No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Beeks Managed Cloud vs OpenText Real User Monitoring comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Beeks Managed Cloud
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
Managed Private Cloud Services (11th)
OpenText Real User Monitoring
Average Rating
6.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.4
Number of Reviews
11
Ranking in other categories
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (32nd)
 

Mindshare comparison

Beeks Managed Cloud and OpenText Real User Monitoring aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. Beeks Managed Cloud is designed for Managed Private Cloud Services and holds a mindshare of 5.4%, up 2.1% compared to last year.
OpenText Real User Monitoring, on the other hand, focuses on Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability, holds 1.4% mindshare, up 0.3% since last year.
Managed Private Cloud Services Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Beeks Managed Cloud5.4%
HPE GreenLake for Private Cloud Enterprise13.2%
Atos Private Cloud and Edge13.2%
Other68.2%
Managed Private Cloud Services
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
OpenText Real User Monitoring1.4%
Dynatrace4.8%
Splunk AppDynamics4.6%
Other89.2%
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
 

Featured Reviews

it_user226614 - PeerSpot reviewer
Global Head of Performance and Service Metrics at a consultancy with 51-200 employees
It can be delivered on a specialised appliance or on the customer's hardware, but the GUI is quite basic.
Velocimetrics can be deployed as a software or hardware based solution. It captures business-level data from multiple sources, then associates, correlates and aggregates this information together in real-time. The product can be clustered for resilience and scaled to cope with complex and high…
YA
Sr. Solution Architect, Project Manager at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees
User-level monitoring with near-real-time analytics boosts service availability
The use case is about user-level monitoring and the availability of a service for a user. It's about whether the service is available, its performance, and the type of errors a user is receiving, from a user perspective The functions that Real User Monitor is intended for, which is to provide the…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It provides good forensic investigations features allowing review of what else was going on at the time of an incident."
"Real User Monitor has made it easier to drill down and see how users connect to and use our website."
"We use RUM and BSM and so far it has been really good at getting real user transactions from a real user monitor and then tying it to a BSM single view dashboard, where we get the whole realistic picture."
"The most useful feature of this solution is tracking. When the application's traffic has been monitored it is taken from that particular application and analyzed. It is then given a live session of that particular user. For example, if you are using your bank application to do some kind of transaction, everything that you do can be tracked by that application."
"Real User Monitor does its job, and that is why we have stayed with it for so many years."
"Very easy to implement."
"Real User Monitoring tools help proactively identify problems before they become critical by monitoring thresholds. There is a threshold and an SOA threshold."
"The Micro Focus technical support is quite good."
"The most valuable feature is application performance monitoring."
 

Cons

"The GUI is quite basic and can look messy very quickly"
"One final complaint I have is that the roadmap from the vendor is not clear, which makes it less attractive to some customers."
"Customer support needs to improve by bringing in more people who are knowledgeable about the tool, as there are very few left."
"Most of the dashboards require a lot of configuration. We are not happy with the dashboard."
"If it is a standalone solution, however, I would not recommend Micro Focus."
"Everybody is moving away from traffic and installing agents on the application to do the job, but Micro Focus is using traditional ways to collect the traffic. They should change their architecture completely."
"We would like to see support for non-Windows environments."
"When we want to monitor our encrypted traffic, this product doesn't work because our cipher is not supported."
"Recently we have been facing some stability issues."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"If I compare with other vendors, other vendors are more expensive"
"Not expensive."
"The price is approximately €30,000 ($35,500 USD) for the enterprise edition."
"Compared to other tools, OpenText Real User Monitoring is an expensive solution."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Managed Private Cloud Services solutions are best for your needs.
913,683 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Construction Company
18%
Outsourcing Company
13%
Comms Service Provider
9%
Government
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business2
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise7
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What needs improvement with Micro Focus Real User Monitor?
The diagnostics perspective, particularly in terms of the root cause analysis of failures, should be improved. There needs to be more development in this area, as the support and the number of peop...
What is your primary use case for Micro Focus Real User Monitor?
The use case is about user-level monitoring and the availability of a service for a user. It's about whether the service is available, its performance, and the type of errors a user is receiving, f...
What advice do you have for others considering Micro Focus Real User Monitor?
I rate the solution as nine. It is a good product. Everyone should have it as it is essential today, but choose the vendor accordingly. I'd rate the solution nine out of ten.
 

Also Known As

Velocimetrics
Micro Focus Real User Monitor, Micro Focus RUM, HPE RUM
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Foreign Exchange Trading, Foreign Exchange Broker, Equities Trading, Global Equity Broker
Avea, Maccabi Healthcare Services, TEB