BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management vs Elastic Observability comparison

BMC and Elastic are both solutions in the Cloud Monitoring Software category. BMC is ranked #45, while Elastic is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.1. BMC holds a 0.3% mindshare in CMS, compared to Elastic’s 4.8% mindshare. Additionally, 80% of BMC users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of Elastic users who would recommend it.

BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management

Read 5 BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management reviews

476 Views
195 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Elastic Observability

Read 27 Elastic Observability reviews

9,965 Views
4,185 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management

Elastic Observability

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management and Elastic Observability compete in the cloud management and observability sectors. BMC is advantageous due to its automation and scalability features, while Elastic Observability stands out for its analytics and visualization capabilities.

Features: BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management offers automated provisioning and lifecycle management, flexible scalability for various workloads, and enhanced resource management. Elastic Observability provides powerful data ingestion and analysis, detailed monitoring, and robust anomaly detection paired with dynamic data visualization.

Room for Improvement: BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management could enhance its analytics capabilities, improve user interface design, and expand integration options with third-party tools. Elastic Observability might benefit from lowering complexity in initial configuration, optimizing resource use for large-scale deployments, and enhancing alert management systems.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management offers straightforward deployment with proactive customer service and structured onboarding. Elastic Observability ensures easy deployment with extensive documentation and a strong community support model, promoting user independence and flexibility.

Pricing and ROI: BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management usually has higher upfront costs, reflecting high service levels with potential long-term ROI. Elastic Observability presents scalable pricing often resulting in lower initial costs, with visible ROI through its operational insights and analytics efficiency.

To learn more, read our detailed BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management vs. Elastic Observability Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management vs. Elastic Observability

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management

Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software

45th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

5.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Management (38th)

Elastic Observability

Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software

6th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (7th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (11th), Log Management (16th), Container Monitoring (4th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Cloud Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management is 0.3%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Elastic Observability is 4.8%, down from 7.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Entprssol67

Enterprise Solution Architect at Engineering Ingegneria Informatica SPA

Helps design blueprints in a cloud environment but the support is a major problem

One of the major problems is that support is not so good. I used to have a support expert in Spain but they left two years ago. BMC doesn't invest a lot in network automation but network automation is a major point in CLM. There aren't any experts here in Europe, maybe they have in America, I don't know. The main problem is the support in Europe. We had a lot of problems with the people who got put on our cases. The agents that we were assigned to were not so capable. They wanted to replicate the problem. If you have an incident, it takes a lot of time to troubleshoot the problem. The incident support is not so good. The technicians don't know the platform well. BMC doesn't want to invest in CLM. Two years ago we had a lot of problems. Maybe BMC realized that CLM is an end of life product.

Read full review

Adelina Craciun

Product Owner at Swisscom

Customization enables tailored monitoring and alerting across departments

The possibility to customize it has been quite useful. Whatever the other departments want to dream up, we implement. Whatever they want to monitor, the granularity of it, the changes in the threshold, and the anomalies that they want reported all require some development. So far, every single request has been fulfilled.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Integrates role-based access control with pre-configured policies for CIS, DISA, HIPAA, PCI, SOX, NIST, and SCAP documentation and remediation."

"Supports unattended installs and image-based, script-based, or template-based provisioning."

"CLM has a multi-cloud portal because they have the resources to implement in various environments in various ports."

"Assesses change impact or completes an audit using multiple dashboard views."

"You can tie together your public and private cloud infrastructure into a "single pane of glass"."

"By allowing end users to request their own services, the request process for systems is much quicker and more accurate."

"Automates Java EE Application Deployment from an SCM system."

"I recommend Elastic Observability for its completeness of vision and wide ecosystem."

"All the features that we use, such as monitoring, dashboarding, reporting, the possibility of alerting, and the way we index the data, are important."

"It has always been a stable solution."

"The solution allows us to dig deep into data."

"Elastic APM has plenty of features, such as the Elastic server for Kibana and many additional plugins. It's a comprehensive tool when used as a logging platform."

"I found Elk to be excellent for log analytics, security analytics, application code-level analytics, collaboration with DevOps teams, CI/CD, microservices, and Kubernetes, specifically cloud-native or cloud-specific tasks."

"The architecture and system's stability are simple."

"For full stack observability, Elastic is the best tool compared with any other tool ."

More Elastic Observability pros

Cons

"Needs integrations with other providers to provide a custom public cloud environment."

"One of the major problems is that support is not so good."

"The installation and configuration can be tricky due to it being built on Remedy."

"It lacked some capabilities when handling on-prem devices, like network observability, package flow analysis, and device performance data on the infrastructure side."

"Elastic Observability needs to have better standardization, logging, and schema."

"The tool's scalability involves a more complex implementation process. It requires careful calculations to determine the number of nodes needed, the specifications of each node, and the configuration of hot, warm, and cold zones for data storage. Additionally, managing log retention policies adds further complexity. The solution's pricing also needs to be cheaper."

"The solution would be better if it was capable of more automation, especially in a monitoring capacity or for the response to abnormalities."

"The auto-discovery isn't nearly as good. That's a big portion of it. When you drop the agent onto the JVM and you're trying to figure things out, having to go through and manually do all that is cumbersome."

"They need more skills in the market. There are not enough skills in the market. It is not pervasive enough on the market, in my opinion. In other words, there isn't a big enough user base."

"The solution needs to use more AI. Once the product onboards AI, users would more effectively be able to track endpoints for specific messages."

"There's a steep learning curve if you've never used this solution before."

More Elastic Observability cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"Elastic Observability is cheaper than other similar solutions, such as Dynatrace. Its license calculation is based on various factors like data volume and physical infrastructure, particularly related to RAM capacity."

"The price of Elastic Observability is expensive."

"We will buy a premium license after POC."

"Users have to pay for some features, like the alerts on different channels, because they are unavailable in different source versions."

"The product’s pricing needs improvement."

"There are two types: cloud and SaaS. They charge based on data ingestion, ingest rate, hard retention, and warm retention. I believe it costs around $25,000 annually to ingest 30GB of data daily. That is the SaaS version. There is also a self-managed license where the customer manages their own infrastructure on-prem. In such cases, there are three license tiers that respectively cost $5,000 annually per node, $7,000 per node, and $12,500 per node."

"So far, there are just the standard licensing fees. Several of the components are embedded in the license or are even open source. They're even free depending on what you use, which makes it even more appealing to someone that is discussing pricing of the solution."

"The product is not that cheap."

More Elastic Observability pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

18%

Computer Software Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Elastic Observability?

Elastic Observability significantly improves incident response time by providing quick access to logs and data across various sources. For instance, searching for specific keywords in logs spanning...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Elastic Observability?

The license for Elastic Observability is the same as for other uses; you pay for Elastic, and you can use it for various cases. Observability is actually cheaper compared to logs because you're not...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Elastic Observability?

I think they are working on the AI-based features, which are currently in technical preview. The only challenging aspect for new users is often writing the query language. Basic searching is very e...

See all answers

Comparisons

CloudBolt vs BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management

Compared 42% of the time

Pandora FMS vs BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management

Compared 33% of the time

Amazon CloudWatch vs BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management

Compared 24% of the time

More BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management Competitors

Sentry vs Elastic Observability

Compared 13% of the time

New Relic vs Elastic Observability

Compared 12% of the time

Dynatrace vs Elastic Observability

Compared 11% of the time

Grafana vs Elastic Observability

Compared 9% of the time

Zabbix vs Elastic Observability

Compared 7% of the time

More Elastic Observability Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Management

July 2025

Download BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management product report

Buyer's Guide

Elastic Observability

August 2025

Download Elastic Observability product report

Also Known As

BMC CLM

No data available

Overview

BMC's cloud management platform drives digital innovation with agile, full-stack service provisioning across cloud and traditional platforms. BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management scales easily while integrating with essential compliance and governance policies to reduce risk.

BMC

Elastic Observability is primarily used for monitoring login events, application performance, and infrastructure, supporting significant data volumes through features like log aggregation, centralized logging, and system metric analysis.

Elastic Observability employs Elastic APM for performance and latency analysis, significantly aiding business KPIs and technical stability. It is popular among users for system and server monitoring, capacity planning, cyber security, and managing data pipelines. With the integration of Kibana, it offers robust visualization, reporting, and incident response capabilities through rapid log searches while supporting machine learning and hybrid cloud environments.

What are Elastic Observability's key features?

Economic licensing: Offers cost-effective plans.
Extensive metrics tracking: Helps in comprehensive system monitoring.
Comprehensive logging: Centralizes log data efficiently.
Performance Monitoring: Provides robust APM capabilities.
Integration: Seamlessly integrates with other solutions.
Kibana visualization: Facilitates data visualization and reporting.
Machine learning support: Enables advanced data analysis.
Flexible deployment: Supports various deployment environments.
Rapid log searches: Enhances quick incident response.
Accessibility: Offers extensive online documentation and connector support.

What benefits or ROI should users look for in Elastic Observability reviews?

Stability: Look for consistent performance and reliability.
Compliance: Effective monitoring aids in regulation adherence.
System Security: Enhanced system monitoring and alert management.
Cost-Effectiveness: Evaluate the economic pricing models.
Scalability: Adequate scalability options for growing needs.

Companies in technology, finance, healthcare, and other industries implement Elastic Observability for tailored monitoring solutions. They find its integration with existing systems useful for maintaining operation efficiency and security, particularly valuing the visualization capabilities through Kibana to monitor KPIs and improve incident response times.

Elastic

Sample Customers

JDA Software, Morningstar, Orange Business Services, Wipro

PSCU, Entel, VITAS, Mimecast, Barrett Steel, Butterfield Bank

Buyer's Guide

BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management vs. Elastic Observability

July 2025

Free Report: BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management vs. Elastic Observability

Find out what your peers are saying about BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management vs. Elastic Observability and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management vs. Elastic Observability report.

See our list of best Cloud Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.