BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management vs Elastic Observability comparison

BMC Helix and Elastic are both solutions in the Cloud Monitoring Software category. BMC Helix is ranked #45, while Elastic is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.5. BMC Helix holds a 0.3% mindshare in CMS, compared to Elastic’s 4.3% mindshare. Additionally, 80% of BMC Helix users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of Elastic users who would recommend it.

BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management

Read 5 BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management reviews

494 Views
203 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Elastic Observability

Read 28 Elastic Observability reviews

8,986 Views
3,684 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management

Elastic Observability

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management and Elastic Observability compete in the cloud management and observability sectors. BMC is advantageous due to its automation and scalability features, while Elastic Observability stands out for its analytics and visualization capabilities.

Features: BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management offers automated provisioning and lifecycle management, flexible scalability for various workloads, and enhanced resource management. Elastic Observability provides powerful data ingestion and analysis, detailed monitoring, and robust anomaly detection paired with dynamic data visualization.

Room for Improvement: BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management could enhance its analytics capabilities, improve user interface design, and expand integration options with third-party tools. Elastic Observability might benefit from lowering complexity in initial configuration, optimizing resource use for large-scale deployments, and enhancing alert management systems.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management offers straightforward deployment with proactive customer service and structured onboarding. Elastic Observability ensures easy deployment with extensive documentation and a strong community support model, promoting user independence and flexibility.

Pricing and ROI: BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management usually has higher upfront costs, reflecting high service levels with potential long-term ROI. Elastic Observability presents scalable pricing often resulting in lower initial costs, with visible ROI through its operational insights and analytics efficiency.

To learn more, read our detailed BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management vs. Elastic Observability Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management vs. Elastic Observability

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 869,760 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management

Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software

45th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

5.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Management (38th)

Elastic Observability

Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software

6th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (7th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (10th), Log Management (14th), Container Monitoring (4th)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Cloud Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management is 0.3%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Elastic Observability is 4.3%, down from 7.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Monitoring Software Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Elastic Observability	4.3%
BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management	0.3%
Other	95.4%

Cloud Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Entprssol67

Enterprise Solution Architect at Engineering Ingegneria Informatica SPA

Helps design blueprints in a cloud environment but the support is a major problem

One of the major problems is that support is not so good. I used to have a support expert in Spain but they left two years ago. BMC doesn't invest a lot in network automation but network automation is a major point in CLM. There aren't any experts here in Europe, maybe they have in America, I don't know. The main problem is the support in Europe. We had a lot of problems with the people who got put on our cases. The agents that we were assigned to were not so capable. They wanted to replicate the problem. If you have an incident, it takes a lot of time to troubleshoot the problem. The incident support is not so good. The technicians don't know the platform well. BMC doesn't want to invest in CLM. Two years ago we had a lot of problems. Maybe BMC realized that CLM is an end of life product.

Read full review

Adelina Craciun

Product Owner at Swisscom

Customization enables tailored monitoring and alerting across departments

The possibility to customize it has been quite useful. Whatever the other departments want to dream up, we implement. Whatever they want to monitor, the granularity of it, the changes in the threshold, and the anomalies that they want reported all require some development. So far, every single request has been fulfilled.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Supports unattended installs and image-based, script-based, or template-based provisioning."

"By allowing end users to request their own services, the request process for systems is much quicker and more accurate."

"Automates Java EE Application Deployment from an SCM system."

"CLM has a multi-cloud portal because they have the resources to implement in various environments in various ports."

"Assesses change impact or completes an audit using multiple dashboard views."

"You can tie together your public and private cloud infrastructure into a "single pane of glass"."

"Integrates role-based access control with pre-configured policies for CIS, DISA, HIPAA, PCI, SOX, NIST, and SCAP documentation and remediation."

"The solution has been stable in our usage."

"The product has connectors to many services."

"Elastic Observability significantly improves incident response time by providing quick access to logs and data across various sources. For instance, searching for specific keywords in logs spanning over a month from multiple data sources can be completed within seconds."

"The ability to ensure that the data is searchable and maintainable is highly valuable for our purposes."

"Its diverse set of features available on the cloud is of significant importance."

"Machine learning is the most valuable feature of this solution."

"The solution is open-source and helps with back-end logging. It is also easy to handle."

"Elastic APM has plenty of features, such as the Elastic server for Kibana and many additional plugins. It's a comprehensive tool when used as a logging platform."

More Elastic Observability pros

Cons

"One of the major problems is that support is not so good."

"Needs integrations with other providers to provide a custom public cloud environment."

"The installation and configuration can be tricky due to it being built on Remedy."

"The price is the only issue in the solution. It can be made better and cheaper."

"Improving code insight related to infrastructure and network, particularly focusing on aspects such as firewalls, switches, routers, and testing would be beneficial."

"The auto-discovery isn't nearly as good. That's a big portion of it. When you drop the agent onto the JVM and you're trying to figure things out, having to go through and manually do all that is cumbersome."

"Elastic Observability needs to have better standardization, logging, and schema."

"There is room for improvement regarding its APM capabilities."

"I am familiar with Azure Monitor, which I find more user-friendly compared to Elastic, which is a very technical tool."

"The cost must be made more transparent."

"It lacked some capabilities when handling on-prem devices, like network observability, package flow analysis, and device performance data on the infrastructure side."

More Elastic Observability cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"So far, there are just the standard licensing fees. Several of the components are embedded in the license or are even open source. They're even free depending on what you use, which makes it even more appealing to someone that is discussing pricing of the solution."

"Elastic Observability's pricing could be better for small-scale users."

"We have been using the open-source version."

"Pricing is one of those situations where the more you use it, the more you pay."

"Users have to pay for some features, like the alerts on different channels, because they are unavailable in different source versions."

"Elastic Observability is cheaper than other similar solutions, such as Dynatrace. Its license calculation is based on various factors like data volume and physical infrastructure, particularly related to RAM capacity."

"One needs to pay for the licenses, and it is an annual subscription model right now."

"There are two types: cloud and SaaS. They charge based on data ingestion, ingest rate, hard retention, and warm retention. I believe it costs around $25,000 annually to ingest 30GB of data daily. That is the SaaS version. There is also a self-managed license where the customer manages their own infrastructure on-prem. In such cases, there are three license tiers that respectively cost $5,000 annually per node, $7,000 per node, and $12,500 per node."

More Elastic Observability pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,760 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

17%

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	16

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Elastic Observability?

Elastic Observability significantly improves incident response time by providing quick access to logs and data across various sources. For instance, searching for specific keywords in logs spanning...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Elastic Observability?

The problem is their licensing model, which is a bit confusing. Many customers struggle to understand their total cost of ownership because Elastic licensing is not dependent on easy, quantifiable ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Elastic Observability?

Out-of-the-box use cases have room for improvement in Elastic Observability. They don't invest a lot in building out-of-the-box observable use cases, and they are more focusing on giving a very fle...

See all answers

Comparisons

Pandora FMS vs BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management

Compared 31% of the time

CloudBolt vs BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management

Compared 25% of the time

Amazon CloudWatch vs BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management

Compared 22% of the time

BMC Helix Cloud Security vs BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management

Compared 22% of the time

More BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management Competitors

Sentry vs Elastic Observability

Compared 13% of the time

New Relic vs Elastic Observability

Compared 11% of the time

Dynatrace vs Elastic Observability

Compared 10% of the time

Grafana vs Elastic Observability

Compared 8% of the time

Zabbix vs Elastic Observability

Compared 7% of the time

More Elastic Observability Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Management

October 2025

Download BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management product report

Buyer's Guide

Elastic Observability

October 2025

Download Elastic Observability product report

Also Known As

BMC CLM

No data available

Overview

BMC's cloud management platform drives digital innovation with agile, full-stack service provisioning across cloud and traditional platforms. BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management scales easily while integrating with essential compliance and governance policies to reduce risk.

BMC Helix

Elastic Observability offers a comprehensive suite for log analytics, application performance monitoring, and machine learning. It integrates seamlessly with platforms like Teams and Slack, enhancing data visualization and scalability for real-time insights.

Elastic Observability is designed to support production environments with features like logging, data collection, and infrastructure tracking. Centralized logging and powerful search functionalities make incident response and performance tracking efficient. Elastic APM and Kibana facilitate detailed data visualization, promoting rapid troubleshooting and effective system performance analysis. Integrated services and extensive connectivity options enhance its role in business and technical decision-making by providing actionable data insights.

What are the most important features of Elastic Observability?

Centralized Logging: Streamlines the collection, analysis, and storage of log data.
Powerful Search: Provides robust search capabilities for quick access to relevant information.
Scalability: Supports growing data needs across diverse environments.
Real-time Telemetry: Ensures up-to-date insights and monitoring.
Platform Integration: Seamlessly connects with services like Teams and Slack.
Data Visualization: Enhances visibility with Elastic APM and Kibana.

What benefits and ROI should users explore in reviews?

Cost-effectiveness: Offers significant savings through efficient data management.
Rapid Incident Response: Minimizes downtime with quick troubleshooting tools.
Comprehensive Insights: Supports better business decisions with detailed data analysis.
Performance Tracking: Enables assessment of system effectiveness and improvements.

Elastic Observability is employed across industries for critical operations, such as in finance for transaction monitoring, in healthcare for secure data management, and in technology for optimizing application performance. Its data-driven approach aids efficient event tracing, supporting diverse industry requirements.

Elastic

Sample Customers

JDA Software, Morningstar, Orange Business Services, Wipro

PSCU, Entel, VITAS, Mimecast, Barrett Steel, Butterfield Bank

Buyer's Guide

BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management vs. Elastic Observability

September 2025

Free Report: BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management vs. Elastic Observability

Find out what your peers are saying about BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management vs. Elastic Observability and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

869,760 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management vs. Elastic Observability report.

See our list of best Cloud Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.