BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management vs Sectona Privileged Access Management comparison

BeyondTrust and Sectona are both solutions in the Privileged Access Management (PAM) category. BeyondTrust is ranked #8 with an average rating of 7.9, while Sectona is ranked #22 with an average rating of 8.0. BeyondTrust holds a 3.8% mindshare in PAM, compared to Sectona’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of BeyondTrust users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Sectona users who would recommend it.

BeyondTrust Endpoint Privil...

Read 30 BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management reviews

2,244 Views
1,157 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Sectona Privileged Access M...

Read 4 Sectona Privileged Access Management reviews

384 Views
193 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

BeyondTrust Endpoint Privil...

Sectona Privileged Access M...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 6, 2024

BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management and Sectona Privileged Access Management are key players in the privileged access solutions market. User feedback suggests Sectona holds an upper hand due to its comprehensive feature set, while BeyondTrust is favored for its cost-effectiveness and efficient support.

Features: BeyondTrust is known for its seamless integration with other security tools, granular policy settings for endpoint privilege management, and competitive pricing aligned with effective support. Sectona offers comprehensive session monitoring, robust auditing functions, and customizable workflows, making it suitable for enterprises in need of stringent security controls.

Room for Improvement: BeyondTrust could enhance its reporting capabilities, which can be cumbersome. It also faces challenges in usability and user interface design, where further refinement could benefit users. Some users suggest improvements in BeyondTrust's scalability options. Sectona, on the other hand, encounters criticism for its initial setup complications and steep learning curve. Users also mention the potential for more intuitive documentation and a more guided user experience during deployment.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: BeyondTrust stands out with straightforward cloud deployment and responsive customer support. Sectona offers a versatile deployment model, but may require more detailed technical support for installation and troubleshooting. Users have noted that Sectona's technical team provides valuable assistance but could benefit from more streamlined support processes.

Pricing and ROI: BeyondTrust typically requires a lower initial investment, making it attractive for budget-conscious organizations. Sectona's higher upfront cost is often considered justified by users due to its extensive feature set and long-term security benefits, which are perceived to offer a better ROI. Users suggest that while BeyondTrust offers upfront cost savings, Sectona's features can translate into significant returns over time with proper utilization.

To learn more, read our detailed BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management vs. Sectona Privileged Access Management Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management vs. Sectona Privileged Access Management

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 851,451 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

BeyondTrust Endpoint Privil...

Ranking in Privileged Access Management (PAM)

8th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Anti-Malware Tools (11th)

Sectona Privileged Access M...

Ranking in Privileged Access Management (PAM)

22nd

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Privileged Access Management (PAM) category, the mindshare of BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management is 3.8%, down from 5.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Sectona Privileged Access Management is 0.9%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Privileged Access Management (PAM)

Featured Reviews

Prashant Uppuluri

Solution Architect at FVC

Provides critical application control and ensures security with a flexible setup process

Regarding the feedback scenario, it's a tough question as I have thoroughly gone through the entire partner portal and library of BeyondTrust, as well as BeyondTrust University. I have also interacted with support whenever a ticket is raised, ranging from P1 to P3 or P2. Most end users and partners seem happy and content with BeyondTrust. The deployment of the solution is generally easy, flexible, and scalable. However, it can be challenging in certain environments, especially regarding management. Improvements could focus on adding more AI features to automate processes that are currently manual or challenging for end users. In some cases of competition, I have noted specific use cases where the recording of sessions was an endpoint for BeyondTrust, providing an edge for higher management. The ability to view recorded live sessions of specific users is a crucial benefit.

Read full review

Pankaj-Mishra

Senior IT Security Engineer at Mahindra Group

Effective risk management, feature of recording all privileged user activities in a compressed format but limited SaaS capability

There are some areas where the GUI could be improved to make it easier to find and update privileged settings and policies. For example, when creating a PAM policy for Privileged, some of the scroll boxes are difficult to navigate. It would be easier if there were one-click options for checking and unchecking boxes rather than having to scroll down and select individual items. This would make the GUI more user-friendly for administrators and SOC teams. So, I would like to see the GUI made more user-friendly, especially for administrators and SOC teams. In future releases, I would like to be able to manage Sectona PAM by location. For example, I'm the global headquarters lead in India, and we have 200 locations around the world. I would like to be able to create sub-locations, so that when I click on support for a location, the configuration is separate. However, the monitoring should still be at the parent level.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The features related to application elevate is amazing. It helped the company to remove almost all admin local users."

"Reduces major vulnerabilities by removing local administrator privileges."

"It's relatively straightforward to set up, especially if you are deploying to the cloud."

"What I liked about this solution is that it can also integrate for tracking malicious use or sending analytics to a host that can process them. I don't know if CyberArk, Centrify, or Thycotic can do that. The analytics was something the client really wanted, and they already had BeyondTrust. It is very scalable. The agent on the workstation is very thin, and the processing power required on a server is nothing out of the ordinary. It is also very stable and easy to deploy."

"One of the valuable features is the absence of any local user in a unique system. All users are defined in the AD; communication is only between Unix and AD."

"AI adds value by automating the onboarding of assets and using smart rules to assign privileges."

"I find the comprehensive Privilege Access Management features valuable, including automation, and the ability to integrate with applications and the Windows operating system."

"I find the solution’s features like section management, password management, and analytics valuable."

More BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management pros

"The most valuable features of Sectona Privileged Access Management include robust session monitoring for privileged users."

"The most valuable feature of Sectona Privileged Access Management for protecting Privileged accounts is its built-in launcher. Additionally, the single sign-on capability is good. Sectona's session recording feature is particularly noteworthy because it utilizes minimal storage. Instead of recording entire sessions, it captures activity only when necessary, optimizing storage space."

"A key factor for my company is support, and Sectona Privileged Access Management has good support. Another valuable feature of Sectona Privileged Access Management is that it's easy to onboard."

"The most valuable feature is the risk management. When a Privileged user performs a certain command, such as running a script, the system highlights it in the risk management section as high, critical, or medium risk."

Cons

"Their technical support could be more responsive and helpful."

"It keeps on breaking every now and then. It is not yet mature. Every time something new comes up or we run into some new issues, the culprit is BeyondTrust because the agents and the adapter are not mature. The new development process goes on, and they're not able to handle things. It should be mature. It shouldn't break every now and then."

"The initial setup was very difficult. Even if you are an expert in EPM, it is still very difficult."

"The deployment process should be clarified or made simpler. It would be helpful if the solution had in-app tutorials for users to look at as they progress through the system. Sometimes we get lost and need to go back to check what exactly the function was. There should be small hints around major key functions. It would go a long way in speeding up the deployment process."

"Reporting analytics is one of the areas that can be improved. It is a new cloud-based solution. So, many more specific reports can come out natively. Currently, we get all the events, and we put them in plug-ins. From there, we generate our own design of reports. If there is a much more solid or robust reporting analytics framework within the product itself, it would be helpful."

"Reports to the end user."

"They need to come up with better integrative options which should be customer-centric."

"The product should improve its price."

More BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management cons

"As I don't have at least one to two years of experience with Sectona Privileged Access Management, I cannot share areas for improvement in the solution. To me, Sectona Privileged Access Management has reasonable pricing, but it could still be improved. I'm also unsure if Sectona Privileged Access Management could cover the requirements of large-sized companies, but for small-sized to medium-sized companies, I'd recommend the solution."

"I would like to see future updates include robust support for cloud environments as organizations increasingly move towards cloud-based solutions."

"Sectona Privileged Access Management needs to improve its stability. It needs to enhance the product's stability because of frequent updates. This is crucial for a solution like Privileged Access Management, as organizations rely on stability. When it becomes unstable, it causes panic."

"Sectona needs to think about SaaS solutions and cloud use cases. For example, we need to be able to integrate Sectona PAM with next-generation applications such as Docker and Lambda, as well as ITD pipelines that use privileged user data."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"What BeyondTrust was providing was user-based licensing which was a great benefit from the client point of view. Recently, I don't know why, the licensing model has been changed, and that is the reason that they have lost a bit of their edge when it comes to the PAM, against our competition. The asset-based licensing, from the user's point of view, is not beneficial. The licensing should be based on the users. The greater the number of users, the greater will be the load and the greater the scalability problems. I presume that is why the licensing model has changed."

"This solution is expensive compared to its competitors."

"On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing a seven out of ten."

"It was very expensive."

"It is relatively more cost-effective compared to the competing product."

"The product’s licensing is different for Windows, Linux, and Mac. The tool’s licensing is yearly."

"Price-wise, it is very competitive. In our area, government entities and banks don't go for the monthly payment. It is a headache even for us in terms of finance and procurement to go for monthly payments. Quarterly might be more logical and reasonable, but the minimum that we go for is one year, and sometimes, we even try to compile and give one offering for three years."

"PowerBroker for a Mac client is three times the price of the Windows version."

More BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management pricing and cost advice

"The licensing cost for Sectona Privileged Access Management is reasonable, though I cannot share the figure because that's confidential information. I'm not paying for additional costs because the current license covers my requirements. I'd rate the pricing for Sectona Privileged Access Management a three on a scale of one to five."

"Sectona Privileged Access Management's pricing is relatively cheaper and aggressive. It is affordable, especially for the Indian market and globally. Compared to competitors, Sectona offers a very good price range."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

851,451 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

18%

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

Healthcare Company

14%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Construction Company

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Looking for recommendations and a pros/cons template for software to detect insider threats

This is an inside-out --- outside-in --- inside-in question, as an insider can be an outsider as well. There is no short answer other than a blend of a PAM tool with Behavioral Analytics and Endpo...

See all answers

What do you like most about BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management?

The solution's least privilege enforcement has helped us ensure access is given to only the required people.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management?

Setup costs vary depending on the scenario. Sometimes we win orders, and other times we lose due to partner preferences or deal scenarios. Customers may negotiate on price, understanding that quali...

See all answers

What do you like most about Sectona Privileged Access Management?

The most valuable feature of Sectona Privileged Access Management for protecting Privileged accounts is its built-in launcher. Additionally, the single sign-on capability is good. Sectona's session...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Sectona Privileged Access Management?

Sectona Privileged Access Management's pricing is relatively cheaper and aggressive. It is affordable, especially for the Indian market and globally. Compared to competitors, Sectona offers a very ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Sectona Privileged Access Management?

Sectona Privileged Access Management needs to improve its stability. It needs to enhance the product's stability because of frequent updates. This is crucial for a solution like Privileged Access M...

See all answers

Comparisons

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management

Compared 19% of the time

Symantec Identity Governance and Administration vs BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management

Compared 8% of the time

Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) vs BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management

Compared 8% of the time

Tanium vs BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management

Compared 7% of the time

Fortinet FortiAuthenticator vs BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management

Compared 6% of the time

More BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management Competitors

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs Sectona Privileged Access Management

Compared 67% of the time

ARCON Privileged Access Management vs Sectona Privileged Access Management

Compared 33% of the time

More Sectona Privileged Access Management Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management

May 2025

BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management report

Download BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management product report

Buyer's Guide

Sectona Privileged Access Management

April 2025

Sectona Privileged Access Management report

Download Sectona Privileged Access Management product report

Also Known As

BeyondTrust PowerBroker, BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management for Windows, BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management for Mac, BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management for Linux, BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management for Unix, Avecto Defendpoint

No data available

Overview

BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management enables organizations to mitigate attacks by removing excess privileges on Windows, Mac, Unix/Linux and networked devices. Remove excessive end user privileges and control applications on Windows, Mac, Unix, Linux, and networked devices without hindering end-user productivity.

Key Solutions Include:

-ENTERPRISE PASSWORD SECURITY

Discover, manage and monitor all privileged accounts and SSH keys, secure privileged assets, and report on all privileged account activity in a single solution.

-ENDPOINT LEAST PRIVILEGE

Enforce least privilege across all Windows and Mac endpoints, gain visibility into target system vulnerabilities, and control access to privileged applications without disrupting user productivity or compromising security.

-SERVER PRIVILEGE MANAGEMENT

Gain control and visibility over Unix, Linux and Windows server user activity without sharing the root or administrator account.

-A SINGLE PLATFORM FOR MANAGEMENT, POLICY, REPORTING AND THREAT ANALYTICS

Utilize a single solution to manage PAM policies and deployment, understand vulnerability and threat analytics, and provide reporting to multiple stakeholders and complementary security systems.

Learn more at https://www.beyondtrust.com/privilege-management

BeyondTrust

Sectona is a Privileged Access Management company that helps enterprises mitigate risk of targeted attacks to privileged accounts spread across data centers and cloud. Sectona delivers integrated privilege management components for securing dynamic remote workforce access across on-premises or cloud workloads, endpoints and machine to machine communication.

Sectona with its light, integrated approach provides a single console for securing passwords & secrets in embedded vault, secure access with cross-platform access technology & manage privileges over endpoints.

Sectona

Sample Customers

Aera Energy LLC, Care New England, James Madison University

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management vs. Sectona Privileged Access Management

April 2025

Free Report: BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management vs. Sectona Privileged Access Management

Find out what your peers are saying about BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management vs. Sectona Privileged Access Management and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

851,451 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management vs. Sectona Privileged Access Management report.

See our list of best Privileged Access Management (PAM) vendors.

We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.