. Additionally, 100% of BMC users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 87% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.
Microsoft Project Server
Read 62 Microsoft Project Server reviews
  • 3,600 Views
  • 1,836 Comparison Views
87% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 3, 2026

Microsoft Project Server and BMC IT Business Management OnDemand [EOL] are competing in project management and IT business management solutions. BMC IT Business Management OnDemand [EOL] has the upper hand due to its comprehensive features and specialized capabilities for IT business management.

Features:Microsoft Project Server includes robust project scheduling, collaboration tools, and resource management that integrate well with Microsoft ecosystems. BMC IT Business Management OnDemand [EOL], however, offers comprehensive IT portfolio management, financial planning, and service demand management aimed at organizations with a strong IT focus.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service:Microsoft Project Server provides an on-premise model suitable for businesses with existing Microsoft infrastructure, offering reliable integration and support. BMC IT Business Management OnDemand [EOL] delivers a cloud-based solution that is easily deployable and minimizes disruption, with a focus on specialized IT support for rapid implementation.

Pricing and ROI:Microsoft Project Server is more cost-effective initially due to the synergies within Microsoft environments, offering a favorable ROI for businesses using Microsoft tools. BMC IT Business Management OnDemand [EOL], while having a potentially higher initial setup cost, delivers significant ROI through its targeted IT management capabilities and process streamlining.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Project Portfolio Management Report (Updated: June 2026).
Buyer's Guide
Project Portfolio Management
June 2026
Download the complete report
Helped 902,417 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

BMC IT Business Management ...
Average Rating
7.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Microsoft Project Server
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.5
Number of Reviews
62
Ranking in other categories
Project Portfolio Management (5th)
 

Featured Reviews

it_user233283 - PeerSpot reviewer
it_user233283
Associate Director at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
Tight integration with systems like SAP, Oracle Financials and Siebel
* Tight integration with systems like SAP, Oracle Financials and Siebel * Demand management: It helps in planning methodology used to forecast or predict, plan for and manage the demand for products and services. * Finance planning & analysis: It helps accelerate planning cycles and make decisions based on real-time financial insights. It supports budgeting, forecasting, financial analysis, performance management, and more. These features can help you track and control costs, and tightly align operations with business strategy, and control the allocated or budgeted costs vs. actual and forecasted cost. * Portfolio management: It is one of the very important functions in this space because in my view it is the function that ensures that the portfolio of IT projects, applications and infrastructure are providing cost-effective benefits to the organization. It is the centralized management of the processes, methods, and technologies used by project managers and project management offices to analyze and manage projects.
Read full review
JV
JorgeValenzuela
Owner at CPSTECH
Collaborative task management simplifies office work, but agile methodology features need enhancement
In order to improve Microsoft Project Server, collaborative features could be enhanced, as it is possible to improve it in a collaborative way similar to other office products, for example, using cloud drives like OneDrive. Another feature is Kanban or other features such as Scrum with agile methodologies. Microsoft Project Server is limited and falls short in using agile methodologies, which is the most important issue to improve. Microsoft Project Server is a good product; it is possible to improve regarding enabling agile features because the teams in my work are using Trello and Jira products due to the blackboards, Kanban, and Scrum. To do activities and stopping activities is more comfortable and easier to use, making it more practical in my teamwork. These features do not exist in Microsoft Project Server.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"I believe that the BMC ITBM solution provides valuable information to CIOs and other business heads, and helps them take quick business decisions about how to manage and utilize their resources."
"The most valuable features are the gantt charts. It's easy to use for me."
"I like the way you can build the schedule by the Don't Start Before or Don't Start After values. You can use it to build your schedule based on how you change your dates. This is how it actually builds the schedule."
"The solution, overall, is excellent for project planning."
"There are many valuable features of this solution. It is very advanced and once you understand and learn how to use it, it can be quite powerful. The whole package can be quite powerful."
"The level of customization is significant, and there are ample resources available online about how to use it."
"Microsoft Project Server has improved our organization by providing visibility of all project portfolios in one place."
"We use the tool in our IT-related projects. All IT efforts are managed using the Microsoft Project Server. Every week, we have a project status meeting where we demonstrate the project's status using the tool. We track tasks and progress, assign owners, and monitor milestones and all project-related work using it."
"It's fine to navigate for a layperson."
More Microsoft Project Server pros
 

Cons

"Better integration with other corporate finance systems would be an advantage."
"We need to be able to compare milestones, calls, and other variables regarding the projects we are working on. I have to contract developers to make reports, which is where things get complicated. They need to develop personal and custom fields for us."
"Risk and issues are stored in the project SharePoint but there is no real auto communication of assignments; there is no mechanism for automatic escalation (much needed)."
"It's very expensive to scale out."
"It would be useful if the solution allowed us to share files or project schedules. You may get that with the cloud version. However, it's not available on the on-premises versions."
"The reporting in the desktop version is not highly customizable or professional compared to other solutions."
"In terms of the performance, I think it's something that took a big toll on the service when a lot of people logged in finally, so that's something that can be improved in the future."
"There are formatting issues that haven't been resolved. This needs improvement as it's annoying."
"The cost could be lower."
More Microsoft Project Server cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"It has features that cannot be bought by other rivals, so cost does not matter."
"The licensing was procured before my involvement."
"There is a subscription model for different types of users for different types of roles."
"There is a licensing cost."
"The price of the Microsoft Project Server could improve, it is expensive here in Africa. When comparing Microsoft Project Server to Oracle Primavera for us, Microsoft Project Server is quite cost-effective."
"It is on the expensive side."
"The product is expensive."
"I cannot comment on the price as I was not responsible for purchasing the solution."
More Microsoft Project Server pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Project Portfolio Management solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
902,417 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Construction Company
11%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Marketing Services Firm
9%
Manufacturing Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business25
Midsize Enterprise12
Large Enterprise33
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Project Server?
The pricing for Microsoft Project Server is standard, around $200-$250, but I think it's actually $80 to $100 per year. The pricing for Microsoft Project Server is relative; I would say it is cheap.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Microsoft Project Server?
In order to improve Microsoft Project Server, collaborative features could be enhanced, as it is possible to improve it in a collaborative way similar to other office products, for example, using c...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Microsoft Project Server?
Today, the use cases for Microsoft Project Server are for office tasks, such as writing in Word processors, worksheets in Excel, Word processors with Microsoft Word, Microsoft Excel, and Microsoft ...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

UMT360 vs BMC IT Business Management OnDemand [EOL] Logo
UMT360 vs BMC IT Business Management OnDemand [EOL]
Compared 21% of the time
Apptio One vs BMC IT Business Management OnDemand [EOL] Logo
Apptio One vs BMC IT Business Management OnDemand [EOL]
Compared 17% of the time
Alfabet IT Planning & Portfolio Management vs BMC IT Business Management OnDemand [EOL] Logo
Alfabet IT Planning & Portfolio Management vs BMC IT Business Management OnDemand [EOL]
Compared 16% of the time
Broadcom Clarity vs BMC IT Business Management OnDemand [EOL] Logo
Broadcom Clarity vs BMC IT Business Management OnDemand [EOL]
Compared 15% of the time
Jira vs BMC IT Business Management OnDemand [EOL] Logo
Jira vs BMC IT Business Management OnDemand [EOL]
Compared 7% of the time
More BMC IT Business Management OnDemand [EOL] Competitors
OpenText Project and Portfolio Management vs Microsoft Project Server Logo
OpenText Project and Portfolio Management vs Microsoft Project Server
Compared 8% of the time
Broadcom Clarity vs Microsoft Project Server Logo
Broadcom Clarity vs Microsoft Project Server
Compared 6% of the time
SAP Portfolio and Project Management vs Microsoft Project Server Logo
SAP Portfolio and Project Management vs Microsoft Project Server
Compared 6% of the time
Planview Portfolios vs Microsoft Project Server Logo
Planview Portfolios vs Microsoft Project Server
Compared 5% of the time
ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management vs Microsoft Project Server Logo
ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management vs Microsoft Project Server
Compared 5% of the time
More Microsoft Project Server Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Project Portfolio Management
June 2026
BMC IT Business Management OnDemand [EOL] reportDownload BMC IT Business Management OnDemand [EOL] product report
Buyer's Guide
Microsoft Project Server
June 2026
Microsoft Project Server reportDownload Microsoft Project Server product report
 

Also Known As

IT Business Management OnDemand, BMC IT Business Management Suite
MS Project Server
 

Overview

BMC IT Business Management OnDemand [EOL] was a comprehensive IT management service designed to streamline project and portfolio management while delivering actionable business insights.

It offered cloud-based capabilities tailored to meet enterprise-level demands, allowing businesses to manage their IT operations with precision. By integrating various IT processes and providing detailed analytics, BMC IT Business Management OnDemand [EOL] enabled organizations to enhance operational efficiency and strategic planning. Its end-of-life status means businesses that relied on its functionalities must seek alternatives or replacements to continue optimizing their IT management practices.

What are the key features of BMC IT Business Management OnDemand [EOL]?
  • Comprehensive Dashboard: A centralized interface offering detailed insights into IT metrics and KPIs.
  • Portfolio Management: Tools for overseeing multiple projects and initiatives, ensuring alignment with strategic goals.
  • Capacity Planning: Facilitates planning and resource allocation to maximize productivity and minimize waste.
  • Cost Management: Tracks and manages IT spending, ensuring budget accuracy and financial accountability.
What benefits or ROI can users expect from reviews?
  • Enhanced Decision-Making: Real-time data accessibility leads to informed choices that align with business objectives.
  • Increased Efficiency: Streamlined processes reduce redundancy and foster seamless collaboration.
  • Cost-Effectiveness: Optimized resource allocation and budget management result in financial savings.

In industries like finance and healthcare, implementing solutions like BMC IT Business Management OnDemand [EOL] involved integrating IT planning with enterprise goals, ensuring that technology investments directly contributed to improving service delivery and operational productivity. This alignment helped organizations navigate complex environments while maintaining a competitive edge.

BMC

Microsoft Project Server streamlines project management with features like resource allocation, project scheduling, and SharePoint integration. It's valued for its intuitive interface and ability to provide comprehensive insights through advanced reporting and dashboards.

Designed to enhance collaboration and efficiency, Microsoft Project Server supports complex task management by integrating seamlessly with SharePoint. It offers tools like Gantt charts and timeline management for effective tracking. Users benefit from Excel and Power BI compatibility, enhancing analytical capabilities. Despite its powerful functionalities, users identify areas for improvement in tool integration, resource management, and collaboration features. There are calls for a modernized interface and more flexible pricing. While the cloud version boasts continuous updates, the on-premises model lags behind.

What are the main features of Microsoft Project Server?
  • Resource Allocation: Optimizes workload across projects.
  • Project Scheduling: Helps plan timelines effectively.
  • SharePoint Integration: Facilitates collaboration.
  • Gantt Charts: Visual timeline for task tracking.
  • Power BI Integration: Advanced data analytics capabilities.
What benefits should you look for in Microsoft Project Server reviews?
  • Intuitive Interface: Easy to navigate and learn.
  • Scalability: Adjusts to growing project demands.
  • Customization: Tailors to specific project needs.
  • Detailed Insights: Comprehensive project overviews.

Microsoft Project Server finds its application across industries by providing tools for planning IT infrastructure and managing enterprise-level projects. It helps organizations document projects and manage portfolios, enabling clear visibility into performance through milestones and KPIs.

Microsoft
 

Sample Customers

AtTask, Cast & Crew, ChipRewards, Fujitsu, Orange Business Services
Magnachip, Gwinnett County Schools, CLEAResult, Medbit Oy, Intelbras S.A., ETS, CORE Construction, Keller Foundations
Buyer's Guide
Project Portfolio Management
June 2026
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Broadcom, Planisware, monday.com and others in Project Portfolio Management. Updated: June 2026.
DOWNLOAD NOW
902,417 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our list of best Project Portfolio Management vendors.

We monitor all Project Portfolio Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.