We performed a comparison between Azure Site Recovery and Commvault Cloud based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Disaster Recovery as a Service solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We use the solution across hospitality and healthcare domains. We use it for custom development. It helps us develop a seamless omnichannel for the healthcare industry."
"Azure Site Recovery is an easy-to-use and fairly stable solution for disaster recovery."
"Azure Site Recovery allows my company to save around 30 percent of the time on every VM that we need to back up and restore."
"Provides generally good performance, from protection to production to failover to data recovery."
"Our primary use case is for disaster recovery and business continuity and disaster recovery (BCDR)."
"The solution is very easy to use."
"Azure Site Recovery's automated file synchronization was a game-changer in managing legacy systems."
"What I love about Azure Site Recovery is its simplicity for basic configurations."
"Commvault Backup & Recovery's search utility is its most valuable feature."
"Great archive feature, OnePass, for the file system and Exchange servers."
"Cloud integration."
"We switched to Commvault because we were looking to centralize management. This reduced IT administrator time as well as providing stability and reliability for data backups in a single console."
"The solution is scalable."
"The compression and deduplication are great for optimizing bandwidth and speed. I don't have to worry about it or think about it, and, because it's a SaaS solution, I don't have to worry about the storage size."
"Real-time synchronization is a good feature."
"Whoever has an Endpoint license can store unlimited data on the cloud."
"One area for improvement with Azure is helping customers predict usage more accurately."
"The primary area for improvement in Azure Site Recovery is its pricing."
"I would like to see more security features."
"Azure Site Recovery's deployment is complex. There are a lot of bugs, and it needs to improve stability."
"I conveyed the feedback to the agent, suggesting an increase in the agent count in our VNS in the USA. I also addressed notification concerns, as some issues didn't trigger alerts during a recent call."
"The support team took a lot of time to respond and was not very professional."
"In the newest version of Azure Site Recovery, the configuration was a little more complex, so this is an area for improvement."
"The tool should improve synchronization."
"The most common feedback I get in terms of Commvault is that it can be complex. I always refer my customers back to their own environment. Almost everything that goes into Commvault is a request by a customer. While it can be complex, it can also be very simple. You just need to understand your environment in order to make sure that you really need to turn on that extra feature or thing inside of Commvault. Maybe you don't need those things. It really depends on how simple or complex your environment is, whether you need all of Commvault's features."
"The main area for improvement is that we sometimes experience negative effects from their updates. If they had a larger test area for their updates, that would help."
"Commvault could benefit from increased automation to streamline processes and enhance predictability."
"The solution's breadth and depth of cloud support are good, but could be better. Some cloud features that are common-sense, especially on AWS, are not completely integrated yet in the product. They are a work-in-progress."
"The stability of the tool could be improved."
"When we send a query to Commvault, they take a long time to answer our questions."
"It is a little more complicated than it really needs to be."
"The integration of Metallic could improve. It would be a benefit if Metallic could integrate with multiple applications or platforms."
Azure Site Recovery is ranked 1st in Disaster Recovery as a Service with 18 reviews while Commvault Cloud is ranked 2nd in Disaster Recovery as a Service with 104 reviews. Azure Site Recovery is rated 8.2, while Commvault Cloud is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Azure Site Recovery writes "Useful for restoration purposes that ensures that the users get to save a lot of time". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Commvault Cloud writes "Provides excellent visibility and helps reduce costs and time". Azure Site Recovery is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, VMware SRM, Zerto, AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery and Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service , whereas Commvault Cloud is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, Rubrik, Veeam Backup for Microsoft 365, Azure Backup and Cohesity DataProtect. See our Azure Site Recovery vs. Commvault Cloud report.
See our list of best Disaster Recovery as a Service vendors and best Disaster Recovery (DR) Software vendors.
We monitor all Disaster Recovery as a Service reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.