BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management vs Elastic Observability comparison

BMC and Elastic are both solutions in the Cloud Monitoring Software category. BMC is ranked #44, while Elastic is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.1. BMC holds a 0.2% mindshare in CMS, compared to Elastic’s 5.3% mindshare. Additionally, 80% of BMC users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of Elastic users who would recommend it.

BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management

Read 5 BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management reviews

171 Views
44 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Elastic Observability

Read 27 Elastic Observability reviews

4,483 Views
787 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management

Elastic Observability

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management and Elastic Observability compete in the cloud management and observability sectors. BMC is advantageous due to its automation and scalability features, while Elastic Observability stands out for its analytics and visualization capabilities.

Features: BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management offers automated provisioning and lifecycle management, flexible scalability for various workloads, and enhanced resource management. Elastic Observability provides powerful data ingestion and analysis, detailed monitoring, and robust anomaly detection paired with dynamic data visualization.

Room for Improvement: BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management could enhance its analytics capabilities, improve user interface design, and expand integration options with third-party tools. Elastic Observability might benefit from lowering complexity in initial configuration, optimizing resource use for large-scale deployments, and enhancing alert management systems.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management offers straightforward deployment with proactive customer service and structured onboarding. Elastic Observability ensures easy deployment with extensive documentation and a strong community support model, promoting user independence and flexibility.

Pricing and ROI: BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management usually has higher upfront costs, reflecting high service levels with potential long-term ROI. Elastic Observability presents scalable pricing often resulting in lower initial costs, with visible ROI through its operational insights and analytics efficiency.

To learn more, read our detailed BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management vs. Elastic Observability Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management vs. Elastic Observability

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 857,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management

Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software

44th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

5.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Management (39th)

Elastic Observability

Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software

7th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (7th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (11th), Log Management (16th), Container Monitoring (4th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Cloud Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management is 0.2%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Elastic Observability is 5.3%, down from 6.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Entprssol67

Enterprise Solution Architect at Engineering Ingegneria Informatica SPA

Helps design blueprints in a cloud environment but the support is a major problem

One of the major problems is that support is not so good. I used to have a support expert in Spain but they left two years ago. BMC doesn't invest a lot in network automation but network automation is a major point in CLM. There aren't any experts here in Europe, maybe they have in America, I don't know. The main problem is the support in Europe. We had a lot of problems with the people who got put on our cases. The agents that we were assigned to were not so capable. They wanted to replicate the problem. If you have an incident, it takes a lot of time to troubleshoot the problem. The incident support is not so good. The technicians don't know the platform well. BMC doesn't want to invest in CLM. Two years ago we had a lot of problems. Maybe BMC realized that CLM is an end of life product.

Read full review

Adelina Craciun

Product Owner at Swisscom

Customization enables tailored monitoring and alerting across departments

The possibility to customize it has been quite useful. Whatever the other departments want to dream up, we implement. Whatever they want to monitor, the granularity of it, the changes in the threshold, and the anomalies that they want reported all require some development. So far, every single request has been fulfilled.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Integrates role-based access control with pre-configured policies for CIS, DISA, HIPAA, PCI, SOX, NIST, and SCAP documentation and remediation."

"CLM has a multi-cloud portal because they have the resources to implement in various environments in various ports."

"Supports unattended installs and image-based, script-based, or template-based provisioning."

"Assesses change impact or completes an audit using multiple dashboard views."

"By allowing end users to request their own services, the request process for systems is much quicker and more accurate."

"Automates Java EE Application Deployment from an SCM system."

"You can tie together your public and private cloud infrastructure into a "single pane of glass"."

"Elastic provides built-in features for queries and report generation. It's a very good tool for monitoring integration capabilities."

"Elastic Observability significantly improves incident response time by providing quick access to logs and data across various sources. For instance, searching for specific keywords in logs spanning over a month from multiple data sources can be completed within seconds."

"I recommend Elastic Observability for its completeness of vision and wide ecosystem."

"I think Elastic Observability is already in very good shape."

"The Elastic User Interface framework lets us do custom development when needed. You need to have some Javascript knowledge. We need that knowledge to develop new custom tests."

"The architecture and system's stability are simple."

"The ability to ensure that the data is searchable and maintainable is highly valuable for our purposes."

"It has always been a stable solution."

More Elastic Observability pros

Cons

"The installation and configuration can be tricky due to it being built on Remedy."

"One of the major problems is that support is not so good."

"Needs integrations with other providers to provide a custom public cloud environment."

"In the future, Elastic APM needs a portfolio iTool. They can provide an easy way to develop the custom UI for Kibana."

"Simplifying the parsing of logs and manual efforts would also be beneficial."

"Elastic Observability is difficult to use. There are only three options for customization but this can be difficult for our use case. We do not have other options to choose the metrics shown, such as CPU or memory usage."

"If we had some pre-defined templates for observability that we could start using right away after deploying it – instead of having to build or to change some of the dashboards – that would be helpful."

"There is room for improvement regarding its APM capabilities."

"More web features could be added to the product."

"The cost must be made more transparent."

"They need more skills in the market. There are not enough skills in the market. It is not pervasive enough on the market, in my opinion. In other words, there isn't a big enough user base."

More Elastic Observability cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"Pricing is one of those situations where the more you use it, the more you pay."

"Elastic Observability is cheaper than other similar solutions, such as Dynatrace. Its license calculation is based on various factors like data volume and physical infrastructure, particularly related to RAM capacity."

"Elastic Observability's pricing could be better for small-scale users."

"There are two types: cloud and SaaS. They charge based on data ingestion, ingest rate, hard retention, and warm retention. I believe it costs around $25,000 annually to ingest 30GB of data daily. That is the SaaS version. There is also a self-managed license where the customer manages their own infrastructure on-prem. In such cases, there are three license tiers that respectively cost $5,000 annually per node, $7,000 per node, and $12,500 per node."

"So far, there are just the standard licensing fees. Several of the components are embedded in the license or are even open source. They're even free depending on what you use, which makes it even more appealing to someone that is discussing pricing of the solution."

"We will buy a premium license after POC."

"We have been using the open-source version."

"The product’s pricing needs improvement."

More Elastic Observability pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

857,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

19%

Computer Software Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Elastic Observability?

Elastic Observability significantly improves incident response time by providing quick access to logs and data across various sources. For instance, searching for specific keywords in logs spanning...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Elastic Observability?

Elastic Observability is cost-efficient and provides all features in the enterprise license without asset-based licensing. However, sizing and licensing information could be clearer.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Elastic Observability?

Of course, maintenance is necessary, as with any software, requiring updates with the latest features and security enhancements. It lacked some capabilities when handling on-prem devices, like netw...

See all answers

Comparisons

CloudBolt vs BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management

Compared 61% of the time

Pandora FMS vs BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management

Compared 39% of the time

More BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management Competitors

New Relic vs Elastic Observability

Compared 14% of the time

Sentry vs Elastic Observability

Compared 14% of the time

Dynatrace vs Elastic Observability

Compared 12% of the time

Grafana vs Elastic Observability

Compared 9% of the time

Zabbix vs Elastic Observability

Compared 8% of the time

More Elastic Observability Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Management

May 2025

Download BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management product report

Buyer's Guide

Elastic Observability

June 2025

Download Elastic Observability product report

Also Known As

BMC CLM

No data available

Overview

BMC's cloud management platform drives digital innovation with agile, full-stack service provisioning across cloud and traditional platforms. BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management scales easily while integrating with essential compliance and governance policies to reduce risk.

BMC

Elastic Observability is primarily used for monitoring login events, application performance, and infrastructure, supporting significant data volumes through features like log aggregation, centralized logging, and system metric analysis.

Elastic Observability employs Elastic APM for performance and latency analysis, significantly aiding business KPIs and technical stability. It is popular among users for system and server monitoring, capacity planning, cyber security, and managing data pipelines. With the integration of Kibana, it offers robust visualization, reporting, and incident response capabilities through rapid log searches while supporting machine learning and hybrid cloud environments.

What are Elastic Observability's key features?

Economic licensing: Offers cost-effective plans.
Extensive metrics tracking: Helps in comprehensive system monitoring.
Comprehensive logging: Centralizes log data efficiently.
Performance Monitoring: Provides robust APM capabilities.
Integration: Seamlessly integrates with other solutions.
Kibana visualization: Facilitates data visualization and reporting.
Machine learning support: Enables advanced data analysis.
Flexible deployment: Supports various deployment environments.
Rapid log searches: Enhances quick incident response.
Accessibility: Offers extensive online documentation and connector support.

What benefits or ROI should users look for in Elastic Observability reviews?

Stability: Look for consistent performance and reliability.
Compliance: Effective monitoring aids in regulation adherence.
System Security: Enhanced system monitoring and alert management.
Cost-Effectiveness: Evaluate the economic pricing models.
Scalability: Adequate scalability options for growing needs.

Companies in technology, finance, healthcare, and other industries implement Elastic Observability for tailored monitoring solutions. They find its integration with existing systems useful for maintaining operation efficiency and security, particularly valuing the visualization capabilities through Kibana to monitor KPIs and improve incident response times.

Elastic

Sample Customers

JDA Software, Morningstar, Orange Business Services, Wipro

PSCU, Entel, VITAS, Mimecast, Barrett Steel, Butterfield Bank

Buyer's Guide

BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management vs. Elastic Observability

June 2025

Free Report: BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management vs. Elastic Observability

Find out what your peers are saying about BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management vs. Elastic Observability and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

857,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management vs. Elastic Observability report.

See our list of best Cloud Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.