Bizagi vs Bosch inubit comparison

"It is a beautifully finished product and provides an excellent cost-benefit."

"I like the business process management engine. It's very detailed, and you can probably map any of the corporate workflow processes you come across in it compared to some of the other solutions out there. I can probably say that it has very good support to work in tandem with other RP solutions in the market. The software is still very user-friendly and integral, and they have pretty good online resources. The automation feature is pretty good, so is the integration feature."

"BPMN 2.0 compliance, while you model the processes, the system can detect your notation errors."

"The solution offers the best user interface and the easiest way of working for the many co-workers that are drawing and developing and documenting their processes."

"Bizagi is really helpful for us to justify a process improvement initiative because we can simulate a to-be process and see how much we can save time, save resources, and how a to-be or a new process can run in the correct logic based on BPMN modeling."

"The free online Help and E-Learning is very strong."

"I very much like the reusable rules and forms, and the way Bizagi controls the process flow. I also like the document generating system to generate PDFs and then .doc files with information gathered from a flow. At the end of a process, you can generate a document that can be printed."

"The main feature of Bizagi is the speed to which we can automate processes and how we can modify them without a strong impact on the end users."

"We contact their customer support often. They are very good and reliable."

"We contact their customer support often. They are very good and reliable."

"Its performance needs to be improved. The main thing is that it is limited, especially in terms of the response times. When the processes become a bit large, it is very awkward to work with the Bizagi modeler. When you have already modeled but start to rearrange, it is quite a bit of an effort to change the stuff. When you rearrange lanes or have new structures, it goes rather squiggly up and down and so on, which could be improved. The visual outputs of the DIREPs of the process models are pixelated and have a bad image quality. It is a PNG or JPEG, and you cannot export it as a PDF. When you have rather large processes, you should be able to arrange them hierarchically. Currently, it is not supported. If you use sub-processes and inflate a process, suddenly the arrangement is totally different, and although you know the process, you have to look where is it now. You need a good understanding of the levels of your processes before you start in Bizagi. It can have automatic support for optimal presentation. In BPM, you should have it from the top left to the bottom right. However, in most cases, people don't know how they should arrange it. Therefore, it would be nice to have a suggestion system for different arrangements to be able to better present the process."

"However, if you are looking at building an application where 100 developers are working in parallel, you will have issues."

"It works slowly on the cloud, sometimes."

"A more complex management of documents, such as advanced searches, indexing etc, without needing to integrate with ECM's (Enterprise Content Management Systems)"

"There could be more documentation."

"As I worked with the desktop version of the Bizagi modeler, I was not so comfortable."

"The performance could use improvement. We couldn't connect the processes to on one file."

"When you start working with information modeling, et cetera, here is no really good solution for the data modeling and information modeling."

"There are better solutions on the market. To make it a perfect ten, they should improve the price. There is a learning curve and sometimes there are issues from the software."

"There are better solutions on the market. To make it a perfect ten, they should improve the price. There is a learning curve and sometimes there are issues from the software."

"I think that its price is reasonable."

"The product must improve its cost."

"The price could be lower."

"The modeler itself is free. For the whole BPM suite, there are other options that may be better."

"Pricing is good value for money."

"It has a very high price. Many clients complain about the price for maintaining the application on Bizagi."

"When we were working with the on-premises solution, the licenses were a little bit expensive because we had to buy one by one a package of a hundred licenses, whereas now, we are working with the cloud solution, and it has a different cost. It's a different business model because we pay the license for the developers, but the cost is by the environment, and we have unlimited licenses. The business model is different now, but the benefit ratio is good."

"My company uses the free version of the product."