• Home
  • Barracuda WAF-as-a-Service vs. SiteLock

Barracuda WAF-as-a-Service vs SiteLock comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Barracuda Networks Logo
Barracuda WAF-as-a-Service
Read 5 Barracuda WAF-as-a-Service reviews
649 views|446 comparisons
75% willing to recommend
SiteLock Logo
SiteLock
Read 3 SiteLock reviews
434 views|340 comparisons
66% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Download the complete report
Buyer's Guide
Web Application Firewall (WAF)
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Barracuda WAF-as-a-Service and SiteLock based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), F5, Microsoft and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF).
To learn more, read our detailed Web Application Firewall (WAF) Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
769,630 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
KiranSyam
A product that offers great bot protection feature with a need to improve its stability
The product has improved my organization due to the protection it offers to our company's website.
Anonymous User
Not only did its website scanner find my website's security issues, but I was also able to implement a security...
I run several personal websites and after getting hacked on one of them I found SiteLock. Not only did SiteLock's website scanner find the issue... Read more →
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "It's very difficult for me to give an estimate of the cost. All I know is that we sell the box itself as a service."
  • "I rate the product's price a five on a scale of one to ten, where one is low, and ten is high. There are no additional costs to be paid apart from the standard licensing fees attached to the solution."
  • "The product is expensive but it offers flexible pricing. It could be affordable."

    • More Barracuda WAF-as-a-Service Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "You can't just stop auto-renew from your billing panel, the way you can with reputable businesses."

    • More SiteLock Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Application Firewall (WAF) solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    769,630 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    What do you like most about Barracuda WAF-as-a-Service?
    Top Answer: It provides an ease of policy management.
    Read all 5 answers   →
    What needs improvement with Barracuda WAF-as-a-Service?
    Top Answer:One significant area for improvement in Barracuda WAF-as-a-Service lies in its market positioning and pricing strategy. Additionally, it could operate in a local data center. This limitation hinders… more »
    Read all 4 answers   →
    What is your primary use case for Barracuda WAF-as-a-Service?
    Top Answer:We use the product for securing email systems, protecting websites, and safeguarding web-based applications and portals.
    Read all 5 answers   →
    What do you recommend for a securing Web Application?
    Top Answer:In addition to Sitelock and Immuniweb, another option to consider for a 24/7 automated vulnerability monitoring tool to protect web applications is Modshield SB Modshield SB is a web application… more »
    Read all 15 answers   →
    Ranking
    29th
    out of 82 in Web Application Firewall (WAF)
    Views
    649
    Comparisons
    446
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    837
    Rating
    6.0
    31st
    out of 82 in Web Application Firewall (WAF)
    Views
    434
    Comparisons
    340
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Barracuda WAF as a Service
    Learn More
    Barracuda Networks
    SiteLock
    Overview

    Barracuda WAF-as-a-Service is a comprehensive solution designed to provide application security, DDoS protection, SSL authentication, protocol support, and application delivery. It is a plug-and-play solution with automated policies, simple configuration, and easy rule creation. 

    The solution can be used for threat prevention or as a cloud-to-cloud backup system based on email protection with cloud security. It is also a web application firewall and covers major protection and threat management functions. With Barracuda WAF-as-a-Service, customers can ensure the security of their web code and comply with global IT policies.

    Real website security means protection from the inside out as well as the outside in. SiteLock does it all -- daily scanning, automatic malware removal, web app firewall, a global CDN for a blazingly fast website and our support team is here for you 24/7. Our dynamic Trust Seal shows visitors your website is safe, increasing conversions and ROI.

    Sample Customers
    Salvation Army
    galaxyguitar.com, robertasinc.com, indiarunning.com, comprarenpr.com, idbasolutions.com, newgrip.com
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company17%
    Government11%
    Comms Service Provider11%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company15%
    Comms Service Provider11%
    Government7%
    Educational Organization6%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business24%
    Midsize Enterprise21%
    Large Enterprise54%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business33%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise54%
    Buyer's Guide
    Web Application Firewall (WAF)
    April 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), F5, Microsoft and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF). Updated: April 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    769,630 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Barracuda WAF-as-a-Service is ranked 29th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 5 reviews while SiteLock is ranked 31st in Web Application Firewall (WAF). Barracuda WAF-as-a-Service is rated 7.2, while SiteLock is rated 6.6. The top reviewer of Barracuda WAF-as-a-Service writes "Easy to install platform with valuable policy management features ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SiteLock writes "Not only did its website scanner find my website's security issues, but I was also able to implement a security system to prevent future breaches. ". Barracuda WAF-as-a-Service is most compared with Cloudflare Web Application Firewall, whereas SiteLock is most compared with Sucuri, Cloudflare, AWS WAF, Imperva DDoS and Comodo cWatch.

    See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.

    We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.