Bizagi vs Bosch inubit comparison

"Business process modelling and simulation."

"The user interface is very good, making it easy for business people to understand."

"Bizagi is a very useful tool because it does not require you to program. The user logic is very easy to understand even for people who are not engineers or developers."

"This solution is easy to use and it is a good tool for process modeling."

"Bizagi is really great for beginners because it's user-friendly and you can learn in it quickly, whereas other similar software are harder."

"The initial setup is super simple."

"It is quite a stable solution."

"The interface, design, and accessible user manuals to help get started using the solution are valuable features in Bizagi."

"We contact their customer support often. They are very good and reliable."

"Its performance needs to be improved. The main thing is that it is limited, especially in terms of the response times. When the processes become a bit large, it is very awkward to work with the Bizagi modeler. When you have already modeled but start to rearrange, it is quite a bit of an effort to change the stuff. When you rearrange lanes or have new structures, it goes rather squiggly up and down and so on, which could be improved. The visual outputs of the DIREPs of the process models are pixelated and have a bad image quality. It is a PNG or JPEG, and you cannot export it as a PDF. When you have rather large processes, you should be able to arrange them hierarchically. Currently, it is not supported. If you use sub-processes and inflate a process, suddenly the arrangement is totally different, and although you know the process, you have to look where is it now. You need a good understanding of the levels of your processes before you start in Bizagi. It can have automatic support for optimal presentation. In BPM, you should have it from the top left to the bottom right. However, in most cases, people don't know how they should arrange it. Therefore, it would be nice to have a suggestion system for different arrangements to be able to better present the process."

"I'm not really satisfied with the reporting aspect."

"It works slowly on the cloud, sometimes."

"It needs some better notation functionality."

"It would be helpful if they added some extra features in the next update."

"It should provide the ability to create a simple application. It can be used for database modeling diagrams and forms, but it should also support CRUD, that is, create, read, update and delete."

"The open source version lacks the option to publish."

"One of the features which could be improved is machine learning. Even though this product has been working on this topic, we can see that it still requires improvement."

"There are better solutions on the market. To make it a perfect ten, they should improve the price. There is a learning curve and sometimes there are issues from the software."

"It is on par with other BPM tools, but not as expensive as Pega nor Appian."

"This solution would be expensive for a company that has a lot of users."

"From what I know of the market, I think Bizagi is a cheap solution for process engineering. Out of the solutions I've tried, from cheapest to most expensive, would be Vizor, Bizagi, Signavio, and then Siemens. I used a version of Bizagi that my university provided for free, so I have never paid for a license."

"We use the free version of the solution because the price is in dollars, making it expensive for where we are in Brazil."

"It is not expensive."

"The Bizagi modeler can be downloaded free of charge."

"Bizagi is totally free for modeling."

"The modeler itself is free. For the whole BPM suite, there are other options that may be better."